Why Have St. Barack And His Media Apologists Been Allowed To Get Away With The Following:

Refute please!

In one of the recent debates, St. Barack of the Inspired (who is inspiring) made the following statement:

      "The only involvement I've had with ACORN was I
        represented them alongside the US Justice Dept.
        in making Illinois implement tha motor-voter law
         that helped people get registered at DMV's"

Aside from the fact that Motor-Voter was Clinton's doing (the Republicans were the part "of ideas" according to The Messiah), take a look at this quote from four years ago from a former ACORN board member Toni Foulkes:

       "We have invited Obama to our leadership training
         sessions to run the session on power every year
         and, as a result, many of our newly developing
         leaders got to know him before he ever ran for
         office".

So who's the liar?  Then of course we know that "bombs away Billy" and Obama filtered through the Woods Fund 190K to Chicago ACORN.

So Obama is a big, fat liar and where's the coverage of it?

2)  Remember when the Hillary planted a question in Iowa story was all the rage last December? The media (Wolf Blitzer had an "exclusive" on the plant's "wink"), and yet several Obama devotees moved to Ohio and established a temporary fake residence in order to vote Row A Messiah during early voting.  This fraud went woefully underreported.

3) Why has The Chosen One never explained how he and the Rezkos bought their properties on the same day and one sold at the market price and the other at way below the market price.  Rezko is another type of "community organizer"--a slum lord. Why was there no red media flag raised over this obvious point?

4)  Why has the press emphasized Palin's whoppers but all but ignored Hairplug Joe's--including his assertion that his copter was "forced down" in Afghanistan on the "terrorist superhighway" (not mentioning it was only snow)?

5) Why was there no outcry when an actual TERRORIST ORGANIZATION (HAMAS) endorsed The Messiah, "We want Obama to win". Can you imagine the hue and cry if it had endorsed McCain?

6)  Why are several Obama stooges in the media allowed to lie about Sarah Palin and get away with it?  Joy Behar on The View: "Palin is currently 'under indictment' in Alaska".  Any calls for Joy to resign,; how about Paul Begala on CNN claiming that his biggest gripe against Palin is that she actually cut funds for special needs kids--when in point of fact she proposed more than DOUBLE the funding?

7)  Why is The Messiah allowed to give one speech about race relations and somehow that excuses this genius from the absurd proposition that he knew nothing, nothing about the pronouncements of Reverend Wright after attending the church for almost 20 years?  And what about his assertion that grandma is a "typical white person". Can you imagine if Hillary had said so and so was a "typical" black?

8)  Why is Trinity United not subject to ridicule for having as its motto, "Unashamedly Black and unashamedly Christian".  Can you imagine if ANY of the other candidates belonged to a church that not only awarded a prize to Farrakhan but had as their slogan, "We're unashamedly white"? Can you imagine?

9)  Why was the media asleep in allowing that fatass Oprah to claim that she never got involved before in politics when I for one distinctly remember her attending a Jesse Jackson rally in 1988?

10) Why is Fox News and perhaps the Wall St Journal the only major outlets to report on the troika of Ayers, Dorhn, and Obama (Hughy, Dewey, and Louie)and Obama's obvious lies that he didn't know of The Ayers' background when he attended the meet and greet at the home of TWO terrorists (oh excuse me "professors) in 1995.  Doesn't the media find it strange that Frau Obama used to work in the same law firm with Frau Ayers back as far as 1987?

11) Again why hasn't the MSM reported the amazing revelation from Percy Sutton (former Manhattan Bourough President) that a well known Jew-hater and racist, Khalid al Mansour, asked Sutton to write a letter of reference to the Harvard Law School on behalf of the then unknown Barack Obama.  How did al Mansour come about knowing the future Chosen One in the first place and why isn't it looked into?

The answer my friends at MYDD is what I've been saying and others like me for almost 2 years now.  Namely that the press is in the tank for Obama and always has been. But hush now, we're in the church of The God Obama and NO ONE is allowed to raise questions nor dissent.

