Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, the left-leaning Independent who caucuses with the Democrats, today introduced legislation that would give the government the power to identify and break up financial firms that are "too big to fail."

The story from Reuters:

An independent U.S. senator on Friday introduced a bill that would give the government the power to identify and break up financial firms that are "too big to fail," an idea that is catching on.

"If an institution is too big to fail, it is too big to exist," said Senator Bernie Sanders in a statement.

"We should break them up so they are no longer in a position to bring down the entire economy," he said.

Sanders is an independent outside the U.S. political mainstream. But he is not the only one looking at break-ups.

Representative Paul Kanjorski, the Democratic chairman of the capital markets subcommittee in the U.S. House of Representatives, is working on a break-up power amendment.

It would give a new government systemic risk council break-up power, with clearance from the president.

"It's the natural action of capital to grow and exceed. Now we're going to contain it," Kanjorski told CNBC television.

He said large banks oppose his amendment because it would threaten them. But, he said, mid-sized and smaller financial institutions would be helped by it because they would be better able to compete if mega-firms were downsized.

"When the people's money is being used to bail out these large companies ... We certainly have to have someone to tell them what to do in order to save them," he said.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said earlier on CNBC that a bill he is working on, which Kanjorski wants to toughen, would let a systemic risk regulator "break up" risky financial firms.

The Obama Administration has proposed regulating large firms' risk-taking much more tightly to prevent them from failing, while setting up new protocols for managing failure if things go wrong. Senator Sander's approach, however, would be to prevent the firms from getting so big in the first place.

The legislation introduced by Senator Sanders would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner 90 days to list commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds and insurers that he deems too big to fail.

The bill defines that as "any entity that has grown so large that its failure would have a catastrophic effect on the stability of either the financial system or the United States economy without substantial government assistance."

A few quick thoughts. One, I think it important to separate investment banks from commercial banks. Two, exotic derivative products need to be regulated. At times it is difficult to tell the difference between Wall Street and the Vegas Strip. Three, don't allow commercial banks to grow via acquisition. Make them grow organically. That's part of the Canadian banking model and the Canadian banking model is worth studying closely. From an April 2009 Brookings Institution report:

In Canada, over-leveraging is discouraged. The ceiling on leverage ratios (assets to capital) for Canada's financial institutions is capped well below the U.S. norm (an average of 18:1 compared to over 25:1, respectively).

Second, the requirements for mortgage loans are relatively stringent. Down payments of at least 20 percent are ordinarily required, unless the bank obtains mortgage insurance through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). The CMHC exerts a prudential influence over mortgage underwriting. Banks rely extensively on it for default insurance, which is conditioned on comparatively strict criteria for creditworthiness.

The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation transparently plays a role in circumscribing residential mortgage securitization. The great bulk of all lending in Canada takes place within the banking system itself, not through a largely unsupervised secondary market for bundles of loans and securities supposedly backed by other bundles of loans and securities--the "shadow banking system" - hedge funds and buy out firms - that has burgeoned in the United States.

Senator Sanders Unfiltered: Break 'Em Up!



Display:


Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

This is an excellent bill that needs to be done, and would not displease our Blue Dog Senators who need to vote Conservatively to stay in office in their Red states.  

It's the kind of bill that should be introduced, briefly discussed, and then quickly passed regardless of whatever opposition Republicans wished to attempt.

It should be followed by a string of bills that are friendly to our Blue Dogs and to many Conservative Republicans, but unfriendly to the selfish interests of Big Business.  These subsequent bills should be passed just as quickly and ruthlessly.

If Obama and our Democrats do not have the courage to take on Big Business on bills as easy to pass as this one, our kids and grand kids face no future we would ever want, given that the global warming catastrophe tipping point for atmospheric concentrations was recently lowered from 450 ppm CO2 to 350 ppm CO2, and we're already at 387 ppm CO2.  

This bill is a cakewalk compared to the kind of legislation we will need to pass on climate change.  We should set a strong pattern of passing much anti-Big Business legislation with broad support now, so that when it comes time to pass anti-climate change legislation, we will all be accustomed to taking on Big Business, and winning.


Read Teixeira's 2009 pdf report to see why Republicans are history.
by Georgeo57 on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 09:48:40 AM EST

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

absurd....the government has no business doing this....


by BuckeyeBlogger on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 11:27:34 AM EST

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

Right, because look how well not regulating the banks worked out for us. Let's stay with that.


by fsm on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 05:05:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

Regulation and breaking up corporations are two different things? whats next? The Government decides that microsoft is too big to fail? Walmart? AT&T? Where does it end. If the slackers in congress has simply properly observed and acted on pending problems in the financial industry, the meltdown woudl have been averted. However they were  busy ignorning the obvious. We didnt need more regulation, we needed to enforce what we had in place.


by BuckeyeBlogger on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 06:33:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

We have had antitrust laws in this country for nearly 120 years.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 11:11:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

We did not have the appropriate regulations in place; in fact, those regulations we did have were systematically dismantled since 1980. That's what Sanders bill is trying to address.

And you do recall that the government broke up AT&T, right?


by fsm on Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 12:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

Yes they broke up AT&T and guess what, AT&T is back together and a much stronger and successful company. Why becuase as a whole it functions better than it did in individual pieces...


by BuckeyeBlogger on Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 12:45:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

AT&T is back together? Wow, that will come as a huge surprise to all my friends who work at Lucent and Verizon. I wonder if they know who signs their paycheck.

Some smaller regional Bells have rejoined AT&T once the market readjusted to become a competitive arena after the initial divestiture. But that doesn't speak to your argument, which was that it is a bad idea for the government to regulate really large corporations to make sure that they can't damage the economy. Government breakups, from Standard Oil to AT&T, have proven otherwise.

Let's not forget that the reason the financial firms became too big to fail is precisely regulations designed to prevent that were gutted in the name of conservative politics. Sanders bill, which really just gets us back to the successful model in place for 60 years (during which the country saw enormous prosperity), is a great step in the right direction.


by fsm on Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 01:27:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Sanders Introduces a TBTF Bill (none / 0)

Welcome to the part of the Democratic Party tent where the bankers replace the people in the seat of power.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 02:47:55 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.