Root for the Green Bay Packers Today

I don't buy this, but this close to the election, every little bit helps. Go Pack!--Chris

I haven't researched this personally, but I have heard it all over the media. Going back to 1932, whenever an incumbent president has run for re-election, their fate was tied in to the Washington Redskins. When the Redskins win the incumbent has won. When the Redskins lose the incumbent loses. Today at 1 PM - Green Bay at Washington. Go Pack!!! (and it will be doubly sweet for this Giant fan who loves to see the Skins lose)

Tags: (all tags)



Go PACK!!!
I'm a die hard Pats fan but today my favorite team is the PACK....Go Packers!!!!
by joedemocrat 2004-10-31 05:33AM | 0 recs
I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
...if it really did have predictive power, I would  be pretty happy about that right now.  Green Bay, which was widely considered to be a Super Bowl contender before the season started, had a surprisingly bad stretch where they lost 4 games in a row early this season.  But they looked far better in their last two games, winning each of them comfortably with huge numbers on offense, 38 and 41 points in those two wins.  The Redskins have one of the best ranked defenses in the league, but their offense is mind-numbingly bad, no more than 18 points in any game all year.  The Packers' defense has been their undoing in most of their losses, but Washington's offense is so bad that it's hard to see where the Redskins can find an advantage.  They've had a terrible season, and few people think they can beat the Packers today.  

Anything can happen in sports, as the Red Sox just demonstrated, but we're talking about a pretty sorry bunch of underachievers in the Redskins, and a pretty confident Packer team that's plenty motivated to continue turning their season around.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 05:50AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
According to the spread, the Packers are favored to win by 1 or 2 points, depending on the bookie.

But let's not get crazy about this - coincidence does not equal causation.

by bushsucks 2004-10-31 06:01AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Exactly, if the Redskins had lost their last pre-election home game in 1984, clearly there would not have been a 20 point shift in the electorate to Mondale.  It really doesn't matter to us who wins this game.  But, if I had to bet on it (and I don't bet on sports, despite following them very closely), I'd bet on the Packers to win by a lot more than 1 or 2.  They're a hot team, and the Redskins are crap.
by Haggai 2004-10-31 06:06AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Interesting you choose 1984, I think this election could be a repeat of that year.
by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 07:16AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Yeah your right, except in reverse.  Kerry wins by such a large landslide victory, that the media narrative will be "How come no one saw this coming?"

Just like it was in 2000, when everyone expected Bush to dominate the electoral college.

by agpc 2004-10-31 08:07AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Now whose wearing the rose color glasses.
by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 09:26AM | 0 recs
Funny you should mention that...
Your boy Bush has practically had Rose Colored Lenses infused directly onto his eyeballs so as to guarantee he doesn't have to worry about Iraq, the Economy (still think its "strong and getting stronger?"), Jobs, Health Care, the stock market, Osama Bin Laden (dead or alive?), amnesty for illegal aliens, social security, and any other domestic issue you choose to insert.

I mean your boy is such a loser that he is the only president to lose jobs for 75 years.  You think he will actually win this election?  Hogwash.

But if you so desire, put your money where your mouth is.  I bet you $1,000 that Bush is loses.  Wan't to take that bet?

Nah, didn't think so.

by agpc 2004-10-31 12:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Funny you should mention that...
This is like betting on a Vikings game with a Vikings fan. How should we arrange the deal? Can I be assured you will pay if Kerry loses?

On to the issues: the economy argument is stale and inaccurate. If you look at this economy compared to the Clinton economy going in to his reelection the unemployment rate is the same, growth is higher now than then. It is so laughable that you insist on saying we have a horrible economy. Give me a break.

Iraq - Small setbacks seem to make excite the liberal base but overall the Iraq reconstruction is moving along well. War is never perfect and John Kerry wont stop all attacks on Iraqis volunteering for National Guard etc. I think your expectations are set higher than the average American.

Health Care - What about health care? Some people don't have it, insurance rates are high. What is your complaint now? As Bush said a litany of complaints is not a plan. Bring your numbers into perspective by comparing them to history. I personally am for expanding Medical Savings Accounts to bring competition back to the industry.

