Even if she wins Texas narrowly (even though they promised blowouts only a few weeks ago), the way the delegates are apportioned there, she will probably have less delegates than Obama.
Exactly and if MI and FL are seated in every election in the future, the states will break rules with impunity in the future knowing that they will not be punished.
Hillary is the one shredding the democratic party by launching dirty attack after dirty attack on Obama while losing 10 states in a row and refusing to drop out.
Also, the whole "this is getting dirty comment" is pretty ironic since almost all of the attacks have come from Hillary (exit polling showed Wisconsin voters overwhelmingly that Clinton's attacks on Obama were unfair) or her illegal 527s.
THis is an interesting article which addresses your post, ripped straight from Penn's talking points: http://www.time.com/time/politics/articl
In any event, Obama is nearly tied with Hillary now in Texas and with the way apportionment rules work there, Obama will receive for delegates than her.
After reading this post, I almost think it is a joke.
So let's see, every state Obama has won (10 in a row now) has been meaningless and every state Hillary has won have been important.
The gall someone has to call on Obama to drop out after winning 10 straight. Surely you would not be advocating for Obama to drop out if he lost 10 straight states like Hillary did, correct?
Leave your partisan hackery at home.
People try and use these polls to their own advantage. Intellectual honesty is not required.
Hillary's firewall seems to be burning down.
» Recent blog linkage
Powered by WebStrong Group.