I get stalked by about four Clinton trolls basically whenever I post: this guy, switching sides, zerosumgame, and another one whose handle escapes me. They all trollrate with abandon, and they all go directly for what they imagine is a personal attack.
isn't "will be". But yeah, she should have had this whole thing locked up in Iowa. When this is all over, her campaign is going to be a case study in how not to run for President.
I'm honestly still amazed that someone with such obvious benefits, institutional support, money, locked-in constituencies, universal name recognition, and a husband who is the last sitting Democratic President, could have cratered so badly. She's having a really good week, but even now she can't pull this off barring a huge upset.
the subtext of all your ranting is that in some way or another I'm anti Semitic.
I don't think that at all. The available evidence merely supports the conclusion that you're somewhat self-righteous and ignorant, and are afflicted with an inability to make meaningful comparisons, which is a far lesser offense.
Really, you should work on that. I speak to you as a friend, otto.
too stupid yourself. Hillary has earned nothing. Certainly not while she's busy knee-capping the first African-American with a real shot at the White House.
There's a reason polls show her getting only 50+% of the black vote as nominee. Maybe those folks aren't aware of the gratitude you insist she be shown. If she somehow pulls this off, I'd be surprised if she gets 30% of the black vote; and the youth vote could be as bad or worse.
in robocalls telling you can't vote until you've received, filled out and returned a piece of mail to be sent to you, that's a perfectly valid interpretation.
This whole thing may be perfectly innocent. But if it were coming from a McCain-linked org in October, we'd all be wary. It's simply not credible to see hardcore Clinton supporters trying to explain away what in other circumstances they would excoriate.
I am applying the standards of evidence that obtain here to the matter at hand. Somewhat unjustly, perhaps, because in this instance, they favor Obama, but having read literally dozens of pathetic anti-Obama screeds based on far less, I'm willing to give the benefit of suspicion to the good folks at Clinton's campaign.
But since I'm generous and know people on the campaign, I might even reach out to them and learn more. Done it before, in fact.