Stock Market - The Nasdaq sits at about 1,974.99 that is still higher than anything before 1999. It went though a correction no doubt in late 1999, but that was part of the recession. It has been on the climb since late in 02. I may be missing your argument though.

Amnesty for illegal aliens - Should there be or not? I do not believe amnesty is what the president is advocating.

Social Security - Yea I won't ever see it if things remain how they are. I support the President's plan to allow me to put some of my social security in to the private market to gain interest.

Anything else you wish to discuss?

by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 02:55PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
only the most deluded partisan hack could suggest that Bush is as popular as Reagan and that Kerry is as weak as Mondale.
by johnny longtorso 2004-10-31 10:59AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Democrats have no memory. The liberals in this country and especially in Europe where protesting heavily against Reagan. They called him arrogant, stupid, a cowboy, a Hawk, a fumbling fool, you name it. In 1984 it was obvious that Reagan had the country behind him, but not if you listened to the far left in this country and the world. Just as today with Bush. We will find out on Tuesday. I will bring the crow, one of us will be eating alot of it.
by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Democrats have no memory? you seem to forget that Reagan's average approval rating in 1984 was 57. what's Bush foundering at, the mid-40s? how exactly do you equate those anemic numbers with "having the country behind him"?

it's not just "the far left" that wants Bush out of office. if it were, he would be going above 50 in the polls. you are either delusional, in denial, or both, to think otherwise. and if it were, you'd have facts to back that up, not just the same old ad hominem "liberal""far left""Europe" rhetoric.

by johnny longtorso 2004-10-31 04:26PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Bush job approval has been fluttering aroung 50 not low 40's.
by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 05:54PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Still waiting for your wager.  Of course, although you talk big, you are smart enough to realize that neither candidate will win that kind of EV margin.  
by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 11:10AM | 0 recs
Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...
Duh.... do you think so?  Hmmm.... so you seem to think this is a coincidence?  Of course it is, Bush-breath.
by GoPackers 2004-10-31 11:52AM | 0 recs
Last Redskin home game and the Election
Since 1936, when the Skins win their last home game before the election, the party in the White House stays in the White House. When they lose, there's a switch.

Here's a link:

by bushsucks 2004-10-31 05:53AM | 0 recs
Redskins Story is True
I'm a die hard 'Skins fan, but I wouldn't worry too much today. The Pack's been throwin' the ball around pretty well the last 2 weeks, and the Redskins have their two starting safeties out for the game, one injured and one just got a dui & is suspended.

I'll be at the game, probably rooting for the Redksins 'cuz it's just a coincidence (I hope) but....

by RecoveringRepublican 2004-10-31 06:12AM | 0 recs
obviously my rational mind says there's no link
but all the same it'd be a nice omen if they were to lose...
by asf6 2004-10-31 06:15AM | 0 recs
Go Pack Go!
Die hard skins fan here (Centreville, Va).  Everyone in my office is a big skins fan.

Today, it's all Green & Gold.

Go pack go!

