It is still unclear to me why Michigan is being penalized when Iowa, South Carolina and Nevada also broke the rules, but were not penalized.
Nonsense. She could never be the mafia boss, because of sexism.
I could just hear the reactions to a global warming study that took that approach.
But, following along with your pedantry, you agree that the practical baseline for the votes graph should be 0, because the candidates started out with 0.
The last example is the best method - 0 is a practical baseline in this instance, whereas it isn't with atmospheric measurements.
However, the data labels do indicate that a significant difference exists.
Kossacks laugh hysterically at the very mention of alegre's name.
She posts such insane rah-rah drivel, she's like a funnier version of Jerome, with more ritalin.
I love her hallmark posting style. First two or three posts to stave off the torrent of laughter.
Thanks for the link.
Hah, Jerome doesn't need graphs to be dishonest. He's dishonest each and every time he questions Obama's position as the front leader rather than declaring him the presumptive nominee.
Indeed. Hillary would have been perfect for 2000, and has run a campaign that would have been more effective then, with her relentless lawyering approach.
Yeah, it's in play, Montana is no country for old men.
It's all about the delegates and the supers, folks.
Of course he isn't. Jerome was all for delegates, and supers serving as the king maker, before he realized that Clinton didn't have a chance with that metric.
Get over your candidate. This isn't about Obama, but fixing it for 2012.
About the level of discourse...what do you know, if you write crap, you'll attract flies.
That was a kickass comment!
» Recent blog linkage
Powered by WebStrong Group.