Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45

Here's the latest:

The latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking update shows John McCain moving ahead of Barack Obama, 48% to 45%, when registered voters are asked for whom they would vote if the presidential election were held today.

These results are based on Sept. 4-6 interviewing, and include two full days of polling after the conclusion of the Republican National Convention last Thursday night. McCain has outpolled Obama on both Friday and Saturday, and is receiving a convention bounce just as Obama did last week.

It seems fairly clear that John McCain has gotten a decent bounce out of his convention, and more precisely the fiery speech delivered at his convention by Sarah Palin. What I'd still like to see though, and what I believe is very important, is where the bounce is coming from.

Last week, McCain led Barack Obama by just 4 points -- 48 percent to 44 percent -- in the South, according to Gallup, the smallest lead he held in the region in over a month, and well down from the normal 9 to 12 points by which he has tended to lead in the region. McCain support in the Midwest, which presumably includes some very red states like Nebraska and Kansas in addition to swingier states like Wisconsin and Ohio, also stood at its lowest point in over a month as of last week.

This is all to say that McCain had quite a bit of room to grow in some of the reddest parts of the country. Accordingly, recapturing support in these areas -- bringing wayward Republicans back to the fold with a base pick like Palin, that is -- would go a long way towards improving McCain's support nationwide, even while not necessarily increasing his chances at winning the presidency as the race is about the electoral college rather than the popular vote.

Of course it very well could also be that McCain is seeing his support rise not only in red states that are less important at this juncture but also in purple states that are more important. Indeed, it will be worth waiting a couple of weeks to see state-by-state polling, which tends to lag behind the national numbers, to see if McCain has received a meaningful bounce in the states he could use such a bounce. But if all this week did was ingratiate McCain with the base, moving up his numbers in deep red states but not in the purple states, this national movement won't be particularly meaningful.

Update [2008-9-7 15:11:31 by Jerome Armstrong]: For those obsessed enough with the tracking polls to want to know each day, here you go (courtesy of an Open Left commenter). Overall though (poll of polls), McCain's bounce is just a little over 2% to date, at 45% overall, compared to 46% for Obama. But it looks volitile and could favor McCain in the coming days. I'm sticking with him needing to get to 47 - 47.5 percent to measure the success of his bounce compared with Obama's.



Display:


Palin's first interview (none / 0)

Off topic, but Palin will do an interview with Charlie Gibson later this week according to Mark Halperin.


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 02:51:56 PM EST

Re: Palin's first interview (none / 0)

Since we're off topic here.  I think Palin is setting us up for another trap. . .  

Rather than hiding from media appearances as her handlers have indicated . . . she may actually capitalize on her reknown and get right out there in the public doing town hall type events.  She's shown that she can speak and if she shows that she's got a command of the issues she'll be a problem.

We've underestimated her before and she might surprise us again.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:14:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's first interview (none / 0)

We've underestimated her before

Some of us knew it was a brilliant pick the moment it was made.  I'd say it was the same group that knew Biden was a dud pick the moment it was announced.

Democrats have a rich history of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.  Underestimate Palin to the party's peril.  I'd say she's the most significant VP pick in my lifetime given how she's transformed this race.  McCain was finished after that DNC convention.  Then he plays his hand just right and picks Palin the day after.  Pure political brilliance.


by reggie44pride on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:42:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's first interview (none / 0)

And Gibson will be lucky enough to have help crafting his questions via the GOP.  And Palin will somehow hit the interview out of the park. And everyone will be wowed by how great she is - looks like we've got ourselves another Rove find ala W...

Yeah but we gonna win this in a landslide - things are going great @@. If this isn't a landslide given the state of affairs in this country, will the Democratic party FINALLY sit down & realize that the marketing is what is killing us, that picking people  who fight tough ala Clinton is NOT bad?  Will we actually do what needs to be done to win?

Or will we bemoan our nominees as the problem like we have Kerry or Gore, when in fact they were WONDERFUL candidates - it is the party that is failing to bring this to victory. The GOP manages to sell us poop on a stale cracker - why is that?  Think about it for a minute!!


by jrsygrl on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:17:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's first interview (none / 0)

I assume that was snark calling Kerry and Gore great candidates? They both showed zero charisma.


by bigdaddy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:47:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's first interview (none / 0)

Right b/c McCain & Bush have GREAT charisma they are an easy sell. When are you going to realize it isn't the candidates so much as the machine that is marketing them that is the problem.

Kerry & Gore would've been great presidents & they were excellent candidates up against a freaking doofus who could barely get through a sentence coherently.  It was the marketing genius that put him into the White House.

And even with that at play Gore STILL won more votes. No charisma my ass.


by jrsygrl on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 10:19:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's first interview (none / 0)

Hiderated for consistent republican abuse of Democratic leaders


by duende on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 09:22:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Uhh - I think it will be the issues that will be (none / 0)

a problem for her.


by activatedbybush on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:11:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uhh - I think it will be the issues that will (none / 0)

Not really.  Her questions will be ready made for her & appear hardball, but she will be prepared. It is a set up. If you think the GOP machine would allow her to go out there without a safety net your insane. Only our party would do that.


by jrsygrl on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 10:21:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The only safety net wide enough for (none / 0)

Sarah Palin is the profound ignorance and stupidity of the American people.  Barack Obama was right on this.


by activatedbybush on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 03:09:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The only safety net wide enough for (none / 0)

That's a very wide net & exactly what Rove capitalizes on.  Our most recent elections I offer up as Exhibit A.


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 08:07:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The only safety net wide enough for (none / 0)

That's a very wide net & exactly what Rove capitalizes on.  Our most recent elections I offer up as Exhibit A.


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 08:07:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The only safety net wide enough for (none / 0)

Hell, we can't save the country from its own stupidity.


by activatedbybush on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 03:20:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The only safety net wide enough for (none / 0)

If the GOP can manipulate the people to vote against their own best interest, which they do quite effectively, why can't our party manipulate the country to vote in majority in their (an our) best interest. Besides I have to live here, so saving the country involves saving myself.


by jrsygrl on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 08:29:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

The Ras' tracking poll, out today which showed a tie race, has the answer to your question as to where McCain's new support is coming from:

"McCain leads by seven points among men while Obama leads by six among women. On Tuesday, when Obama's lead peaked, he had a fourteen point advantage among women."

White working class (no college) women are moving to McCain-Palin en masse. This result strongly suggests the move in the polls is due almost entirely to Palin's selection and speech performance. If that is true, the move in the polls is not a bounce, it is a structural change in the fundamentals of the election.


by oliver777 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 02:53:06 PM EST

Keep on celebrating Oliver (none / 0)

McCain's movement is due to the gains he has made among women; Obama will not win this election if he does not defeat McCain among women by at least ten points.  We'll see what happens.


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 02:54:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Keep on celebrating Oliver (2.00 / 1)

and here's how -

Demonstrate respect for Hillary's abilities.  he should prepare for his debates with her help, and run with Bill on the economy. He should indicate if not say so directly that Bill is no racist and that Hillary is an asset.

