John McCain To Suspend Campaign To Focus On Economy

From CNN.com:

John McCain suspends campaigning to work on economy, requests postponing Friday debate; asks Obama do the same

Yeah I bet you'd like that.

TPM has McCain's full remarks.

Update [2008-9-24 15:25:50 by Todd Beeton]:Shorter John McCain: Hey, look over there!

McCain is, of course, trying to frame this ultimately political maneuver as the exact opposite:

I am calling on the President to convene a meeting with the leadership from both houses of Congress, including Senator Obama and myself. It is time for both parties to come together to solve this problem.

We must meet as Americans, not as Democrats or Republicans, and we must meet until this crisis is resolved. I am directing my campaign to work with the Obama campaign and the commission on presidential debates to delay Friday night's debate until we have taken action to address this crisis.

Wily. Can Obama reject this proposal without looking like the bad guy? This needs to be framed as John McCain in panic mode. This is what someone who panics does, while Barack is calm and steady in a time of crisis.

Update [2008-9-24 15:29:4 by Todd Beeton]:This in from the Obama campaign:

At 8:30 this morning, Senator Obama called Senator McCain to ask him if he would join in issuing a joint statement outlining their shared principles and conditions for the Treasury proposal and urging Congress and the White House to act in a bipartisan manner to pass such a proposal. At 2:30 this afternoon, Senator McCain returned Senator Obama's call and agreed to join him in issuing such a statement. The two campaigns are currently working together on the details.

Update [2008-9-24 15:32:3 by Todd Beeton]:Chris Bowers says what I'm thinking:

It appears that McCain's move is clearly designed to one up Obama's earlier move. What a ratfucker. Obama makes a move behind the scenes, McCain makes him wait on an answer, and then announces this at the same time. This is a total ratfuck.

Update [2008-9-24 15:45:57 by Todd Beeton]:Political Radar has some reactions from the Obama camp that look promising:

"The debate is on," a senior Obama campaign official told ABC News.

Obama supporter and chief debate negotiator Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., told MSNBC that "we can handle both," when asked about his reaction to McCain's call to postpone the first debate because of the administration's bailout plan. [...]

Obama is willing to return to Washington "if it would be helpful," a campaign official said. But the official reiterated that Obama intends to debate on Friday.

It's not clear to me though if this is the Obama campaign's final answer to McCain's statement today.

Update [2008-9-24 16:4:35 by Todd Beeton]:Dana Bash on CNN said McCain does intend to pull alll of his ads.

Barack Obama should be speaking on this any moment.

Update [2008-9-24 16:18:1 by Todd Beeton]:Sen. Reid as quoted on CNN said the debate should go on and is framing postponing the debate and having the pres candidates return to Washington as "injecting presidential politics" into the process. Good.

Lindsey Graham's reaction to Reid: "I'm dumbfounded." What a shocker.



Display:


To Focus On Economy (none / 0)

Well fuck.  This would have been great if Obama got to it first.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:19:32 PM EST

This is not a great idea either way. (none / 0)

Let the banking committees handle it, which neither McCain nor Obama are on.

They can be kept informed without actually being there.


"No government has the right to tell its citizens whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown
by auboy2006 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:22:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This is not a great idea either way. (2.00 / 1)

McQueeg wants to work on the economy?  Hasn't he done enough damage already?


When you start out making the "slippery slope" argument, where do you draw the line?
by Jess81 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:28:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Heh. (none / 0)

You think McCain can walk and chew gum at the same time?


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:53:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: To Focus On Economy (none / 0)

If he did, we'd be screaming and the GOP would still attack.


by RandyMI on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:39:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am absolutely convinced (none / 0)

McCain's move is to divert attention from this and this.


Our long national nightmare is over.
by Beltway Dem on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:40:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Enquirer? Come on. (none / 0)

Give it a rest already.  Come back when a credible publication prints it.

Better yet, don't.  Sex scandals are so 1998.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:46:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Enquirer? Come on. (none / 0)

They got Edwards right.  I mean, c'mon.  They may print things that nobody else prints, but they do document their accusations.


