Progressive Democrat Newsletter Issue 240

Welcome to 2010. Hope everyone had a good break.

In 2010 we still have a long way to go with our economic recovery. And, as I have been saying for more than 5 years, the best way to revitalize our economy is through conversion to a green economy. Focusing on energy solutions like solar, wind, small hydroelectric, methane capture, biodiesel, etc. we create American jobs, produce energy more locally (hence improving the efficiency of energy delivery) and reduce our dependence on nations like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. The United States has dragged its feet on this. As individuals we have generally been reluctant to make the personal decisions necessary to create a sound market for clean energy. And our local, state and Federal governments have been painfully slow to put in the incentives and regulations that would encourage such a shift. In 2010 we have to turn the tide both as individuals and at the level of government. This is critical both for job creation and for addressing global warming.

There's more...

18 Reps Call for Up-or-Down Vote on Surge. Peace Groups Target 100. Is One of These Your Rep.?

Breaking, 18 U.S. Representatives led by Jim McGovern, Barbara Lee, and Walter Jones (R-NC) have called on Speaker Pelosi to provide "the opportunity for a separate debate and up-or-down vote on the President's proposal to escalate the United States military presence in Afghanistan." The up or down vote would be stripped of bundling tactics like including unemployment benefits or, as Afterdowningstreet's David Swanson quips, funds to "save the kittens." This comes on the day a new Facebook group Stop the Surge is announcing a call campaign from now until December 24th, targeting the House members who co-signed McGovern's bill HR 2404 demanding an exit strategy, to commit to a "no" vote on escalation funding. It is feared that the additional $50 billion per year for the surge will be the "anvil" upon which any further action on domestic initiatives, such as health care reform, will be crushed.  The Facebook group states:


"The following reps have cosponsored McGovern's HR 2404 demanding an exit strategy. They know they didn't hear one in Obama's West Point speech announcing a surge of 30,000 more troops. They now need to cosponsor Lee's HR 3699 blocking the funding of the surge. No money, no surge."

The press release from Rep. Lee's office states:
 

"President Obama spent three months reviewing and deliberating United States strategy in Afghanistan. At the very least, Congress owes our men and women in uniform an honest debate regarding the benefits, costs, affordability, and strategic importance of a military escalation...combating terrorism around the globe will not be fulfilled by sidestepping this critical debate."

"Those of us who have signed this letter have differing views on how to move forward in Afghanistan," said Rep. Jones. "I, for example, do not believe that `doubling down' on the strategy of propping up the Karzai regime in Afghanistan is the correct strategy, but rather we should work with and through the tribal structures that have existed in the country for centuries.  We can all, however, agree that this is an issue that deserves a debate.  The American people deserve a debate on something that could so deeply affect their loved ones and their country."

Text of letter and 18 co-signers HERE. The letter signaled a return of the Legislative Branch into the decision-making process on war, reiterating the importance of Congress' role and responsibility.

This follows a speech on the House Floor by Cheney-why-don't-you-STFU Congressman Alan Grayson calling for no escalation funding.


The Facebook group strategy of targeting the 100 co-sponsors of HR 2404, mirrors film director Robert Greenwald's Rethink Afghanistan campaign, a large grassroots initiative which demands a civilian solution to a problem which, the group maintains, has no military solution and in fact can only be exacerbated by expanded military operations.  "Rethink" has spawned hundreds of Meet-ups and showings of Greenwald's film "Rethink Afghanistan" in homes and in public spaces across the country (full disclosure: I am interviewed in the film.)  

An enormously broad range of Afghan women's activists, experts both military and civilian, Afghan elders building tribal coalitions for security, and others have called the troop escalation a bad idea which will turn what is essentially an insurgency driven by hunger, starvation, and the red cape of foreign troops on Afghan soil, into a united, nationalist uprising which will only benefit the Taliban and the Karzai warlord government, not the Afghan people.  "Zoya" of the Afghan women's organization RAWA, who has conducted a US speaking tour under a disguised identity for her safety upon her return to Afghanistan has said:

"RAWA strongly believes that throwing more troops in will not solve the crisis of Afghanistan.  It will even make the situation worse than before."

