First, this has litle/no correlation to winning in the general election.
Second, if you still insist on going by that false metric, Obama has won "major" states to (VA, WA, TX, GA)
Claim #2: is primed to win more states
Claim #3:especially the key state of PA
The best electoral analysis online is at fivethirtyeight.com, and their general election average for PA stands at
Obama +1.7 Clinton +0.6
Most polls show that PA will be competitive no matter who the Dem nominee.
Claim #4 she has support from more Dems within core constituencies than Obama:
BWAAHAhahA! Like...the ones that support her!? She's behind in the primary vote. You know that?
Claim #5: she raises $1 million a day
Nope. She only raised $22 mil in Febuary.Obama raised $55 mil.
Claim #6: and Obama has not been fully vetted, as we've all tragically seen in the past week.
While Obama may have been "vetted," all the people he's ever known apparently have not. If you'd like me to link to videos of preachers that Hillary has taken council with, I'd be glad to.
This, to me, is almost one of those "line in the sand" issues. Even John McCain has indicated that he would help stop MTR. I don't understand how Hilary Clinton could take the Bush position. I really don't, and I hope her position on MTR improves.