What About 60?

Yglesias weighs in on the new Senate balance:

In many respects the main significance of Franken's victory isn't that it brings us to 60 senators, it's that it increases by one the number of serious progressives in the Senate. But Franken or no, the balance of power still rests with a large block of centrist Democrats and Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe on the other side. The situation by no means dooms Obama's agenda to defeat, but it does mean that legislative outcomes are overwhelmingly likely to be a fairly pale shadow of the agenda a majority of the public voted for last year.

There's two different issues. The first involves the centrist block - Senators are islands to themselves, and Dem leadership can't herd them easily. Obama's agenda will always face resistance - but I'd rather negotiate with Senators in my own party than with Republicans.

Yglesias also mentioned the second roadblock: until Senators Byrd and Kennedy return to full health, Democrats literally won't actually have 60 votes.



Display:


Yglesias (2.00 / 1)

Chuck Todd he is not.   Yglesias = captain obvious.


by RichardFlatts on Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 04:52:17 PM EST

Senators are islands to themselves... (2.00 / 1)

exactly.  it's a lot harder to herd the senate than it looks.  i may not share all the criticisms of harry reid that i've read, but it is certainly fair to observe that he has not been the most effective leader at keeping democrats together and moving forward...


"We did not come to fear the future. We came here to shape it." - President Obama, Sept 9, 2009
by bored now on Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 06:26:32 PM EST

well... (none / 0)

since i had the opportunity to observe him in action, bob dole was widely admired on both sides of the aisle for his work as majority leader.  i do think he would have had trouble adjusting to the mobile age, though.

but getting back to the original point, i'm not sure that we can predict who will make a great majority leader.  it's really a unique job, part politician, part psychiatrist, part vote counter, part soothe sayer.  what i'm trying to suggest is that the path to leader is by no means a great way to predict how good one will be once they obtain the job.

i would be circumspect about judging lbj (or any pre-"modern era" leader by the same standards we'd use today.  regardless, there are so many competing forces trying to influence outcomes in washington -- including, now, us -- that it might be impossible to be a great leader.  i don't know.  but i guess i don't see it in reid.  i have no idea who could fill that role, but until it happens, how can we know?


"We did not come to fear the future. We came here to shape it." - President Obama, Sept 9, 2009
by bored now on Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 09:49:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.