McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet Rumor

The buzz in the blogosphere yesterday was the rumor, advanced by ArcXIX at dailykos, that 4 month old Trig Palin is not Sarah's child, but her daughter Bristol's. Today, to nip that rumor in the bud, the McCain campaign has released a statement from the Palins that Bristol, who is 17 and unmarried, is actually 5 months pregnant now. While the Palins' statement is pretty standard stuff, Reuters is reporting a statement from a "senior McCain aide" that takes a more politically confrontational tone, desperately attempting to connect the rumor and the Obama campaign.

"The despicable rumors that have been spread by liberal blogs, some even with Barack Obama's name in them, is a real anchor around the Democratic ticket, pulling them down in the mud in a way that certainly juxtaposes themselves against their 'campaign of change,'" a senior aide said.

Once again outclassing his opposition, in a statement at a press avail earlier today, Barack Obama called out the McCain campaign and called on everyone to "back off these kinds of stories."

Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown reports: At a press avail in Monroe, Mich., Barack Obama on Palin: "Back off these kinds of stories."

"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and/or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn't be a topic of our politics." [...]

"I am offended by that statement. There is no evidence at all that any of this involved us," he said. "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if I thought there was somebody in my campaign who was involved in something like that, they would be fired."

The desperation inherent in their invocation of Barack's name when railing against the internet rumor implies to me their deep desire to change the subject altogether, to distract from what is clearly a piss poor job of vetting of Sarah Palin. The McCain campaign claims to have known about this pregnancy, but why then wouldn't they have released it on their terms instead of in this reactionary way? And why the hell would a Palin spokesperson not even have known about Bristol Palin's pregnancy just two days ago?

Talking Points Memo has a good catch from The Anchorage Daily News:

The Daily News had asked Palin's press secretary, Bill McAllister, over the weekend to address rumors that Bristol was pregnant.

"I don't know. I have no evidence that Bristol's pregnant," he said on Saturday.

McCain is trying to turn this on offense but clearly Palin has turned into a headache for them and considering her connections to Ted Stevens and her upcoming deposition in the firing of her ex-brother in law, that's not likely to go away any time soon.

Update [2008-9-1 15:50:32 by Josh Orton]:

There's only one of two possibilities here:

First, liberal blogs have become SO POWERFUL that a single non-frontpage DKos diary about a pregnancy rumor forced, within 1.5 days, a presidential campaign to announce the teenage-pregnancy of the VP candidate's daughter.

-OR-

This rumor was already circulating among traditional news types, and the McCain campaign actively flacked the DKos diary around to reporters as "proof" of how vicious and scurrilous the left is. And then conveniently let hang the (completely false) notion that Obama staffers fanned the flames of a negative story during a hurricane.

Take a guess.

Update [2008-9-1 19:3:42 by Jerome Armstrong]: Just to add in my opinion. It took me about 30 minutes last night of looking into the 'rumour' to figure out its bullshit. In their rationale, the propagandists of it, like Andrew Sullivan, reminded me of the Obama-haters that promulgated the lies about his Hawaii birth. Sick opposites attract. Don't become what you hate.



Display:


At the very least (none / 0)

I would imagine Palin would have second and third thoughts about going after Obama's character now. If not, I suppose I won't be surprised, but I'd like to think that being outside the mainstream of GOP talking points is good for SOMETHING at least. She certainly had no problem complimenting him when she wasn't the nominee.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:35:09 PM EST

Re: At the very least (none / 0)

I don't know, Republicans aren't known for their keen sense of irony.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:37:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: At the very least (none / 0)

At the very least anyone on our side who participated in perpetuating this rumor should have their head examined.  You did not help us...in fact you hurt us by forcing our candidate to beg you to shut the he** up.  jeezus.  Let's get on with getting Senator Obama elected President!  Get out there and GOTV.....especially in the swing states!

Go Obama!!!


by cChalfonte on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:32:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

McCain is shameless.  Obama's campaign had nothing to do with this rumor.   It was all independent.   On the other hand, McCain's surrogates were front and center in questioning Obama's Birth certificate, his religion and anything else to 'prove' he is not an American.