by jbryant0007 2004-10-31 06:20AM | 0 recs
My sympathy to Skins fans
I'm a 38 year Packer Backer and you better believe I'll be rooting today like never before!  Living in Jax, FL I'm also a Jaguar fan and familiar with Brunell.  As long as Favre is on his game Mark will melt like the wicked witch on Oz.  Sorry Redskins 'cause otherwise I like you guys and who couldn't love watching the return of the great Joe Gibbs.
by JaxDem 2004-10-31 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: My sympathy to Skins fans
Go Ahman Green!!!  Favre is not quite the player he is; Green's your workhorse.  Luckily, the Skins Run Defense is not as good as their pass defense who will be missing Taylor I believe.  
by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 06:52AM | 0 recs
against the tide
I will be rooting for the Redskins anyway. This is a year for all these olds myths to die anyway.
by Jerome Armstrong 2004-10-31 06:38AM | 0 recs
Re: against the tide
I agree. 2004, we're changing the rules, every precedent (except for the incumbent rule!) out the window.  Red Sox wins the pennant, and Democrats outclass Rethugs in every bit of the political game.
by aruac 2004-10-31 06:53AM | 0 recs
Re: against the tide
Ah well, I guess the Packers want to continue the tradition.
by Jerome Armstrong 2004-10-31 09:22AM | 0 recs
Try being a Bears fan
For the first time ever, I am cheering for Green Bay.  Luckily, I know several Bears fan doing the same.  It is hard for us, but a GB win is better than a Bush one.
by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 06:48AM | 0 recs
I already
put some cash on the packers this morning.  Technically it's not the incumbent that wins or loses depending on how the Skins do the prior sunday to the election, it's the incumbent PARTY, e.g. in 1988 neither bush1 or dukakis was an incumbent, but the redskins won the sunday before so bush1 (incumbent party) won.  go pack, but even if redskins win, kerry wins tuesday 311-228 at the least, 385-153 if their truly is a gale force at his back.  The 311 is all Gore states won again plus new hampshire, ohio, and florida.  but if there truly is a surge for kerry going on right now he could pull in nevada, arizona, colorado, missouri, arkansas, north carolina, virginia, and west virginia.  let's dream.
by fred 2004-10-31 07:25AM | 0 recs
What did I tell you about the spread?
6:28 left to go in the 2nd quarter, Packers lead 17-0.  The Redskins have not scored more than 18 points in any GAME all season.  This is a flat-out ass-kicking.
by Haggai 2004-10-31 09:03AM | 0 recs
Redskins won't lose
until the Red Sox win the World Series...
by yettrab 2004-10-31 09:09AM | 0 recs
I hate the Packers
But I'm happy they're up 17-0 in the second quarter.
by DraconisRex 2004-10-31 09:10AM | 0 recs
I don't believe in any of that stuff...  But I know the superstitious do...  So, if the Pack wins...  Hey, if it's only one-half percent, it's better than the Redskins and one-half percent the other way...
by DraconisRex 2004-10-31 09:13AM | 0 recs
OK, Now you're asking a lot of me!
The Pack? Root for the Pack? If I do that I'll have to turn in my Bears jearsey.

Geez, this politics stuff is killing me. First I find myself more interested in C-Span than the Bears lately. Then I find myself focusing on the polls in WI more than the Bears game plans. Now I'm rooting for the Packers for Democracy!!!???

Damn I can't wait for Wednesday so the world can go back to being normal and I can again focus on my poor pathetic Bears.

go pack.

Rick 'em
Rack' em

Rick 'em
Ruck 'em

Get that ball and really

(i feel so dirty)

by michael in chicago 2004-10-31 09:17AM | 0 recs
Re: OK, Now you're asking a lot of me!
You gotta take one for the team, Michael.  Time to suck it up. :)
by Haggai 2004-10-31 09:18AM | 0 recs
Re: OK, Now you're asking a lot of me!
I feel your pain.  At least the tradition doesn't involve rooting against the Bears.
by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 11:12AM | 0 recs
17-7 GB at halftime
Two stupid Packer turnovers cost them at the end of the half, they should be up at least 24-0.  Redskins defense, after giving up a league-best 230-240 yards per game so far this season, has already given up 234 yards to Favre on 14 of 18 passing.  Washington offense is as lousy as ever: dropped passes, shaky QB protection, careless penalties, utterly shambolic clock management.  I don't think this one's going to be close.
by Haggai 2004-10-31 09:35AM | 0 recs
Re: 17-7 GB at halftime
Another stupid interception pass, 20-14 with 5 minutes left!
by Jerome Armstrong 2004-10-31 10:57AM | 0 recs
Re: 17-7 GB at halftime
And now yet another pick.  This is pathetic.  The Redskins actually have a chance.
by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:00AM | 0 recs
Wow, what a dramatic turnaround just now...
Redskins looked like they had scored to go ahead, but their TD was called back on a (questionable) penalty.  Then GB intercepted a pass on the next play!
by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:07AM | 0 recs
olbermann had this last week

(scroll down, I think)

by newmanme 2004-10-31 10:58AM | 0 recs
Favre must be a Republican
3 Interceptions.
Favre looks like he's throwing the game.