He should start naming his cabinet with the most qualified professionals who can speak with clarity about the issues.  

He should professionalize the race, show the difference between his candidacy and the pug one, with clarity and expertise.  

He should ignore Sarah.  

the run against McCain should include actuarial tables and the rates of incident of recurrence of his deadly cancer.  Older voters  are less inclined to ignore John's age and health, we know how much harder things get as we age, how much more quickly we tire, how many of our friends have died.  


what a relief
by anna shane on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:08:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So he should leak to the (none / 0)

press that he's having HRC help him with his debates?  Let's say that actually happens (HRC helping him with his debate prep); I think most of us on this blog would commend him for getting help in an area where he is not particularly strong and being secure enough to ask a former adversary that is a strong debater for help.  I imagine the media would have a field day with him and mock the fact that he has to seek help from HRC.  McCain's crew would have a field day.


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:26:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So he should leak to the (none / 0)

and he could counter that he's interested in results, it's not his ego he's interested in but in fixing the many problems facing us. he could turn that into yet another opportunity to show leadership and that he cares about having a government that works. He'd lose no one, and he'd gain some on the fence who worry he's too high on his own judgement and not on what's proven to work and what experts think.  


what a relief
by anna shane on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:39:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So he should leak to the (2.00 / 1)

Of course, if he had wanted her help she would be VP. Too late now.


by Marjoriest on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:40:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So he should leak to the (none / 0)

Obama's need to please the media, and fear that they will mock him, is one of his big weaknesses. The media was fretting that Palin would overshadow McCain and what does he do? He gives her more exposure, even makes her a centrepiece of his speech.

Whatever the real reason the perception is that Obama did not consider Hillary because he feared he would be overshadowed by Bill and Hillary Clinton. The media congratulated Obama on his judgement, the voters? Not so much.

I don't think leaking that HRC is helping will make much difference, but if McCain wins it will be because he impeached Obama's credibility and Obama's actions made him look weak.


by souvarine on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:16:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't get me wrong (none / 0)

I definately think he should solicit her help in private with his debate prep; after all, Obama has claimed that he wanted bring the best people into his circle and since she is one of the best debaters in the party, it would only make sense that he would ask for some assistance as to how he can improve.  The problem is I have a tough time seeing Obama ever making that admission.

But the point is that even if Obama actually called HRC for help with debating, I'm not sure he would want that info leaked to the press.  You make a decent argument in response though.  


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:23:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't get me wrong (none / 0)

which is why it would help him, everyone thinks he's too proud and that's not a message anyone would want to give. Plus she really would help him, she'd help him debate better and she'd help him avoid saying the wrong things and saying more of the right things. He talks in the sound bites, but he is always open to 'interpretation,' he hasn't figured out how to say things both simply and unambiguously and he says the same thing too many times. That funny name line has to go.  


what a relief
by anna shane on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:58:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Keep on celebrating Oliver (none / 0)

No how, no way, no Clintons!


by reggie44pride on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:53:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 0)

Another conclusion you could reach is that it won't last. America is going to find out a lot about Sarah Palin- and a lot of it they won't like. This is going to be a close race for a while now...but I am not worried yet


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 02:54:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

The Obama campaign and MSM has had a more than a week camped out in Alaska and there is no 'there, there'- nothing is sticking.

The only hope now is for some 'gotcha' journalist to catch Palin in a major gaffe.  Already you see Obama, Biden, and the entire talking head class screaming for press interviews of Palin - that's all that's left to counter the 'Palin Effect'.

She interviews with Charlie Gibson this week, so we will see.


by oliver777 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:10:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If that is true (none / 0)

If, red stater.

A bounce is called a bounce for a reason.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:06:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is your name oliver or Michael (2.00 / 0)

or Astroturf?

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/t odays-polls-97.html#comment-106907896558 5776193


by JJE on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:37:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I agree (none / 0)

McCain will probably be up by five percentage points on Monday. But I would like to see what the polls will show by the end of the week. Obama tends to do better in polls conducted midweek then weekend polls because younger voters tend to be out on the weekend.

I agree that the Palin selection was a game changer. Prior to the selection, McCain's campaign was in trouble. Now, at the minimum, the political fault lines of the 2000 and 2004 elections have returned. A thousand vote switch here and there will determine the election. But if McCain continues to lead by five to ten points by the end of next week, then I think Obama is going to have to use the debates to get back in the game.


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:45:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 1)

Mccain's speech was better than Palin's in my view...

It wasn't delivered with precision and the man can't give a speech to save his life but it had a lot of honesty and character to it , I think it would be responsible for his bounce , much more than Palin's if any of the speeches was responsible at all..


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 02:55:54 PM EST

Rasmussen seems to imply (none / 0)

that McCain's speech helped him with men; Obama had closed within three but the polling post-McCain's speech pushed the advantage back to seven.

Palin's speech seemed to help him with women; Palin cut Obama's lead among women in half to six, when it was fourteen last week.  The numbers seem contradictory to Palin's favorable rating among women, which is only 50% for rasmussen.  I suppose you could argue that most of Palin's unfavorables among women stem from black and Hispanic women, whereas she is actually performing very well among white women.


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:01:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rasmussen seems to imply (none / 0)

Could be the way you analyzed it .

I know Mccain's speech was panned by some pundits but i don't think thats the way it played with the average voter watching at home...

Palin is doing well for now , but lets see how she does under questioning .

By the way in my opinion she would perform beyond expectations at the debates and under questioning...


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:10:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Managing Palin expectations (none / 0)

That's why we can push the idea that Biden's gonna cream her in the debate.  If she does well in the debate then the MSM will crow about her unexpectedly wonderful performance.

She's a good speaker with debating experience we should push that line, and if she does trip up then we got the blessing we want.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:00:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I heard some Alaskans say: (none / 0)

Palin is a great debater. She doesn't have to know a subject very well for her to come up with a couple of very persuasive lines during a debate.

I think our best strategy is to lower expectations for Obama and Biden. Obama is best at giving inspirational speeches. Palin is also going to be more impressive than Biden because of her personality, and Biden's tendency to talk in paragraphs. Then when Obama and Obama beat expectations, they can move up in the polls.


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:55:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I heard some Alaskans say: (none / 0)

"lower expectations for Obama"

That was the entire primary season.


by reggie44pride on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:55:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 0)

Honest and Character???

Come one now. This guy stopped having either of those things when he realized he could still win the nomination.

I will freely admit that John McCain was once one of the most honest men in the Senate. But those days are long gone and he would make the nightmare known as the Bush Administration look like the 90's if he gets elected.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:03:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCains speech (none / 0)

The end moved me amazingly, I'm pretty cynical and him standing there saying    "Stand up to defend our country from its enemies. Stand up for each
other, for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America.
Stand up, stand up, stand up, and fight.
Nothing is inevitable here. We're Americans, and we never give up.
We never quit.
We never hide from history. We make history."
was really something. We needed that seven years ago.

