You own this sight right? You make money off of it I assume?
You just lost a loyal reader. This really sets the bar low, and you have really lost any credibility in my eyes. Commentary, criticism, etc are all valid, but this crap is deserving of a troll rating as far as I'm concerned. You can take your "our version of Bush" and shove it. You apparently have nothing of substance left to add to the debate.
"if you include Florida and exclude MI and the undemocratic estimates from caucus states, then Hillary is just behind in the popular vote by slightly over 440,000 votes."
So wait... If you pick and choose which states to count, Hillary is only 440,000 votes behind? Wow she is kicking butt! Just a suggestion: It would be even closer if you exclude Maryland, Virginia Georgia, Illinois and the Carolinas.
And the argument that that is only 1% of the "40,000,000 million" expected to vote in the primary? First of all, that means 40 billion, second of all, does the 40 million"include Florida and exclude MI and the undemocratic estimates from caucus states?" Because my guess is that the 40 million is total voters, including the caucus states, so your percentage is based on faulty math as well. Desperate, desperate, desperate....
Your statement makes no sense to me. But I will say this, if Obama isn't enough to unify the party, McCain sure as hell is. If 8 years of Bush aren't enough for you, don't blame Obama or anyone else for your porblems. or maybe your one of those people who doesn't "need a president."
no one said the white dem vote doesn't count. I am sure it was an honest mistake on Jerome's part (hoentsly, no snark here) that people pointed out. Your comment, though, seems to indicate that you think only white dems should be counted...