Sponsor of SB1070 doesn't understand it. The Daily Show does (and doesn't like it)
by Restore Fairness, Tue Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:46 PM EDT
From the Restore Fairness blog.
Three simple images. Dora, Eric from Chips, and a serial killer. Now guess – who looks “reasonably suspicious” of not having papers and therefore should be stopped and questioned by the Arizona police as per it’s new law, SB1070?
That’s the question Daily Show host Jon Stewart asked on the show last night, referencing the images above. Calling out the “draconian new immigration law” for being an affront to democracy by requiring people to carry their documents on them, he likened it to a time in the pre-civil rights era when newly freed black slaves were required to carry IDs. Jokes apart, the staged sketch gave us a little taste of what life could be like if SB1070 was, in fact, enforced in Arizona. It was the same question posed to Governor Jan Brewer, when signing the bill into law, to which she replied, “I don’t know what an undocumented immigrant looks like?”
Confusion around the bill is rife. In an interview on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews, co-sponsor of the bill Senator Huppenthal agreed that it would be racial profiling were officers to check the status of someone based on “reasonable suspicion”, thereby going against the statute of the bill that he signed into law. About 8 mins. into the clip, Chris Matthews asks Senator Huppenthal -
Under the law you passed and was signed by the governor this week, can a police officer who spots a car with five or six people in it, who he thinks because of instinct, experience, whatever, evidence, whatever you use— can he stop that car and say, I think these people are here illegally, I‘m going to stop and check them? Can he under the law do that, without any crime involved? Can he do that?
After hedging the question, Senator Huppenthal answered-
You know, the racial profiling was illegal before this bill. It‘s illegal after it. The bill itself makes it illegal…No, he cannot. That would be – that would just simply be racial profiling, and that would not be permitted under the law.
Since its passage, civil rights groups, advocacy groups and President Obama have critiqued SB1070 for practically mandating racial profiling and violating fundamental notions of fairness. Clearly, when its co-sponsors cannot articulate its impact, then its effects will be even more adverse. These are already being felt on Arizona’s economy and tourism as calls for an economic boycott come to light, even as Governor Brewer continues to deny any wrongdoing. Meanwhile Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon has taken a strong opposition stand to what he considers an unconstitutional and unenforceable law, including approaching the Phoenix City Council to give their support to a lawsuit filed by the city of Phoenix to prevent the laws implementation because of its effects on civil rights and costs associated with its wrongdoings.
SB1070 is going to have ripple effects. For the state of Arizona, for its potential copycat effect across the nation, and for the ideals of equality and justice. Take action now and stop this dangerous law from being implemented.
Learn. Share. Act. Go to restorefairness.org
Tags: Racial Profiling, Arizona, Breakthrough, civil rights, comedy, Dora the Explorer, Eric Estrada, Governor Jan Brewer, Hardball with Chris Matthews, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jon Stewart, Mayor Phil Gordon, MSNBC, Phoenix, President Obama, Restore Fairness, SB1070, Senator John Huppenthal, The Daily Show, Undocumented Immigration, blog, deportation, detention, due process, enforcement, human rights, immigration, race, Border (all tags)