Our long national nightmare is over.
by Beltway Dem on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:53:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't care about Edwards, either. (none / 0)

None of that is my business.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:59:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Enquirer? Come on. (none / 0)

Give it a rest?

The Great and Powerful Jonah Goldberg strongly disagrees with you:

[I]t's worth pointing out that while the Enquirer may or may not be scrupulous in its choice of stories -- that's in the eye of the beholder -- it is pretty scrupulous about its facts. They win lawsuits. They've broken a host of stories the MSM guys couldn't.

I don't care about sex scandals per se, I care about their double-standards, and this one's a doozy. I can't wait to hear the republiclone army foaming at the mouth at how salacious and irresponsible the Enquirer is, less than two months after they praised it as a bastion of risky and courageous journalism.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:01:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm comfortable thinking they're scumbags (none / 0)

The double standards issue is certainly relevant, but if I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about getting some head or about Edwards's midlife crisis sex, then I can't turn around and say that Palin fucking some guy for a discount on snowmobile parts (or whatever the hell it is) is somehow the worst thing I ever heard.

I'm trying to get through this election and avoid becoming the enemy.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:17:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm comfortable thinking they're scumbags (none / 0)

The good news, you don't have to care about Clinton's BJ or Edwards' affair. The republicans will care for you. You don't have to become the enemy, but I'd hope you don't want to become the prey.

I recall we hashed this out when Edwards' affair was revealed, and we're all entitled to our own judgment on what's relevant to office. But I despise a cheater, be it on income taxes or a wife. Sure, it shouldn't be enough to force a president out of office, but it should be enough to keep a candidate from getting there.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:24:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Such a relief (none / 0)

I'm so glad the Republicans are there to care about these things so I don't have to. :I

We all cheat a little, one time or another, on something.  I ride my bike on the sidewalk when the street is extra-busy and sometimes get yelled at by cops about it. Obama said he wouldn't sign a bill that had telecom immunity in it, and he did do that.  That's cheating, in a sense.

Where do you draw the line?

"I don't get why prostitution is illegal. Selling is legal, and fucking is legal...so why isn't selling fucking legal?"

--George Carlin


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:37:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Such a relief (none / 0)

C'mon...changing positions on a bill or riding your bike on the sidewalk is not exactly the same as having an affair. "Cheating" isn't binary. Severity and context matter.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:46:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Exactly my point (none / 0)

How does the placement and motion of someone's wang (or corresponding other naughty part) compare to anything else?  

Some (not me, mind you) would say that Obama's flip on FISA is indicative of a worrisome moral and political flexibility that has effects far beyond one person cheating on his or her spouse.  Which is more important?  Marital fidelity or, you know, The Constitution?

Indeed, me riding my bike on the sidewalk risks serious injury to pedestrians (plural!) if I'm not careful.  It would take some, ahem, serious doing to have an affair to have that much impact.

Under traditional viewpoints, you have a point.  My point is that there are multiple ways of looking at things, and not everyone cares about people's sex lives.  I've been under the impression that Europeans really don't give it a lot of thought for some time now.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:59:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign (2.00 / 2)

I have a better idea. Let's have the debate on the economy.


by RandyMI on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:20:23 PM EST

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign (none / 0)

Even better yet, cancel the foreign policy debate entirely...  John McCain, no foreign policy debate for you!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:41:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

shrewd (none / 0)

a shrewd move by mccain. there was nothing else for him to do to stop the bleeding. In one swoop he has changed the story line and provided himself with the opportunity to look like a statesman on the economy. Obama should handle with care.


by wasder on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:21:51 PM EST

Re: shrewd (2.00 / 1)

That's ridiculous. This is a perfectly reasonable way to handle this crisis.

Thankfully, once they re-schedule the debate I have no doubt they'll suspend the Iraq War so McCain can focus better.

