Blog Action Day: The Climate Change Movement Gains Major Steam

Happy Blog Action Day!

Change.org, in partnership with groups like 350.org and the National Resources Defense Council, is pushing a climate change focus for today's Blog Action Day, and I am happy to be one of the 10,000 bloggers taking part. There is no issue more urgent than climate change. Issues like health care and poverty are tragic and pressing, but as scholar-activist Bill McKibben says, climate change is the one issue that our descendants will not be trying to fix in 100 years. The science, from the University of Cambridge to the UN's International Panel on Climate Change, is clear: in order to head off massive storms, devastating drought, expensive population shifts, massive species extinction, and other horrific events, we must become more energy efficient in our daily lives and cleaner in our national energy policy, and we must do it now. NASA's James Hansen says we may only have three years left to act.  Very few scientists put the tipping point number at higher than ten.

Yet for all the doom-and-gloom, I am excited. After decades of inaction, momentum is finally building around the movement to protect the environment and fight climate change, and it's really invigorating to see. Everywhere you look, from the faith community to corporate America to even the Senate Republican Caucus, this cause is gaining steam.

My own beat is the intersection of faith and politics. I started a new job this week working with Repower Nebraska as their part-time faith outreach coordinator. (This post is not endorsed by Repower America, but I want to be clear about who I am.) All across America, churches are waking up. I had a phone call today with an Episcopal clergywoman who said there are three areas of concern for churches on climate change: spirituality (experiencing God in nature, recognizing the environmental language of Scripture, etc.), environmental stewardship or creation care (heeding the call of Scripture to take care of what we have been given), and eco-justice (climate change will disproportionately affect the poor). Churches are getting that message. I wrote here last week about Day Six, a new effort from the progressive group Faithful America to make sure climate change legislation helps the poor. The Episcopal Ecological Network is a great resource to learn what Episcopal churches around the country are doing to green their communities.

You may be saying yeah yeah sure sure, of course the liberal mainline Protestants are getting involved - but the good news is the movement is broader than that. Thanks to the language of "creation care," many Evangelicals are getting in on the act, too. Rich Cizik, former Vice President for Governmental Affairs of the National Association of Evangelicals, resigned his job after announcing his support for civil unions, but not until he had spent quite some time building support within the Evangelical community for action on climate change. Joel Hunter, a conservative megachurch pastor in Florida, was hired to be the new president of Ralph Reed's Christian Coalition in 2006. The board asked him to resign over his positions on climate change, but the fact that his selection even got that far is indicative of a huge shift within the community.

Even more important are the most recent corporate and political developments. I'll go into detail about poll numbers, bipartisan support, and more below the jump.

A lot of ink has been spilled here so I won't go to too much detail about politics, but I will say three things. First, it's even more exciting to see companies like Nike, Apple, and even PG&E pulling out of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in protest to its denier stance on climate change than it is to see advertisers fleeing Glenn Beck like rats from a burning ship. Second, the issue polls well; public opinion is solidly behind taking action on climate change. President Obama has stronger approval ratings on energy and the environment than he does on health care. To be fair, climate change hasn't had an August recess, but it does give us a baseline of support from which to work. Cap and trade is even popular in some Blue Dog districts.  Three, as you may expect, this surge of national interest is leading to real political progress. Things looked grim in the Senate for a long time even after Waxman-Markey passed the House, but with a second conservative Republican pledging her support for Kerry-Boxer yesterday, hope is alive and well. Lindsay Graham and Lisa Murkowski will likely bring Lamar Alexander with them, and possibly even John McCain. Throw in the dependable Maine twins, and that's six Republican votes to provide cover for moderate Democrats like Blanche Lincoln.

Pushing our elected representatives to pass climate change and public transportation legislation is the most important thing we can do, but it's not the only important (or necessary) thing. We also need lifestyle shifts. The overwhelming message we here is that going green is easy, and in many ways it is - how hard is it to recycle, unplug the TV when you're not watching it, or shut the car off in the drive-through line? -  but in many other ways it will be hard. This country needs a fundamental shift in its lifestyle, practicing not just more energy efficiency but also less consumerism. This entry has gone on long enough as it is, but tips on going green I whole-heartedly recommend the Sierra Club's Green Life blog.

If I had to boil down this post into one sentence, it is this: We are making real progress toward saving this planet for future generations, and I am so excited. Please use the comment section to suggest other resources for green tips and green products, and to tell us what's happening in your area.



Display:


Laughable (1.00 / 1)

Please.....Hansens is a complete crackpot touting junk science...anyone buying into this doomsday nonsense is a nut....


by BuckeyeBlogger on Thu Oct 15, 2009 at 09:44:26 PM EST

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

It's really cute that you think you're smarter than NASA, the NOAA, the IPCC, and the University of Cambridge. Your mother must be so proud!


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Thu Oct 15, 2009 at 10:51:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

You want to start comparing reputable scientific agencies evaluations on global warming? Woudl you lile to see a list of other Hansen predictions that were  discredited previously? Woudl you like to actually review the facts and compare the science refuting his and others assertions regarding global warming? Lets go....


by BuckeyeBlogger on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 09:15:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (2.00 / 1)

Sure, let's compare the science.  Why don't you start by citing all the peer-reviewed studies that stand in opposition to the IPCC consensus on climate change.  Don't worry, it won't take you long to compile that list.

