not over the line, but i do like the cats better :)
um how about......... no.
This controversy is EXACTLY linked with the other via one word: BIAS.
Jerome has done zero to address the matter.
So while he is addressing the easier charge of Polling bias, now he needs to address user bias.
Why did he feel the need to remove the ability to REC an article from over 200 people?
What did he hope that would achieve?
Does he plan on keeping this "sweep" past Hillary's concession speech?
Just because you say there isn't a controversy doesn't make it true (that kind of talk only works in the WH press room)
Agreements all around!
you compare a response between a comdedian calling Hillary a name, and GWB comparing Democrats to Nazi's.
The only hate I showed today was towards the Republican troll which you guys are more than happy to have on board, ChitownDenny.
I dare you to have him removed from this site, but you wont because he fills your agenda.
Well, this more hindsight, but if she was looking for a graceful exit as so many say, today the opportunity was sitting RIGHT there.
Think about it, for her a high note is a win in Kentucky, not a gleaming historical show of party unity.
Im just dissapointed.
If her concession doesn't breed positivity I will be really dissapointed.
your the one defending Bush.
Okay, now that you got that out of the way.
How about the major controversy you have not addressed at all.
I don't even need to mention it, There are 5 threads in the last 24 hours, one started by an Admin of your site.
We are waiting for a statement or action from you.
Randi Rhodes= irrelevant AA radio host.
George W Bush= world's most famous tyrant, repsonisble for the deaths of 4000+ Americans and 100000+ Iraqis.
Jennifer you should be embarrassed for your statement.
But I wonder if Bush made this comment knowing it would test Hillary and our party's unity.
She condemned it and thats great, but if she is trying to impress superdelegates and party elders in general she should have been first.
We can all agree that if the VP spot is anything she has a remote interest in, she missed a solid opportunity to achieve that.
I want to see Hillary fighting Bush/McCain/GOP.
We need her for that fight!
She can pretend to keep her campagin till june, fine.
But she needs to be the "Fighter" she is so famous for.
Thats the point, we NEED Hillary to attack Bush and McCain.
If she wants ANY future in our party she will have to do it.
So what if Hillary said nothing at all today.
Or she waited till tommorow night for the weekend dump, what would you say then.
You have to understand that after the "as far as I know" trick and a hundred more just like it it is easy for us to see this.
Also saying McCain was ready for Commander in Chief, but she didnt know if Obama was?
Al had a great point.
You know why Hillary will never be Obama's VP, because she should have been rushing to bash bush over this, especially if she wants respect.
When Shuster said "pimp" he was flushed out in 1 hour tops.
Note to user living under rock:
This site has no rules.
Rules are broken all the time and not dealt with at all.
Users are disciplined with no breaking of rules or explanation why.
Sounds like no rules to me.
I never dissed Alegre in that post and it wasn't snark.
I am calling out New Hampster for "informing" us not that Alegre is at work, and does not blog there.
But that Alegre is at work, so she can feed her kids, something us elite Democrats would know nothing about.
So by victimizing her she thinks she sets up some kind of forcefield.
Tactics right out of the campains.
I get it it.
She said NOTHING.
If that is the case she needs to drop out, before American's really start to hate her.
She definitely will lose ALL Jewish support over this one.
Comparing Obama to Hitler, if it's too hard for Hillary to attack Bush on that, how will she ever attack a republican for ANYTHING!!!
» Recent blog linkage
Powered by WebStrong Group.