• on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    You don't think that Obama earned his election?

    I think that you had your heart set on a Democratic romp in the 2010 midterms and with a Dem in the WH, especially one  not named Hillary Clinton, John Edwards or Dennis Kucinich, you decided to push the pnaic button.

    In short, you've got a clinker in your head about Obama, or you have your heart so set on the Dems partying like it's 1974 at the lower levels that it's clouded your perspective.

    What's your problem Kent? This is beginning to sound like something far beyond politics.

    Are you the only person in your neighborhood who doesn't have a bedsheet in his closet?

    You don't think Obamam earned his election?

    Jimmy Carter was a fish out of water, at best the fall guy for an out of gas governing coalition  that should have gotten the gate in 1968, but for some reason didn't

    (This is a non-artisan view of history Kent, it's definitely above your level).

    How you can say it was handed to him is beyond me and in a lot of ways he is very much up to the job. Just beacause you, Jerome and everyone else on this Limbaugh Liberal web site are panicking over the stopped clock elections and don't like the way he's doing as job as party leader in a difficult time doesn't give you any reason to brand him a failure.

    But it must be nice to be perfect.

  • on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    And if ronald reagan hadn't been elected in 1980, the GOP would have taken Congress 12 years earlier with the gown-ups still in charge.

  • on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    Don't bother trying to talk down these doom-cryers.The Limbaugh Left has 435 Republicans in the House next year and they aren't budging from that prediction.

  • on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    And another thing...

    If Kent got his wish, one of the Senate seats that would be sagfe Dem, would be IL, where that balck man who scares Kent so much would be running for re-election.

  • on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    If Hank Paulsen had rescued Lehman Brothers, Obama wouldn't have been elected. We'd probably have traded this nightmare in for a worse one.

     

    But who cares?

    As long as Upstate Kent had his veto-proof Democratic Congress, everything would be just fine..

    BTW you selfish little jerk, accoridng to a recent poll, 81 percent of Democrats approve of Obama's performance and 19 percent agree with Kent.

  • on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    I agree with you Rhoda. I don't know if the Dems have beaten back the GOP, but there seems to be a change in the atmosphere over the last month or so. At least you're not throwing the towel in and you have some points to ponder for the future.

    Alas, this is the liberal blogosphere and encouraging words are very hard to come by, even in the best of times.

  • on a comment on 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    It would be nice if they were honest Jerome and what you call "Sugar-cating" or spinning drives me nuts too, and has done so for more years than you are old, Jerome.

    That's what they do. Sorry, that's politics.

     

    BTW, according to a recent poll, 81 percent of Democrats approve of the job President obama is doing--and 19 percent post at MyDD .

  • comment on a post 2010 polling over 3 years ago

    You quote Donna Brazille and Bob Shrum's comments Jerome.

    What are they supposed to do? Run around screaming and hollering like the posters on this site?

    Mimic Kent?

    I'm not a Pollyanana or a cockeyed optimist, but the negativity on this site is downright disgusting.

  • on a comment on Feingold: Incompetent campaign? over 3 years ago

    Like your comment about Kent not dealing with facts. I think you hit the nail right on the head (wish it was Kent's head).

    Maybe the rest of us should just stand back and let Kent and BJJFighter argue over who hates Obama more

    (although Jerome would probably want to be part of that, too).

  • on a comment on Feingold: Incompetent campaign? over 3 years ago

    I'm not an Obamoron, I happen to be a student of history and judging from what you've been writing I wonder about what you're projecting onto the President.

    "A pitifulfigure?"

     

    "A sick man?"

    Are you serious?

    In all honesty, you're probably right about the 49-state landslide. After all, it takes more of the smaller states the GOP usually carries in order to get 13 or 17 electoral votes and history doesn't repat as much as it rhymes.

  • on a comment on Feingold: Incompetent campaign? over 3 years ago

    The only way he redeems himself is if he has long re-election coattails?
    Good thing you don't write the history books.

    You post has zero recs--for obvious reasons.

  • on a comment on Feingold: Incompetent campaign? over 3 years ago

    And if Obama carries 49 states and brings back a Dem congress in '12, what will you say then, Dirtbag?

  • on a comment on Feingold: Incompetent campaign? over 3 years ago

    Trey-

    This is the liberal blogosphere. Obama probably accesses RW sites to get more positive reactions.

    You also have to remember that Kent has this hang up about Obama.
    I don't know what the President did to Kent that was so terrible, but he's been whining about him ever since the 2008 election.

  • on a comment on Whiners over 3 years ago

    Is there an unrec button on this site?

    I'd like to apply to everything this defeatist little prick has evrer posted here.

    GO AWAY KENT!

  • on a comment on Whiners over 3 years ago

    Don't bring up the WI speech.

    The only thing Jerome and the rest of the MyDD crowd is concerned with was how long Sen. feingold hung around.

Diaries

Advertise Blogads