McCain is worse than Bush now.  I can't believe that Americans are so gullible that they still think that he has any 'Maverick' left in him.   McCain is a souless shell intent on gaining power and nothing else.


by gavoter on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:35:56 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

It certainly didn't take long for Palin to go from a supposed "asset" to a very real liability.


by auronrenouille on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:36:37 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

I've been impressed at Obama's ability to hit exactly the right tone and exactly the right points again and again in this campaign.  I'm hoping this is a measure of his character and not just a measure of his political discipline.  Way to go, O.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:36:52 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

In an odd way, it is an example of how his big ego can be of great benefit to the country. He takes so much pride in actually trying to walk the walk.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:40:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

Sound like you don't believe he's a stand-up guy, then?  This is an honest question.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:58:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

I guess you meant this as a compliment...but it reads like an insult. Just out of curiosity, do you know any candidates for president that haven't had a 'healthy' ego?


by royce on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:12:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

I think he has reason to have a big ego, and that he has not let it become a negative trait. He has tied his own integrity to his sense of self-worth, and I view that as a very powerful thing.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Sep 02, 2008 at 05:06:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (none / 0)

I don't really understand how conservatives think -- if they do.

Will they praise Palin's teenage daughter for not using contraceptives and not getting an abortion, or will they condemn her for having sex before marriage? (We all know they'll hold the boy blameless regardless.)

Will they think this makes Sarah Palin a good parent or a bad one?

And will they think that someone who obviously can't run her own family to their satisfaction could run America to it?

Stay tuned. And never undersetimate the power of hypocrisy and denial.


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:38:07 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (none / 0)

Publicly, they'll defend her to the very core. Privately, they won't like it. Desmoinesdem posted links to a lot of fundamentalist Christians who think she was out of place for putting her career above family, the fact that she didn't realize her daughter was having sex will only cement that way of thinking.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:42:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (none / 0)

If Palin were a Democrat, the Religious Right would be calling for her head.   They would be screaming to the hills about what a terrible mother she is.

What kind of mother would abandon a 4 month old infant with special needs for her political ambition.  And what kind of mother would be so absent from her family that she would fail to know that her own teenage daugher was having sex, pre-marital sex.  Why wasn't Palin home to teach her children proper values?

In any event, this is also another good reminder why Palin is so dangerous and abstainance only education does not work.  All you get is pregnant kids.


by gavoter on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:46:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (2.00 / 1)

I know fundies very well...

This will not go over as bad as you think... The teenage mother will be praised for keeping the baby (although getting married 'just 'cos of that is REAL fundie territory and is what is going to politically hurt this situation the most... I digress)...

Her "sin" will be forgiven, since she has done the right thing and kept the baby.  the family will actually be held in higher esteem by by the fundies for supporting her...

The teenage daughter, unfortunately, will be looked down upon from hereon in... it wont' be to her face... but, behind her back... as for Sarah Palin, her stock will rise in fundie circles for being supportive of "life".  She won't be looked upon as a "Bad mother", but one willing to sacrifice for "life".

So, there you go... from a Catholic (I know she's not Catholic, but, fundie Catholics are the ral pro-life extremists) fundie perspective...


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:57:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (2.00 / 1)

Yeah, and really, I think we should all recognize that she's doing the right thing.  If some Obama surrogate wanted to say something about this (and I suggest that they only have the most disciplined and respected person they can possibly find) it would be that a lot of kids in that situation just don't have a family as connected and supportive to their kids' lives.  For whatever reason.  And while we want to reach those kids to help them make the right choice, they have a choice to make.  Bristol really is blessed with the family she has (despite their loony political views).  But not everyone is so lucky.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:04:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (none / 0)

You make good points, Mike, but what does it say that the daughter was having pre-marital sex and got pregnant and now will be getting married (I give the marriage 2 years) to the young man? Can you say "shotgun wedding"?
Where's that "abstinence only" education when you need it?

"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:51:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Smear Obama (2.00 / 1)

I agree, which is why I think the "shotgun wedding" aspect the most politically troublesome... it certainly is NOT going to woo hillary voters, when the assertion is that Palin feels that if your kid gets pregnant, they should be forcibly married...


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:03:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries (2.00 / 1)

Putting on my judicious observer hat:

The girl was wearing an engagement ring on Friday. Apparently it was also public knowledge in her hometown. It clearly seems not to have been a secret, not the first thing they thought of announcing to the national media.

And frankly you would have to be borderline insane yourself to have predicted that a rumor invented out of thin air -- on the internet -- about you faking your own pregnancy could gain enough currency within 72 hours to have prominent national reporters asking you questions about it.