It's absurd to think that McCain should have to retain more than one major issue in his brain at once. That's just not how the world works.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:03:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: shrewd (none / 0)

I was kinda thinking maybe we just suspend the whole shabangabang and just let Bush go another term?  I mean, the candidates cannot seriously make time to debate, then logically, they sholdn't even run anymore.  In fact, out of fear and shock of it all, I am just going to stop typ......


by KLRinLA on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:49:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: shrewd (none / 0)

Bull, Obama should go right for his jugular like a bull in a china shop.  call him out on it starting with one simple statement:

"John McCain, if this issue is sooooo pressing you feel you need to suspend your campaign, why are you just now bringing it up 10 days after the initial crisis hit?  Are you that slow to respond to crisis?  As POTUS are you saying you can only do one thing at a time?  Are you using this just to try to get a political edge?"

Obama needs to not only respond, he needs to get aggressive and make MCCain explain himself.


by tlhwraith on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:50:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hell no!! (2.00 / 1)

I think Obama should say no to this idea. Let Congress and the current President iron out this mess. McCain knows he's in deep sh*t!


by zenful6219 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:22:27 PM EST

Re: Hell no!! (2.00 / 1)

Obama is part of Congress if you did not realize that. I understand he is running for President, but he still is the Junior Senator from Illinois.


Restore America's Strength.
by RJEvans on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:25:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (2.00 / 1)

Yes but he's not on the right committees.  Until the bill is out of committee what exactly could he do anyway?


But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.
by thezzyzx on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:27:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (2.00 / 1)

Duh, of course I understood that. But, unless I'm mistaken (and I'm not), there are many people right now on the appropriate committees debating and grilling the Bush liars and trying to come up with a plan. McCain's idea is nothing but theater. Obama should call him on it by saying no to cancelling the debate, and he should recommend it be on the economy instead of foreign relations.


by zenful6219 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:29:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (2.00 / 1)

This is exactly the right course of action Zenful. Take it very seriously, tell the American people that they would most benefit from switching the topic of the debate to the economy so that they can hear two different strategies for managing this crisis and then wax McCain's ass Friday night.


by wasder on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:37:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (none / 0)

that would be a very very bad move.  Obama can parlay this, but he has to be careful, and he absolutely has to acquiesce to the debate delay, if not follow suit entirely.

There go my friday plans.  I had some pretty good drinking game rules made up.


by semiquaver on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:27:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (2.00 / 2)

I disagree about cancelling the debate. The debate should absolutely continue. However, instead of it being on foreign relations, Obama should call for it to be on the economy.


by zenful6219 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:31:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (none / 0)

Yup. As if anyone will even be talking about this ploy once the debate happens.

I can imagine the pundits now: "We'll hear from our analysts in a moment, and then we have the results from our focus group later tonight. But gosh, I can't help but think that this debate should've been postponed..."


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:05:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hell no!! (none / 0)

I think he already has. Wasn't that what Rep. Emmanuel was talking about?


by spirowasright on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:13:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

seriously? (2.00 / 1)

oh my fracking god.  wtf?


Being Normal is for the Mediocre.
by Doug Tuttle on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:22:43 PM EST

McQueeg keeps throwing hail maries. (2.00 / 3)

This is another attempt to grab control of the news cycle.  It's related to the Rick Davis revalations, I'm sure.


When you start out making the "slippery slope" argument, where do you draw the line?
by Jess81 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:25:14 PM EST

Re: McQueeg keeps throwing hail maries. (2.00 / 2)

This election is a chess game.  McCain just said "check".  So what.  Obama's next move needs to be "check-mate".  The economy is Dem's/Obama's game.


Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:42:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not sure how he does that (2.00 / 0)

As I recall, though, Dole resigned his Senate seat well after he had won the nomination, when it was clear he was well behind in the polls and needed a game-changer.  Sort of like the present situation, maybe.

Here's how I look at it.  There are two groups of people out there: those who see this as a genuine act by McCain, and those who see it as a stunt.  Presumably everyone here sees it as a stunt, but we're not everyone.

