by chancecoke, Fri Jul 11, 2008 at 02:28:47 PM EDT
It seems Michelle Obama has her own twist regarding those whose income is low enough to qualify for the $600 government's so-called stimulus tax relief package. Criticizing the short term advantage to an audience of mostly African-American women in Michigan she stated, "What can you do with that? Not to be ungrateful or anything. But maybe it pays down a bill, but it doesn't pay down every bill every month."
It would have been wise for her to have stopped right there. But she added, "And it may even feel good that first month when you get that check. And then you go out and you buy a pair of earrings."
by Student Guy, Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 03:58:47 PM EDT
by rustybias, Sun Mar 30, 2008 at 06:34:13 PM EDT
Cross-posted from dKos diary, where candidate is currently live-blogging.
PATRIOTIC PROGRESSIVE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE BYRON DELEAR
DONOR DRIVE TO HELP UNSEAT BUSH REPUB. PRO-WAR TODD AKIN
LAST DAY IN REPORTING PERIOD TO JOIN THIS EXCITING CAMPAIGN...COME ABOARD!
by Jo Etta, Fri Sep 28, 2007 at 10:52:40 AM EDT
Crossposted from Show Me Progress
Until the last few days, the only celebrity status Charles "Chet" Hurth from Union, MO had enjoyed was for being sued ten years ago when he was a law student at St. Louis U. for biting a female law student on the butt--so hard she had to seek medical treatment. Now Hurth, the city attorney for tiny New Haven is embroiled in something that's grabbing headlines in the San Francisco Chronicle.
You're probably aware by now of the latest dirty trick the Republicans are up to, a petition initiative drive in California. They want Californians to vote in June on whether to split California's electoral votes in the 2008 presidential election by awarding electoral votes by each congressional district rather than by the winner-take-all rules that have applied.
Under its proposed district-by-district system, Kerry - who won California's popular vote in 2004 - would have received just 33 electoral votes, and Republican President Bush would have earned 22 votes - more than the number awarded in Illinois (21), Pennsylvania (21) or Ohio (20).
by CT student, Mon Jan 29, 2007 at 03:12:29 PM EST
We talk a lot here about electability - both the myth and the reality. It seems like the best way to discuss electability is to go through the swing states, one by one, and see who could win there.
I'm going to make two big assumptions. The first is that the electoral map will be broadly similar to 2004. In other words, Giuliani isn't swinging New York, there isn't another terrorist attack, and so on. The swing states are the same. For that reason, I'm going to count any state won by both Gore and Kerry as safe. I know that they aren't - especially Minnesota and Wisconsin - but if we can't deliver those seats to any of the three major candidates, we've got bigger problems. In any case, that's 248 electoral votes.
The second assumption is that the candidates run a good enough campaign along their current lines. I'd consider Kerry's campaign to have been well run - could've been better, but he did decently against an incumbent president during a war - so this isn't a particularly high bar. I'm just not going to factor in likelihood to make a big gaffe or to hire fools. Hillary will run a DLC/motherhood campaign, Edwards a populist campaign and Obama will be hopeful platitudes masking progessivism.