That's why they didn't announce it on their own terms. As they say in the military, no plan survives contact with the opposition.


by blueflorida on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:42:58 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign (2.00 / 2)

The rumors about Trigg wereactually started by Alaska Republicans on the other side of the state party's civil war.


by RandyMI on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:43:48 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign (none / 0)

That's a very good point to make in more ways in one. The Murkowski/Stevens/Young wing of the Alaskan GOP wants to see her destroyed so that they can restart their little graft soiree. Also goes to show just how profoundly disorganized the McCain campaign is.


by blueflorida on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:59:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign (none / 0)

Do you have any sources on this?  If so, I recommend you write a letter to NY Times.  Check out their internet front-pager right now.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us/pol itics/02PALINDAY.html?_r=1&hp&or ef=slogin

Liberal bloggers and all.  This might be worth a diary and a call to action.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:27:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign (none / 0)

This was started months and months ago. They're scrubbing really fast. Hurry.

feed://groups.google.com/group/talk.poli tics.misc/feed/rss_v2_0_msgs.xml


by Jeter on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:13:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

If Mrs. Palin and the McCain campaign knew that Bristol was in a family way, how do you explain this crack from Maureen Dowd yesterday:

"Sarah is a zealot, but she's a fun zealot. She has a beehive and sexy shoes, and the day she's named she goes shopping with McCain in Ohio for a cheerleader outfit for her daughter."

Maybe MoDo was just being cute. Or maybe the outfit was for daughter Willow (age 14) or Piper (7). But if they knew Bristol was preggers, McCain and Palin should have been shopping for something else.


by Joe R on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 03:52:06 PM EST

McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

And why is it now suddenly OK for McBush to attack Obama while Gustav is howling, after all that "country first" bullshit yesterday?


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:01:43 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

because its only a category 2, duh.  jeez, man, get with the program.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:05:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

Also, there were five and a half years when McCain didn't have anyone to attack politically.


by TCQuad on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:33:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

OR she was nominated as a ringer/placeholder.  Due to the media scrutiny & the effect on her family & children she steps out of the race at some point & they put someone else in her place, who in comparison to her looks great.  It makes us have to reshift our campaign again. Don't be surprised if that happens - & if they nominate a Huckabee or someone the Evangelicals won't care; they will be pleased - everyone will be told to treat the Republicans better (it's that damn liberal media @@)  & a candidate like a Huckabee will have less time to receive scrutiny (plus everyone will walk on eggshells at that point with the Republicans so the stories will just focus more on the Democrats)...


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:04:14 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

I don't know.  Can a candidate win without really having a convention and never really picking a running mate?  If she quits, McCain starts looking like a wreck.  I think we're all tired of wrecks.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:08:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

If that happens McCain will be the next McGovern.


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:08:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

I don't know  - the GOP is the master of spin...

It will be painted that the liberal media did this & she had to look out for the  best interests of her children.  The die hards will eat it up & we will have to shift gears. The low information swing voter will vote however "group think" makes them sway which is what the GOP is very good at doing.

Either way I wouldn't underestimate their marketing savvy.  They aren't targeting us to win - remember they are targeting their campaign towards the one-dimensional and the ignorant voters of which there are arguably more than not.


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:42:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

It doesn't matter. Judgment is perhaps the biggest overarching theme of this campaign and many people will begin to wonder about McCain's judgment if he loses his first VP choice.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:22:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries (none / 0)

We Evil Liberal bloggers could also remind the media of the "Harriet Miers" theme song.
Or we could talk about Sprio Agnew's rapid rise in politics and how that ended badly for the Republicans.
Look at this:

In 1962 Agnew ran for election as Baltimore County Executive, seeking office in a predominantly Democratic county that had seen no Republican elected to that position in the twentieth century, with only one (Roger B. Hayden) earning victory after he left. Running as a reformer and Republican outsider, he took advantage of a bitter split in the Democratic Party and was elected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 07:02:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

I expect McBush/McPalin to be too busy explaining her child's behavior to their own crazy ilk to be able to paint Obama effectively.


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:52:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

Actually their own crazy ilk; the evangelical base will have no problem with her whatsoever.  The red staters after all have the higher incidence of teen pregnancies; broken marriage etc.  She is one of them you do realize.  And most importantly she supports the policies they do so the hypocritical value of it is negligible.  My point is these people will never be won over; the best bet we have is to hope they stay home; establish a firmer base for ourselves and cater to it ala the GOP.


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:42:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

I had no illusions about them ever voting for Obama. Staying at home is the real possibility.


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 09:17:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

It seems alot of people do.  Right now the evangelicals are officially behind Palin, moreso then ever.

And Karl Rove has just gotten away with calling Biden a "Blowhard doofus."  Will McCain say that is untrue & demand Rove to apologize like no doubt the Dems would do in this situation? Or will he simply laugh & shrug it off as if to say "hey doesn't speak for me."  Karl Rove's remark was step one of influencing group think.


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 10:16:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

You're just guessing about the reaction to a story not even a day old.

As for Rove, he lost the 2006 election so his mantra as a machievelli is a bit tarnished these days. I'm ceratin Obama isn't afraid of him.


