I've written a bit about the extent to which Sarah Palin seemingly went in a quest to get back at a former brother-in-law, an effort which has drawn an investigation and has forced Palin to lawyer up. But even before Palin became Governor, her actions were already being called into question. According to The Washington Post's James V. Grimaldi and Kimberly Kindy, the judge overseeing the custody case involving Palin's sister and former brother-in-law had some strong words for Palin's family.
The divorce went to trial in the fall of 2005 while the state police internal investigation was pending. Anchorage Superior Court Judge John Suddock reviewed the complaints filed by Palin and her family. At trial on Oct. 27, 2005, the judge expressed puzzlement about why the family was trying to get Wooten fired, since depriving the trooper of a job would harm his ability to pay family support to Palin's sister."It appears for the world that Ms. McCann and her family have decided to take off for the guy's livelihood -- that the bitterness of whatever who did what to whom has overridden good judgment," Suddock said in an audio recording from the trial on TV station KTUU's Web site. "Aesop told us not to slay the goose who lays the golden egg. For whatever reason, people are trying to slay the goose here and it tends to diminish his earning capacity."
With such a near constant flow of uncomfortable news about Palin, it's no wonder some in the establishment media (and also the not-so-establishment media) are beginning to ask whether Palin will endure on the GOP ticket or if, like Tom Eagleton before her, she will be replaced with another choice deemed to be less risky.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 54 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.