Tags: Media, obama (all tags)

Comments

73 Comments

Boo ya!

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

I noticed you can't respond to anything except to do this nonsense. yesterday someone posted the US Constitution on here in response to my diary--perhaps they could have sent a copy to Biden,  who didn't know the first Article from the Second!!!

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

Sorry, I didn't read it.  I don't think anyone will.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:29AM | 0 recs
Reading this dribble...

...is bad for the IQ.

by psychodrew 2008-11-02 11:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

God, the baby has a cold again. This is the fourth one in ten months. Yeesh.

by ragekage 2008-11-02 09:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

you're giving pug talking points. Acorn is an agency dem's like, its purpose is to register low-income poor voters who are usually overlooked. Doesn't mean many of them actually vote, but their the 'least among us' and worthy of being registered.

This doesn't fly not only because speaking to a non-profit isn't the same as being involved with their voter registration drives, it also doesn't fly because dem's like acorn, we like what they're doing, we're not concerned about individual voter fraud, which is a non-poblem but a pug talking point, we''re concerned about voter suppression, voter intimidation, and election fraud in its various forms.

Good for Barack, I hope Hillary also addressed that worthy group.  

by anna shane 2008-11-02 10:18AM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

Dude, you're killlllling the bandwitdth!!!

by ChitownDenny 2008-11-02 11:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

Remove your troll-rating, and I'll explain why you're wrong (seriously).

by Jess81 2008-11-02 12:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

I couldn't "none" rate you, so I "mojo" rated you.  This better be good!

by ChitownDenny 2008-11-02 12:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

Well it's not that interesting, but here it is: when you embed a picture, any picture, the site that it's on doesn't transmit it - instead it tells your browser to go to the site where it's hosted and get it from there.  Also, when you blow it up that size, that's just your browser taking a small picture and stretching it, but in terms of bandwidth it's still the same 80x80 animated gif that it was.  If you follow.

So in the first place, mydd isn't carrying it at all, in the second place, it's only a couple thousand bytes - the size has nothing to do with it.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 02:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

time's up.

by ChitownDenny 2008-11-02 02:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

The picture was annoying but hardly worthy of troll-rating, especially considering the lack of quality of the diary it was posted to.

by edg1 2008-11-02 02:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

Dude, you missed the explanation by roughly a minute. There's still time to remove that unwarranted troll rating.

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 03:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Boo ya!

Did it really take you a whole minute to write "time's up"?

by Jess81 2008-11-02 07:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. McCain and his trolls

Troll.

by Nathan Empsall 2008-11-02 09:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

"Handsomegent" is likely neither handsome nor a gent.

Discuss.

by rfahey22 2008-11-02 09:13AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Indeed.  I'd be surprised if anyone actually read it: I just saw the title and assumed it was "whine whine whine, cry cry cry".  Do you suppose I'm mistaken?

Remember during the primaries when his diaries were all ranting about "Negroes"?

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:18AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Yep, I'm surprised he's still here.  

by rfahey22 2008-11-02 09:19AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Really? You're really surprised he's still here? Have you forgotten who runs this site?  There's a reason why guys like this are still here and many other folks have been forced to adopt new screen names or move on.

by the mystical vortexes of sedona 2008-11-02 09:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

It's people like this guy who kept me from supporting Hillary in the primaries.

by Bush Bites 2008-11-02 12:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Why

It must really be exhausting and painful to live with so much hatred and bitterness that he feels the need to share it with anonymous strangers all over the internet.

This election season, as remarkable as it's been in so many ways, has left a field of casualties: psychologically and emotionally damaged people for whom the internet has become an enabler of their obsessions and an outlet for their anger.

