Zero Against McCain
by Trey Rentz, Thu Sep 04, 2008 at 05:51:35 AM EDT
Last night the people who brought us the biggest spending government in the history of the United States of America, had a fun time chanting "Zero, Zero, Zero!" - so this is my little observation about what you get, when you go up against Zero "O" Obama.
After all these people who claim to be "conservative" , really should be aware of some basic math. But given their record, I thought it best to do the math for us all.
What do you get, when you put "O" Against McCain.
Thats right. In November. You will get "O"
0 x M = 0
What happens when you need to get back to your origin, back to your roots and start new. Yep. Thats right, folks. You go to "O".
When "O" gets into the base of things, when whatever you've got in your denominator gets closer to zero - What do you get? Infinity. Thats right, folks, if you put "O" in the White House, you'll get infinite return on your investment.
lim 1/x as x approaches "0" ---> infinity
But Sarah Palin was honestly the star of the night. Standing there, promising to give big Texas oil the rights to drill Alaska and pump oil all over the place.
What will drilling the ANWR do, to help stop our country's energy problem? Well. the ANWR doesn't have enough oil in it to run even a tenth of our demand. So, we'd be importing oil.
Instead of focussing on alternative sources (which she gave a quick little mention to.) In other words, their drilling plan would have
0 (pronounced "zero")
Effect on the problem we're facing as a country, that we're addicted to foreign oil.
I guess "Zero" could also mean, the number of democratic Florida congressmen chasing young boys around in congress in their underwear. I'm pretty sure they want zero tied to the Democratic party.
Where did zero come from?
The symbol, "Zero" began 1,400 years ago in what is now modern-day Iraq but then, babylon - as a placeholder to stand for empty columns. The first symbol to represent an empty column, was "YY", and somewhere around the 9th Century, in India, we see the first recorded use of the symbol "0" to represent that empty column.
FOUR HUNDRED YEARS AFTER THE REST OF THE WORLD , we began using the "0" and it accelerated our math systems to radical new horizons.
And why were we late in adopting "Zero". Because religious evangelicals were busy "educating" us, and refused to let go of their old system of Roman Numerals because we were "superior" to the Hindus and the Africans.
The early adopters of Zero had a huge advantage over the evangelics who just didn't get it. They just couldn't understand change. The "zero" became the hero.
So, thats the story of O vs. McCain. I think. Did I miss anything?