Malalai Joya, the Afghan woman legislator who was thrown out of Parliament upon her criticism of "warlords" in the government, and who has already survived numerous assassination attempts, has called for US withdrawal as the wisest course, and says that the Afghan people are capable of turning on the Taliban themselves if the US would stop making them stronger by its presence:

"[If] these occupation forces leave Afghanistan and their governments leave us alone then we'll know what to do with our destiny - if they leave us a little bread and peace, because these warlords and the Taliban have no fruit among the heart of my people. My people hate them."

Chief Zazai of the Tribal Union in the Zazi valley, whose father was assassinated by Mullah Omar and who has united 11 tribes in his area as guarantors of security who pledge loyalty neither to the Taliban nor the Karzai government, says"

"To send more troops means to create more new battles, I think we have already got a few nasty fronts in the south where the British soldiers and U.S. Marines are fighting almost non-stop and of course more troops means more body bags and that itself would be an alarming sign. In Vietnam the U.S. had over half a million soldiers and still the generals were asking for more. I would suggest that Gen. McChrystal instead explore better alternatives on the ground rather than asking for more troops."

Numerous foreign policy actors have said it is a mistake to believe that there is no means of mounting a civilian assistance solution which would reach the poorest of Afghans.  Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank which finances Afghanistan's widely hailed National Solidarity Program, notes:

there are steps one can take to make corruption harder and less likely. Afghanistan's reform-minded finance ministers have taken practical steps to simplify government processes and add transparency to reduce opportunities for corruption...

Zoellick told the Washington Post:

"locally led projects are the most effective. The National Solidarity Program...empowers more than 22,000 elected, village-level councils to decide on their development priorities -- from building a school to irrigation to electrification. So far, the program has reached more than 19 million Afghans in 34 provinces, with grants averaging $33,000. Development owned by the community can survive amid conflict: When an NSP-funded school was attacked in August 2006, the villagers defended it."

And in a remarkable Boston Review article by journalist Nir Rosen, Rosen concludes:

"Afghanistan should have been easier. Eight years after overthrowing the Taliban--the world's most detested and backward regime, which provided no service to its people--the United States has restored many brutal warlords the Taliban expelled. The authority the United States established is a failure, corrupt and brutal. Americans and their allies manage to kill innocent civilians, and the Taliban have once again become attractive to many Afghans. A few tens of thousands of troops will not turn things around."

Rethinkafghanistan and the Facebook "Defund the Surge" are asking citizens to call the following congressmembers, who have demanded an exit strategy, rather than the open-ended commitment "subject to conditions on the ground" which President Obama described in his West Point speech. Calls from constituents are most effective.  Is your congressman one of these?  Then you have power.  Let's give our young brothers and sisters in uniform  the best Christmas ever.  "Merry Christmas, trooper.  You're not going to Afghanistan."