It's also an early view of the venom Obama will be up against for the next four years -- the same kind of hatred that Clinton had to deal with his entire time in office. It's excruciatingly ironic, isn't it?

by BobzCat 2008-11-02 09:23AM | 0 recs
Re: Why

Ah, the biggest "haters" have been the Clinton haters who tried to destroy her in the spring for not groveling at the feet of the Messiah. I can relate to you if you choose a littany of disgusting remarks made by Matthews, Olbermann, Jeanie Moos, Tom DeFrank--if you care to read them.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Why

Serioiusly, part of me feels sorry that you're in such pain. But the rest of me has no pity for you. There are far more healthy ways to deal with what you're going through, and you choose instead to merely pour salt into your wounds and display them to the virtual world.

You're only doing yourself lasting damage, and whatever your agenda may be, this will not advance it.

by BobzCat 2008-11-02 09:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Why

Obama saves! I hate Clintons! Clintons lost! Obama wins! The Clintons are dead! Long live the Clintons!

by Iago 2008-11-02 02:59PM | 0 recs
Not ironic

I'll bet you any amount of money he spent the 1990s trying to convince people that Vince Foster was Hillary Clinton's lover, and praying for a recession or a terrorist attack to prove he was right about that, too.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:39AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

You're right one out of two.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

You must actually think anyone is going to bother to guess.  Poor, sad, sad sack.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Obama's election (God forbid) ie (Obama forbid) will be the beginning of a left wing totalitarianism the likes of which we have never seen.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

k

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Heh. Awesome.

by Cincinnatus 2008-11-02 10:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Be nice - or I'll see to it that you end up rooming with Phyllis Schafly in the deprogramming camp.

by zonk 2008-11-02 11:24AM | 0 recs
Woohoo!

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 11:47AM | 0 recs
Wait.

That's a bad thing?

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 11:48AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

Your allies in the wingnut movement said the same thing about the Clinton Administration.

by Bush Bites 2008-11-02 12:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack A

You're serious?  You really believe this?  After all that we've witnessed in the last eight years-- Gitmo, extraordinary rendition, secret prisons, the most opaque presidency in American history, torture, the Patriot Act, Christian fundamentalists striving to strip others of their rights and to discredit solid science, rightwing hate radio that sounds not far removed from radio broadcasts in America, systematic and pervasive corruption throughout the government-- After all of this you think the left is the threat to America?  You think progressives are the dangerous ones?  I'll never understand diseased and thoroughly distorted minds such as your own.

by Philoguy 2008-11-02 03:08PM | 0 recs
It's a common disease, really.

You've never heard of Rightwingitis?

The variant you're seeing here can be especially lethal. The attempt to endure a particularly rabid form of the disease with the continuing charade of being in perfect health (a left-leaning mindset) results in sudden ill-timed and awkward Tourette's like outbursts. That "left wing totalitarianism" bit is just another sad example of the humiliating symptoms of its hapless sufferers.

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-03 03:23AM | 0 recs
"Refute please!"

Can we just point and laugh instead?

by username 2008-11-02 09:17AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

No kindly refute, then vote McCain/Palin--please Clintonites, don't weaken.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:25AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

I feel so sorry for you.  Seriously.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:27AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Why, no KoolAid drinking at my house.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:28AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Because most people spend time with people who like them.  Instead you spend hour after hour here, writing things that no one will read, throwing tantrums that people laugh at, and in general being pathologically anti-social.

I know there are Klan websites that eat this stuff up, but you post it here.  Why?  Were you beaten as a child, and is that the only way you can relate to other human beings now?  Also, what explains your fixation with "negroes", as you put it?  

I don't know, I just see you as standing on top of a belltower with a rifle, unless someone intervenes first.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:32AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Dude, who are you talking to?

by ragekage 2008-11-02 09:34AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Do you ignore people crying out for help?

When a child is crying, I go to them.  When someone is in pain, I try to comfort them.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:41AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

I'm not the least bit in pain. I am a very successful and happy person with a wonderful set of family and friends.  Disdain of this egotist fraud Obama is not categorized as a psychological disorder--although in the coming years it JUST MIGHT BE. Get the gulags ready. Ooops, now I'm a paranoid.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:47AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

See, you write that, and you may even believe it on some level, but all I see is someone who needs to be loved, and is seeking out negative attention because it's the only attention they've ever known.

