Details on Secret CIA Assassination Program Begin to Emerge

Yesterday after reading in the Wall Street Journal that secret CIA program whose disclosure former Vice President Cheney ordered withheld from Congress apparently involved targeting high level Al Qaeda operatives, I wondered if it wasn't already common knowledge that the United States was targeting for assassination Al Qaeda operatives. Surely, this is not Earth-shattering news that requires keeping Congressional leaders in the dark. Black operations against Al Qaeda's leadership and their rank and file has been on-going since the early days of the Clinton Administration.

Today, the UK Guardian adds more color and suggests that the CIA program that Vice President Cheney ordered concealed was a program similar to a suspected Mossad program that tracked down and killed members of the Palestinian Black September terrorist group that were involved in the attack on Israeli athletes that left 11 dead at 1972 Munich Olympics. This Mossad operation was first reported by Canadian journalist George Jonas in his book Vengeance: The True Story of an Israeli Counter-Terrorist Team and later made into an Academy Award nominated film, Munich, by Steven Spielberg.

From The Guardian's story:

Dick Cheney, the former vice president, ordered a highly classified CIA operation hidden from Congress because it pushed the limits of legality by planning to assassinate al-Qaida operatives in friendly countries without the knowledge of their governments, according to former intelligence officials.

Former counter-terrorism officials who retain close links to the intelligence community say that the hidden operation involved plans by the CIA and the military to launch operations, similar to those by Israel's Mossad intelligence service, to hunt down and kill al-Qaida activists abroad without informing the governments concerned, even though some were regarded as friendly if unreliable.

The CIA apparently did not put the plan in to operation but the US military did, carrying out several assassinations including one in Kenya that proved to be a severe embarrassment and helped lead to the quashing of the programme.

A former intelligence official said the plan was hatched in the cauldron of the September 11 attacks when officials were pushing various forms of unilateral action and some settled on the Israelis as an example.

"One of the most sensitive areas has been what we do in friendly countries that don't want to co-operate or maybe we don't have enough confidence to entrust them with information. If you have an al-Qaida guy wandering around certain bits of the world we might decide that we need to deal with that ourselves, directly, without making a lot of noise," he said. "There was a plan to deal with that. It was much talked about in the CIA and the military had its own operation."

Another former senior intelligence official responsible for dealing with al-Qaida said that assassination plans were reined in after similar covert operations by the military were botched and proved to be embarrassing, particularly the killing in Kenya. He did not give details of the operation.

The official said he believes from conversations with serving members of the CIA that the area of real concern in Congress is that the planned operations may also have involved the covert surveillance of American citizens.

There appears to be common agreement among knowledgeable former intelligence officials that the controversy goes beyond the immediate question of assassination and capture of al-Qaida operatives as there have been numerous killings and detentions since the 9/11 attacks.

One former official said that the Bush administration discussed assassinations in the context of a ban introduced in the 1970s that responded to several failed CIA attempts to murder Fidel Castro, and concluded that as the US had declared itself at war with al-Qaida and the Taliban, this ban did not apply.

In the aftermath of September 11th when the entire world was on the American side, it is difficult to conceive of most foreign governments not co-operating with US intelligence on these matters. The main exception would have been Pakistan whose intelligenc services, the ISI, retains links to Al Qaeda and other Islamist terror groups. Furthermore, extra-judicial assassinating Al Qaeda operatives in the field is a far different cry from assassinating foreign leaders. Based on what we know now, it still remains puzzling as to why Vice President Cheney would order the details of this secret CIA program, and now apparently a DOD program as well, concealed from the Gang of the Eight in the Congressional leadership.



Display:


Re: I don't think this is as controversial (none / 0)

Actually, such a program, in light of Bush's post-9/11 executive orders, wouldn't even be illegal (and, I might point out, wouldn't it be better if we could assassinate our enemies and kill three or four people, than go to war and kill thousands?  another debate for another day).  The only alleged illegality in all of this is Cheney's supposed order to supress the information, which is part of what makes the whole thing so odd....


by bannana873 on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 06:47:33 PM EST

It would be better to do neither (none / 0)

It's not an either or proposition. Cheney's evident crime of hiding these covert operations from Congress is bad enough.


by NealB on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 08:32:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't think this is as controversial (none / 0)

Your instincts are good.  Sure, it's a difficult foreign relations problem when you don't have consent from the local government - and you risk embarrassment like with those CIA guys in Italy - but is it really plausible that Leon Panetta hears about such a concept and instantly shuts it down without a second thought?  Of course there has to be more to it.

I wouldn't be surprised to find out the truth is along the lines of this stray paragraph from the quoted story:

The official said he believes from conversations with serving members of the CIA that the area of real concern in Congress is that the planned operations may also have involved the covert surveillance of American citizens.

Whatever it is, it's definitely something a lot more controversial than just covert CIA hit squads going after al-Qaeda.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 07:50:40 PM EST

I care if it's illegal (none / 0)

Not sure what you mean when you say the "public would have approved of the problem...." Not sure who your GenY friends are, but praising the response of a hit squad secretly sanctioned by Israel is not just sickening, it's antithetical to fundamental tenets of democracy. Not surprising that a theocracy like Israel would commit such crimes against humanity, but frightening that some members of generations born during the Reagan era don't find their actions abhorrent; not just naive, abhorrent.

Lucky for you, Cheney's crimes aren't your crimes, or your friends crimes. Still, if you and they don't think this is controversial, you're not just part of the problem, you're the source of it.


by NealB on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 08:17:39 PM EST

You just met one (none / 0)

Maybe I'm the last one, but the purposes of the CIA are controversial. An operational group within the federal government that is exempt from almost all of the government's rules is controversial.


by NealB on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 09:05:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have yet to meet anyone (none / 0)

What, have you met five people or something like that?

Nationally, the CIA has long had a reputation for ignoring the law when it suited their purposes.  Have you read about their support of the coup in Chile back in the 70s?  Or their role in the Iran-Contra affair?

Seriously, you win the award for boggling my mind the most today.  

All I can say is that you really need to seek out a wider circle of colleagues.  


by RickD on Tue Jul 14, 2009 at 12:52:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.