Netroots Alliance

BlogTalkRadio

Add to iTunes





Obama Me With Fries!

"I want to publicly acknowledge Hillary Clinton for the outstanding race that she has run.

"She is a great senator from New York she is an extraordinary leader of the Democratic party and she has made history alongside me over the last 16 months and I'm very proud to have competed against her."

--Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton

"I know Senator Obama understands what it is at stake here. It has been an honor to contest these primaries with him. It is an honor to call him my friend."

--Hillary Clinton on Barack Obama

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, two of the ablest politicians in recent memory, have declared an end to hostilities. Understanding that they share the same goals, with some respectful disagreement on how to achieve these goals, they are beginning the process of coming together to form a united front against John McCain in the fall.

As passionate partisans, it is now time for us to follow their lead and start the reconciliation process among the netroots so that our country can turn abruptly away from the edge of the cliff it's been skating along these past few years of the Bush administration, and start heading in a direction that restores our values and reunites our country.

That's why I say: Obama Me With Fries!

Hillary Wins Michigan!

I think there is a seriously important thing to keep in mind about Michigan.  Even though the Democratic race was not contested (and might not even count), the number of Democrats who voted was not so far behind the number of Republicans who voted a seriously contested event that does indeed count.

Now, let me suggest why I believe this is really, really important, Hillary received almost as many votes in her non-contest (328,151) as Mitt received in his real contest (337,847).  That is good news for Democrats.  We don't even have to throw a "real event," and people are showing up in numbers on a par with the Republicans.

VIDEO: Mike Gravel Channels Allen Ginsberg

Like Allen Ginsberg back from the dead.

Mike...

...meet Allen.

2008Central.net's Live Blog Of MSNBC Democratic Debate In Pennsylvania (October 30, 2007)

[Republished from 2008Central.net.  This live blog will be updated periodically on Donklephant.  For the latest, please visit the active post.]

We are ready to go!  The debate starts at 9pm EDT.  It will air on both MSNBC and on MSNBC.com and will be moderated by Brian Williams with supplemental questions from Tim Russert.  The debate is taking place at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

8:05: Less than an hour to go.  Currently working on getting some pictures from the press photo pool, although they're usually just taking the preliminary pictures about now, so it may still be too early...

8:11: Candidates from left to right: Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Dennis Kucinich, Bill Richardson.  And, if you're just dying to know, Brian Williams is indeed "happy to be back in Philadelphia."

9:02: Brian Williams introduces Drexel University by talking about the school's mascot, Mario The Dragon.

9:03: First question to Obama about whether or not he's going to get tough with Hillary Clinton.  He gives a solid response about changing politics.  Hillary's rebuttal was sure to ignore the fact that Obama even spoke and to note that the criticism she receives from the right is ample evidence that she is very different from the right.

9:06: John Edwards makes a point to use a positive tone when asked about using the harshest rhetoric in the campaign against Clinton. Clinton responds by referring to her record in very generic terms, and refers vaguely to battles in the 90s. She's referring more and more to the policies of the 90s, and she only does that when on defense.

9:08: Russert doesn't let Hillary dodge the question and frankly asks her about her Iran policy.  She adimately denies that the vote is a pretext for war.  Clinton loses her cool a bit and sounds like the guy that flipped out on the Bobs in that movie, Office Space.

9:13: It's Doddtime!  Dodd calls for leadership and notes that although the Kyl-Lieberman amendment is not an overt pretext for war, the 76 votes in favor of it could be used down the line in order to pressure support for military action.  Dodd notes that it was critical to oppose it in order to stop the trend.

9:14: Biden says, the president already had the authority to do everything that amendment called for and contends that the real harm in passing the amendment was that it feeds into the negative impressions of the United States abroad.  Says it was a bad foreign policy.  Ultimately, Dodd and Biden frame their answers on Kyl-Lieberman in a way that significantly hurts Clinton and adds credence to the attacks that Obama and Edwards have been laying.

9:15: Obama is asked about attacking Iran, and says it should not be the focus or the concern, and focuses on diplomacy while referencing the points Dodd and Biden made. He eventually concedes that should Iran be on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon that war would be an option.

