I am in NYC this evening. I wound up, purely through Priceline happenstance, staying in room 1208 at the Hilton Millenium, which is directly above the former WTC 9/11 location; at this time of night, it is full of construction trucks-- still excavating with the haunting blowhorn going off intermittently.... and it looks like, 9 years later, that they are still pulling out original tower concrete and iron that remains.
And the news... I have to admit a bit of hope with Obama making the right choice over Afghanistan when I read about his administration staff telling CNN: "People at the Pentagon are trying to force a certain outcome."
More from the WH:
"Reports that President Obama has made a decision about Afghanistan are absolutely false," Jones, who generally keeps a low public profile, said in a prepared statement Monday night. "He has not received final options for his consideration, he has not reviewed those options with his national security team, and he has not made any decisions about resources. Any reports to the contrary are completely untrue and come from uninformed sources."
CBS Exclusive: Sources Say Force Will Grow to 100,000 - Nearly Filling Gen. McChrystal's Request; Long-Term Stay Planned
McChrystal wanted 40,000 and the president has tentatively decided to send four combat brigades plus thousands more support troops. A senior officer says "that's close to what [McChrystal] asked for." All the president's military advisers have recommended sending more troops.
The first combat troops would not arrive until early next year and it would be the end of 2010 before they were all there. That makes this Afghanistan surge very different from the Iraq surge, in which 30,000 troops descended on Baghdad and the surrounding area in just five months.
But now, sources out of the Pentagon are saying that Obama is about to go for his own "surge" of troops as part of a long-term occupation of Afghanistan.
For now though, I refuse to believe that Obama and the Democrats will make this huge a mistake. It's too unbelievably self-destructive to accept.
9:30 pm must mark the end of construction, as the machines have quieted down below. Its remarkable, how one event can serve to swerve a nation off course. I know that there were evil people that committed the atricity of 9/11, and it is natural to want vengeance; but at some point, the loss must be let go lest it turn in with its destruction.
We are becoming lost as a nation in the land of a country that, as it stands now, had nothing to do with 9/11. We no longer have a military reason to be in Afghanistan-- other than we are losing a war that's now 9 years old. Yes, we want to help the people that live there gain a better life, and we do have a global responsibility to fund the UN and NGO's that fulfill such a task. I fear the worst for our nation if we deepen the US military presence in Afghanistan.
I'm gonna go out for a walk around this place now, and hope for the best-- that Obama wields the power he has to turn off the machines of a meaningless war. Let the Republicans whine and gloat about it. Democrats won the past two cycles because they vowed to end our midesast wars, not go deeper into a new one. We will not lose if we do the right thing; in fact, just the opposite.
Update [2009-11-9 22:57:1 by Jerome Armstrong]: The last time I'd come to to ground zero was during the '04 GOP convention, when Bush was renominated. With Anatopia, we walked the entire perimeter, stopping often to view the left memories from friends and relatives. Tonight, I walked over to St Paul's church, and as I was coming back around the side, I was struck at the presence there next to the sidewalk of the 9-11 ground zero cross-- in its temporary location since 2006. They've begun working again below. Non-stop it appears through the night.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 18 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.