2 mintues to play.

by davidscott 2004-10-31 11:07AM | 0 recs
Re: Favre must be a Republican
Well, things are looking a lot better now than they were about 120 seconds ago.
by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:08AM | 0 recs
Re: Favre must be a Republican
Packer defense comes up BIG!

Brunell intercepted!

by davidscott 2004-10-31 11:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Favre must be a Republican
From what I'm told, Favre has a reputation for throwing interceptions.

Going into this game, my dad (huge Packers fan) told me that it was going to come down to Washington's offense vs. Green Bay's defense, which could possibly suck more.  As for the other way around, don't expect to see it much as Favre doesn't like holding onto the ball for more than a couple downs or so.

Nice to see that it looks like we'll win even if that turned out to be essentially correct.

by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 11:13AM | 0 recs
Re: Favre must be a Republican
Yes, Favre does throw lots of picks, it was always his biggest weakness (though he's an obvious first ballot Hall of Famer when he retires).  Even a team with a dreadful offense like Washington can stay competitive when the other team keeps turning the ball over.  
by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:17AM | 0 recs
packers will win
packer interception they have the ball on wash 20 with 2 minutes left
by markgolf630 2004-10-31 11:08AM | 0 recs
Scary Omen
Wow. Is this how the election is going to go? Washington looks like they will win it only to have the TD called back on a conroversial motion penalty. Then the very next play Green Bay intercepts and looks like they will run out the game.

God I hope Tuesday night is not like this game. I couldn't take it. Will Bush look like he will win it, only to have Kerry take the nod on some controversial state poll numbers?

Karma is a bitch if this happens.

(I can't believe I rooting for the Packers like this!)

by michael in chicago 2004-10-31 11:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Scary Omen
I wasn't aware of any part of the superstition that ties the result of the game to the result of the election other than who wins.  IE, I don't think a scarily close victory on one field is necessarily supposed to translate to a scarily close victory on the other.  I think it's just that if all is said and done and the smoke clears and one team is ultimately on top, so is their candidate.
by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 11:16AM | 0 recs
28-14 Packers
They score again, looks like this one's in the bag.  It's a clear illustration of how there is one stat that's probably more important than any other in the NFL: turnovers.  GB should have been up by 3 or 4 TDs for the entire 2nd half, what with the Redskins' abysmal offense, but they're gonna escape because of a lucky break.
by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:16AM | 0 recs
It's a final: Packers win 28-14
So chalk this up as an (obviously irrelevant) indication that Kerry will win on Tuesday!
by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:22AM | 0 recs
Re: It's a final: Packers win 28-14
Hey, I'll take it.  Especially because now either Kerry wins or an over-eighty-year-old tradition dies.  Either way, something big happens.  I'll much prefer the former, of course, know.
by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 11:23AM | 0 recs
Re: It's a final: Packers win 28-14
Fox News broke in to their programming to annonce the victory and its predictive implication. (Hey, gotta watch Fox when you can bear it. Keep an eye on the other side)

This gave them something other to report than the "margin of error" tutorial they ran every time they showed their poll where Bush had lost so many points in their polls this week. And the race tied.

They were even explaining how it was really six points either way in the MOE not 3.

They would show the poll first--with URL--then give the MOE lesson, then show theirs.

Needless to say up until yesterday it was "Bush ahead", no MOE advised.

by MazeDancer 2004-11-01 03:48AM | 0 recs
Green Bay wins
This should be widely reported so that Bush voters know that they don't have to go to the polls on Tuesday.
Plus, it must be true:  late in the game, (after showing a bad Viking game for most of the day), my Fox/Sinclair station finally went to the GB game, only to immediately cut away. "NFL Rules" the announcer said . . .
by marvin 2004-10-31 11:29AM | 0 recs
As someone living IN Green Bay,
I would have to say that Scalia was correct in ruling the Skins' TD null and void and that the ruling would not apply to any other games....