9:17: Clinton notes that the amendment didn't give Bush any special powers.  Calls for action on Sen. Jim Webb's legislation, which explicitly requires the President to get approval from congress before taking military action in Iran.  somehow claims to agree with Biden on Iran, even though he spent his whole time criticizing her.Clinton reiterates that she will not let Iran get nuclear weapons, stresses diplomacy and economic sanctions.  Specifically, she mentions economic sanctions in regards to Libya and North Korea but does not mention the elephant in the room with sanctions - Iraq.

9:20: Edwards asks the obvious question of why Clinton voted for the resolution if she's as demanding for diplomacy as she claims.  Edwards goes on to chide Democrats for not standing up to the Bush administration.  I imagine that's a lot easier to do when you're not in the Senate any longer.

9:22: Kucinich gets to speak.  Invokes Article 2 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution and calls for the impeachment of President Bush.

9:24: Russert asks for a pledge to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb.  Hillary pledges that she will do everything she can do to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, John Edwards says he would take every responsible notion.  Obama notes that all of them likely want to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, says "let's short circuit this" and begins talking about the politics of fear and how they impact foreign policy and erode civil liberties.  Biden pledges to keep the U.S. safe and notes that "it is complicated stuff" (because, stuff really demonstrates just how complex it really is).  Biden goes on to put things into perspective and says that there are other more immediate problems that need to be considered when considering Iran.  Dodd talks about experience and says Pakistan is more immediate problem.  Richardson takes the bate and pledges to ensure that Iran does not get a nuclear, then points to his experience in foreign diplomacy.  He points to one of the hostages from Iraq whom he negotiated the release for (during the 90s, not now).  Kucinich asks the media to be more cautious with their rhetoric; calls for nuclear nonproliferation.

9:32: Hillary Clinton opposes the Iraq War, but not the soldiers (duh).  Says that there is no military solution and that she will begin withdrawal as soon as she takes office.  Clinton criticizes Bush for only relying on a small group of people for advice (Pot, meet Kettle, he's black too).

9:35: Edwards draws a dichotomy: 'If you believe that combat missions should continue in Iraq, if you believe that there should be no timetable for withdrawal' then you should support Clinton; but if you want the combat missions to end within the first year (so he won't immediately stop them?) and if you want the troops out then you should support Edwards.  Edwards criticizes Clinton for her general election strategy and says that there should only be one type of rhetoric, the truth as opposed to rhetoric for the primary and rhetoric for the general election.

9:38: Clinton clarifies the combat missions critique.  Notes that she will have a responsible withdrawal and that troops will remain to protect our embassy and pusue al-Qaeda.  Says that combat missions will continue in a limited way so that soldiers can defend themselves while the withdrawal is occurring.

9:43: And we're back, Hillary gets her 9th opportunity to speak. This time it's to respond to Giuliani's recent critique that she is inexperienced.  Clinton says, "the Republicans and their constant obsession with me demonstrates that I am communicating effectively what I will do."  Clinton speaks broadly about what she will bring.  Clinton one ups Obama's catchphrase of turning the page by saying that she wants to "throw the whole book away." Good metaphor.

9:44: Russert follows up.  Asks if Clinton will the national archives to release Sen. Clinton's communications as first lady with then president Clinton.  Clinton says that the archives are moving as quickly as they can.  Russert asks about a letter written  by Bill Clinton requesting that specific records not be released until 2010.  Hillary dodges.

9:45: Obama says that Republicans are "obsessed with Hillary" because that is fight that they are comfortable with and one that they are used to fighting.  Goes on to say that it is precisely the reason why he should be the nominee because if she is elected partisan bickering will prevail for the next 8 years, whereas he has an opportunity to transcend it.

9:46: Edwards follows Obama with a nonsensical response.  Mentions Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy and asks, "Will America Be Fine?" if a Democrat who can bring change is not elected.

9:50: Hillary responds to the criticism by saying that progress was being made in the 90s and hits a home run by saying "change is just a word if you don't have the strength and experience to make it happen."