The first part stunk.


by del on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:48:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

These numbers aren't surprising... (none / 0)

...given the post-Republican convention trends over the past 48-72 hours.

What's alarming to me is the news in Beeton's diary, below.

Deploying the same strategy against McCain/Palin, from a communications, as Obama did against Clinton, post Super Tuesday, really wasn't all that effective. It was more of a hold-the-ball/beat-the-clock concept, tied into delegates. And, most importantly, in a situation where he had the committed delegate lead post Super Tuesday, too.

The GE is, by definition, much more dynamic than the Primary. If Beeton's diary really is correct, this is bad news.

Again, Axelrod had very little national experience until this year. He ran the Simon campaign's media for all of 10 minutes in 2000; then he ran Edwards' media in Iowa, before that campaign imploded.

We will meet the Rethugs head-on in the GOTV arena, come election day, and more-than-likely beat them in the field due to Plouffe's brilliant leadership this year. But, as far as Axelrod's concerned, I find the concept of Obama going forward with a mediocre (AT BEST) communications along the lines of what was deployed in the primary between the first week of February and the first week of June of this year very, very disconcerting.

I would rather feel good about the directions of the Obama air game than anxious about it, like I do now.

This is our election to lose, and like any other professional matchup, if you give the opposition room to exploit your weakness, they will do just that.

Axelrod's national campaign communications inexperience is a weakness.

(And, IMHO, anyone that mistakes this for a concern troll comment has their head up their ass!)


by bobswern on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:04:23 PM EST

You have any ideas then bob (none / 0)

as to how Obama should deal with the Palin phenom?


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:06:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Do what they're doing... (none / 0)

...just harder

1. Play her up so she doesn't meet expectations (go Biden on this!)

  1. Dispatch Hillary
  2. Obama throw serious punches at McCain.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:15:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You have any ideas then bob (2.00 / 2)

Ignore her and keep pounding on the ECONOMY stupid.  

Read the NYT today on why Rethugs are a dying breed due to the ever widening and historic income gap. . . try to get this thing away from personalities and back to the economic issues,

... your wages, gas prices, food prices, tax cuts for the rich.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:22:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You have any ideas then bob (none / 0)

Exactly.  The Sarah Palin pick is a designed to be a distraction and the more the Dems play into it the better for the Repubs.  Ignore her and talk about things that matter.

Stay on message - McCain=Bush.  Just keep pounding that one and we will win.  

People are dying for a change so don't let the Repubs change the subject.


by jmnyc on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:28:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You have any ideas then bob (none / 0)

"Stay on message - McCain=Bush"

The problem is that more people watched McCain's speech than Obama's invesco address and saw that McCain was no GWB.  His oratory skills are not great, but his appeal to moderates was tangible and his condemnation of the GOP for their actions over the last 8-12 years was another bone to the Indies.  

I think the McCain = Bush strategy is a losing one, because when McCain is on a big stage, like the convention or presumably in the debates, people are not going to see that except for people who are already voting for Obama


by reggie44pride on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:58:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You have any ideas then bob (none / 0)

Of course McCain was going to distance himself from GWB - the guy has approval ratings south of 30%.  The conventions are basically unrebuted advertising.

Frankly, I am not going to get too upset about polls right.  The debates are far more important having killed Jerry Ford, Jimmy Carter and Al Gore.  The debates also made Ronald Reagan (he was losing 46%-40% b/f the debate) and Bill Clinton. See how McCain does in the debates when he actually has to dance around the facts of how much he actually supported Bush.  

One other thought, if we can't make the case McCain=Bush we are going to lose and we might as well pack up the party and start over.  It's not a hard case to make.  See the new ad from the DNC.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsm emo.com/2008/09/dnc_ad_mccain_parrots_bu sh_on.php


by jmnyc on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 08:22:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Very much so.... (2.00 / 1)

...Tarheel47 has it spot on in their recent diary comments.

You go after them. The gloves come off now and they stay off until the GE.

The Rethugs were always, historically, much better than us at this. And, if we're going to win in November, we have to tell it like it is, and "damn the torpedos."

That starts with about one paragraph of commentary that stays exactly the same between now and Election Day. In the ad biz, it's called continuity of theme. And, if the theme's too much of a miche-mache (i.e.: more than 30-50 words, and even that's too much), it gets lost in translation!

This is not a time to be "polite." Too much is at stake.

Where's the 'cut-to-the-bone' 527 advertising on our side? Where's the repetitive commentary coming from a chorus of surrogates?

Polite don't work, fellow Dem's.

As Einstein said it best: "The definition of insanity is: Repeating the same action and expecting a different result!"

This holds true for the reality that if we elect McCain and Palin, we'll just get more of the same results as we've had for the past eight years.

But, it's a double-edged sword.

If the Democrats move forward with an air game similar to 2000 and 2004, we'll end up with the same result on Election Day, too!


by bobswern on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:22:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

ideas (none / 0)

He should be talking up the economy of the '90's, a democratic economy, that he will bring back. People understand they had it better in the '90's. They don't process new ideas or the how of it. Just that it was better. AND WE HAD A DEM PRESIDENT!


by del on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:52:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: These numbers aren't surprising... (2.00 / 1)

Obama was brutally effective at cutting off every corner and angle that Clinton might have had, once he got the lead and could just run out the clock.

That was sure the playbook they intended for the GE as well. It didn't work.

Now they are heading to uncharted waters. Behind. What does Obama do when he's behind in a situation that he has to win? I think you are right about the organizing part (at least theoretically and with the big potential Palin cavaet), but till then?


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:17:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: These numbers aren't surprising... (none / 0)

And throwing MONEY at it (Obama outspent Hillary 3-1 in OH, PA, IN) was ineffective.  

You could even argue that boots on the ground also had limited effect as Obama had plenty of organization in those states even tho Hillary did too.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:25:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The GOP's negative ads are... (2.00 / 1)

...multi-layered and much more innovative, in terms of their media buys.

The go negative from the top (via national advertising); they go negative from the bottom (via innovative micro-targeted cable/broadcast placements--something new as of late, too). As you well know, Jerome, up until now, this "negative from the bottom" strategy was only deployed via direct mail and robo-calling this year.

The sheer NUMBER of localized, negative t.v. spots the Rethugs are producing this year is nothing short of mind-boggling. They're localizing and micro-targeting negative broadcast advertising at a level unlike anything any campaign's seen...ever.

But, they continue to hammer from the top-down via their communications strategy, as well. There's lots of arguably powerful, negative media playing out from the GOP'er side on a national level, just like in 2000 and 2004.

We have to hit them hard, nationally, and with a very precise, negative continuity of theme. We are not doing that right now.

Then, we have to play catch-up on the negative, micro-targeting side of this, as well.

And, Axelrod just does NOT have the chops for this. It's strictly a matter of experience and resume.

