Oh Noes! NYT Says Obama Will Have Only One Term

So suggests this alarmist frontpage headline over at Politico:

NYT reporter warns of one-term Obama

Scaaary. The crux of the story:

White House reporters for The New York Times predict that the market collapse will force President-elect Barack Obama to abandon for now many of his campaign promises.

If his stimulus plan "doesn't work out, he may very well be a one-term president," said Jeff Zeleny, who covered Obama's campaign. "It's hard to imagine that he could be reelected if the economy's in the exact same position four years from now."

"A lot of the things he said on the campaign trail you can now dispense with," said correspondent Peter Baker. "For the moment he has to focus on the economy."

This story reminded me of a line from one of my favorite movies, Broadcast News, when Aaron Altman (Albert Brooks) looks on as Tom Grunick (William Hurt) cuts to a shot of himself tearing up in one of his stories, and he remarks:

Let's never forget, we're the real story, not them.

Reporters saying stupid conventional beltway shit is news? Really? Of course it would be for Politico, whose favorite post-election narrative has been to document all the promises that Obama won't keep, even before he's sworn in. So, when some New York Times reporters -- code for "liberals" -- said they suspect that Obama's agenda would be compromised as a result of the economic crisis and that it could lead to a one term presidency, Politico jumped on it. For them, it's pure gold!

The fact is, this is a really dangerous narrative to advance. Clearly Politico has made a conscious decision to establish an adversarial relationship with Obama, perhaps in an attempt to prove their independent bona fides. But what would actually be helpful to, ya know, the country and stuff, is to help solidify an alternate narrative, one that argues that the economic crisis is an opportunity for bold change, not an obstacle to it and that the stimulus package is itself a means to begin fulfilling his promises by investing in green jobs and making health care more efficient and accessible, not that the two are mutually exclusive.



Display:


Re: Oh Noes! (2.00 / 1)

I assume we all remember that FDR got crushed in 1936 after he failed to end the Depression.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Jan 12, 2009 at 02:18:31 PM EST

Do the Math (1.00 / 0)

He's talking about big, fuzzy "economy" topics again - the lobbyists moved in last december and have been working on him ever since.

I bet they are trying to convince him that he can't operate washington without him. Did you know that , to make government look smaller - the Bush Republicans fired alot of government employees at the IRS, and then farmed their work out to contractors, paying more - and the actually collection rate went DOWN?

The people who are trying to convince Obama that, say, for example - National Healthcare - is not a big deal and can be pushed to the side are the same people who, if they are trying to run a small business  - don't have to pay 1700.00 a month premium for coverage for two or three employees and think that programs like Universal Healthcare won't have an impact. Because they're paid not to.

The only way to fix America is to remember she's already great, without big headed president elects coming in trying to "change" her. And simply restore her to a beacon of democracy that she is.

Nixon started off the HMO thing. "I've spoken with Ed Kaiser and believe me, its a good thing - its all about decreasing the amount of care people get. When that happens, he makes money.."

And the next day..

"My fellow Americans.. I have taken steps today to increase healthcare for all citizens.."

This is the thing: Obama is setting himself up for EPIC FAIL if he decides to try to cut a middle road. There is no middle road.

There is only the path we are born to travel.
I still have faith in him. But after a bunch of lobbyists are taking over the cabinet, and his campaign staff heading off to become lobbyists.. you can only place your bet that he knows what he's doing, and we'll make it. Everything else, and you're writing off America herself.

I'm not going to do that. Obama is small potatoes. Thousand years from now, no one will remember his name.  But if we rise up from the ashes of the Bush Republicans, we'll be remembered as a great country.


by Trey Rentz on Mon Jan 12, 2009 at 02:24:01 PM EST

Re: Oh Noes! (none / 0)

Politico tilts to the right.  Ben Smith covered teh Dems from a centrist perspective, but the blog is conservative and Republcian oriented, for the most part.


by TomP on Mon Jan 12, 2009 at 02:29:32 PM EST

That NYT piece is even more pathetic (2.00 / 0)

Farther down in the piece, there's a nice little bit about how Obama hasn't sat down with the NYT reporters to let them grill him. So clearly they have had their feelings hurt.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Mon Jan 12, 2009 at 02:54:04 PM EST

Re: Oh Noes! NYT Says Obama Will Have Only One Ter (2.00 / 0)

Hmmm.  NYT and politico have both been unabashedly smearing Franken and Mark Ritchie here in Minnesota.  Do I see a pattern emerging?


Howard Dean is my go-to guy
by lojasmo on Mon Jan 12, 2009 at 03:07:47 PM EST

Re: Oh Noes! NYT Says Obama Will Have Only One Ter (none / 0)

Well that's three more years than the lunatics over on the Confluence give him. There they honestly believe that Obama will be forced to resign by year's end over some yet-to-be-named scandal, then Biden will appoint Hillary as VP and presto Hillary is President in 2012.

Those PUMAs give Free Republic a run for their money in terms of lunacy. They have launched a new umbrella group called Pumasphere (dot com, I think) where they are advocating Harriet Christian as the next Senator from New York. Pumasphere is a coalition of 36 blogs including one called Team Sarah, which is a coalition of women dedicated to advancing the values that Sarah Palin represents in the political process. Yes because no one represents what Hillary Clinton stands for better than Sarah Palin.

On Obama's prospects, I think it important to constantly remind the American public how we got here and who is responsible for this mess. I understand the post-partisan stance to a degree but at the same time he needs to be very clear on assigning blame.


Follow me on Twitter.
by Charles Lemos on Mon Jan 12, 2009 at 08:46:33 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.