John McCain's Rick Davis Problem

In an interview broadcast on Sunday, John Harwood asked John McCain about his campaign manager, Rick Davis's lobbying work on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. McCain's response was to insist that Davis's involvement had concluded long ago:

My campaign manager has stopped that, has nothing to do with it since and I'll be glad to have his record examined by anybody who wants to look at it.

Careful what you wish for, Senator.

On Monday, The New York Times reported that Davis had been paid more than $30,000 a month over 5 years (almost $2 million) by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to "defend them against stricter regulations."

As if that weren't bad enough, The Times followed that up today with a new bombshell: that in fact Davis was still receiving payment as recently as last month from Freddie Mac.

Mr. Davis's firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the two people said.

They said they did not recall Mr. Davis's doing much substantive work for the company in return for the money, other than to speak to a political action committee of high-ranking employees in October 2006 on the approaching midterm Congressional elections. They said Mr. Davis's firm, Davis Manafort, had been kept on the payroll because of his close ties to Mr. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, who by 2006 was widely expected to run again for the White House.

Mr. Davis took a leave from Davis Manafort for the presidential campaign, but as an equity holder continues to benefit from its income.

What this means is that either John McCain was blatantly lying in his interview with Harwood on Sunday or had no idea what his campaign manager was up to. Pick which is worse.

As MaryScott says, this should be absolutely devastating to McCain's bid for the presidency. At the very least, I really don't see how Davis continues on as McCain's campaign manager after tomorrow.

This is how David Donnelly, director of the watchdog group Campaign Money Watch, put it in a statement to The Huffington Post:

"John McCain's campaign manager and Freddie Mac essentially had a secret half a million dollar lay-a-way plan. For almost three years, they made secret, monthly payments of $15,000 to Rick Davis for apparently no other work than for him to provide special access to a future McCain White House in exchange. If McCain knew about this, his presidential campaign should be over. If he didn't know about it, he ought to fire Rick Davis immediately."

In a nice piece of poetic justice, I love that the sources for the story only came forward in response to the McCain campaign's own attempt to smear Barack Obama with a false guilt by association charge of their own.

But last week the McCain campaign stepped up a running battle of guilt by association when it began broadcasting commercials trying to link Mr. Obama directly to the government bailout of the mortgage giants this month by charging that he takes advice from Fannie Mae's former chief executive, Franklin Raines, an assertion both Mr. Raines and the Obama campaign dispute.

Incensed by the advertisements, several current and former executives of the companies came forward to discuss the role that Rick Davis, Mr. McCain's campaign manager and longtime adviser, played in helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac beat back regulatory challenges when he served as president of their advocacy group, the Homeownership Alliance, formed in the summer of 2000. Some who came forward were Democrats, but Republicans, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed their descriptions.

One has to wonder if this story would have even come to light if the McCain campaign hadn't tried to play a bit too fast and loose with the truth. Ain't karma a bitch?



Display:


Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (2.00 / 1)

Well, Davis may go but I doubt it.  Still, a nasty turn in the middle of another bad week.  And Schmidt, the Rove acolyte, looks a complete ass, or presumptuous bully, after his tirade against the NYT on exactly this point earlier this week.    My favourite take so far from someone who should know:

Robert McCarson, a former spokesman for Fannie Mae, criticized the McCain campaign's attack on Obama, given the five years of payments to Davis.

"It's either idiocy or hubris" on the McCain campaign's part, McCarson, a Democrat, said in an interview.

Pete Yost - Source: Freddie Mac paid McCain aide's firm AP 24 Sep 08

I'll say.  Again, which is worse?


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:20:45 AM EST

in a twisted kind of way... (none / 0)

you have to admire the sheer audacity of their lies and bellicosity.  At the end of the day, it won't work (fingers crossed), but they've kept it close.


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 05:04:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: in a twisted kind of way... (none / 0)

Yeah, it is going to be close but I think we will win this one and the irony is this was going to be the 'clean maverick McCain' campaign while they will probably succeed instead of debasing this kind of politics for an election cycle or two if they lose big.  And Schmidt as Rovian apprentice seems more like those cheap designer label 'knock-offs' one gets offered on the sidewalk than the real McCoy, he's missing something of 'his master's voice.'


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 05:12:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Schmidt is different from Rove (none / 0)

because he doesn't have a long history with McCain that Rove has with Bush.  Rove really understood Bush's strengths and weaknesses (which are different from McCain's) because he has been with him since the early 1990's.  Rove might be a one trick pony with Bush (or someone like Bush - i.e. Palin).  Plus, you're right, Schmidt comes across as a real bull in a china shop.

