There is no Regime Change with Dynasties

Crossposted from Left Toon Lane, Bilerico Project& My Left Wing


click to enlarge

Just get ready to fire up your email client and send me some hate mail, but I can't get all worked up over the retirement of Fidel Castro.

I hope for many things - the birth of Cuban democracy, Cuba's first voting scandal - I am even looking forward to a sitcom about Havana! But I think those things are far off. I seriously doubt Raul Castro will be a great agent of change for the Cuban people.

I also can't get too worked up over American dynasties. While I am NOT comparing Bush to Fidel (that is letting Bush off lightly), nor am I comparing Clinton to Castro (she is not the devil incarnate as the right wing conspiracy would have us believe). I am saying, we need new blood to lead this nation. Dipping into the same gene pool is bad for West Virginia and it should be considered bad for the rest of the country.

The world has changed a lot since 1980, when the first Bush entered the White House just as the world has changed a lot since 1992, when the first Clinton entered the White House. I am beginning to feel like a ball in a tennis match - back and forth, back and forth. I fail to believe the only good political ideas in this country come from only two families. What are we gonna have after a Hillary Clinton presidency, President Jeb Bush? Some other Neo-con Bush clone fantasy?

I am just saying for a democracy to survive, we need to stay away from Dynasties.

Tags: cartoons, comics, Cuba, Fidel Castro, raul castro, webcomics (all tags)

Comments

2 Comments

Re: There is no Regime Change with Dynasties

trez lamo

by Seymour Glass 2008-02-19 05:29AM | 0 recs
The Roosevelts

were another political dynasty.  But a pretty damn good one.

Look, it doesn't matter if two leaders share a last name.  It matters what they do in office.  

BTW, that West Virginia slur was pretty uncool.

by costanoan 2008-02-19 05:57AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads