A Recovery, But For Whom and For How Long?

Last Thursday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis at Department of Commerce released preliminary Third Quarter GDP figures. Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 3.5 percent in the third quarter of 2009, the first sequential growth in four quarters. The increase in real GDP in the third quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, private inventory investment, federal government spending, and residential fixed investment.

The figures released also mark the strongest growth rate in two years and a pause in the economy's dark slide. Over the past 12 months, the US economy  had contracted 2.3 percent. In 2008, the American economy grew a scant 1.1 percent shedding 2.6 million jobs, a number equal to the number of jobs found in states such as Wisconsin, Missouri or Maryland. And throughout 2009, the US economy has continued to shed jobs. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed has increased by 7.6 million to 15.1 million, and the unemployment rate has doubled to 9.8 percent. The job losses have been particularly brutal in a number of sectors. Employment in manufacturing has contracted by 2.1 million since the onset of the recession while the construction industry has lost another 1.5 million jobs. So in looking at this recovery, one must ask for whom.

Nearly 63 percent, or 2.2 percent, of the 3.5 percent increase in GDP was due to temporary government tax credits to consumers that have either expired or are set to expire before the end of the year. For example, durable goods spending surged 22.3 percent boosted by the Federal government's "cash-for-clunkers" program. Federal spending outlays added another 0.6 percent to growth. But for the fiscal stimulus, we would be looking at an essentially flat-lined third quarter.

Furthermore though corporate profits - 81 percent of the S&P 500 topped expectations - rebounded, most of the increase in profit, however, came from cost cutting rather than from robust sales, which should raise concerns about the sustainability of the nascent economic recovery. And corporate cost cutting was achieved largely by depressing wages and cutting employees' hours. The Obama recovery, such as it is, is little more than another vast redistribution of wealth from the bottom to the top. Wall Street gains mask Main Street pain. The players may be different, but this is still a neo-liberal game being played.

On Meet the Press, Secretary Geithner described the growth in the economy as "broad based." He must have a rather narrow definition of "broad based." This is a recovery that is leaving millions of Americans further behind and eroding living standards. While corporate profits rise, real average weekly earnings continue to fall. Average weekly earnings in the manufacturing sector rose by only 0.7 percent in September, as the average number of weekly hours worked fell to a record low of 33 hours. That's the lowest annualized weekly earnings growth since such data began to be tracked in 1964. Overall, the BLS reports that average weekly earnings have fallen by 1.9 percent since the beginning of the year with disposable income decreasing 3.4 percent in the quarter. It is simply incumbent upon the Administration to do more for the average American worker. The budget was a start but the Administration needs to address the structural unemployment problem and fully commit to broad redistributive policies that will create truly broad-based prosperity and not just one for investment bankers.

The economy has still has some major hurdles to confront. In February I began harping on the coming crash in commercial real estate. US commercial property sales are forecast to fall to the lowest in almost two decades as the industry endures its worst slump since the savings and loan crisis of the early 1990s, according to property research firm Real Capital Analytics Inc. Thankfully, this is beginning to get some press as billionaire investors Wilbur Ross and George Soros "freak out."

There continue to be deflationary pressures in a wide range of asset classes: housing and rents being the most noticeable. But there are also inflationary pressures in the commodities markets. Since the start of the year, oil prices have more than doubled, copper is up more than 120 percent and gold has gained more than 10 percent. Zinc prices despite a 5 percent decline in demand are up over 75 percent. And while food inflation has so far remained in check, there are warning signs of creeping food prices.

It is to the Administration's credit that we have averted a systemic crash. However, as the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department begin to wind down the extraordinary programs implemented over the past year, the likelihood of further financial turmoil is not just extant but high. And for too many Americans, the financial turmoil never ceased to begin with.

Below the fold, the thoughts of Joseph Stiglitz on the recovery.

From Bloomberg News:

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph E. Stiglitz said the U.S. recession is "nowhere near" an end and the economy's third-quarter growth rate of 3.5 percent, the first expansion in more than a year, won't carry into 2010.

While this week's figures on gross domestic product are "very good," the numbers would be "miserable" without stimulus measures enacted by the Obama administration, Stiglitz said today at a forum in Shanghai. He urged the U.S. and other countries not to pull back on efforts to shore up economies.

