Robertson calls for assassination of Hugo Chavez

As the dailykos version of the story read:  Radical Cleric issues fatwa to kill the President! Crossposted from Dameocrat Blog - U.S. & World - Robertson Calls for Chavez's Assassination: "VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. -- Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson (search) suggested on-air that American operatives assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez (search) to stop his country from becoming 'a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism.'

We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability,' Robertson said Monday on the Christian Broadcast Network's 'The 700 Club.'

'We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator,' he continued. 'It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.

Chavez has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics of President Bush (search), accusing the United States of conspiring to topple his government and possibly backing plots to assassinate him. U.S. officials have called the accusations ridiculous.

'You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it,' Robertson said. 'It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... and I don't think any oil shipments will stop.'"

There are several problems with this proposal.

1)One Chavez isn't a dictator. He has been elected three times already. The last time was a recall election monitored by the Carter Center, which Jimmy Carter himself declared legimate. He won by close to 60% of the vote. Unlike Ohio 2004 and Florida 2000, the devices used in this election left a paper trail.

2)The coup wasn't popular. If it was Chavez wouldn't have won the recall that occured after the coup. Also isn't is stupid to have a coup when you can just recall someone who is unpopular? Maybe the reason they had a coup was because they knew the people weren't really on their side?

3)Chavez has only threatened to stop oil shipments if there is an attempt on his life. His successors are actually the ones that vowed to do this. By threatening Chavez, you are making this event more likely. You are also proving him absolutely right in his fear that the US is trying to kill him.

4)Isn't Robertson suppose to believe in the 10 commandments.  You know, "Thou shall not kill!  Though shall not steal!  Though shall not lie!"Looks to me like you have broken several here Pat!  You are killing Chavez, just because he wants to govern his own country and because you want to take his oil instead of having to buy it lawfully, and you are lying to justify it.  You are nothing but a big time thug Pat!

Because of this argument you Pat, have actually convinced me of the necessity of putting the 10 commandments up in the classrooms of all the red states!

Tags: (all tags)



What Communist?
The Russians... the Chinese who are becoming more capitalistic than the US....

Maybe he is afraid of Cuba????

by Parker 2005-08-23 06:52AM | 0 recs
Who would Jesus assassinate?
by KTinOhio 2005-08-23 09:07AM | 0 recs
He's gone too far,
and he's completely divorced from reality. He's lost his nut if he thinks that "[extremely religous] muslim extremism" and "[completely athesitic] communist infiltration" will work together.
by Hannula 2005-08-23 09:47AM | 0 recs
Re: He's gone too far,
No he is just greedy...

He was furious when the Liberian president was deposed... turns out his church(company) owned diamond mines there... that was okay for the government to torture the population just as long as he was getting his diamonds.

by Parker 2005-08-23 10:16AM | 0 recs
Do you realize
that you just demonstrated how sociopathic the Reep worldview is?

You just compared shouting to a crowd at a pep rally to advocating the murder of a foreign leader.

Come on: elaborate. It'll be an interesting object lesson in the kind of bizarre, twisted worldview we're dealing with.

by catastrophile 2005-08-23 12:26PM | 0 recs
Pat Rob.
Has always been crazy i guess he thinks that now that the Republicans have power over the press he will be okay probibly will.
by Liberal 2005-08-23 12:20PM | 0 recs
Poor Pat
Evidently, he sees the President having trouble with Iraq, so deflect the bad away from Iraq he talks about assassinations of other militant leaders.  Just like Bush deflected attention away from not capturing Usuma, and deflected attention away from that and captured Hussein in order to get reelected!
by mleflo2 2005-08-23 12:50PM | 0 recs


Advertise Blogads