It doesn't have to be that way.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:55AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

None of what you have stated is true.  I made no such remarks nor rants about "negroes".  I have stayed off this site for over two months but I decided to come back on to bring up some matters which the Obama lovers can never respond to nor care to.  So far NO ONE has responded to the Toni Foulkes quote which proves not only that this unqualified fraud is a liar about a major point, but that the press continues to shill for him. Instead of criticizing me and acting as if this were a medical school, why not engage in discourse about this nominee.

by handsomegent 2008-11-02 09:43AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Oh pleasee, don't tell me.. (0.00 / 13)

that Obama doesn't posit himself as some sort of Poitier type-the educated high class negro of the 50's and 60's. He shrewdly knew that he'd better come across that way than as Spike Lee.

by handsomegent on Fri May 23, 2008 at 06:29:43 PM EST

Now, about those other things that you claimed:

The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is a 24-hour, toll-free suicide prevention service available to anyone in suicidal crisis. If you need help, please dial 1-800-273-TALK (8255). You will be routed to the closest possible crisis center in your area. With more than 130 crisis centers across the country, our mission is to provide immediate assistance to anyone seeking mental health services. Call for yourself, or someone you care about. Your call is free and confidential.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 09:53AM | 0 recs
Ah, okay- handsomeagent is a garden variety racist

Thanks for providing that quote. Very telling.

by Angry White Democrat 2008-11-02 10:34AM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Thanks for posting.

I don't mind kibitzing with some sad and misguided PUMA, but I won't entertain a racist.

by Bush Bites 2008-11-02 12:49PM | 0 recs
Re: "Refute please!"

Yes, Handsomegent is strictly from the school of Texas Darlin anti-obama posters.

There was a real cut-off, we had some angry angry folks, but only a few would let their racism seep out...

HG was among those posters.

by WashStateBlue 2008-11-02 01:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Why am I an idiot?

I'll have to post some pictures of the baby. Is any around here a lawyer or have any experience with custody issues?

by ragekage 2008-11-02 09:33AM | 0 recs
As one of the more vocal ....

of the Hillary supporters here during the primaries, and as someone who still supports Hillary, her goals, her ideals and her policies, I have to call you a fool.

You are NOT doing any good for Senator Clinton, in fact, your actions have the opposite effect.  That being said, I am now inclined to believe that all along you are not really who you pass yourself to be, you are in fact, a Republican troll here purely for the purpose of being divisive and to act as a spoiler.

With those things in mind, you are hereby cordially invited to don your best formal attire and align your lips with the lower end of my alimentary canal.

by emsprater 2008-11-02 09:52AM | 0 recs
You are truly

A Putz of Galactic Proportions....

I will not miss you after the 5th, when you and the rest of the PUMAs go on a 6 month crying jag, and then, hopefully, seek some pyschiatric help.

by WashStateBlue 2008-11-02 10:25AM | 0 recs
Some Facts

In 1995, Mr. Obama was on a team of lawyers that represented Acorn in a lawsuit to compel Illinois to comply with federal laws intended to enhance access to the polls. The team also represented Equip for Equality, a group that promotes the rights of the disabled, and four individuals.
[snip]

In fact, the Justice Department was on the same side as Acorn in the lawsuit, as were other organizations, including the League of Women Voters. Those plaintiffs won the case.

The training:

Lewis Goldberg, a spokesman for Acorn, said Mr. Obama conducted two leadership training sessions of roughly an hour each for Acorn's Chicago affiliate over a three-year period in the late 1990s. He was not paid for that work, Mr. Goldberg said.

by jsfox 2008-11-02 10:28AM | 0 recs
Don't go bringing facts into this.

