It's obvious they are letting objective studies persuade them to flock to the winning candidate. TD, HRC's goose is cooked. Put a fork in it, it's done.
If she had run a campaign from the beginning that didn't assume that she already had the nomination she might be in the winning slot now. But that is not the case. Ready from day 1. Apparently not.
I don't see enough Repugnican bashing diaries on here. I do see a lot of HRC vs BO diaries on here, how can that be helpful to our party? Let's focus our energies on the real "enemy", McBush III.
I'm a little disturbed by this diary. My husband is in the Army and I don't see how a military family could possibly support Mrs. Clinton.
She voted to go to war "based on the intel that was available at the time". She just took it at face value. Didn't ask questions. That bothers me. The President holds my husband's life in his/her hands. I want someone who thinks about those their decisions affect.
Now she supports a quick withdrawal in hopes that it will help her gain the nomination.
She "misspeaks" about being snipered at. We have friends who have been truly shot at, and I find it insulting that someone would make up a story for the empathy or whatever she was hoping for.
Honestly, I find it sickening. But that is only my humble opinion.
At any rate, if she's the nominee after the convention (fairly or unfairly) she's a better alternative than McCain.