Talking Obama into putting stock in the media direction of folks other than Axelrod, however, is probably just wishful thinking. I'd like to think that's not the case, and that Barack's tremendous common sense will prevail here, and modifications to their air game will be implemented with great haste.

If it doesn't happen right now, however, it's then an ongoing weakness which the GOP will continue to exploit by outmaneuvering us on message straight through Election Day.

Without the "neo-theo-conservatives," being mobilized, which was the case pre-Palin, I really did believe our ground game would prevail on Election Day. But, with this wild card being played, and with a mobilized far right in play now, it's not a good omen.

Reliance on a solid Democratic air game becomes more important now than it was even a couple of weeks ago. Right now, we do NOT have that in our arsenal.

Sorry, but it's just the truth.


by bobswern on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:38:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Pretty scary.  I guess one silver lining is that McCain gets sloppy when he's the frontrunner or feeling confident.

The Obama campaign needs to get some positive attention in the media, as it's been all Palin and McCain for over a week now.  Bring the focus back on the issues, and do it with more than just the McSame mantra that the voters have heard for months now.  Talk about how McCain wants to privatize Social Security, for starters.  Most 72 year olds don't have a dozen houses to stash their cash in.


by therealdeal on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:08:14 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I  am going to I think stop coming to blogs. Pretty much all that is being said is based on bias etc. McCain got a bounce. What was bush's bounce in 2004? What about the bounces in 2000. How long did thos elast. Did they reshape the races?


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:12:50 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Yes, they did.

The Gore-Lieberman bounce in 2000 and the Bush-Cheney bounce in 2004 most definitely reshaped the race for at least a month, and surely contributed to their both getting a majority of the votes in those elections.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:20:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

With 8 weeks left, the only remaining opportunity to undo McSame's bounce may be the debates.  Or something catastrophic in a closet somewhere.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:28:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Jerome:

Gore wonf the popular vote in 2000 by 600,000 votes

Kerry got no bounce from his convention.

Bush won in 2004 by GOTV.

Obama has a much superior GOTV than does McCain

OBAMA has always exceeded his poll results even when he lost primaries

If this is a base election then Obama win's because the Republicaqn base has eroded.


by BDM on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:36:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 1)

the Republicaqn base has eroded

It quickly came back with Palin.

It's about independents.  Always has been.  Always will be.


by reggie44pride on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:47:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I know BDM, that was my point about the Gore-Lieberman bounce and their winning the popular vote.  Also, the thinking of the Republican base, that its eroded, seems a bit out-dated, given Palin.

I've always said this was a base election, the think that it wasn't led us down the wrong path to winning in '08/


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:01:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 1)

One of the problems the Democrats have is that while gains have made in registration, their base is still smaller thar the Republicans.  To win a base election, our base has to be bigger.  We have to grow the base, that simple.


by esconded on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:02:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

that's factually inaccurate but whatever


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:08:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The 50 State Strategy (none / 0)

That's what the 50 state strategy should mean. We should build a progressive political infrastucture in all 50 states.

However, base building should occur not only during the campaign season but in the off season as well. The 50 state strategy is actually a bad strategy for a particular presidential campaign to conduct. The fact is, money spent in swing states is far more productive than money spent in states where the outcome is already known.


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:00:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

What were the bounces Jerome? Can you provide me with the numerical difference? How has the narrative changed here or reshaped a close race from being close? We are also talking a Sunday after ther bounce. Shouldn't we wait a few days to know whether the numbers are sustainable or should we just go with them being true?


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:37:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I'm not saying anything is set in this one yet, I'll wait and see.

I don't have the numbers of what the bounce was for Gore-Lieberman in 2000, except that I remember the VP selection being widely approved, and then 'the kiss' and how it brought about a great month thereafter in the polls. Same with Bush coming out of 2004, Kerry getting ransacked in August, and then undecideds shifting to Bush. In both cases, it was more of a trend, with a bounce in the middle of the overall movement.

And yes, I would listen to an argument that said McCain's looks like a trend within which a bounce is happening, right now.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:07:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I am not saying ignore the numbers. I m saying keep them in perspective. We all can agree that Obama needs to take control of the narrative (tht's what this means to me) rather than it being a call for funeral arrangments to be made.


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:12:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I agree on 2004 but Gore's convention bounce disappeared after the first debate and he was consistently behind by 2-4 pts until the final weekend.  I am actually convinced the Bush drunk  driving story made enough people take a second or third look at Bush and enough changed their minds that Gore won the popular vote in the end.

We win or lose this election on whether or not we can convince the electorate that McCain=Bush which shouldn't be that hard.  Sarah Palin is designed to be a distraction so ignore her.  That is the most effective strategy.

Incidentally, the DNC has a devistating ads linking Bush and McCain together on the economy, etc.  

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsm emo.com/2008/09/dnc_ad_mccain_parrots_bu sh_on.php

We need more of these run everywhere.


by jmnyc on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:39:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Here, you can imagine how 08 fits in:

http://www.pollster.com/blogs/polling_tr ends_in_2008_vs_04_a.php


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:21:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (2.00 / 2)

Today's Zogby poll also shows a 4 point spread and McCain is nearing 50%

Moreover, Larry Sabato (heard in Fox news program) using insider information from pollsters is forecasting a HUGE, HUGE bounce for McCain in the coming days. This he was saying before today's Gallup poll results were published. That means, ~48% of the Moderate Hillary Voters (~9 million) (who previously said that they were not for Obama in a previous poll) are strongly moving towards McCain.

In the Democratic Primaries, Obama consistently lost to Hillary among the undecideds (in the last few days before election) even in states where he won. Since McCain is nearing 48-50% (gallup/Zogby), even if Obama reverses this trend, it will be hard to beat McCain.  

Biggest Blunder of the Democratic Party in 2008:
Not choosing Hillary as VP.
Not electing Hillary as Presidential nominee.
Obama NOT embracing Bill Clinton's moderate fiscal/health care policies

Southern California Hillary Voters will put entire CALIFORNIA in PLAY next week

PA, MI, NJ may be turning PINK because of Catholic Hillary Voters

OH, FL, VA, CO may already be OUT OF PLAY


by Avistan on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:17:42 PM EST

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

I think you are wrong.  I just talked with my sister who was a rabid Hillary supporter, and said that they liked Palin after she was picked, but today my husband talked with my sister and she is now a rabid Obama supporter because she knows that old man McBush is a liar and is scared shitless that he could win.  I predict that once these rabid Hillary supporters have time to sit down and think about what a McBush win would mean are now starting to turn into rabid Obama supporters.  YUP!


by Spanky on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:44:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (2.00 / 1)

Not all Hillary supporters are women. 40% of Hillary supporters are men too. They are moderate to fiscally conservative Regan Democrats. They are Bill Clinton supporters before they became Hillary supporters. They live large numbers in Central and Southern California, McComb county in Michigan etc. They are going to McCain in large numbers.


by Avistan on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:55:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary supporters switching to Obama (none / 0)

Many will maybe most. BUT there will be a lot that don't.

