Limbaugh responds to Pres with vomit, defense of Merrill Lynch

As Icebergslim notes in her popular dailykos diary, Obama recently educated Republicans on the wisdom of ignoring Rush Limbaugh. Yesterday, Limpaugh responded by spewing the following verbal diarrhea (click link at your own risk) from his sullied pie hole:


There are two things going on here. One prong of the Great Unifier's plan is to isolate elected Republicans from their voters and supporters by making the argument about me and not about his plan. He is hoping that these Republicans will also publicly denounce me and thus marginalize me. And who knows? Are ideological and philosophical ties enough to keep the GOP loyal to their voters? Meanwhile, the effort to foist all blame for this mess on the private sector continues unabated when most of the blame for this current debacle can be laid at the feet of the Congress and a couple of former presidents. And there is a strategic reason for this.

Actually, Obama is trying to make the argument about his plan, and his words were a good faith effort to herd the sheep-like Republicans away from the Rush Limbaughs of the world who desire to lead them over a cliff.

The impotent blowhard goes on to don a tin-foil hat and accuse Obama of putting politics and a potential Democrat permajority before the country's economic well-being. According to Limpbaugh's drug-crazed logic, Obama seeks to manipulate the electorate by luring them into an economic plan brimming with poisons such as job creation and economic relief for the middle class and poor.

Limbaugh also asserts that Obama's plan threatens the future of tax cuts, and, amazingly, he defends Merrill Lynch's 1.2 million dollar redecoration of an executive's suite in the same inebriated breath. As a lifelong, loyal Democrat and a fervent supporter of the current president, I urge Rush Limbaugh to keep up the good work:

Obama was angry that Merrill Lynch used $1.2 million of TARP money to remodel an executive suite. Excuse me, but didn't Merrill have to hire a decorator and contractor? Didn't they have to buy the new furnishings? What's the difference in that and Merrill loaning that money to a decorator, contractor and goods supplier to remodel Warren Buffet's office? Either way, stimulus in the private sector occurs.

Tags: Barack Obama, Recommended, Rush Limbaugh, TARP (all tags)

Comments

19 Comments

Limbo is a waste of space. Do we need to bother

where he is commiting his verbal diarrhea anymore?

by louisprandtl 2009-01-24 05:20PM | 0 recs
if limbaugh was a cat...

this would be him:

by canadian gal 2009-01-24 05:22PM | 0 recs
KO asked the other night...

Is Rush Limbaugh molting? Look at him. Does he look like he's about to shed his skin lately? It must be the drugs.

by iohs2008 2009-01-24 07:02PM | 0 recs
Re: KO asked the other night...

Are you sure it was Oldermann? I thought that was Jon Stewart.

by vcalzone 2009-01-25 06:33AM | 0 recs
I stand corrected

It was John Stewart.

Still, I love how KO doctored the image of Rush with the cigar to make the cigar appear extra long.

by iohs2008 2009-01-25 07:16PM | 0 recs
I have nothing to add but:

by sricki 2009-01-24 10:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Limbaugh responds

shameful

by verona 2009-01-25 03:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Limbaugh responds

alright, who mojo'd this guy?

by Jess81 2009-01-25 05:35AM | 0 recs
I thought he was referring to Limbaugh as shameful

If commenter was referring to my diary, my mojo still stands :-)

by Bob Sackamento 2009-01-25 05:41AM | 0 recs
Re: I thought he was referring to Limbaugh

That is how I understood verona's comment also. I believe Jess meant well, coming to your defense, a simple misunderstanding. Thanks for the excellent diary Bob.

by phoenixdreamz 2009-01-25 06:06AM | 0 recs
Re: I thought he was referring to Limbaugh

Jess follows me around HRing all my comments.  I'm so inside it's head, it can't help it anymore.

It must hate me.  I laugh at it's impotence.

by verona 2009-01-25 09:43PM | 0 recs
Re: I thought he was referring to Limbaugh

What is shameful is that you guys, instead of debate, simply make fun of Rush's past drug use and his weight.

You are impotent, all of you.

by verona 2009-01-25 09:51PM | 0 recs
I think Jess was right afterall.

I'm taking back my mojo.

by Bob Sackamento 2009-01-26 01:12AM | 0 recs
Re: I think Jess was right afterall.

Told you.

by Jess81 2009-01-26 10:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Limbaugh responds

Your mother mojod me.

by verona 2009-01-25 09:50PM | 0 recs
Warren Buffet?

Rush, you frickin idiot, Warren WOULDN'T drop stockholder funds outrageoulsy decorating his office...EVEN if the economy was rolling!

He has, oh, what is the word I am searching for...

Ethics. Yeah, Ethics.

I know that is word missing from the Wall Street vocabulary, but YOU Rush, using Buffet as an example is like Pol Pot quoting the Mahatma....

by WashStateBlue 2009-01-25 06:03AM | 0 recs
Re: Warren Buffet?

It ain't that, even. The money coming from the government is not coming to help their businesses, it is coming to help OTHER businesses and, more importantly, private borrowers. Using it to give out executive bonuses or redecorate puts money in the economy, sure, but it doesn't benefit the country.

by vcalzone 2009-01-25 06:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Warren Buffet?

Exactly.  He's been sucking the supply side teat for so long though that handing out money exclusively to multi-billionaires so that they can spend it and stimulate the economy doesn't sound ludicrous on its face.

by Jess81 2009-01-25 12:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Warren Buffet?

Stop following me around, you ugly freak of nature.

by verona 2009-01-25 09:43PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads