I heard that conference. The lawyer said that they will step back and think about it; but will keep their options open. I think today's count was just put it out of their reach. Besides the ground for challenge is really weak - a) claim that double counting net Franken 110 votes and b) 44 absentee ballots should have been counted (the 600 number is just a smokescreen). Those add up-to less than 225. I think Coleman will rather save money for other legal problems that he is going to have.
Making any effort to criticise Israel. Come on, did u miss all those statements on economy that he has been making and the economic bills that he is working upon. Please dont be a blind follower of a President, otherwise we are no better than Republicans.
for invocation. Even the so-called centrist did not invite Falwell for such an honor. Plus this just reinforces the lingering suspicion that people had about Obama's less-than-enthusiastic support for gay issues (remember the refusal to take a photograph with Gavin Newsom). No I am sorry, that you are defending this really despicable decision of Obama is beyond comprehension. Maybe you are taking your Obama-infatuation a bit too far.
about GBLT isssues as we wanted him to be. In his desire to reach across the aisle he has gone and shakken th devil's hand. I have no doubt that GBLT civil right issues will take a long step backwards under Obama's presidency.
There is no possible way that Obama will leave only a small mark on history (although I think history will also judge Clinton better than you just did). Johnson lived in more turbulent times and hence left a better mark. Also, Johnson had an able administrator following his Presidency: for all his faults, Nixon was one smart guy which cannot be said abt the man who followed Bush. If Gore had won (which he did), this country would have been a much different place. Part of Obama's legacy will be determined by who follows him.
Like how US continues to exploit the various regions of the world. How do you think US maintains is economic superpower. Why does it sponsor overthrowing of governements and sometimes sending its own army so that it has access to the rich resources. So stop STEALING first before blaming others for it. Besides, I do not see how India STOLE ur jobs; it is the IT companies who went to India. What is it that India exactly did to get the companies in India: send in their army?
Care to explain how the space program helped defense in 1950's and 1960's. Besides, if US is so rich, why do you a) complain about some developing country getting some of your wealth and b) send in ur army to steal resources from other countries (does Iraq ring a bell?)
Did US need the space program or the nuclear weapons in 1950's and 1960's or even now when a significant population lives in poverty and does not have access to healthcare. And stop blaming India for STEALING US jobs. Indeed a good case can be made that it is the WEST which has been stealing resources from the developing world for Centuries now. You are just showing urself to be an ignorant racist.