I was a Hillary voter. Not because she is a woman, but because she seems moderate. I am prochoice, a woman, and registered indie (so I can vote in either party at primary). BUT I will not vote Obama for many reasons. I feel that McCain will be checked by opposing congress. I have seen him go against his party many times which gives me hope. I don't think he will die soon handing off to Palin. And by the way after checking into her record of Governing if doesn't seem like she pushed her views as much as is being said in MSM.

One interesting thing is McCain voted against the Lebanon involvement back in the '80's AGAINST his party and Reagan. I do wonder if he would have been as much to get into Iraq if he had the intelligence reports that a President gets. You know it wasn't just the public and the Dems that were lied to.


by del on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:05:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary supporters switching to Obama (2.00 / 1)

Why would you want a president that is checked by Congress instead of a president who will work with Congress to achieve substantial, progressive change?


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:06:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary supporters switching to Obama (2.00 / 1)

Let alone that Republicans have fixed it so that the President has pretty much unlimited power when it comes to the execution of law.

Or that he'd still be able to lead us into war anywehere in the world without asking.

Or that any of the candidates he or Palin would nominate to the Supreme Court would be unacceptable.

Leave all that aside and ask yourself...

Why in the FUCK would you trust a Democratic congress to stand up to a Republican president?


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:17:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

McCain is not getting many votes from those who voted for Hillary during the primaries. However, where he is gaining is with "waitress moms" older lower income women, a demographic group where Hillary ran strong. These are the people who may not have voted in the primary, but would have voted for the Democratic ticket had Hillary been on the ticket.


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:06:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

Hillary would have been in the same boat. It seems that NOTHING trumps the POW card. Not economic opportunity, not sane energy policy, not the prospect of cheaper and more comprehensive health care, not cleaner cars, not 9 trillion dollars of added debt, (when you include the Fannie May/Freddie Mac bailout) nothing.

This election has turned into the bad boy (McCain) against the egghead dweeb (Obama) and America will choose the bad boy every time.

I hope to god I'm wrong, but it feels like Obama has already lost the election. The GOP hasn't even flipped the switch on their slime factory and when they do, it's over. Obama gets maybe 40 percent of the vote if he's lucky.


by ktoz on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:47:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

His bounce is overwhelmingly his VP pick, they were energized by Palin . . . POW is only a small part of this bounce.

She has plenty of time left to trip up.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:53:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary in same boat (none / 0)

Not true, she is VERY convincing on the economy.
 Plus she could carry even more Hispanic and women's vote.
by del on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:34:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary in same boat (none / 0)

How is she convincing on the economy? What policy positions does she have that make you think she'll improve the economy?


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:07:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

There is no reality to your post


by BDM on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:48:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

Sabato is saying this?  If that is the case, we are in big, big trouble....  He's almost never wrong...


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:38:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

OK, wait... Sabato in the Detroit Free Press today is saying the exact opposite...  did he suddenly change his mind today?


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:42:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

Whoa, calm down. I'm discouraged by today's tracking poll too, but California being in play? I think you are panicking just a little too much.

Did Sabato say New Jersey was turning pink and California might be in play, or is that your projection?


by democrattotheend on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:04:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Relax Chicken Little (none / 0)

The sky ain't falling.   We are going to win this!


by activatedbybush on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:10:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It is Hillary Stupid !!! (none / 0)

Sarah? Is that you?


I will wear my heart upon my sleeve For daws to peck at
by Iago on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:13:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is the race (none / 0)

This is the race for now and for all time unless and until something happens to change it.

McCain will maintain a lead of 2 to 5 points in the national polls.  Unless he screws up, and unless the corporate press/media actually reports the screw up, he will win by that margin.  He will get all the Bush states from 2004.

Tell me where I am wrong.


by James Earl on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:29:07 PM EST

Re: This is the race (none / 0)

Where you're wrong is that it's just a bounce. There's a good chance that the dynamics of the election haven't changed and things will return back to "normal" in a few weeks.

It all depends on the nature of the campaign in the last few weeks.


by Covin on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:57:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

he won't get IA or NM (none / 0)

both Bush states.

Almost all of the states now considered tossups were Bush states. McCain would have to run the table to win all the Bush states.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 08:15:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This is the race (none / 0)

Iowa


by Reference Librarian on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 10:39:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

He could screw up in the debates like another 'Czechoslovakia' moment.  

If Obama could get McCain to show some of his temper that would do it.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:35:15 PM EST

This Is Wishful Thinking (none / 0)

Hoping McCain misspeaks, which he very well may do, is not a plan for Democratic victory.

The public seems to be inclined to give him a pass on his errors, including those of fact, because he presents an amiable, even humble at times- ("I'm an imperfect servant")- face.

I agree with an earlier commenter who said that seniors are aware of the ravages of aging, but that may be offset by the familiarity they feel with McCain, as opposed to the "newness" of Obama.  


by susie on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:09:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

2004 Election (2.00 / 1)

For what it's worth (from Wikipedia):

In the beginning of September, the successful Republican National Convention along with the allegations by Kerry's former mates gave Bush his first comfortable margin since Kerry had won the nomination. A post-convention Gallup poll showed the President leading the Senator by 14 points.

According to Gallup, Bush jumped out to a 7 point lead directly after the 2004 Republican National Convention--first week of September.  About 10 days after that, Bush's lead had widened to 14 points, again according to Gallup.

Kerry ended up losing the election by 2.4 points.  Just putting this out there, for a bit of historical perspective.


by Will Graham on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:35:35 PM EST

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

We are suppose to lurch from moment to moment pretending that history begins with each moment we are experiencing. That a minor bounce in a tight race pre-conventions that will be seen as a tight race post convention is the same as a 14 point lead. History be damned. We have  narratives to believe in. Didn't you get the memo?


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:41:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

This is a bounce This was predicted. Bounces always come down.

Their is way too much panicky about one poll.

Lets see what other pollster's say. Gallup AND rASMUSSEN are not the only pollster's and we will see what they have to say.

Every phenom  eventually hit a rough spot and so will Palin. The question is how does she handle it


by BDM on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:42:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

Every phenom  eventually hit a rough spot and so will Palin. The question is how does she handle it.

True, plus I just don't buy the idea that a candidate can ride his VP's coattails to victory--which is what the Republicans are counting on at this point.  That just defies logic.  Isn't it a political truism that the VP must not outshine the top of the ticket?  There must be a good reason for this bit of conventional wisdom.  My guess: Because it makes the guy actually running for president looks small and weak by comparison.


by Will Graham on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:55:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This election is different? (none / 0)

Isn't that the argument we always use to respond to those pointing out things that are unfavorable to us?  That this election is different from any other.  I don't see why the same reasoning couldn't be applied to answer arguments that run against us.


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:58:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The final sentence should read (none / 0)

"I don't see why the same reasoning couldn't be applied to answer arguments that run in favor of us" to reply to your argument that a presidential candidate cannot just ride the coattails of a VP candidate to victory.