I doubt many of the people who see it as a stunt will be offended no matter what Obama does in response.  But for those who see it as genuine, won't they be pretty upset if Obama decides to hit back in a tough, partisan way?  I'm not saying he needs to go along with the game, but I do think he needs to calibrate his response very carefully.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:26:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McQueeg keeps throwing hail maries. (2.00 / 4)

Seriously, that was my first thought. They haven't gotten a news cycle in over a week and this one is rapidly taking a disastrously bad turn for them. So, they decided to throw another hail mary. These kind of tactics should scare the crap out of any objective observer.


by noop on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:56:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I could see this either way... (none / 0)

...it could make McCain look big or it could make him look weak.  I have no clue.

I don't understand what exactly McCain could do in DC that he couldn't do on the trail.  He's not on the banking committees or anything like that.

One thing you can say about McCain's campaign - it's sure not boring.


But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.
by thezzyzx on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:26:16 PM EST

The full text (2.00 / 1)

America this week faces an historic crisis in our financial system. We must pass legislation to address this crisis. If we do not, credit will dry up, with devastating consequences for our economy. People will no longer be able to buy homes and their life savings will be at stake. Businesses will not have enough money to pay their employees. If we do not act, ever corner of our country will be impacted. We cannot allow this to happen.

Last Friday, I laid out my proposal and I have since discussed my priorities and concerns with the bill the Administration has put forward. Senator Obama has expressed his priorities and concerns. This morning, I met with a group of economic advisers to talk about the proposal on the table and the steps that we should take going forward. I have also spoken with members of Congress to hear their perspective.

It has become clear that no consensus has developed to support the Administration's proposal. I do not believe that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we are running out of time.

Tomorrow morning, I will suspend my campaign and return to Washington after speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative. I have spoken to Senator Obama and informed him of my decision and have asked him to join me.

I am calling on the President to convene a meeting with the leadership from both houses of Congress, including Senator Obama and myself. It is time for both parties to come together to solve this problem.

We must meet as Americans, not as Democrats or Republicans, and we must meet until this crisis is resolved. I am directing my campaign to work with the Obama campaign and the commission on presidential debates to delay Friday night's debate until we have taken action to address this crisis.

I am confident that before the markets open on Monday we can achieve consensus on legislation that will stabilize our financial markets, protect taxpayers and homeowners, and earn the confidence of the American people. All we must do to achieve this is temporarily set politics aside, and I am committed to doing so.

Following September 11th, our national leaders came together at a time of crisis. We must show that kind of patriotism now. Americans across our country lament the fact that partisan divisions in Washington have prevented us from addressing our national challenges. Now is our chance to come together to prove that Washington is once again capable of leading this country.

9/11?  Really?  You want to go there, John?

Anyway, McCain hasn't been at his day job in the Senate for months.  He has been railing against Obama for not meeting him in town halls for months.  

If he can't find time for a 90 minute debate on his strongest topic of foreign affairs on a Friday night because of this crisis that the entire rest of Congress is working on, then I'm not convinced that he can handle the multi-tasking and multi-disciplinary job that is the President of the United States.

Obama should say that McCain is more than welcome to stay home, then go to the debate and answer questions on foreign policy and the economy for the 90 minutes.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:27:31 PM EST

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign (2.00 / 1)

After 22 years in the Senate, McCain finally wants to focus on the economy? He still has not answered where he stands on the bailout.


by RandyMI on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:29:32 PM EST

Re: John McCain (2.00 / 0)

It's as if McCain woke up this morning and suddenly realized he's a member of the United States Senate.  How many votes has he made this year, 2?


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:30:08 PM EST

jerk. (2.00 / 0)

Wow, McCain found the only thing that could possibly have politicized the crisis even more than it already is.

Because the campaign goes on whether or not it's "suspended".


When you start out making the "slippery slope" argument, where do you draw the line?
by Jess81 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:33:26 PM EST

CNN is confirming that McCain camp (none / 0)

has said that Obama called McCain this morning so they can release a joint statement.


by puma on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:34:03 PM EST

Fine - suspend (2.00 / 1)

This is silly.

We're WINNING.

