The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West

I'm at the San Jose Convention Center at the annual SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West leadership conference. You thought unity was the theme of the Democratic convention? This conference gave it a serious run for its money. When I was at the SEIU convention in Puerto Rico, my fellow bloggers and I wrote briefly about the conflict brewing between the international and this 150,000 strong California-based healthcare worker local but since then it has escalated and UHW-W intends to fight back.

On August 25 SEIU President Andy Stern announced a trusteeship hearing on whether SEIU should appoint a trustee to "take charge and control of the affairs of SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West and a trusteeship imposed over UHW-W." The hearing is to be held Sept. 26 & 27 somewhere in Northern California.

The timing is curious, coming on the heels of allegations of corruption on the part of Tyrone Freeman, head of another California healthcare workers local and a Stern appointee; it also came mere days before UHW-W's leadership conference and I can tell you from being here, if the international wants a fight, they found one.

The conference was attended by more than 2000 elected UHW-W workplace leaders and the sense of purpose and resolve among them is palpable. They are motivated, they are unified and as one woman addressing the convention put it:

The giant is awake and we are pissed.

The membership here unanimously passed a resolution vowing to fight the trusteeship:

Let it be resolved that we will fight to ensure that UHW members maintain full control of our union and oppose any attempts to unlawfully trustee our local and place it under the watch of appointed leaders from Washington, DC for purely political reasons; and

Let is be further resolved that UHW will fight to keep our members united in one statewide healthcare workers union and will use all available means, including mobilizing our 150,000 members to support our union and directing our President and Officers to take all appropriate actions including deploying the necessary resources, staff, and other means to carry out this resolution.

A good 4000 or so also marched through downtown San Jose and then held a rally, waving signs reading "We built this union and it's ours" and "Our union, our voice." They feel that Stern, with his threat of a trusteeship, wants to weaken their power by trying to divide their membership. No one here intends to let that happen.

In the short term, that fight entails deploying members to DC to meet with all 53 members of California's congressional delegation. How many of the 53 will actually meet with UHW's members is unclear, of course, but they intend to try. In addition, leadership here repeatedly rallied the crowd of 2000 to take off work on Sept. 26 & 27 to attend the trusteeship hearing and bring 10 co-workers with them. They want to overwhelm the international with 20,000 plus to let them know they're not going down without a fight. There is a sense from people I've spoken to that the trusteeship is probably inevitable; they're calling the hearing a "kangaroo court." But at the same time members are saying quite simply "We won't go", referring to their refusal to be taken from their union without their say.

In the longer term, what UHW-W hopes to achieve is 1. to build one statewide healthcare workers union in California; and 2. to, as they put it, "reform SEIU into a democratic union with leadership accountable to its members." At the heart of this conflict, it's really union democracy that people are fighting to preserve.

Robert at calitics nails why this matters for all of us.

Whatever the outcome, there is a strong commitment to democracy among the 2,000 members here - democracy in the workplace, democracy in their union, democracy in their nation. Despite the internal politics that is an extremely positive sign. The labor movement has been at the forefront of social democratic politics in this country for over 100 years. When labor is strong, progressive politics are strong. Which makes the SEIU's efforts to trustee UHW all the more disappointing, as we need unions to be laser-focused on this election and on the policy battles that will begin as soon as the dust settles in November.

On a more local level, it also matters to us here in California because UHW-W has literally been one of the most reliable and most generous progressive partners in our fights here in California. In its attempt to undermine UHW-W's leadership, the International is actually undermining the progressive movement in California as well.

For a more complete rundown of the conflict you can read SEIU-UHW shop steward Shayne Silva's piece over at Open Left.

(Disclaimer: SEIU-UHW flew me up to San Jose to cover their leadership conference.)



Display:


I don't get getting involved in internal fight (none / 0)

We don't question why the Sierra Club is more democratic than LCV, and I just don't get why bloggers would want to get involved in an internal fight as nasty as this. Reward good behavior and criticize the external moves, but the internal fight makes no sense.

