GOP Turning House into a Zoo

For those not currently watching C-SPAN, which is recommended watching at present, the Republicans are trying to turn the House of Representatives into a zoo in an effort to impede debate over healthcare reform. At present, they are interrupting every short speech by a group of Democratic women legislators. The Joe Wilsonification of the GOP continues...

Take a look:

Update [2009-11-7 11:28:7 by Jonathan Singer]: My old boss Congressman Earl Blumenauer tweets:

Dingell in chair!!!! Finishing what his Dad started 60 years ago! 45 years after his leadership enacting medicare. Sweet!

It's pretty remarkable that the man who presided over the debate over Medicare in 1965 is now presiding over the debate over today's healthcare reform proposal.

Update [2009-11-7 17:35:8 by Charles Lemos]: Augmenting Jonathan's post, there is more on this story at Think Progress.



Display:


Re: GOP Turning House into a Zoo (none / 0)

If only President Obama would have been more forceful in pushing HCR, this never would have happened.

(clutches pearls)

The democratic party is DEAD if they fail to do this.

Too bad president Obama hasn't accomplished the signing of any legislation.


Howard Dean is my go-to guy
by lojasmo on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 12:17:32 PM EST

meanwhile (2.00 / 1)

Democratic leaders sold out women's access to reproductive health care by allowing a vote on Bart Stupak's amendment:

It reads:
   
The amendment will prohibit federal funds for abortion services in the public option. It also prohibits individuals who receive affordability credits from purchasing a plan that provides elective abortions. However, it allows individuals, both who receive affordability credits and who do not, to separately purchase with their own funds plans that cover elective abortions. It also clarifies that private plans may still offer elective abortions.

Because of the limits placed on the exchanges, most of the participants will have some form of premium credit or affordable subsidy. That means most will be ineligible for abortion coverage. The idea that people are going to go out and purchase separate "abortion plans" is both cruel and laughable. If this amendment passes, it will mean that virtually all women with insurance through the exchange who find themselves in the unwanted and unexpected position of needing to terminate a pregnancy will not have coverage for the procedure. Abortion coverage will not be outlawed in this country. It will simply be tiered, reserved for those rich enough to afford insurance themselves or lucky enough to receive from their employers.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 01:32:58 PM EST

and I agree (2.00 / 1)

with David Waldman:

Keep an eye out for promises to "fix" Stupak in conference. Might "magically" be traded... for public option.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 01:34:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: and I agree (2.00 / 1)

Another huge problem with the amendment (for those pro-choicers leaning towards it) is that is makes no exception for the health of a woman.

I mean health insurance that won't cover preserving the health of the mother... that's just sick.


by vecky on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 02:05:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.