The election is going to happen 11/4 whether John McCain has 6 weeks or 5 weeks of campaign time to close the gap.

If John McCain wants to piss away one of those weeks, fine by me.

We're winning, people... time is on our side.


by zonk on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:35:12 PM EST

Re: Fine - suspend (none / 0)

Exactly! We are winning. There is no need for Obama to agree to cancel the debate. McCain is unable to handle the situation. Obama is cool, calm and collected. McCain is panicing.


by zenful6219 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:39:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Leave McCain's Chair Empty (2.00 / 4)

That's what they did in 1980 when Jimmy Carter refused to debate John Anderson. They let Reagan debate Anderson and left an empty chair to make it clear that Carter was not there.

Obama can use the debate as a lenghty news conference. Every time a question is posed to John McCain, the cameras should zoom in on his empty chair and then the moderator would ask Obama the next question.

The Constitution states that this is an election year. We do not suspend elections simply because the financial markets are in crisis. At any rate, although the economy is bad, this is not the Great Depression. Continuing the electoral process is more important than a quick fix bailout for bankers. McCain's ploy is a trap to make it look like that he is a leader and Obama is not.


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:39:15 PM EST

Re: Leave McCain's Chair Empty (2.00 / 3)

hahaha, I love it, I proposed the same thing on Kos...This move reeks of desperation and showmanship...Country first would be allowing the country to know your running mate...Not panicking in crisis


by Dingaling on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:44:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Leave McCain's Chair Empty (2.00 / 3)

Yeah, it was a pretty good political. Many don't want to admit it.


by soyousay on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:50:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Leave McCain's Chair Empty (2.00 / 2)

politically, it's great, i'll admit it, because many people lack the ability to see through the fog...As far as character goes, it's a joke.


by Dingaling on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:54:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Leave McCain's Chair Empty (none / 0)

Good character is in the eye of the beholder. Some (including me) think MANY politicians are a joke; especially now.


by soyousay on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:22:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Leave McCain's Chair Empty (2.00 / 0)

Huh?  So is good political theater.


When you start out making the "slippery slope" argument, where do you draw the line?
by Jess81 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 05:09:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Leave McCain's Chair Empty (none / 0)

Huh?


by soyousay on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 05:14:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Another reckless gamble from the maverick (2.00 / 2)

 What's he gonna do when he gets us into a war with Iran, Russia, North Korea or Canada?  "Hey guys, lets just take a break for a minute and sing kumbaya, ok?"


Change has come to America.
by the mystical vortexes of sedona on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:48:29 PM EST

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign (2.00 / 1)

Will Palin suspend campaigning? Will the ads and mailers stop? Will he instruct the RNC and state parties to suspend?


by RandyMI on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 03:55:17 PM EST

Neither of them are on the banking committee (2.00 / 1)

They don't really have anything to do, in terms of their day job, until it comes out of the committee.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:00:53 PM EST

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign To Focus On Ec (2.00 / 2)

The US had elections during the Civil War and World War 2.  Obama can come out on top with this issue if he hits back hard.  Elections aren't incidental.  They're the means by which the American people get to decide how to respond to crises.  If McCain can't do both he has no business being president.

This works every which way.  If McCain doesn't show up for the debate Obama can slam him for being obstructionist, the same way he's being with Palin.  If McCain slams Obama for not "caring" about the economy the Dems can say he's politicing the issue, and Congress, at this point, will only approve a stop gap because the GOP is simply incompetent.

Obama, hand McCain his ass.  He just blinked.  Don't try to be the "better man".  A majority of the public has already concluded that the GOP doesn't know what they're doing.  The question they're asking is whether you're tough enough.  Treat him like crap and watch your poll numbers go up even more.


by IncognitoErgoSum on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:03:17 PM EST

McQuitter (2.00 / 1)

People will see him as McWhiney McQuitter. They all know that 2 hours on Friday night are not going to take away from the real horse trading going on in Washington. People are not that stupid.


by gert on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:08:15 PM EST

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign (none / 0)

Does Obama suspend his debate prep in FL to come back to D.C.?  If nothing else McCain is gaming him by eating into his prep time.

