Self-Correction in American Elections

By: Inoljt,

One thing I've recently observed is the degree to which America self-corrects when selecting its leaders. It's very interesting to compare successive presidents; the new president nearly always lacks the weakness the previous president had. Though of course he comes with his own flaws.

I'll start with Jimmy Carter. Carter was known for being honest and a bit naive, in stark contrast to his predecessor Richard Nixon.

Carter, however, had a negative reputation for being an obsessive micromanager. He was replaced by Ronald Reagan - who was famous for leaving the details (and sometimes the whole plan itself) to his aides.

Reagan and the elder Bush were criticized as too old for the job. So along came Bill Clinton and Al Gore, the youngest presidential team in history, as the next presidential group.

Of course, Bill Clinton is remembered for his sexual indiscretion and the Monica Lewinsky affair. His replacement - George W. Bush - was widely characterized as morally upright and religious.

He was also characterized as stupid. Which is a criticism nobody would level at his successor Barack Obama - one of the most intellectual persons who has ever graced the high office.

And so the cycle continues onwards.

Tags: America, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Elections, George Bush, Jimmy Carter, Politics, PRESIDENTS, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan (all tags)



Re: Self-Correction in American Elections

So, the next President will be a short fat white guy with no brain.....

by QTG 2009-10-14 07:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Self-Correction in American Elections

No no no.  The line is: "The next President will be an American..."

by Steve M 2009-10-14 07:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Self-Correction in American Elections

I was wrong. It will be a fat half white (the other half) short stupid uncharismatic Republican woman with several divorces whose never traveled more than 5 miles from home was born wealthy and can't dribble.

by QTG 2009-10-15 03:59AM | 0 recs


Advertise Blogads