As for consolidation, in the abstract it makes a helluva a lot of sense to move towards a stronger union movement.


by Bob Brigham on Sat Sep 06, 2008 at 08:16:43 PM EST

Re: I don't get getting involved in internal fight (none / 0)

Because the goal of Stern's consolidating power into creating a one man dictatorship in the union and removing members from having a voice is so he make secret deals with corporate America that undermine workers rights but increase his own power. All Stern cares about is his personal power.

That why the big business press fawns over him as the "modern 21st century union leader." That is why there is a culture of fear and intimidation within SEIU, where if you don't praise Stern and drink the purple kool-aid, they try to destroy you. This goes against the real tradition of the labor movement is which empowering workers to act for themselves, in with local democracy and locally controlled unions based in the workplace.


by JimmyHiggins on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 12:58:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't get getting involved in internal fight (none / 0)

I agree; getting involved in this silliness only prolongs it.  I personally feel like the California people are going too far (especially the California Nurses' Assoc) but I'd rather they sorted it out internally (and QUICKLY).


by auronrenouille on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 01:59:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't get getting involved in internal fight (none / 0)

Right Bob, like you've never gotten involved in internal fights within the Democratic Party.  Because "we don't question" the DLC.

Maybe bloggers would want to get involved because they're progressives and the outcome of this struggle matters.


by Woodhouse on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:25:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West (none / 0)

I have tried to follow this for a while.  I understand the fact that some don't particularly care for the personality of Andy Stern.  I don't understand what specifically they think he is trying to do, or how specifically he is trying to do it, that should cause me to oppose SEIU.  Please do explain.

What I can tell you for sure, from the perspective of someone working for organized labor in an open shop state, is that we don't care about internal squabbles.  We don't care about one-half of one percent of the progressive element of our economy or politics fighting with the other one-half.  

We are up against it ourselves, and have little time to listen to some group that claims that one of the most aggressive, pro-active, and progressive labor unions is somehow subverting the labor movement.

So, I am asking you: explain yourself concisely, or get on board with the rest of labor.  We are working for the survival of organized labor; it better be an awfully good reason for us to distract our attention from that battle to turn our attention to an internal power struggle.  


by Nate Willems on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 01:37:24 AM EST

Re: The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West (none / 0)

If you don't understand it, then why do you feel so entitled to dismiss it?  Because it's an 'internal squabble'?  You're in the labor movement, so tell me this: is the Teamsters for a Democratic Union just 'one-half of one percent of the progressive element of our economy,' not worth paying attention to?  Would you have felt the same way when the the CIO purged its socialist elements in the '50s to make itself more amenable to the AFL and the federal government?

Please.  I'm not sure who this "we" is you refer to, but don't presume to speak for everyone who works in the labor movement.


by Woodhouse on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:33:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Allow me (none / 0)

The internal structure of SEIU, and the cronies Stern appoints to run the new consolidated locals work VERY HARD to thwart true member participation, ownership and democracy.  The only reason Healthcare West can assemble that many members fighting for their union is because they have defied the International's culture and actually worked to involved ALL members in a genuine manner.

Were it up to Stern and the rest of the Kool-aid crowd, members would be carefully picked up and put down as needed -- to show up for political events to provide the required sea of purple, to be photographed as needed or serve as tokens in a variety of roles.  They would not have a true voice, they would not have any power and they would not exert their will on the union they pay for.

There are a number of ways to do this -- by cherrypicking the "activists" and shutting out the "trouble-makers", by making no real concerted effort to reach and involve THE MAJORITY of members in democratic decisions, by turning "active members" into Stern loyalists with parttime jobs, trips, flair and bullshit.  

Roselli has built a truly democratic union by aggressively trying to reach and involve ALL members and servicing THEIR needs and not the needs of the International.  For this and this alone he must be destroyed.

The members of Healthcare West are not an anomoly in SEIU -- they speak for the vast majority who have never been organized enough since they first signed that card ot have their voices heard.

This "internal struggle" is important to all progressives because within it lies the future of not only the labor movement but true people-powered driven democracy.  If "progressive organizations" like SEIU are allowed unchallenged to further marginalize and silence the already disenfranchised in the name of "building strength" what the hell is it we stand for?