Or were you longing for the typical contest between peer-reviewed studies on one hand and Wall Street Journal op-eds on the other hand?  I don't think you'll find anyone here interested in playing that game.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 01:23:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

Sure we can start with The study entitled "Heat Capacity, Time Constant, and Sensitivity of Earth's Climate System,"  authored by Brookhaven National Lab scientist Stephen Schwartz. That study was hailed by many as discredited the IPCC. Shall we continue?


by BuckeyeBlogger on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 10:22:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (2.00 / 1)

Hailed by whom?  James Inhofe?  You may not have noticed, but the usual suspects hail EVERY study as discrediting the IPCC consensus.  Usually before they're even published.

Why don't you explain to everyone why you think this Schwartz study discredits the IPCC.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 10:27:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

Steve asked for peer-reviewed journals. Where was this study published? And where does Schwartz gets his money? And even if those questions are answered satisfactorily, that's one. Thousands of peer-reviewed articles on climate change have been published. The number probably isn't even double digits for the deniers.


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 11:08:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (1.00 / 1)

Theres an old saying....dont confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up. That pretty muvh sums up the attitudes of the Global Warming end of the world nuts. YOu actually believe the junk science that these people are touting in the name of  saving the earth, when in fact is it about controlling what we do, how we do it and importantly reaching into our pockets in the name of the earth. You may be foolish enough to believe this crap, I do not, nor do most logical people who actually read and think for themselves.....


by BuckeyeBlogger on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 11:36:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

Ah, yes. If the scientific method produces it and if other scientists verify it, then it must be junk science. If, however, Exxon pays for it and the Republican Party endorses it, then clearly it's the only trustworthy information out there. Brookhaven matters (and yes, it does), but the University of Cambridge and Dartmouth College do not. And why not? Because their studies don't fit with your view.

You're as guilty as anyone of having already made up your mind, and it's rather amusing that you can't see it. The only thing laughable here is your assertion that anyone who holds a different view than you must not be thinking for themselves.


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 11:50:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

Thats pretty funny, that is your comments that I believe anyone who doesnt agree witg my view is not thinking for themselves. In all the time I have been a member here and been commenting I have been attacked, personally at times and called a republican troll and so forth. I am a conservative democrat and my views as well as the views of other like minded democrats are attacked and ridiculed here. My experience has been that if I dont agree with the progressive or liberal left, that myself and others are dismissed and ridiculed. Interesting but not suprising given that my experience is also that the liberal left considers itself smarter than the rest of us.

Look at the healthcare debate, the focus is incorrectly placed only on coverage instead of what will really lower costs and therefore increase accessibility. That is reduction of wasteful procedures, tests and surgeries, lack of personal responsibility for one's own health and lifestyle management, tort reform which would allow physicians to stop practicing defensive medicine. Those are the drivers of high healthcosts. Covering everyone tomorrow wont do a darn thing to reduce costs. But everytime that statement is made, including by physicians, healthcare policy experts and so forth, the liberal left screams they are being paid for by lobbyists. The left has such a hard on for universal coverage it doesnt admit that without cost reduction universal coverage will do nothing to reduce costs. You have go to reduce costs and provide coverage at the same time. The cost reduction side has been essentially ignored in this.


by BuckeyeBlogger on Sat Oct 17, 2009 at 10:11:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

I agree with your points on health care and about the importance of reducing costs, but it may surprise you to learn that this entry wasn't about health care.


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Sun Oct 18, 2009 at 12:35:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

For the record, the reason I've TR'd two of your comments is not because we disagree, but because you insist on using words like "foolish" and "nuts" to make your arguments. Name-calling doesn't get you anywhere - if anything, it will convince people NOT to listen to you. If you have a point to make, I would think you'd want to use respectful language so that people would actually hear it out.


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 11:53:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

Before you have too much fun lecturing people on how they're not interested in considering competing evidence, perhaps we should take a closer look at why you decided this particular study, out of dozens of climate change studies published that particular year, represents the final verdict on the subject.  My educated guess is that your opinion is based on one criterion and one criterion only: the fact that you believe this study contradicts the pro-climate change consensus.  Think about it if you dare.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sat Oct 17, 2009 at 01:05:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

No sir, I have read numerous studies, articles and attended lectures on the subject. I have plenty of concern for the environment and believe we should be focused on keeping it clean and safe. I also believe that we need to focus on reducing our dependence on oil through the use of wind, solar and nuclear energy. However this nonsense that the planet will essentially fal to ruin in 4 years or 40 years for that matter is nonsense.


by BuckeyeBlogger on Sat Oct 17, 2009 at 10:15:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

No one is saying the planet "will fail to run." The earth will keep turning just fine - but the systems and society we have set up in the past sixty or so years will not.


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Sun Oct 18, 2009 at 12:36:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

"The seas soak up heat from the sun"

Really?  That's the study you're going to cite?


Howard Dean is my go-to guy
by lojasmo on Sat Oct 17, 2009 at 05:59:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Laughable (none / 0)

Go ahead.


Howard Dean is my go-to guy
by lojasmo on Sat Oct 17, 2009 at 02:51:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Check out operationfree.net (2.00 / 1)

Operationfree.net has a bus tour of vets going from town to town to plug the national security aspect of climate control.  Hopefully this kids the "I vote on fear" crowd that could care less about the environment.


by alectimmerman on Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 09:23:46 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.