9:52: Obama asked about his specific experience.  He cites a few things.  I can't help but think the other candidates must be frustrated by their lack of attention.

9:54: Richardson gets a turn.  Cites some differences with Clinton but resorts the same old, "Look, I'm a Governor..." line.

9:55: Dodd is asked about his recent criticism of Hillary's electability.  He doesn't really explain why she isn't electable.  Edwards gets a follow up and talks about Clinton's lobbying.

9:58: Kucinich gets his

10:00: Biden says he is not running against Hillary Clinton, that is he running to be the leader of the free world.  He then launches a strong attack against Rudy Giuliani.  Criticizes him for not having foreign policy experience and delivers his first YouTube moment, saying: "There's only 3 things he [Rudy Giuliani] mentions in a setence...a noun, a verb and 9/11."  Biden then turns to Richardson and reminds him that he's the one on the stage with the most experience, talks about things he was doing in the 70s, then says another great line: "maybe I've been around too long that you've forgotten all the good things that I've done."

10:05: Russert challenges Hillary on an apparent difference between her private and public positions on social security taxes.  As an aside, Russert's questions can basically be boiled down to: 'you're a hypocrite....why?'

10:06: Obama says that it's common sense that something needs to be done about Social Security and says that of the options available raising the cap on social security is the best one of the options available.  Returns to politics in general and says that the problem is ultimately that candidates are afraid to discuss good ideas that are on other side of the political spectrum and says that he is not afraid to embrace good ideas.

10:10: Obama responds to concerns about swift boating by saying that when he was running for Senate, he was told it wasn't going to end well because no one would vote for a "black guy named Obama."  Says that what matters is dealing with the swift boat ads fast and strong.

10:12: Break time.  It's worth noting that Ron Paul spammers have completely taken over the chat room for Mike Gravel's protest debate.  sigh

Continued at 2008Central.net...

It's Time Lower Tier Candidates Step Aside -- From Debates

With less than three months and three debates away before the first Democratic primary, it's time to tell Mike Gravel, Rep. Dennis Kucinich and either Chris Dodd or Joe Biden, whoever is third from the bottom in most polls, they can no longer attend the upcoming debates.  Actually, it's time `they' made that decision for voters.  

Sen. Gravel takes Hillary Clinton to the woodshed - as WE ALL SHOULD!!



Senator Mike Gravel took Hillary Lieberman Clinton to the woodshed today, in a commentary written for TheHuffingtonPost
(see: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-mike-g ravel/hillary-war-with-iran-is_b_66505.h tml ).

This really is a serious matter and we have to reject the War-Hawks who fool and deceive the public time and time again with this sort of trumped-up, dishonest, and reckless propaganda (about other impoverished but Oil-rich Nations) in order to give false 'political credibility' to senseless acts of Warfare and mass-violence and unlawful Corporate theft of their natural resources.

Excerpts:

Canvassing for Democrats in Central Illinois

This morning I went to our local Farmer's Market to work at the Democratic Party booth. I had our local volunteer coordinator pencil me in last month, and I'm very glad I went. I only regret that I wish I had brought a camera in which the battery needed to be recharged, so I have no pictures to offer.

Follow me beneath the fold..

New Gallup Numbers Show Increasing Clinton Lead

The new polling numbers from Gallup show Sen. Hillary Clinton with a commanding lead and a significant drop in support for former Sen. John Edwards. Edwards lost 31% of his support dropping from 16% to 11%. Clinton gained 2 more points and is nearly at 50% in Gallup polling.

Hillary Clinton      47%.
Barack Obama    25%
John Edwards     11%
Bill Richadson       5%
Joe Biden             3%
Christopher Dodd  1%
Dennis Kucinich    1%

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/200 7/09/gallup-giuliani.html#more

Gallup compared the 2008 race to previous election cycles.


But one would have to assign a fairly low probability at this point to the chances of any one other than Clinton ending up with the party nomination.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/gallup/2007/09 /how-certain-is-.html



Embed on your site
Feed & Extra

» Recent blog linkage