Representative     District     Phone

Bartlett, Roscoe G.   MD-6   202-225-2721

Berkley, Shelley    NV-1    202-225-5965

Berry, Marion    AR-1   202-225-4076

Bishop, Timothy H.   NY-1   202-225-3826

Braley, Bruce L.   IA-1   202-225-2911

Carson, Andre   IN-7   202-225-4011

Christensen, Donna M.  VI   202-225-1790

Clay, Wm. Lacy   MO-1   202-225-2406

Cleaver, Emanuel    MO-5   202-225-4535

Costello, Jerry F.   IL-12   202-225-5661

Davis, Danny K.   IL-7   202-225-5006

DeFazio, Peter A.   OR-4   202-225-6416

Delahunt, William D.   MA-10   202-225-3111

Doggett, Lloyd   TX-25   202-225-4865

Duncan, John J.   TN-2   202-225-5435

Farr, Sam   CA-17    202-225-2861

Fattah, Chaka   PA-2   202-225-4001

Fudge, Marcia L.   OH-11  202-225-7032

Gutierrez, Luis V.   IL-4   202-225-8203

Hare, Phil   IL-17   202-225-5905

Harman, Jane  CA-36   202-225-8220

Hastings, Alcee L.  FL-23  202-225-1313

Himes, James A.  CT-4   202-225-5541

Hodes, Paul W.  NH-2    202-225-5206

Holt, Rush D.  NJ-12  202-225-5801

Honda, Michael M.  CA-15  202-225-2631

Jackson, Jesse L.  IL-2  202-225-0773

Kagen, Steve  WI-8  202-225-5665

Kaptur, Marcy  OH-9  202-225-4146

Kilpatrick, Carolyn C.  MI-13  202-225-2261

Kilroy, Mary Jo  OH-15  202-225-2015

Lewis, John  GA-5  202-225-3801

Loebsack, David  IA-2  202-225-6576

Lujan, Ben Ray  NM-3  202-225-6190

Maloney, Carolyn  NY-14  202-225-7944

Matsui, Doris O.  CA-5  202-225-7163

Michaud, Michael H.  ME-2  202-225-6306

Moore, Gwen  WI-4  202-225-4572

Napolitano, Grace F.  CA-38  202-225-5256

Oberstar, James L.  MN-8   202-225-6211

Olver, John W.  MA-1  202-225-5335

Pastor, Ed  AZ-4  202-225-4065

Pingree, Chellie  ME-1   202-225-6116

Polis, Jared  CO-2   202-225-2161

Price, David E.  NC-4  202-225-1784

Richardson, Laura  CA-37  202-225-7924

Rohrabacher, Dana  CA-46  202-225-2415

Rothman, Steven R.  NJ-9  202-225-5061

Rush, Bobby L.  IL-1  202-225-4372

Ryan, Tim   OH-17  202-225-5261

Schakowsky, Janice D.  IL-9  202-225-2111

Schrader, Kurt  OR-5  202-225-5711

Serrano, Jose E.  NY-16  202-225-4361

Sestak, Joe  PA-7  202-225-2011

Shea-Porter, Carol  NH-1  202-225-5456

Slaughter, Louise McIntosh  NY-28  202-225-3615

Space, Zachary T.  OH-18  202-225-6265

Speier, Jackie  CA-12  202-225-3531

Spratt, John M. Jr.  SC-5  202-225-5501

Stearns, Cliff  FL-6  202-225-5744

Stupak, Bart  MI-1  202-225-4735

Sullivan, John  OK-1  202-225-2211

Sutton, Betty  OH-13  202-225-3401

Thompson, Bennie G.  MS-2   202-225-5876

Thompson, Mike   CA-1  202-225-3311

Tierney, John F.   MA-6  202-225-8020

Tsongas, Niki  MA-5  202-225-3411

Walz, Timothy J.  MN-1  202-225-2472

Waxman, Henry A.  CA-30  202-225-3976

Welch, Peter  VT  202-225-4115

Whitfield, Ed  KY-1  202-225-3115

Woolsey, Lynn C.  CA-6  202-225-5161

Wu, David  OR-1  202-225-0855

Yarmuth, John A.   KY-3  202-225-5401   

WHERE DO YOUR CONGRESSMAN'S MILITARY CONTRACTOR CAMPAIGN DOLLARS COME FROM? Go to Maplight.org ("Defense") 

There's more...

Brave New Congressman Grayson Calls for Halt to War Funding

Speaking on the House floor today the congressman who on Hardball told Dick Cheney to "STFU" took up Rethinkafghanistan.org's 100,000 signature petition to halt funding for any troop escalation into Afghanistan.  As of yesterday the petition had 80,000 signatures, 20,000 short of the 100,000 goal.  A Facebook call by Rethink, a project of director Robert Greenwald's Brave New Films, resulted in the additional 20,000 being gathered within 24 hours.

