Judd Gregg Could Be Named As Commerce Secretary Pick As Soon As Monday

The New York Times is reporting that the Obama White House has confirmed that Republican Senator Judd Gregg is indeed at the top of the list for Secretary of Commerce and the announcement could come as early as Monday.

As for the question of whether this appointment would get the Democrats to the magic number 60, that is still unclear.

Mr. Gregg's selection could also open the door to a significant shift in the balance of power in Congress. There are now 58 Democrats in the Senate; the number will rise to 59 if Al Franken of Minnesota is seated after the legal challenge to the race results is completed.

If Gov. John Lynch of New Hampshire, a Democrat, replaced Mr. Gregg with a member of his own party, that would put the Democratic majority at 60 -- a magic number in the Senate because it is the number of votes needed to control the legislative agenda and block a filibuster.

But there are no guarantees that Mr. Lynch would pick a Democrat: New Hampshire is a state that prizes its political independence, and Mr. Lynch is a moderate. Some analysts say the governor could turn to a well-regarded Republican --Warren Rudman, a former senator from New Hampshire, has been mentioned -- to serve as a kind of "caretaker senator" to fill out the remainder of Mr. Gregg's term, which expires at the end of 2010.

Sources have acknowledged Gregg's reluctance to take the appointment if it means he'll be replaced with a Democrat.

A main factor in whether Mr. Gregg accepts the commerce position, these officials say, is a commitment from Mr. Lynch that he strongly consider a Republican or an independent for the Senate seat.

Although, really, one can't really imagine his turning it down regardless. Hell, he's a Senator in the minority and is the only Republican left in Congress from New Hampshire; the writing is on the wall.



Display:


Re: Judd Gregg (2.00 / 1)

If Gregg wants the Republicans to have the power to stymie his new boss, he's the wrong person for the job.

That would be like me taking a job at a new company, but only if I could be sure my old company can still stomp my new boss.

Jerk.


by Bush Bites on Sat Jan 31, 2009 at 07:55:19 PM EST

Re: Judd Gregg Could Be Named (none / 0)

Writing in NH - even a caretaker Republican wouldn't be all bad. An open seat in 2010 is a better target than trying to defeat the popular Gregg.


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Sat Jan 31, 2009 at 10:03:35 PM EST

Consider an independent? (2.00 / 2)

That's interesting....

So, the find a nice left leaning independent, and then they can say to the Republicans:

"Hey, we didn't pick a Democrat, what else do you want..."

Bye-bye filibuster!

Well, it would be fun to watch John Cornyn yelp like the little angry poodle he is?


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Sat Jan 31, 2009 at 11:05:44 PM EST

Re: Judd Gregg Could Be Named (2.00 / 4)

Who does Gregg think Lynch is, Gov. Blagojevich?


by lukeness on Sat Jan 31, 2009 at 11:54:05 PM EST

Re: Judd Gregg Could Be Named (2.00 / 2)

Hey! That Senate seat is @#$%^&* golden!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Sun Feb 01, 2009 at 01:29:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Judd Gregg Could Be Named (none / 0)

Warren Rudman is basically a Democrat, so it would be good to see him.


by Bob H on Sun Feb 01, 2009 at 07:11:07 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.