If we go by recent history, the party with the bigger convention bounce wins the election.  In this case, that seems to be McCain slightly.  However, the "this election is different" line would be a good response.


by Blazers Edge on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:04:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This election is different? (none / 0)

At this point the Republicans are expecting Palin to carry McCain over the finish line.  That is undeniable.  Look, maybe things will be different this year, who knows?  But there is just no historical precedent for such a thing.  McCain's campaign is quickly becoming subsumed by the cult of Sarah Palin--his VP.  I just don't see how this is a good thing.  The VP is supposed to complement the top of the ticket, not replace it.

You could be right though.  Who knows?  I guess we'll see...


by Will Graham on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:08:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

Never in history has a presidential election ever had a woman win 18 million votes - this was reopened on the mind of many of those voters with the Palin pick.

Because of that we might have to reassess logic and conventional wisdom .


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:06:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

you are better suited when you aren't making this about the primary. when youdo that you pull bck the curtains


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:14:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

My point is that McSame is content to "ride the coat-tails" of his VP pick, unlike contenders in the past, because of what Hillary did in the primaries.

Until she trips up, the Rethugs will keep the spotlight on her.  I'm not a believer that she'll lay low in the coming weeks.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:23:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

Actually she doesn'tneed to trip up. The problem with the strategy is a) AMericans don't vote VPs and b) It eventualy makes mccain look weak. You have to separate out initial hype and buzz from sustainability. I dont see how he does that for 60 days- mayb eyou do. But I dont. Not amongst the demographics he has to appease


by bruh3 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:29:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

Al Gore was a surprising VP pick because he was much better known and had a more solid national reputation than Bill Clinton. Candidates who are afraid of being outshined look weak to voters, regardless of the tactical genius TV pundits think they posses.


by souvarine on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:29:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

Al Gore in no way outshined Bill Clinton, even in 1992.  Clinton was a juggernaut from the beginning.

I don't think that McCain thought Palin would outshine him when he picked her, but she sure as hell does now.  Republicans are now voting for the bottom of their ticket, Dems are voting for the top.

Which boat would you rather be in?


by Will Graham on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:46:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

With 57 days left I'd rather be in the boat that is riding higher. I was enjoying being ahead in the polls for the past couple weeks.


by souvarine on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:22:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 2004 Election (none / 0)

Yes.  And Gore got about a 6 point bounce in 2000 after his convention only to lose it with a poor performance in the first debate.  Don't forget that Reagan was behind Carter before their debate.

It is way, way too early for panic.  If McCain is still ahead in mid-October, maybe then maybe I will panic.


by jmnyc on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 08:41:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Few days of bad pollling (2.00 / 0)

And you guys are shitting yourselves. Election 2004 after the thugs convention Bush was 15% ahead in Gallup poll. If McCain is only three points ahead then things are much better than it looks. This bounce will fade away. Keep your nerves.


by Nick on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:01:40 PM EST

Re: Few days of bad pollling (none / 0)

And Zogby poll is an online poll.


by Nick on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:11:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I'm also disquieted and worried about this bounce, but keep in mind, Obama was up by 8 or 9 in these same polls a week ago.

Now it's possible Palin made such a damn good impression that suddenly all women everywhere are switching parties and votes and McCain will now win in a landslide ... or it's possible this is just a bounce, just like Obama's.


by Siguy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:05:20 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 0)

This thing just got started, folks.  We're not even a week past Labor Day.  Calling McCain's bounce "insurmountable," as some have done here, is ridiculous.  The 'Pug convention just ended three days ago.  If McCain still has a three point or more lead ten days from now, then let's start to worry.


by JK47 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:15:10 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

If McCain still has a three point or more lead ten days from now, then let's start to worry.

Remember that Bush's lead 10 days after his convention was 14 points--and then he ended up winning the election by only 2.4 points.  There's still a lot more twists and turns on this ride...


by Will Graham on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:20:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Problem Being- (none / 0)

The number of undecideds grows smaller with each passing day.  Undecideds don't stay undecided until the last minute, for the most part.  One by one, they make up their minds, so that the number that can be convinced that Dems are better than Repubs is quite small by the last 7-10 days of the election cycle.


by susie on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:25:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 0)

Saw on CNN last night a loo at Palin's claims at the convention and what was real.  Reporter's that cannot interview her are interviewing people in Alaska...and starting to define her in ways that are not positive:  "...sees things in black and white..." "...takes credit for work the whole state did..." "did NOT sell her state jet on eBay..."  (BTW McCain has been stating that she indeed sold the jet on eBay for a profit when it was sold to a gov. race donator for $600,000 less than the eBay amount = no profit)  

She is a HOT item and, I's sorry, she just does not look ready to take on the AMERICAN press candidly.  I am sure she is charming as hell, but I also think she is going to trip...she is too new to this and it shows.  Her body language and movements during her speech at the convention expressed her discomfort.  Her need to use teleprompters during speeches shows a level of unpreparedness.

I think we keep going with the same playbook, ride out the storm, KEEP OUR HEADS, and watch the repubs implode.  Unless they shrink-wrap Palin and just run her convention speech all the time, she is going to get tarnished because she is NOT in Obama's league as a orator or a statesman (-person?)  And it will, once again, come down to the difference between Obama and McCain...not Palin.  Anyone want to bet old man McCain can handle himself BETTER now that we have officially entered into the political season?

And can someone HONESTLY tell me that things cannot change over the next two months?  Really.  In two weeks there have been big fluxes, why are things going to settle down now?

(And for the record, correctly or not, Obama was considered the UNDERDOG in the Primary until Super-Tuesday.  Yeah, he had the lead, but Hillary was EXPECTED to take the lead then.  I am waiting for the state-by-state polls before I start to freak-out.)


by Hammer1001 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:39:17 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

OK guys, McCain got as bounce.
So quit you whuining and start working on the 2010 midterms.
by spirowasright on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:42:53 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

P.S.-Since you've already declared McSame the winner.


by spirowasright on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:43:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Larry Sabato (UVA) was on the tube this AM (2.00 / 1)

I think Sabato is one of the best in the business, fairly Democrat-friendly for the most part; he was on about an hour ago. He stated that there will be polling coming out between Monday and Tuesday which shows significant movement toward McCain. Today's Gallup and Rasmussen results may just be the beginning.

My hope is that some in the media as well as bloggers do what they should have done from the beginning: just leave Sarah Palin alone. They are turning her into Joan of Arc, and the GOP is reaping the rewards.


by BJJ Fighter on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:45:35 PM EST

Re: Larry Sabato (UVA) was on the tube this AM (none / 0)

I remember when Zoby, back when he was respected, thought that John Kerry would win in 2004.


by wilder on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:16:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Larry Sabato (UVA) was on the tube this AM (none / 0)

zogby thought Kerry would win, but his numbers nailed it, saying Bush, right?