Activists are targeting about 70 congressmen who have demanded an exit strategy by co-sponsoring Rep. McGovern's HR2404, who have not yet committed to voting no on escalation funding.  Activists say that President Obama did not deliver an exit strategy in his West Point speech, but an open-ended presence subject to the vague caveat of "conditions on the ground."  Activists say the first step in an exit strategy is to stop "entrancing," which leads to quagmire and increased hostilities in which yet more troops will be required and requested after a period of time. Following is the action item suggested by peace activists, to be commenced immediately in support of Grayson's call on the floor of the House this morning.

Phone numbers and short script to congressmen:

HR 3699:

 A BILL...To prohibit any increase in the number of members of the United States Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan...No funds appropriated or otherwise made available under any provision of law may be obligated or expended to increase the number of members of the United States Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan so that the number of members serving in Afghanistan exceeds the number so serving on the date of the enactment of this Act.
 

Suggested script:

Hi, I'd like to leave a message for the Representative regarding a bill on the war in Afghanistan.  First I'd like to thank Rep.­­­­____ for cosponsoring Jim McGovern's H.R. 2404, which demands an exit strategy from Afghanistan.  President Obama clearly did not give an exit strategy in his speech at West Point.  Therefore, we think the representative should take the next step and commit to voting "no" on funding to send any more troops to Afghanistan, by sponsoring Barbara Lee's H.R. 3699.  Please co-sponsor Congresswoman Lee's HR 3699.  Thank you.

