#NotIntendedtoBeaFactualStatement

Kudos to Comedy Central's Stephen Colbert for keeping the pressure on Arizona Senator John Kyl for his gross indecency on his non-factual claim made on the Senate dais during last week's budget showdown that abortion services are "well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does.” In fact, abortion represents only three percent of Planned Parenthood services.

After Think Progress pointed out the glaring factual error, a Kyl spokesperson said that the Senator's remark on the dais of the Senate "was not intended to be a factual statement, but rather to illustrate that Planned Parenthood, an organization that receives millions of taxpayer dollars, does subsidize abortions.”  How a Senator, and who as the Minority Whip is the number two in the Republican leadership in the Senate, could go on the dais of the Senate make such an outlandish statement and then hide behind the even more buffoonish defense that such a falsehood was not intended to be a factual statement is reprehensible. Senator Kyl merits a formal reprimand from the Senate. Facts are not just stubborn things, they should be sacrosanct.

After skewering Senator Kyl on his show, The Colbert Report, the comedian has taken to Twitter with a series of non-factual statements about the junior Senator from Arizona.

No less egregious, boy I am overusing this word these days but what isn't egregious these days, was the claim made by the anchors of Fox & Friends that Planned Parenthood's services could be found at any Walgreens. While the right has long been prone to untruths, the lies are getting more desperately and patently absurd. Let's hope the American people are paying attention.

Still I've been monitoring the Arizona press and while the story has been carried in both the Phoenix and Tuscon newspapers, neither paper has come out with an editorial lambasting the Senator Kyl for his blatant disregard for facts. It's a sorry state of affairs when late night comedians have to do the work that the media should be doing, lambasting what is clearly unacceptable in a political debate. If we abandon the truth, what else have we?

Distracting Obsessions

The unfortunate and troubling circumstances surrounding the rather arbitary arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates should not become a distracting obsession given the urgent necessities of the body politic. If a Sargeant in the Cambridge Police Department is upset that the President of the United States considers that said officer "acted stupidly" that's his problem, not the nation's.

While it is extremely unsettling that an officer acted in a manner that was seemingly abusive of rank, it is more unsettling how easily distracted the media becomes with issues of less than paramount importance.

The Hill provides colour on the White House reaction to an increasingly comical media circus.

President Obama regrets the distraction that his comments about a police incident in Cambridge, Mass., caused, according to a White House spokesman.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Friday that if the president knew "just how much of an overall distraction and obsession it would be, I think he would regret distracting [the media] with obsessions."

Gibbs did not say Obama apologized for his comments.

Obama started a maelstrom with his comments at Wednesday's primetime press conference, where he said police officer James Crowley and the Cambridge Police acted "stupidly" after Crowley arrested African-American Harvard scholar -- and longtime Obama friend -- Henry Louis Gates for not producing identification after breaking into his own locked home.

The ensuing fallout gathered steam Thursday and overshadowed the White House's push for progress on healthcare reform before Congress leaves for August recess.

Gibbs, speaking to reporters in his West Wing office Friday morning, said the president has no plans to call either Crowley or Gates.

Since Obama spoke Wednesday night, Gibbs and the president have seen their efforts at message control on healthcare collapse.

Police unions have blasted the president's remarks, and Crowley told reporters that Obama was out of line to weigh in on a situation when he did not know all the facts.

A man was arrested in his own home for no apparent reason other than an act of capriciousness on the part of a law enforcement officer. Even if you grant that Dr. Gates had become agitated, it is hard to believe that once Dr. Gates had proved that he was in his own home that the officer had any reason to remain on the premises.

Yet yesterday, as the President traveled to Cleveland for a town hall meeting on health care reform, Press Secretary Gibbs was inundated by questions aboard Air Force One about the President's comment on the Gates affair.

According to a White House transcript from Gibbs's conversation with reporters on the plane, he was asked 14 full or partial questions about Obama's remarks and seven about the healthcare town hall. Talk about misplaced priorities.

Update [2009-7-24 15:44:28 by Charles Lemos]: The President has made a clarifying statement. "Because this has been ratcheting up and I obviously helped to contribute ratcheting it up, I wanted to make clear in my choice of words I think I unfortunately gave an impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sergeant Crowley specifically," the President said."I could have calibrated those words differently," he said, adding that he had invited Crowley and Gates to meet him at the White House. I'll add that my point is not to speak to the details of the case but rather to bemoan that the Gates Affair has become a distracting obsession for the media.

There's more...

Diaries

Advertise Blogads