I guess that anything is possible but I don't see the upside to the O-camp in this. At this point - ESPECIALLY at this point - there is a lot of negative chatter throughout the whole of the netroots. Clintonistas for Obama, and any other like-group are going to be only marginally more negative than what you find here right now, or even on the more O-centric sites. Any attempt to silence these groups would only deliver a negative backlash - a DESERVED negative backlash.
The truly negative Puma groups are fairly marginal and, as far as I've seen, mostly self-contained on their own domains. So this tactic would pull only those members of the netroots who have moved from die-hard Hillary support to Obama support - albeit cautious or somehow qualified support. Again this seems nonsensical - it would create a vacuum for genuine anti-Obama sites to fill. Even more dangerously, there are Republican sites devoted to winning over Clinton supporters (and "supporters",) these sites could expand with their creative fiction about McSame's great respect for women.
Even if the Obama campaign is absolute evil incarnate (and I still strongly believe they're the good guys,) I just can't see them making this imbecilic a move.
It's not goopy at all - use cherry jam & go heavier on the actual cherries. It's really good.
Hah! I remember fluffernutter! Even as a kid I questioned how this could be considered "food." I had a real sweet tooth & drove my mother nuts begging for them (the POWER of advertising to kids!) I wouldn't admit it at the time, but they just weren't as good as the ads made out and I let my demands peter out pretty quickly.