by MAL Contends, Thu Oct 04, 2007 at 01:38:48 PM EDT
Remember the guy who was tasered for asking Sen. John Kerry questions?
Felony charges are being pursued.
This is what we have become. Ask a Senator challenging questions and you lose your rights.
Become passionate, and you get what you deserve (as some say), not to mention swiftboated by none other than the Senator's office.
I know there are a lot of Sen. Kerry supporters here; but this is wrong. I ask if Rudy Giuliani were the speaker, would not our reactions to Mr. Meyer's plight be different? Our indignation aroused?
by Intrepid Liberal Journal, Sun Jun 24, 2007 at 12:44:09 PM EDT
The topic below was originally posted in my blog, the Intrepid Liberal Journal as well as the Independent Bloggers Alliance, the Peace Tree and Worldwide Sawdust.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
So reads the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. However, the Constitution does not prevent employers from encroaching upon the free speech of their employees. Even so, most Americans assume their right to free speech is protected in all aspects of their life - including their jobs. The reality is quite different.
by Joseph Hughes, Wed Apr 18, 2007 at 07:07:57 AM EDT
Looking back at the exchange of ideas that started with this story
and now continues with this one
, I'd like to further engage in the discussion of the Don Imus saga, specifically as it relates to the free-speech issues so important in today's society. To that end, I'd also like to dive into the issues Matt, a journalism graduate school friend, brought up in his latest comments
by Joseph Hughes, Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 01:54:16 PM EDT
In response to something I wrote
about the Don Imus saga Friday, Matt, a journalism graduate school friend of mine, replied and made his case
quite succinctly. Another friend, Karl, weighed in
, as did I
. With our back-and-forth in mind, I'd like to add some detail to my point-of-view. If I may make so bold, Matt's entire argument can be summarized in his own words: "By calling for (and ultimately causing) the firing of Don Imus, it sets a bad precedent for free speech." I disagree, and, though I am as firm a defender of free speech as he, I would like to take this argument in a different direction, speaking to both the issues of our freedoms and the role of the people-powered movement in the debate.
by mrickard, Fri Apr 06, 2007 at 09:12:33 AM EDT
Freedom of speech is under attack in Florida where current bills in the House and Senate are threatening to restrict citizens from voter registration activities and leafleting around shopping centers, parking lots and other commercial property.