Feds may have held off Arizona law, but border law gets the green light
by Restore Fairness, Mon Aug 16, 2010 at 03:55:57 PM EDT
From Restore Fairness blog. Although a federal judge struck down on some of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law SB 1070’s major provisions in a critical victory, the untrue notion that Washington has lost control of the border remains. Within this atmosphere of hate and misinformation, President Obama signed a $600 million bill that increases appropriations for border security in a piecemeal approach to immigration reform, leading to profound disappointment at Congress’s decision to propose, promote, and pass border enforcement bill HR 6080.
From Restore Fairness blog. Although a federal judge struck down on some of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law SB 1070’s major provisions in a critical victory, the untrue notion that Washington has lost control of the border remains. Within this atmosphere of hate and misinformation, President Obama signed a $600 million bill that increases appropriations for border security in a piecemeal approach to immigration reform, leading to profound disappointment at Congress’s decision to propose, promote, and pass border enforcement bill HR 6080. In a statement on the passage of the bill into law President Obama said,
“I have made securing our Southwest Border a top priority since I came to office… So these steps (passage of the law) will make an important difference as my administration continues to work with Congress toward bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform to secure our borders, and restore responsibility and accountability to our broken immigration system.”
For many, the emphasis on increased enforcement without any effort to address the egregious violations that come along with these is unacceptable. The New York Immigration Coalition for one argued,
The immigration crisis is dividing our nation in ugly ways we have not seen in generations – a situation exacerbated by ramped-up enforcement. Not only is it not solving the immigration crisis, it is also tearing up our communities and our nation. However much money is thrown at aerial drones and border agents and the like, it still won’t fix the problem.
Ironically, HR6060 was introduced by Senator Charles Schumer who is leading the immigration reform effort in Congress, and was passed unanimously in the Senate. The approaching Senate elections seem to have driven forth the abrupt decision, as jobs and border security are considered issues expected to be on voters’ minds when they go to the polls in November. House Democrats actually called a special session to pass the border security bill as well as a $26 billion aid bill to keep teachers and other public workers from being laid off.
The border security measure would fund the hiring of 1,000 new Border Patrol agents to be deployed at critical areas along the border, 250 more Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and 250 more Customs and Border Protection officers. It provides for new communications equipment and greater use of unmanned surveillance drones. Almost one-third of the money goes to the Justice Department to help agencies such as the FBI, the DEA and the ATF deal with drug dealers and human traffickers. The bill is funded by raising fees on foreign-based personnel companies that use U.S. visa programs, including the popular H-1B program, to bring skilled workers to the United States. India says higher fees would discriminate against its companies and workers.
According to Los Angeles Times,
Immigration is an important election-year issue for some voters, and supporters of the measure from both parties hope it will demonstrate that Washington is capable of addressing border security after Arizona passed a tough illegal immigration law.
For these very reasons, many organizations oppose the law, shunning these politically expedient strategies which ultimately damage immigrant communities, instead calling for a renewal of the administration’s commitment to uphold our nation’s values and achieve real progress on immigration reform. With the negative focus on enforcement, many are calling for passage of the Dream Act and AgJobs in September to help undocumented students and farmworkers as important down payments on the broader reform that is needed. At the same time, they are calling for President Obama and the Department of Homeland Security to implement administrative reforms that would provide relief to those at risk of deportation and family separation and measures that would restore basic due process to the immigration system. As Deepak Bhargava from the Center for Community Change noted,
It is extremely disappointing to see Congress fall for Republicans’ wholly manufactured allegations of an insecure border. Every study and report shows the border has never been safer. Crime statistics, free of political bias, show crime has never been lower…Republicans are impervious to facts.
According to blog ImmPolitic, many Republicans who keep calling for more border security before considering immigration reform will never be satisfied.
As we wrote about here and here, a series of enforcement “benchmarks” were set in the 2007 immigration reform legislation. Those “benchmarks” have largely been met, and more enforcement resources have been deployed that were not contemplated at the time. Still, politicians who are opposed to actually fixing our broken immigration system call for more enforcement. They have moved the goalposts, and they will move them again.
Instead of building on the victory of the Arizona lawsuit, Congress and President Obama is taking a step backward.
Learn. Share. Act. Go to restorefairness.org
Tags: agJobs, Arizona, ATF, Breakthrough, DEA, DHS, drug trafficking, FBI, H-1B, HR 6080, human rights, human trafficking, ICE, Justice Department, Mexico, NYIC, President Obama, Restore Fairness, SB 1070, Senator Schumer, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Border Security, Comprehensive Immigration Reform, deportation, dream act, due process, Employment, enforcement, immigration, Border Security, Comprehensive Immigration Reform, deportation, dream act, due process, Employment, enforcement, immigration (all tags)