So you're positing the theory that Clinton's policied which provided the ability of, perhaps, millions of low and middle income families to be able to own homes caused the economy to crash eight years later?
I reject that argument when it is presented by (many) conservatives, and I reject it when you posit it. Why? Because it's baloney. (when you resort to regurgitating right-wing talking points your credibility is further diminished, bruh)