Representative     District     Phone

Bartlett, Roscoe G.   MD-6   202-225-2721

Berkley, Shelley    NV-1    202-225-5965

Berry, Marion    AR-1   202-225-4076

Bishop, Timothy H.   NY-1   202-225-3826

Braley, Bruce L.   IA-1   202-225-2911

Carson, Andre   IN-7   202-225-4011

Christensen, Donna M.  VI   202-225-1790

Clay, Wm. Lacy   MO-1   202-225-2406

Cleaver, Emanuel    MO-5   202-225-4535

Costello, Jerry F.   IL-12   202-225-5661

Davis, Danny K.   IL-7   202-225-5006

DeFazio, Peter A.   OR-4   202-225-6416

Delahunt, William D.   MA-10   202-225-3111

Doggett, Lloyd   TX-25   202-225-4865

Duncan, John J.   TN-2   202-225-5435

Farr, Sam   CA-17    202-225-2861

Fattah, Chaka   PA-2   202-225-4001

Fudge, Marcia L.   OH-11  202-225-7032

Gutierrez, Luis V.   IL-4   202-225-8203

Hare, Phil   IL-17   202-225-5905

Harman, Jane  CA-36   202-225-8220

Hastings, Alcee L.  FL-23  202-225-1313

Himes, James A.  CT-4   202-225-5541

Hodes, Paul W.  NH-2    202-225-5206

Holt, Rush D.  NJ-12  202-225-5801

Honda, Michael M.  CA-15  202-225-2631

Jackson, Jesse L.  IL-2  202-225-0773

Kagen, Steve  WI-8  202-225-5665

Kaptur, Marcy  OH-9  202-225-4146

Kilpatrick, Carolyn C.  MI-13  202-225-2261

Kilroy, Mary Jo  OH-15  202-225-2015

Lewis, John  GA-5  202-225-3801

Loebsack, David  IA-2  202-225-6576

Lujan, Ben Ray  NM-3  202-225-6190

Maloney, Carolyn  NY-14  202-225-7944

Matsui, Doris O.  CA-5  202-225-7163

Michaud, Michael H.  ME-2  202-225-6306

Moore, Gwen  WI-4  202-225-4572

Napolitano, Grace F.  CA-38  202-225-5256

Oberstar, James L.  MN-8   202-225-6211

Olver, John W.  MA-1  202-225-5335

Pastor, Ed  AZ-4  202-225-4065

Pingree, Chellie  ME-1   202-225-6116

Polis, Jared  CO-2   202-225-2161

Price, David E.  NC-4  202-225-1784

Richardson, Laura  CA-37  202-225-7924

Rohrabacher, Dana  CA-46  202-225-2415

Rothman, Steven R.  NJ-9  202-225-5061

Rush, Bobby L.  IL-1  202-225-4372

Ryan, Tim   OH-17  202-225-5261

Schakowsky, Janice D.  IL-9  202-225-2111

Schrader, Kurt  OR-5  202-225-5711

Serrano, Jose E.  NY-16  202-225-4361

Sestak, Joe  PA-7  202-225-2011

Shea-Porter, Carol  NH-1  202-225-5456

Slaughter, Louise McIntosh  NY-28  202-225-3615

Space, Zachary T.  OH-18  202-225-6265

Speier, Jackie  CA-12  202-225-3531

Spratt, John M. Jr.  SC-5  202-225-5501

Stearns, Cliff  FL-6  202-225-5744

Stupak, Bart  MI-1  202-225-4735

Sullivan, John  OK-1  202-225-2211

Sutton, Betty  OH-13  202-225-3401

Thompson, Bennie G.  MS-2   202-225-5876

Thompson, Mike   CA-1  202-225-3311

Tierney, John F.   MA-6  202-225-8020

Tsongas, Niki  MA-5  202-225-3411

Walz, Timothy J.  MN-1  202-225-2472

Waxman, Henry A.  CA-30  202-225-3976

Welch, Peter  VT  202-225-4115

Whitfield, Ed  KY-1  202-225-3115

Woolsey, Lynn C.  CA-6  202-225-5161

Wu, David  OR-1  202-225-0855

Yarmuth, John A.   KY-3  202-225-5401   

WHERE DO YOUR CONGRESSMAN'S MILITARY CONTRACTOR CAMPAIGN DOLLARS COME FROM?  Go to Maplight.org ("Defense")

There's more...

Reform moves through the House

I applaud the The Financial Reform bill that made its way out of the House with a lot of good reform measures included. When you look into the massive unaccounted for giveaways that the Fed is involved in, worth Trillions, number one on the list is the Grayson-Paul amendment to audit the Fed, which was included in the bill.

The "Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009" now has to get through the US Senate in whatever form it takes there, and we can begin to see some needed reform.  Congressman John Garamendi has more on the bill in a post here.


There's more...

We have a few options

Between Alan Grayson in the House, and Russ Feingold in the Senate, the Democrats have a couple of truth-tellers that are not afraid to take on Obama's desire to drag the Democrats into supporting an escalation of the occupation of Afghanistan.

Russ Feingold rips Afghanistan decision:

Feingold, flanked by four members of the House of Representatives who share his views, told reporters during a news conference on Capitol Hill that he disagrees with Obama's policy -- set to officially be revealed to the nation this evening during a televised prime time address -- even though he knows the president is doing what he thinks is right.

"This is a mistake, to move in the direction of a huge troop build-up," Feingold said. Obama, the senator added, "is doing what he thinks is right. We just disagree."

Feingold said he would consider pushing for several measures to stop Obama from fully implementing his new Afghanistan strategy. However, he said the Senate should not delay other matters, including the health care reform bill, to focus on the war.

"As far as I'm concerned, everything would be on the table to prevent this error from occurring," he said.


Alan Grayson:


Q: Congressman Grayson, do you think President Obama is leaving his base?

A: Yes.

A terrific interview of Grayson, whom I predict will easily win re-election; likewise Feingold.

The options are to stop this in the House or in the Senate. I don't believe Obama will find the votes of Democrats in the House-- he will have to lobby Republicans. It only takes one Senator.

There's more...

Diaries

Advertise Blogads