Roselli has been successful (not Andy Stern!) in reaching out to, organizing and giving voice and power to the poor working class, IN SPITE OF Andy Stern.  Roselli is the progressive success story here, not Andy Stern. And if Andy's march to progressive domination is allowed to continue without critique his poor judgement and the scandals that shadow him will bring the faltering labor movement to it's knees.  When the big purple dragon goes down ( and it could if the corruption and power grabbing continues ) so will too the rest of the labor movement under the weight of it's purple hypocrisy.


Jesus Christ was a community organizer and Pontius Pilate was a governor.
by GRO on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 09:19:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

An injury to one is... (2.00 / 1)

Nice summary: democracy in the workplace, democracy in the union, democracy in the nation

Two points:

The idea that there are "internal" fights and "external" fights, and that the former are off limits is not helpful. It comes from the old AFL-CIO bureaucratic culture that discouraged dissent and debate and is especially outmoded in the age of the internet. In what sense are the debates between Stern and Roselli and the members of SEIU internal?

Clearly a great deal is at stake for all unions -- if SEIU even partially succeeds in reviving the union movement, as it has, all will benefit. If SEIU builds a model of unionism that is autocratic and prone to corruption, as it has, all will suffer.

The question increasingly being asked by SEIU members is why not organize for union power and union democracy?

Sounds like Nate Willems is working hard to organize -- no greater calling. But surely it matters whether the organizations you struggle to build are democratic or not? Or if the officers steal the members money?

If the principle of democracy and worker control seems like a luxury, and you want a practical perspective, check out the book "Worker Activism after Successful Union Organizing" by Linda Markowitz.

Stern and his fellow leaders of SEIU have long expressed their disdain for questions of union democracy, but they can not keep them off the table.

For more background on SEIU's "internal" battles and why they matter to all of us, check out Herman Benson's Union Democracy Blog http://bensonsudblog.blogspot.com/

(FYI I work at the Association for Union Democracy, which Benson founded.)


by Matt Noyes on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 02:29:48 AM EST

Re: The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West (none / 0)

I don't think there is that much difference in leadership styles between Andy Stern and Sal Roselli.  In fact Roselli was a strong supporter of Andy Stern's policies regarding mergers and internal democratic procedures when it benefited his leadership of UHW.  Roselli has only come out against them, when they no longer benefited his leadership of SEIU.  Some Stern-like things that Roselli has done include:

Squashing any type of internal democratic debate within Local 399, when it merged with UHW.  I had knew several people who worked for UHW at this time, so am very famillier with the tactics used by Sal Roselli to squash any type of democratic debate with the old elements of Local 399.

Roselli also tried to appoint the UHW delegates to the SEIU convention rather than have them elected.  It was Andy Stern and the international that forced Roselli to have democratic elections to elect delegates to represent UHW at the SEIU Convention.


by veganpete2 on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 01:35:39 PM EST

Re: The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West (none / 0)

Rosselli didn't try to appoint convention delegates. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

Initially UHW adopted rules that elected delegates needed to come from the elected shop floor stewards. That was technical violation of the rules, which the Stern gang pounced on. UHW immediately rectified the errorm, and held new elections. This was all apply documented on the UHW web site.

www.seiuvoice.org

The Sternbots are trying to confuse the issues with easily exposable lies, counting on people not bothering to look up the truth. Sort of like Sarah Palin.


by JimmyHiggins on Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 03:26:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West (none / 0)

Not true - there was a vote by Local 399 members and Local 250 members to approve the merger that formed UHW.  You're making unsubstantiated allegations here.  Do you have any examples of this 'squashing any type of internal democratic debate'? If not then this is meaningless slander.


by Woodhouse on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 02:19:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Fight For United Healthcare Workers West (none / 0)

JimmyHiggins - I didn't say anything about being pro-Stern.  You assume too much. All I said is that Rosselli is not beyond reproach and that this is not a black and white issue.  Unlike you I don't swear blind fealty to either Stern or Rosselli.

Please offer some evidence other than the UHW website to support your argument. Sal Roselli's undemocratic practices were published in the San Francisco Chronicle and San Francisco Examiner.  I can provide links if you want.


by veganpete2 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 01:16:05 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.