Al Harris for Sec. of Defense!

by Tundraman 2004-10-31 11:35AM | 0 recs
2-1 EV ratio
28-14 Pack = 359-179 Kerry

That happens when Kerry wins all of the swing states, including AR, VA & WV, but not including MO & NC. Actually, not an entirely unlikely outcome. This is my new prediction ;)

Landslide. Mandate.

Fox News broke into interview on polling problems to report:

Graphic: "Redskins just lost... Kerry wins??"

Announcer: "...does not bode well for the administration."


by scottmaui 2004-10-31 12:54PM | 0 recs
UK Bookies
MSNBC reported that the bookies in the UK may adjust their odds based on the outcome of this game. We may doubt the relevance of this, but when oddsmakers take it into account, they are at least realizing that there are some real consequences in the narrative and the morale or phychological effect it creates.
by scottmaui 2004-10-31 12:58PM | 0 recs
An unremarked football open
Navy (Lt. Kerry) beat Air Force (ANG LT Bush) earlier this Colorado Springs, home of the Religious Right, West.

And I enjoy seeing the Skins lose, omen or no omen.

by Ragamuffin Gunner 2004-10-31 01:18PM | 0 recs
Re: An unremarked football open
And the Boston Red Sox won, too.

It may not mean anything, but maybe it will at least make Football Fans for Truth shut up for a while.

by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 02:37PM | 0 recs
And a Wisconsin team beat them
Take note: Not only did the 'Skins lose the home game - predicting a Kerry victory - they lost to the Green Bay Packers. According to my tea leaves, this means Wisconsin will put Kerry over the top.
by DanK 2004-10-31 02:17PM | 0 recs
Well, this is entertaining
But probaby not very productive.
by clawed 2004-10-31 02:21PM | 0 recs
by kan101 2006-05-08 08:10AM | 0 recs
by kan105 2006-05-13 04:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Root for the Green Bay Packers Today
在线激情视 频
林心如三级 片
免费成人电 影下载论坛
成人电影下 载地址
免费成人电 影下载网站
成人电影下 载
在线激情电 影
同志激情小 视频
在线偷拍电 影
激情电影下 载
在线偷窥电 影
在线黄色电 影
性激情小视 频
明星激情小 视频
免费偷拍电 影
免费激情小 视频论坛
免费激情电 影
无码成人电 影
无码激情小 视频下载
黄色电影下 载
成人电影下 载在线欣赏
大陆成人交 友
偷拍电影下 载
在线性交电 影
在线色情电 影
免费黄色电 影
免费色情电 影
艺术激情享 受
性交电影下 载
激情小视频 下载网站
免费性交电 影
成人电影下 载区
免费偷窥电 影

