Can someone explain Wisconsin's Steven M. Biskupic' prosecution?

I don't understand Steven M. Biskupic's case against Georgia Thompson. The evidence does seem so ridiculous that I must be missing something- can someone elucidate the other side of the story?  How could a jury have convicted based on what I have seen. Do we have any juror's reactions? (Was it even a jury case?)The motive of the crime being that ongoing employment helps supervisors!? I would appreciate someone posting from within the state.  

Tags: Steven M. Biskupic, US Attorneys, Wisconsin (all tags)


1 Comment

Re: Wisconsin Biskupic

Did you get this? (tried before)

press release of the Thompson indictment: 06/pr012406_Thompson_ind.pdf

there is nothing in the indictment, Biskupic drank the Rove kool aid.

covering the issue at:

by MALCONTENDS 2007-04-16 10:59AM | 0 recs


Advertise Blogads