• and Bin Laden's college transcripts

  • comment on a post It's About Power over 3 years ago

    It's about oil.

    I have been commenting about the ostrich nature of discussions of Libya, including the President's which do not include the word "oil". 

    For clarity in thinking about Libya, it would be better if we had learned from the Iraq model of discourse. In Iraq, instead of saying “sectarian violence” we should have consistently said “faith based violence”

    Here we should consistently use the phrase “Oil Rich Libya” as in “A lot separates the mission in Oil Rich Libya from the invasion of Iraq,". 

    It's a useful right wing rhetorical strategy as in "wasteful government spending" going back at least to Cato's carthaga delenda est but I suspect, it was a major element in that rock sucking Demosthenes' Phillipics

  • comment on a post Scalia is Originalist... Except When He's Not over 4 years ago

    They are originalists when that gives them the rationale to rule the way they want to, they are federalists when that gives them the rationale to rule the way they want to.  They are for states rights unless it doesn't gives them the rationale to rule the way they want to.  Giving them the benefit of the intellectual doubt is a weak suckers play, just like the liberals they despise.  You can predict their ruling based on what they want, rich over everyone else, whites over everyone else, religion as long as it's fundamentalism or Catholic and government over civil rights.

  • comment on a post Congressman Heckler over 4 years ago

    Wilson is just following a long and noble South Carolina tradition http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/hist ory/minute/The_Caning_of_Senator_Charles _Sumner.htm

    That incident helped bring the Civil War (or as Wilson probably calls it the War of Southern Independence).  Perhaps this will result in a new birth of freedom also.

    for those of you that twitter

    Actblue page Rob Miller, Wilson's opponent ttp://bit.ly/13CgmC @CongJoeWilson, #CensureWilson, http://bit.ly/1hUrqM

  • comment on a post LA-Sen: David Vitter Had a Lousy Week over 5 years ago

    Does the governor of Alaska get lifetime health insurance ?

    Or does she get it from her husband's job ?

  • comment on a post Moving Foward with Uniting American Families Act over 5 years ago

    Gay Aliens Invade

    Anchor Lesbians

    Aliens Invade to Destroy Equal Marriage


  • I was listening to NPR (against my better judgement) and on the He said/She said with Brooks and EJ Dionne they played this part of the statement:

    "I will seek someone that understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or a footnote in a casebook, it is also how our laws affect the daily realities of people's lives, whether they can make a living and care for their families, whether they feel safe in their homes and welcomed in their own nation"

    David Brooks then said he wished Obama has said something about the constitution.   Of course leaving out:

    "I will seek somebody who shares my respect for constitutional values on which this nation was founded and who brings a thoughtful understanding of how to apply them in our time."

    The moral is whenever you hear David Brooks say something, if someone wants to bet he is lying, get odds if you take the bet.

  • comment on a post Just got back from Afghanistan over 5 years ago

    What kind of oversight would you recommend to ensure we don't go off the track ?

  • comment on a post Help Scott Murphy In NY-20 over 5 years ago

    I would rather have it seen that a blue dog cannot win because they lack popular support.  We have a comfortable majority in the house and we should use it to force people who take our money and vote against it to pay a price.

  • comment on a post NY-20: Scott Murphy Up By 4 over 5 years ago

    If we make it clear we are not supporting him because he is a blue dog, and he loses, perhaps that will show the clout of people who do not obstruct the majority view.

  • comment on a post 40 good bloggers over 40 (updated) over 5 years ago

    Talkleft ?

    Has a son who is passed the bar last year (I think) so I guess she is over 40.

  • comment on a post Running After Two Hares over 5 years ago

    I prefer to think of this as a masterful way of controlling the agenda.  By taking the born again fiscal discipline that the Blue Dogs and GOP have suddenly discovered after 8 years and have been blathering about for the last three weeks, and turning it into a force to cut (non-stimulative) defense spending, eliminate (non-stimulative) tax cuts for the wealthy (and hedge fund managers), and cut (non-stimulative) (regressive) national health care costs, we are ready for a real debate.  He is playing offense.  

    Think about the debate in the Progressive Blogoshere about making the first offer on the stimulus too small.  This is not too small, this is an assault on the three major problems we have: military spending, unfair irresponsible taxes, and health care.

    Now let's have the debate on our terms.

  • comment on a post Credit Where Credit Isn't Due over 5 years ago

    This is a real opportunity to point out that x voted against the bill which he is now taking credit for.  Just keep on repeating it.  X (who voted against the bill) appeared at a ribbon cutting for xxx

  • comment on a post Most Conservative House GOPer Trashes Limbaugh over 5 years ago

    Look at what happened when Obama called bullshit. That is when he said, "You can't listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done"  In other words, if you guys are espousing Rush, you are not Serious People.  He is a buffoon. (or at least that's how I interpreted it).  It was an Emperor's New Clothes moment.

    All of a sudden people (I mean right wing people) are in a tizzy. Defending Rush,(a losing proposition with the rest of America) or attacking him (a losing proposition with the, do they still call themselves dittoheads, Limbaugholics) or simply denying his importance. (See also Luke 22:54-62)

    I think it is an example of a great Bully Pulpit Moment.

  • comment on a post The Financial Sector Becomes a Call Option over 5 years ago

    It occurred to me reading this that this might be a case of benign neglect.  We (the progressivesphere) kept on worrying about moral hazard as in if the people who caused this especially bank management have no accountability for what they do, then they will just do it again.  The usual recourse was what happened to AIG, new management (partial) and wipe out the stockholders.  Note that the spa fiasco would not have been news in "normal" times.

    Behold, the wonders of the market are wiping out the stockholders.  And do we really think given the current climate that the management is not going to be impacted ?  "Hi. I took a 100 Billion dollar capitalization and ran it over a cliff."

    Because of the instinctive secrecy of the Bush administration and because of the devastating effect on stock prices for any given bank, the actual facts, which were probably known six months ago, that the banks were insolvent has taken a while to come out.

    Bush could, like global warming ignore it but Lincoln's adage (updated) really holds in the market; you can fool all of the people for only a few quarters while etc.

    What this means is that the banking system has collapsed of its own greed and Obama has $350 billion dollars to rebuilt it in his own image. So what will a community organizer do in that situation ?  

    He by his "one president" policy or the timing of the transition, finished the conservative system with a reductio ad absurdum.   That is, allow conservative principles to work and you end up with a bankrupt financial system.


Advertise Blogads