"When we look at if workers can get jobs, if they can work full time, if businesses are able to sell goods they produce, in those terms, we are nowhere near the end of recession" in the U.S., said Stiglitz, 66, the former chief economist at the World Bank. The U.S. job market is still "in very bad shape."

Federal assistance to the housing and auto industries helped propel growth in the July-September quarter. President Barack Obama, in his weekly radio address to the nation, today called the Oct. 29 report on GDP a "good sign" and said an expanding economy is the first step to job creation.

While most economists estimate the recession has ended, the National Bureau of Economic Research is responsible for determining when contractions begin and end. The Cambridge, Massachusetts, organization usually makes its recession pronouncement as long as a year and a half after the fact. The group defines a recession as a "significant" decrease in activity over a sustained period of time. The declines it measures would be visible in gross domestic product, payrolls, production, sales and incomes.

Surging Unemployment

The U.S. unemployment rate reached a 26-year high of 9.8 percent in September and economists project it will exceed 10 percent by early 2010.

"The unemployment rate is likely to go up," Stiglitz told reporters two days earlier in Beijing. "Growth won't be fast enough to bring down the unemployment rate."

Stiglitz, a professor of economics at Columbia University in New York, said the growth rate of 3 percent to 3.5 percent needed to create enough jobs for new U.S. labor market entrants was unlikely to be sustained into next year.

It is too early for the U.S. and other countries to begin easing stimulus measures put in place a year ago to avert a financial market meltdown, Stiglitz said.

"For the world as a whole, it's premature to think about exiting stimulus," he said today in Shanghai. Stiglitz became a Nobel laureate in 2001, sharing the prize with George A. Akerlof and A. Michael Spence, both of the U.S., for their analysis of how markets function when buyers and sellers have different information about a product or service.

Curbing Stimulus

Around the world, central banks are paring emergency measures taken at the height of the financial crisis. The record $1.4 trillion budget deficit limits Obama's options for more aid, Obama's options for more aid, while Federal Reserve officials try to convince investors that the central bank will exit emergency programs in time to prevent a pickup in inflation.

Japan's central bank said Oct. 30 that it will stop buying corporate debt at the end of the year. Australia this month became the first Group of 20 nation to raise rates since the height of the crisis, and Norway's central bank followed.

In China, the State Council pledged Oct. 21 to continue monetary and fiscal stimulus even after the economy exceeded officials' expectations for the first nine months of the year. Growth is likely to top the government's 8 percent target for 2009, the central bank said this week.

U.S. economy's third-quarter growth at a 3.5 percent annual rate followed four quarters of contraction that marked the worst performance in seven decades.

Obama, in his remarks, said "economic growth is no substitute for job growth.


Update [2009-11-2 0:13:58 by Charles Lemos]: Apparently Paul Krugman and I are of the same mind tonight. His op-ed in the New York Times is as always worth a read.
The good news is that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a k a the Obama stimulus plan, is working just about the way textbook macroeconomics said it would. But that’s also the bad news — because the same textbook analysis says that the stimulus was far too small given the scale of our economic problems. Unless something changes drastically, we’re looking at many years of high unemployment.
I am insistent - the problem is structural, not cyclical.

Display:


Re: A Recovery, But For Whom and For How Long? (none / 0)

Maybe I'm just being a contrarian, but was there no value in having a "systemic crash" if that system is massively dysfunctional. A lot of lessons were learned (and subsequently un-learned under Reaganomics) from the systemic crash of the 30's. I think it would have been more beneficial to lance the boil of this massively corrupt financial structure than try to reform it with little baby steps. But then again, Obama is such an Establishment player, the latter won't happen either.


"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." -- Denis Diderot
by Stoic on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 07:41:48 AM EST

Re: A Recovery, But For Whom and For How Long? (none / 0)

There has been over $25 Trillion dumped into the bankrupt banking system to keep it afloat. This is showing up in the GDP data, but that data has been irrelevent for over 30 years.

We should be building things once again instead of bailing out Wall St./City of London parasites.

The only thing saving the Democratic party so far in this economic collapse is that the GOP has nothing to offer. The post-indutrial, information age, "green" era is nothing but a farce, especially for those of us making under $100,000/year.


by dantch on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 10:54:01 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.