• comment on a post Barack Obama Gets Fired Up over 5 years ago

    This was pretty damn good.

    I'd like to hear him talk like that every day.

    The sad fact is that while those of us who follow politics closely ground every detail about Obama into dust over the last six months or so the great mass of Americans only know that he is the black guy who is running for president.

    The country needs to meet and become acquainted with the Senator Obama in this video.

  • comment on a post Is It Bayh? over 5 years ago

    God, I hope not.

  • comment on a post Bring In A Fighter over 5 years ago

    On the fighter business:

    I couldn't agree more with the need for a fighter. Not to fight the primaries over again, but I didn't see Senator Clinton as more of a fighter than Senator Obama.  Neither one seems inclined toward a large battle.

    Neither Bush is a fighter, but they both had plenty of people who were willing to do their fighting for them.  How come no Democrat ever has the kind of help that Republicans get?

    Since there is apparently no living Democrat who is willing to go to the mattresses for the party's nominee, Obama is left on his own.  He's got to get it done, and in the next ten days, or this is just going to get worse as the summer goes on.

    On the vice-president candidate:

    The only reason to turn down a VP spot is because you have something in you or in your history that would make you an untenable candidate.  If some one takes themselves out of the running, we have to respect that.

    Obama better not be depending on his VP choice to make up for any perceived deficiencies in him as a president.  He's the top of the ticket and no running mate is going to sell him.

    I just better be a universally acknowledged good choice, rather than a safe choice.

  • comment on a post Tomnibus Goes Down over 5 years ago

    I guess I am stupid, but can anyone explain to me why not one Democrat was able to do this during the years of Republican majority?

    Is it only because all the Republicans will uphold his hold, so to speak?

    The Republicans filibuster everything the want to and apparently suffer no political damage from doing so.  Why, then, were Democrats so fearful of using the filibuster?  Why don't the Democrats make the exact same threat, the so-called nuclear option, that Bill Frist made?

    Why isn't this even in the public dialogue?

  • on a comment on Open Thread over 6 years ago

    Funny? Well anyway I'm not laughing.

    Americans choose their political leaders the same way they choose everything else:  corporate media propaganda and TV ads are poured onto an audience that is amazingly ignorant.

    Why are Americans so satisfied with this?

    Who benefits from this?

  • comment on a post Iowa First Lady Mari Culver Endorses John Edwards over 6 years ago

    Like you, I have no idea how Ms. Vilsack's endorsement of John Kerry effected the outcome there in 2004.  Her endorsement came after the widespread campaign to bring down Howard Dean was already in full swing.

    But, I was in Iowa at the time and I do recall that while it was stated that her endorsement was not an endorsement by Gov. Vilsack, nudge-nudge, wink-wink, pretty much everyone in Iowa I talked with assumed that it was.

  • Why not file suits and request injunctions against the illegal solicitations?

    Why not go all out to publicize what they are doing?

    Where is Jerry Brown on this?

    The existence of the California Democratic Party is open to question.

  • The corporate ruling class is very invested in the failure of Howard Dean.  He is a potentially transforming person, with a following, and they will not let that happen.

  • I have always held that the big story was not Dean but the Deaniacs.  He didn't make us, we made him.

    People who had never donated money, volunteered their time or even paid attention to campaigns before Labor Day got involved. People who hadn't done anything political other than voting, since college or ever, made changes in their lives to become more active and attentive citizens.

    And it wasn't all about the Kiddie Korps that the corporate press/media focused on.  At most Dean events I was part of, including Iowa, there were as many people older than I was, 49, than younger.

    Dean was not the producer or the leader, but instead he was the product of a diverse movement of people into politics in reaction to the Republican and right-wing excesses that began in the 90s and, with the invasion of Iraq, lit some fires.  

    Currently the most visible product of this movement is the left blogosphere.  We won't really know or understand the effects of this movement for a few years.

    Many of the people who were activated in 2003-2004 have not continued their activism, but many have and they are part of all three of the major candidates' campaigns.

    If the apparent level of excitation is less than it was in 2003-2004, it is because the people are already engaged.

  • comment on a post For Nancy Pelosi, a Time to Choose over 7 years ago

    Does the House leadership stand with the people or the powerful?

    I have to assume this is a rhetorical question.

    Pelosi & Co. pander to the people from time to time, but they work for the corporate ruling class. Matthew 12:33.

  • comment on a post Rudy Giuliani (R-Gibberish) over 7 years ago

    On MSNBC tonight, Rudy's position was declared to be the same as John Kerry's during the 2004 campaign, and it was touted as evidence of Rudy's toughness and courage in taking on Bush's handling of the Iraq War.

    I cannot throw up enough.

  • The choke was the failure to get rid of Lieberman.  There is no question that the Democratic senate would have more latitude, on every issue, if Lieberman were not there.

  • comment on a post Senate Dems Face Embarrassment of Riches over 7 years ago

    The Democratic Party has a chance to win a Lieberman-proof majority.  It is the second such opportunity.  Last time they choked.  I am not sure whether they are really ready this time, but it is in this respect that the grassroots, netroots and any progressive with a voice can and should push them into doing it.

    In 2006, the Democrats won as a result of a disparate set of people and forces, and despite their refusal to attack Bush & the Republicans on Iraq in a straightforward manner.  It is my hope that they will not hold back this time.  

  • comment on a post Revisiting the Hackett Litmus Test over 7 years ago

    I wrote that test and apart from being bitter that it isn't called the James Powell Litmus Test (kidding, really), I feel sometimes it was and is misunderstood.

    I wrote it out of frustration.  It was a response to the corporate press/media's behavior, adopted even by "some Democrats" we know, which was to label any candidate supported by the left blogosphere or citizen activists as "far left."  Along with this was a tendency to magnify policy differences that were real, but not a barrier to broad support for Democratic candidates who were willing to stand up for the Democratic base and their interests rather than criticizing them or hiding from them.

    It's true, as at least one person wrote, that there is no policy on this list.  There's a simple reason for that.  Until we get rid of Bush/Cheney and until we start to re-democratize the corporate press/media structure and until we can the dismantle the right-wing propaganda machine, our policy must be doing those things.  None of the policies we want to adopt and none of the policy areas that we deem important are going to get any attention until we make those changes.

    This is the only time in my life that I said something that other people thought was interesting or important enough to quote and talk about.  It is very flattering.

  • comment on a post Questions for Edwards, Obama and Reid over 7 years ago

    Senators,

    What do you have to say to the majority of the American people, and the overwhelming majority of your party, who are alarmed that you are doing nothing to change Bush's policies?

Diaries

Advertise Blogads