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:20:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Larry Sabato (UVA) was on the tube this AM (none / 0)

Larry Sabato is hardly ever wrong...  Although, he was quoted in the Detroit Free Press today saying that McCain's bounce will have stopped...  So, I guess he was wrong about that and turned around again today...

So, we'll see... if the Palin pick has created a new Republican coalition, then the American presidency is going to be Republican for a long, long time...


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:20:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Larry Sabato (UVA) was on the tube this AM (none / 0)

Actually, I bet he's probably talking about the PPP polling done in MI, CO and FL this weekend. If so, it is time to strike or panic.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:22:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Larry Sabato (UVA) was on the tube this AM (none / 0)

No it isn't.   Relax...  its RIGHT AFTER THE CONVENTION.  I'd wait until AT LEAST THursday with the trackers and maybe even next week.  


by yitbos96bb on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:20:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Steady, steady (2.00 / 1)

Ignore the soap opera.  Palin will do what Palin will do.  Hillary will do what Hillary will do.  Hillary's supporters will do what they're going to do.  Can't do anything about any of that.

Ignore the day-to-day polling.

Obama and Biden are doing what they should be doing, and they should keep doing it.

Going to swing states and doing photogenic and press-worthy events.

Hammering on the economy with specific policies and stories connected to what's going on in each state.  You know, the "I didn't hear them say anything about you" stuff.  It's real and it works.

Hammering McCain and Palin on policy rather than personality.

Raising money like mad so they can put ads on TV and finance the mail and phone staffing.

Registering voters like mad to set up the turnout program.  Making personal contact to set it up as well.

In two weeks absentee ballots will start going out in some states, and O/B will work hard on getting as many of those votes in as possible to narrow the turnout targeting.

Each of us should do what we can to support all of this.

Grind it out.  60 days.


by DFLer on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 04:53:00 PM EST

Re: Steady, steady (2.00 / 1)

Agreed.  Obama's message has been simple and consistent from the beginning.  And it's perfectly aligned with the public mood.  He should continue pounding away right up 'til election day.  All things considered, Obama's run a very good campaign.  And I think the tough, extended primary just made him stronger.  

If all it takes for the GOP to win is to nominate a right-wing evangelical for VP, then no Dem nominee could possibly beat them.  Not Obama, not Hillary, nobody.


by Will Graham on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:03:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Steady, steady (2.00 / 1)

The sudden energy is not because Rethugs nominated a "right-wing evangelical" but that it was a WOMAN right-wing evangelical.  

Pains me that we left that door wide open and McSame walked her right in.


If you had everything, where would you put it?
by wasanyonehurt on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:55:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If it helps him in OH and VA (none / 0)

Then it's a winning strategy for him


by activatedbybush on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:05:18 PM EST

Re: If it helps him in OH and VA (none / 0)

I really don't think Obama can win OH. His chance is at best 20%. In fact, the same goes with FL. His only hope is to pull an upset in VA. Otherwise, it's going to be a very long 4 more years for us..


by darklywise on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 05:46:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

That's Absurd (none / 0)

Kerry came within 80K votes of winning OH, and the country's mood has changed quite a bit since then.  I might see VA and CO as better bets than OH this year, but his odds are up.  FL is tougher because we have an old fart running and there are lots of those down there.  Plus a lot of the Jewish voters living down there have bought the neocon crap that these wars will protect Israel and are more willing to look at a thug than before.    


by activatedbybush on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 03:12:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Things we should see more of (none / 0)

  1.  The McCain bush hug.
  2.  Sarah Palin's name on earmarks
  3.  McCain's first wife
  4.  McCain saying he doesn't know about the economy
  5.  McCain saying he doesn't know how many houses he has.
  6.  McCain calling the religious right leaders agents of intolerance
  7. McCain singing bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran

by activatedbybush on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:08:19 PM EST

It's about our comfort zone... (none / 0)

I think a Democratic win in this cycle has mostly to do with a change in the size of our base so that the comfort zone that many Americans feel with a white, military, conservatve candidate, even those who have a hunch it is voting against their best interests policy-wise, can be erased.  I don't know if that will happen this year or not.  Americans are very susceptible to the "good American" image of the fifties that Sarah Palin s a new version of and John McCain the old version.

It would be really nice to see that go away but I'm not sure times are quite bad enough, or the nature of who votes changed enough, to make that difference.  I just hope so.


by mady on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:13:34 PM EST

downballot impact (none / 0)

The biq question is, does McCain have coattails?
That's what I'll be looking for in House and Senate polls.

If Sabato is right, time to write off the presidential election.


by esconded on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:35:39 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 0)

100 posts and all but 3 or 4 are about how DOOMED we are. Heh. You got to love it. I agree 100% with Jerome's update. To bad the comments sucked this thread dowwwwwwwwwwwn into OH NOES territory.
Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:40:45 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Obama was up +8.
Now he is down -3.
The Differece is 11 Points
Is this not a reason to be afraid.
by hpg on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:50:49 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

No it isn't.

Nest Thursday we will see a little more accurate results... the polling will be all past the weekend coverage, new cycles, etc.   If he has a +3 then worry a bit.  But remember.  Gore had a decent lead coming out of the convention.  Bush was up on Kerry who managed to narrow the gap... didn't carter and dukakis have leads as well (albeit not as big as the media claims with Dukakis.  

We still have debates.  Lets wait and see what Wednesday says.


by yitbos96bb on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:18:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Jerome,

Haggai's stuff IS good, but its still a guess.  Please preface that sort of thing.  We don't KNOW the actual break down of the numbers.


by yitbos96bb on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 05:57:46 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

He has the moe there to see.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:22:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I remember a race a while ---- the Democrat ahead by more tha a dozen points and had punted his plan to campaign, had no state strategies, and looked like a jackass when Ted Koppel told him in September that the Republican had locked up enough states to secure an electoral victory

Folks ---- national polls and daily tracking is a complete and utter waste ---- Have we secured Kerry's blue states, do we have enough states in play with enough electoral votes to give Obama options for winning the White House, and are there enough Bush States in danger of being in won by Obama to keep McCain off its game?

The Blue States do look good ---- but we've got to make sure those states are a lock.  

There are about 100 electoral votes in play right now ---- building a voter registration edge there is key.

Do everything possible to keep the pressure on in Red States will keep McCain in check.


by kmwray on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:09:59 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Which race are you talking about?


by yitbos96bb on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:15:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Jerome,

Haggai's stuff IS good, but its still a guess.  Please preface that sort of thing.  We don't KNOW the actual break down of the numbers.


by yitbos96bb on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:14:14 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

Between the two conventions there where most
tracking polls. There were not many
state polls.
For example the state polls in Iowa and
MN were +15 and +12 what happends when the state polls also go down. I mean (-11) points.
by hpg on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:56:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

While not quite time to panic yet, (none / 0)

it is cause for some concern. There's gotta be a way to get Palin, and if I wanted to really be extreme, find a way to swap Biden for Hillary on the ticket, tho thats not terribly likely.