McCain has been doing town halls, and this debate plays to his strength, so losing prep time isn't as big an issue to him.

Bold move for a campaign that is trailing right now.   If Obama doesn't counter with something equally as bold does he risk not play into this recent McCain theme of America first?


by RichardFlatts on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:09:22 PM EST

Why not debate the economy now? (none / 0)

These guys are both supposed to be prepared to be President, right?   Have the debate on Friday night, in Washington, DC, on the Senate floor.

As for suspending the campaign, that is ridiculous.  Hopefully we will see a more high-minded tone in the discourse given the gravity of the times, but we do have a current President don't we (sometimes I forget)?  Let President Bush lead on the issues of today and have the candidates focus on their plans for the future.


by activatedbybush on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:19:47 PM EST

Re: John McCain To Suspend Campaign (2.00 / 2)

Best quote ever:

"McCain suspends campaign due to lack of interest"


by Skaje on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:20:54 PM EST

Re: John McCain To (2.00 / 0)

OK...This has officially become the most fucked up campaign in my lifetime and I have to think the most fucked up in the last 60 years.   This just gets stranger and stranger.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:21:01 PM EST

Well, I guess if your definintion of (none / 0)

"campaign" is to be as lying and divisive as possible, then of course you should suspend your "campaign" Johnny McLame.    But I think, and I believe that Barack Obama agrees, that this campaign is about us, and the future of our country.  What more important time to have a real conversation about this question than now?

Of course these guys should debate - sorry John, it's time to get out of your foxhole and face your opponent like a man.


by activatedbybush on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:22:07 PM EST

Obama should come back with (2.00 / 1)

Him, Biden, and McCain going to the "summit" and leave Palin out since she is not in the Congressional leadership, further pushing Palin out to the side and showing how irrelevant she is


vote blue in 2008
by sepulvedaj3 on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:27:59 PM EST

A stunt, a gimmick.... (2.00 / 1)

And, they are prepared to have Obama say no, so they can send out the surrogates, like Lindsey and Joementum to do the "I'm OUTRAGED at how little Obama cares about this crisis..."

Don't buy it. Any meeting, anything EXTRA they can do CAN go on without suspending the campaign.

Can you imagine Faux News if the shoe was on the other foot, and McCain was pulling away, if there was a terrorist attack today in, let's say, Puerto Rico; and Obamb's team wanted to suspend the campaign for the crisis?

They would scream bloody murder.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:35:48 PM EST

The debate is on (none / 0)

1) Obama has not agreed to suspend debate in fact they have said Obama can handle both.

Next-

The University of Mississippi is going forward with the preparation for the debate. We are ready to host the debate, and we expect the debate to occur as planned.

At present, the University has received no notification of any change in the timing or venue of the debate.

We have been notified by the Commission on Presidential Debates that we are proceeding as scheduled.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:37:49 PM EST

Re: The debate is on (none / 0)

Great.

What can McCain claim?

Holding the debate as scheduled is adding to the economic woes?

He is SOOOOOOOO busy working on the economy (when did that start) those two hours will kill his master-planning.

BS, let him whine. Let him threaten to boycott.

That'll work big-time.  


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:42:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What DIFF is this going to make? (none / 0)

And, what exactly IS McCain going to do?

Hold an economic conference?

Spend his days advising Dodd, Reid, Shelby?

These guys know more about the economy then he does.

Call his bluff. This is crap-ola, something Rove probably called Schmidt and told him to pull.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:39:29 PM EST

Stunt (none / 0)

 A stunt from a failed candidate, which will fail.


1st Law of Obamadynamics: For every action, there is a greater than equal criticism. In advance.
by QTG on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:40:07 PM EST

Where's Jerome? (2.00 / 1)

To tell us how BRILLIANT of a move this was for McCain, ya know-- kinda like Sarah Palin


by gecollin on Wed Sep 24, 2008 at 04:40:51 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.