• on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago



    ATM machines were not designed with removable memory cards.

    Nor were they designed with private databases that you and I cannot see
    (we can verify our own bank balances -- imagine if we couldn't?).

    You need to watch the video posted in the diary
    and learn the difference here.
    Read up about them at the:  http://www.bradblog.com site.

    If we could vote on ATM machines, there'd be no problem.  
    But Diebold Vote machine corruption has been repreatedly documented over and over again and
    they have even been disqualified in some States.

  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago

    I hope you're not trying to deny that.

  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago



    Its the Corporations (probably a little CIA meddling as well).

    Besides, the Republicans have been relishing the prospect of running against Hillary.  For many years they have been just assuming that Hillary would be their opponent.  That's who they want and who they've been game-planning for.

    The Establishment does not want an outsider from either Political Party.


  • comment on a post NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago

    Town of Sutton Confirms Ron Paul Totals were 31, not zero. "I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error. This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results."

    Bev Harris is amazing and the input below from her is just the beginning of unraveling the fraud in New Hampshire: "One noticeable thing on the 59 screen shots I grabbed between 10:45 pm NH time and midnight NH time, is that the ones that had late results (not submitted as of 4 hours after poll closing) -- well, you'd expect them to be hand count locations, right? Nope. Mostly Diebold locations. That's a major red flag to me. How the heck can you not push "print" for four hours??? It normally takes only 30 minutes to wrap things up and print the poll tape when the polls close.

    "My method was grabbing the municipalities left to right, right to left, starting at the south end of the state and working up. I only got about three rows up. Anyone who has additional time slice information documenting late reporters I'd like to see it. Late reporters from the first 59 locations I grabbed":

    Brentwood - Diebold location - had the Dem results, but no Republican results as of 11:53 pm (polls closed at 7)
    Chesterfield - Hand count location - no results as of 11:00 pm
    Derry - Diebold location - no results in as of 11:42 pm
    Fremont - Diebold location - no results in as of 11:48 pm
    Greenfield - Hand count location - no results in as of 11:52 pm
    Hampton - Diebold location - results in on time, but I flagged this because every Dem candidate had a result divisible by 5 and for Republicans, Huckabee 217, McCain 1217, Romney 1217, it just looked weird. So much for my statistical capabilities.
    Hollis - Diebold location - results not in as of 11:54 pm
    New Ipswich - Diebold location - results not in as of 10:52 pm
    Newton - Diebold location - results not in as of 10:58 pm
    Pelham - Diebold location - results not in as of 10:56 pm
    Temple - Hand count location - results not in as of 11:26 pm
    Winchester - Diebold location - results not in as of 10:46 pm

    McCain was declared the winner by several networks 17 MINUTES after the polls closed. Same thing I wrote about in my last column. With a few precincts "reporting" or "projected," it's all over - even before the bulk of ballots are "counted" by the machines. What a farce.

  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago

    http://www.bradblog.com/ is not a Ron Paul site

  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago



    DKos didn't debunked anything.
    He just authoritatively trolled the issue.

    He doesn't understand the details of Diebold memory cards and the track record of these machines.

    See:  http://www.bradblog.com/
    All the information is demonstrated there.

  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago

    Election Fraud occurred in 2006 too.

    20,000 votes were lost (disappeared) in FL-13 where Christine Jennings was supposed to win. The Republican candidate sits in her seat today.

    Same thing with NC-08

    There has been E-Voting Fraud in every single election cycle: 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008.

    When are people going to start getting it?  Just why do want a damn non-open, non-verifiable, hidden-from-view (yet programmable and with removeable memory cards) Election process to determine the result?  

    DIEBOLD is run by admittedly hardcore GOP/Neocon people anyway.


  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago

    You don't understand.
    Read http://www.bradblog.com/

    All the information, and the proof that you are looking for is documented there.

    The raw or un-adjusted Exit polls are not reported to the public, although the Media gets to see them.  

    The released Exit polls are made public after the results and after they have been adjusted (normalized) around the official tallies.

    This is not new, this is exactly what happened in 2004 with John Kerry.

    Read http://www.bradblog.com/

  • comment on a post NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago



    For those people who are Hillary Clinton supporters, this issue is not about her.

    The same problem will effect the General Election here as well.

    Whether it is Clinton or Obama that is the D-Nominee, they will be running in the General Election against John McCain or Mitt Romney or Guiliani (Huckabee will be finished off).

    The public may favor the Democratic nominee by 10%, it won't matter.

    Diebold decides who wins and who loses, not you or I.

  • on a comment on NH Voter Fraud confirmed! over 6 years ago

    > "..the exit polls from CNN showed Clinton winning."

    No.
    Those were the released Exit polls which are adjusted after the Election results.

    The unadjusted Exit polls showed Obama winning (as reported on Chris Matthews Hardball)

    See: http://www.bradblog.com/

    Read the articles posted there.
    The Vote Fraud is clearly demonstrated.



  • All the Diebold vote fraud is documented right here:
    http://www.bradblog.com/





  • All the Diebold vote fraud is documented right here:
    http://www.bradblog.com/



  • on a comment on Open Thread over 6 years ago



    All the Diebold vote fraud is documented right here:
    http://www.bradblog.com/



  • on a comment on Open Thread over 6 years ago



    All the Diebold vote fraud is documented right here:
    http://www.bradblog.com/



  • comment on a post Diebold and New Hampshire over 6 years ago



    All the Diebold vote fraud is documented right here:
    http://www.bradblog.com/



Diaries

Advertise Blogads