You might disturb his delusions.

by psychodrew 2008-11-02 11:36AM | 0 recs
handsomegent,
the primaries are over.  The decision has been made and Barack Obama is the Dem candidate.  Your choice now is to vote for Obama or not vote for Obama.  
If you seek a Republican president, this is not the site for you.  And while I support discourse on this site, your diary does not lead to discussion.
by ChitownDenny 2008-11-02 10:45AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Have St. Barack And His Media Apologists B

Clean-up in aisle five.

by Shaun Appleby 2008-11-02 11:40AM | 0 recs
Dude...

from the tenor of your post, you are really having a bad day.  On second thought, you've been havina a bad week, a bad month, a few months; hell, your year has been pretty much a downer!

I feel sorry for you, just a bit sorry. You see, I am keeping busy working for Obama.  I get to see the nation move in positive ways and nearly all the people I meet and talk to are not filled with hate likeyou are. Knowing that my efforts thughly throw you into a tizzy is my motivation. Knowing there are people like you adds to both my motivation and my reward.

I can't imagine what must be going through your mind..the hate, the anger, the emotion.  So much so that it has obviously clouded your judgment.

Well, enough for now.  I'm off again to work towards victory.

One last qestion though.  When Obama wins in a landslide, what does that do to your argument? I suppose you'll say it proves your point. My view is that the landslide destroys your argument and stands as a rejection of your hate.

Have a nice day.

by mchughusa 2008-11-02 11:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Get Used to It.

Just get used to it, Dude:

President Barack Obama.
Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama.
Our 44th President, Barack Obama.
U.S. President, Barack Obama.
Barack Obama, President of the United States.

It's happening, it's happening now, and there isn't THING ONE you can do to stop it.

Rant, rave, curse, cry...Just get used to it because you're gonna hear it for at least 4 more years.

Enjoy.

by Its All So Goofy 2008-11-02 11:48AM | 0 recs
Whatever happened to all of the

"why can't he close the deal" arguments you used to make?

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 11:57AM | 0 recs
He closed the deal. (n/t)

by mistersite 2008-11-02 12:39PM | 0 recs
Hence the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 03:50PM | 0 recs
Oh, and drop the charade., please.

I know Clinton supporters. Clinton supporters are my friends.

Troll, you're no Clinton supporter.

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 12:00PM | 0 recs
Hey Handsome douche

Say it with me now PRESIDENT OBAMA

ok I will meet you half way PRESIDENT St BARACK

by wellinformed 2008-11-02 12:27PM | 0 recs
(d)

by chrisblask 2008-11-02 12:59PM | 0 recs
We don't come to your Klan meetings

so please stay off our progressive websites.

by JJE 2008-11-02 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: We don't come to your Klan meetings

Damn right.

by Jess81 2008-11-02 02:17PM | 0 recs
"that fatass Oprah"

Oh goody! Racist AND sexist! Two for the price of one

by b1oody8romance7 2008-11-02 03:57PM | 0 recs
Refute please:

Clinton ran a lousy campaign:

1. In Iowa, she refused to take questions at most stops and her campaign conducted itself like they were "owed" the nomination.

2. When Obama had his first money numbers in, the Clinton campaign was slow to make the changes needed to try and elbow its way into the same fund raising area.

3. They were slow to recognize that "Change" was more important than "Experience" this year.

4. Internal backbiting and fights were not handled by Clinton, allowing them to fester.

5. It wasn't until too late that she began to run an effective campaign, after she was mathematically out of it.

6. Some of her highest campaign operatives did not seem to understand the rules that they helped set up.

I say all of this as a personally offended 2-time Edwards County Chair.

by IowaMike 2008-11-02 04:11PM | 0 recs
Don't take the bait.

He's no Clinton supporter. Trolls don't care for rationale, his diary is simply a pathetic excuse to re-ignite the primary wars. Don't fall for it.

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 06:30PM | 0 recs
I'll put it in words you can understand.

Go fuck yourself.  

by KLRinLA 2008-11-02 05:12PM | 0 recs
Refute this.

You're a clueless troll. Refute please!

by Sumo Vita 2008-11-02 06:32PM | 0 recs
Re: YOU LOST ASSHOLE!!!!!

Blow me!!!  And you still can't refute, can you?

by handsomegent 2008-12-06 04:17AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads