by Mikeb302000, Sat Nov 12, 2011 at 12:48:15 AM EST
The Times Union reports on the sentencing and her reaction.
I'm not sure if we came to a consensus last time we talked about this one, so just in case I didn't make myself clear that time, here's my take on it. She's going to jail for the wrong reason. The District Attorney said it right.
"Barbara was not the victim in this case," Assistant District Attorney Debra Pomodore said. "Raymond, her husband, was the victim."
I'm all for women's rights. I'm the one who keeps linking to my "guns are bad news for women" post. But in this case, what she did is no different than all the other cases we read about in which someone snaps and uses a gun.
Temporary insanity might have worked, but not the battered wife defense. That's my take on it. What do you think?
Please leave a comment.
(cross posted at Mikeb302000)
by Caro, Sun Jul 29, 2007 at 04:53:45 AM EDT
By David Podvin
The police officer put a gun to the driver's head and demanded that she orally copulate him. To avoid being murdered she complied, after which he provided the choice of victimized silence or fatal reprisal. The woman tempted fate by contacting the district attorney, who used DNA testing to contradict the officer's denial that any sexual contact had occurred. During the prosecution's case the accused was proven to have told one self-incriminating lie after another. The defense attorney then played a familiar trump card, labeling the victim a woman of easy virtue "with whom sex was always an implied option". It took the jury of eleven males and a female less than two hours to acquit.
MORE MORE MORE