大众激情小 视频
在线成人电 影
成人交友网 站
性成人电影 下载
成人电影下 载播放
偷窥电影下 载
色情电影下 载
韩国激情小 视频
艺术激情享 受
by yyy777 2006-05-31 12:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Root for the Green Bay Packers Today
圣诞树网站建设google优化Google左侧优化google排名Google左侧排名GOOGE左侧优化 5490;名 上海google优化google优化排名上海google左侧&# 25490;名上海google排名上海google左侧&# 20248;化google优化Google左侧优化短信群发短信群发器 短信群发群发短信短信群发器 小灵通群发 器小灵通短信 群发器短信群发软 件手机短信群 发软件短信群发设 备手机短信群 发设备手机短信群 发器网站建设网站设计网站制作美女图片美女写真性感美女制服美腿西洋美女走光偷拍网友自拍两性包装印刷上海包装印 刷免费电影免费下载电 影免费在线电 影上海印刷上海包装弯管弯管上海hp笔记ੑ 2;维修上海惠普笔 记本维修上海IBM笔记Ĉ 12;维修上海DELL笔记 412;维修上海联想笔 记本维修上海东芝笔 记本维修上海acer笔记 412;维修上海华硕笔 记本维修上海索尼笔 记本维修上海sony笔记 412;维修上海hp笔记ੑ 2;维修上海IBM笔记Ĉ 12;维修弯管 弯管加工 路灯节能路灯监控 合同能源管 理google优化google左侧优化google排名google左侧排名 短信群发短信群发企业短信群 发短信平台路灯监控路灯节能合同能源管 理短信群发短信群发软 件短信群发器 上海短信群 发上海短信群 发器上海短信群 发平台上海短信群 发价格上海短信群 发业务上海短信群 发软件上海短信群 发公司上海短信猫 上海手机短 信群发上海移动短 信群发短信群发设 备上海短信群发系 统短信群发系 统上海上海绿色短 信系统上海短信系 统上海短信投 票上海短信投 票系统短信管理系 统短信投票管 理系统上海短信投 票管理系统 武汉短信群 发免费短信群 发软件免费短信群 发手机短信群 发武汉短信群 发平台短信群发软 件下载免费手机短 信群发软件 手机短信群 发软件免费短信群 发软件下载 短信群发软 件破解版手机短信群 发软件下载 免费短信群 发软件破解 网上免费短 信群发软件 手机短信群 发器短信群发器 价格手机短信群 发器破解版 免费手机短 信群发器免费短信群 发器小灵通短信 群发器北京短信群 发器深圳短信群 发器上海短信群 发器武汉短信群 发器下载免费短 信群发器免费手机短 信群发手机短信群 发破解版网上手机短 信群发手机短信群 发器价格短信猫报价 上海短信猫 报价短信猫深圳 短信猫价格 短信猫池短信猫二次 开发短信二次开 发平台西门子短信 猫广州短信猫 报价广州短信猫 商易短信猫 上海短信群 发公司北京短信群 发公司杭州短信群 发公司郑州短信群 发公司福州短信群 发公司长沙短信群 发公司沈阳短信群 发公司武汉短信群 发公司西安短信群 发公司深圳短信群 发公司短信群发价 格短信群发平 台短信群发卡 上海短信群 发卡短信群发机 上海短信群 发机短信群发设 备企业短信群 发漫游短信群 发漫游短信群 发器上海漫游短 信群发国际短信国际短信资 费国际短信怎 么发如何发国际 短信 发国际短信 动感地带国 际短信中国移动国 际短信移动国际短 信国际短信软 件国际短信群 发软件国际短信收 费 国际短信群 发国际短信群 发通道上海国际短 信群发国外短信国外短信群 发国外短信群 发通道免费国际短 信免费发国际 短信怎样发国际 短信联通国际短 信国际短信多 少钱国际短信多 少钱一条国际长途短 信动感地带国 际短信飞信国际短 信国际漫游短 信移动发国际 短信国际手机短 信国际短信如 何发送国际短信价 格上海国际短 信价格神州行国际 短信手机发国际 短信如何发国际 长途短信国际短信费 用国际短信业 务国际短信合 作怎样发送国 际短信国际漫游短 信费用电脑免费发 国际短信发国际短信 便宜联通发国际 短信手机自动发 国际短信动感地带发 国际短信上海国外短 信群发老板手机号 码上海老板手 机号码老板手机群 发老板手机短 信群发上海老板手 机号码群发 八口短信猫 8口短信猫池 ; 四口短信猫 4口短信猫单口短信猫 短信猫上海八口短 信猫上海四口短 信猫上海单口短 信猫小灵通短信 猫移动短信群 发短信群发工 具短信群发业 务小灵通短信 群发移动短信群 发软件联通短信群 发中国移动短 信群发多口短信猫 上海短信猫 销售上海短信猫 销售公司上海短信猫 批发上海短信猫 销售商短信猫上海 销售商国际短信群 发公司上海国际短 信群发公司 国际短信群 发代理上海国际短 信群发代理 国际短信群 发通道国际短信群 发渠道国际短信服 务公司上海国际短 信群发通道 上海国际短 信群发商国际短信群 发业务国际手机短 信国际手机短 信服务国际手机短 信公司国际手机短 信业务国际手机短 信群发国际手机短 信群发公司 上海国际手 机短信国际企业手 机短信群发 国外手机短 信群发国外企业手 机短信群发 上海企业短 信群发
by feigeone 2007-12-22 09:55PM | 0 recs


Advertise Blogads