Ensign's parents gave $96,000 to family of senator's mistress

When Governor Mark Sanford's soap opera pushed Senator John Ensign's infidelity out of the news, I thought the senator from Nevada was in the clear. However, via Swing State Project I saw this story from Roll Call that should eventually lead to Ensign's resignation.

In April 2008, each of Ensign's parents gave $12,000 gifts to Cindy Hampton (who had been having an affair with the senator), her husband Doug Hampton, and both of the Hamptons' children. That's $96,000 Ensign's parents paid to the family of their son's mistress.

"The payments were made as gifts, accepted as gifts and complied with tax rules governing gifts. After the Senator told his parents about the affair, his parents decided to make the gifts out of concern for the well-being of long-time family friends during a difficult time. The gifts are consistent with a pattern of generosity by the Ensign family to the Hamptons and others," Ensign's lawyer Paul Coggins said in a statement.

Coggins also stressed that the payments were not from campaign or federal funds, and were not related to either Hampton's work for Ensign. "None of the gifts came from campaign or official funds nor were they related to any campaign or official duties. Senator Ensign has complied with all applicable laws and Senate ethics rules," Coggins said.

I would like to know more about that "pattern of generosity." Who suggested that Ensign's parents make these gifts? Who else has received $12,000 gifts from the senator's parents over the years?

If sending $96,000 to the Hampton family was intended to buy anyone's silence, it didn't work. In June Doug Hampton asked a Fox News reporter to cover how "Senator Ensign pursued and engaged in a relationship with my wife."

I do agree with Doug Hampton about one thing: "Senator Ensign has no business serving in the US (sic) Senate anymore!"



Display:


Re: Ensign's allowance (none / 0)

This just boggles the mind. Truly at a loss for words on this one.


Follow me on Twitter.
by Charles Lemos on Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 12:16:15 AM EST

Clearly it boggled the math mind (none / 0)

$12k x 4 = $48,000.

So either we are talking 4 gifts of $24k, or 8 gifts of $12k (perhaps spread out to avoid gift taxes) or a poorly reported $96k total.

Because something literally does not add up here.


by Bruce Webb on Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 11:38:26 AM EST

Hope his billing records are better than this (none / 0)

From the Roll Call link:

""In April 2008, Senator John Ensign's parents each made gifts to Doug Hampton, Cindy Hampton, and two of their children in the form of a check totaling $96,000. Each gift was limited to $12,000. The payments were made as gifts, accepted as gifts and complied with tax rules governing gifts. After the Senator told his parents about the affair, his parents decided to make the gifts out of concern for the well-being of long-time family friends during a difficult time. The gifts are consistent with a pattern of generosity by the Ensign family to the Hamptons and others," Ensign's lawyer Paul Coggins said in a statement."

Okay doke. We got one check for $96k. Which was obviously made out to somebody or something, which person or thing was instructed to dole it out in payments not to exceed $12k per occasion. Gosh it might be interesting to take a quick look see at Attorney Coggins Trust Account. Because I suspect it is not a coincidence that the annual limit for tax exempt gifts is $13k.

I ain't no lawyer but a single check for $96k designated to be distributed over time in $12k chunks just screams tax fraud to me.


by Bruce Webb on Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 11:47:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.