While yes, electoral college determines the winner of a Presidential election, the chance of losing the election while carrying more popular votes is extremely slim: of the 55 presidential elections, only 4 have been won with less than a plurality of the popular vote, or in the 45 elections since 1828(when popular vote is considered to have been widespread), only 3 have been won with less than a plurality of the popular vote, which means in both scenarios, the popular vote winner has won the election 93% of the time. National polls DO matter. We need to get 527's on Palin's ass.


by Lakrosse on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:44:02 PM EST

Ironic...neither major party nominee could (2.00 / 1)

swallow their bitterness from the primaries. In terms of finding a running mate who had "scope", and breadth of experience--not to mention a degree of star quality--Obama and McCain both failed. Clinton was far better than Biden, and Romney would easily surpass Palin.


by BJJ Fighter on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 11:23:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm sorry, (none / 0)

but there's no way Romney woulda surpassed Palin. Palin was a homerun at this point, because shes always been a KKKonservative whereas Romney was once a liberal, and she's not of the Mormon cult. Palin was perfect for McCain, whereas the pick of Biden may cost Obama the election.


by Lakrosse on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 12:21:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

You can't just pick numbers that add up to the 3-day averages and declare them solved.  There are so many possibilities.  Especially when you factor in that Gallup is rounding their numbers.

I've been working on a program to figure out the widest possible range each day's number could be, limited by the 3 and 7 day moving averages.  The results are starting to look useful.  But it also proves that all these guesses you see littered around the net are wildly, wildly off the mark in one way or another.


by tunesmith on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:47:12 PM EST

Poll of Polls (none / 0)

CNN's Poll of Polls is:
Obama 44
McCain 43

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/24/p oll.of.polls.chart/index.html


by del on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 06:53:23 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (2.00 / 0)

People, you all need to calm down.  These numbers represent all the positive feedback from Palins speech.  Let's stop with the sky is falling junk until at least a week or so later.  Same thing happened on Saturday of last week when everyone declared "no bounce" for Obama, but there was a subsequent one.

Right now, there is a lot of stuff being thrown at people, and we really need to wait until the dust settles.  I said it before, but it is really counter-productive to put so much stock in the daily tracking polls.  I say wait until at least the first couple of debates, then a clearer picture will be seen.

Right now Obama is doing what he needs to do, going on the offensive and keeping it on the issues.  HRC discussions, really counterproductive.  Monday morning quarterbacking is never a productive activity.  Fact of the matter is, if Obama had chosen HRC and the polls looks as close as they do now, people would be yelling about what a bad choice he made.

The bottom line is that the polls are tracking an instantanous "emotional" reaction, and right now everyone is in "lust" with Palin.  Let's see what happens when at least 2 weeks (so funny it has barely been one week) has passed at least!


by tlhwraith on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 07:17:09 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

USA Today/Gallup: (9/5 to 9/7)
McCain 54 (50 among RVs)
Obama  44 (46 among RVs)

Thais can't be made up.  That's a 17 point swing in a week.  


by esconded on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 09:09:41 PM EST

Analysis of all polls (none / 0)

Instead of looking at the spread, let us look at the McCain vote alone from today's polls:

Zogby - 49.7%
Gallup Tracking - 48%
Gallup USA Today - 50%
Gallup likely voters - 54%

The lowest is 48% . If he gets 2% from the undecided voters, then he wins the election.

This massive migration of the voters is due to the following:

Republican leaning Independents who voted for Obama in the 'Open Democratic primary' are leaving in large numbers (because of Sarah Palin) and that is why 10% spread is reflected in likely voters (54-44%). They came and screwed our primary and now they are screwing him in the General Election. These traitors should not have been allowed in our primaries in the first place.


by Avistan on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 09:22:06 PM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

The national polls mean jack.  Go to RealClearPolitics and click on the electoral map and Obama's advantage becomes clear.  McCain has to win nearly three quarters of the toss up states and not get surprised in his base states to win.  That looks like a tough road to me.  
Another thought, it is possible to have a tie in the electoral college, but that would still elect Obama, because the Democrats control a majority of House delegations.
Free speech isn't free when corporations controls the media.
by BDaddyL on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 12:32:46 AM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

I'm worried.

It's so depressing how ineffective the left wing machine has been compared to the right. I honestly felt the Republican convention was a joke, Palin is the most embarrassing candidate I can imagine, and the Republican's are putting forward absolutely no ideas at all to move the country forward. If Palin was a Democrat the Republican's would have destroyed her candidacy by now. And yet, the blogosphere feels irrelevant and the national narrative remains in the hands of the right. Where are all the successful talking heads from 2006? Where is Webb? Where is Hillary? Where is Leahy? Every time I see a Democratic politician, like Harold Ford Jnr for example, they're being objective rather than trying to win hearts and minds.

I hope Obama can do this. I trust he can beat their arguments but he has to market himself in a more direct and resonant way. His responses to the issues of the day are fantastic but they are 10 minutes long and have no decent soundbites for the national news. He needs to stop communicating with the audience in front of him and start talking to those watching TV at home, with barely a moment of attention to devote to what he's saying. That's the reality.

If we lose this one... We might as well just let them just have the country because the truth is the party will have let the nation down so badly, just as it did when it failed to win an easy election in 2000. McCain is clueless. That is the reality. He doesn't propose any vision or solution for the future. To be honest, he's an even weaker candidate that Bush.

The implications for everything in this country: healthcare, the economy, housing, poverty, education, the supreme court (after Ginsberg and Stevens it'll be like 7 Conservatives to 2)... And the implications for the rest of the world... the middle east peace process/Iraq/Afghanistan ... it's truly desperate to say the least.

It's great reading the analysis, but shouldn't the blogosphere be co-ordinated. The right get on point with Wright, Ayers, and they wreak havoc. While we are all lampooning their stupidity watching John Stewart suddnely we realize, f**, they've somehow managed to earn an irreversible 10 point lead.

Please people, do everything you possibly can to help Obama win this election.


by Graham1979 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 01:51:39 AM EST

Re: Gallup Tracking Poll Has McCain Up 48-45 (none / 0)

The first thing is to stop underestimating our opponents. If you think "the Republican convention was a joke, Palin is the most embarrassing candidate I can imagine, McCain is clueless, he's an even weaker candidate that Bush" then you probably don't understand how Republicans win.

The second thing is to respect the voters. It is hard to win in a democracy if you demonstrate disrespect for the voters. Which means you have to understand why they elected people like George Bush and you work out how to persuade them to support your side.

I won't argue that our party hasn't let the nation down badly. The issues we face are critical, the Republicans do not have solutions for them. Rather than putting forward the candidate with a realistic plan to win the general election we went with the transformational candidate.

I hope Obama wins, and I am doing what I can, but one reason I did not support him in the primary is because he based winning the general election on hope in a new politics, not on a plan.


by souvarine on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 03:03:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.