Schmidt has transformed McCain into something that is unrecognizable from the essence of McCain.  Maybe they had to.  Of course, just the fact that McCain has allowed Schmidt to do this to him and his campaign tells you something about his character.  

If you are them, what do you do?  They're in a tough spot because the externalities are so against them.  They can't count on a candidate as disciplined as Obama to make a mistake.  

Time is running out.    
 


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 06:29:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (none / 0)

I tell you, they should really let John McCain in on the details of John McCain's campaign.  This has already been discussed over two months ago...then again I ain't complaining, No FcCain Way


by KLRinLA on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:56:03 AM EST

Schmidt is running that campaign... (2.00 / 1)

not Davis.  I don't really know what Davis does and what power he has.  I guess he's handling McCain's comparatively modest field operations which are limited by the public financing.   McCain has gone all in with and sold his soul to Schmidt, a real hard ass Rovian.  Schmidt is controlling strategy, message, press and Palin (and McCain).  

Plouffe and Axelrod are equal number twos in power within the Obama campaign - and they have been from Day 1.  Obama talks to Axelrod more frequently but he knows that Plouffe is on top of the grinding organizational muscle that is going to win some of these close States.  Plouffe is a real hero in our campaign - and Obama knows it.  


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:59:47 AM EST

Re: Schmidt is running that campaign... (none / 0)

It's a no-drama campaign. I'm really not sure that can be emphasized enough. Plouffe has more of a public face (I get emails from him all the time, after all :) while I can't remember one from Axelrod), but you're right, Obama does more day-to-day with Axelrod.

I've never heard a hint of there being jealousy or infighting or anything else. It's very hard to imagine that after this long a campaign all the principals have just agreed on everything, but it's clear they know how to disagree and settle things without taking it outside the conference room.

It's an extremely impressive organization all around.


No Way. No How. No McCain-Palin!
by Texas Gray Wolf on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:30:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (none / 0)

This story features on the MSNBC website but is absent from the completly spineless and increasingly nauseating CNN.
It should be a major story carried by all of the networks,but so far as I can see,thats not the case.
by Lodgemannered on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 06:19:31 AM EST

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (none / 0)

I agree. I hope they pick it up and run with it during the day.

On the other hand, Campbell Brown singlehandedly brought CNN back into my good graces, for a little while at least. I'm very much hoping the others pick up her spin on Sequestered Sarah and run with it.


No Way. No How. No McCain-Palin!
by Texas Gray Wolf on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:32:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (none / 0)

Non-story, really.  His firm?  I n which he has an interest.  You really don't want to go there. Think for just a minute.
Most of this "gotcha" stuff on both sides is just a carny act - and a side-show at best.
by M1513 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:52:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (2.00 / 0)

lol!


When you start out making the "slippery slope" argument, where do you draw the line?
by Jess81 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 10:22:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (2.00 / 1)

Obama should call Rick Davis out, and demand McCain fire him.

It'll draw media attention to this, piss off McCain, and no matter what McCain does, he loses. If he fires Rick, he looks weak, vacillating, and has a serious break in his field operation just over a month before the election. If he keeps him, he looks like a corrupt asshole.


by Zephyr on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 08:20:12 AM EST

Counting down (none / 0)

To when the McCain campaign throws a fit at the media and calls them biiiiiiiased for reporting this.


by Dr Squid on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:19:07 AM EST

Gary Hart anyone? (none / 0)

Follow my advisers around!  Really!  They're doing nothing wrong!


But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.
by thezzyzx on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 09:20:49 AM EST

Re: Gary Hart anyone? (2.00 / 0)

Good analogy.

A better analogy would be if Gary Hart had just unveiled an ad accusing his opponent of infidelity.


When you start out making the "slippery slope" argument, where do you draw the line?
by Jess81 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 10:24:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (none / 0)

Do they think we are stupid?

That's right, they are counting on it.

McCain:  We Won't Be Fooled Again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9njqqelj Ao


by gouko787 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 10:51:49 AM EST

Re: John McCain's Rick Davis Problem (none / 0)

trying to laay low. Davis is off the airwaves so he can lay low and see if the drumbeat subsides and if it'll blow over. I doubt it will but I'm afraid it might.


by cacamp on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 12:58:10 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.