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 11:04:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (2.00 / 1)

I am going to venture a guess here. About 2-3 months ago Bristol told mom and dad she was pregnant. They were shocked and disappointed. There were tears, angry voices, tearful apologies. This was followed by resignation acceptance and quit gut wrenching family conversations. The fathers family was called and more talks more tears more angry voices. Choices should they give the baby up for adoption should the kids marry and raise the baby. Choices were discussed and choices were made. The issue was resolved dates were set and both families continued on with life incorporating the new realty. It was resolved, it was being addressed. Life goes on. The same thing has happened in millions of homes over the decades.


by 2maddogs on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:05:36 PM EST

McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

Millions of homes in this situation don't have one of the parents running for VP as a bone thrown to cultural conservatives.


by ObamaOrBust on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:11:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

According to my sister in Ohio, (none / 0)

Bowling Green, for those keeping track, the faked pregnancy story was all over the local news last night with little to no mention of "Liberal Blogs."


by Beomoose on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:14:06 PM EST

Respecting their privacy (2.00 / 1)

The person who disrespected Bristol's privacy the most in this was her mother, who sent out a press release about her pregnancy that's literally world news.

I remember in 2000 and 2004, there were glossy, multi-page spreads in fashion, news and culture magazines of all the candidates' families. It's a part of modern presidential politics. She says she's releasing this news in response to a rumor, but it would certainly have broken as a story on its own over the course of the campaign and anyone who'd thought about the matter for five minutes would know it. If Palin really cared about her daughter's privacy, she wouldn't have made a small town open secret into an occasion for national gossip by entering the most glaring media spotlight.

Palin knew she'd have to make this press release from the moment she accepted the VP slot. It obviously wasn't a very important consideration.


by Natasha Chart on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:14:58 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Triesama To Internet Rumor (none / 0)

about the update -- sure, the ridiculous mccain campaign tried to smear Obama, but I think that the two options you provide are not mutually exclusive. Neither do they fully describe what happened. This rumor appeared not just on dKos, but on several major progressive blogs, conservative blogs, and journalist blogs (like Andrew Sullivan). If we buy into Peter Daou's triangle theory, it's not hard to understand that this thing leaped from the blogs into circulation among the press. Reporters read blogs too. They also have email addresses. I personally believe (believe to have witnessed) that when a group of blogs collectively catches onto a story, they can force the media to pay attention to it, if not publish about it. There was an article in a british paper over the weekend about the proliferation on blogs of provocative fake photoshopped photos of Palin. Blogs and what we blog about, matters.


by blueflorida on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:29:05 PM EST

Just a thought, but.... (none / 0)

Aren't there any pictures of the pregnant governor?

Don't VP candidates also release their medical records.

Shouldn't these two things end the rumors?


by IowaMike on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:34:29 PM EST

Re: Just a thought, but.... (none / 0)

no, no, no.  that's sooo 2004.  the way to end rumors is to pretend that they were started by liberal bloggers.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:47:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign implodes (none / 0)

Ya know...
the past few days...
There have been no postings by the moderators of major blogs (including MyDD) on this issue.
The GOP is aware of what all of you are doing.
What do they have...Freepers and Sludge...

Even the pretend Politico is having a hard time..


"harlequin speech of suicide, demanding instantaneous lobotomy"
by nogo postal on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:37:36 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign implodes (none / 0)

A 'conservative' blogger posing as a liberal, Obama supporter, Andrew Sullivan, blasted the trash out and gave them the issue.


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 07:18:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Of course, (none / 0)

we can be thankful that here at MyDD, all the Obama posters, including the front pagers, were out there front and center denouncing this rumor as being vicious and beyond the pale.

Oh wait, that didn't happen, did it? Kinda funny how I still see diaries ridiculing Palin because her daughter is pregnant at 17.

But let's all feel as if we are wonderful and above it all anyway, OK? Let's make sure everyone knows how it's only the horrible Republicans and their people who push ugly rumors like this.

How dare they! Have they no sense of decency?


by frankly0 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:48:57 PM EST

Oh, and Todd, (none / 0)

could you please point me to your own post -- before Obama's comment, of course -- denouncing these rumors as vicious and unfounded?

Thanks in advance.


by frankly0 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:52:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Of course, (none / 0)

You can look at my comment history to know where I stood. Its disgusting that it came to this, and even recognizing it doesn't deserve a post.


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 07:19:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Of course, (none / 0)

You must not have read too many comments about it, then, because there were several made on this very blog about spreading false rumors.
Like this one, for example:

And without solid evidence, can we please stop the ridiculous speculation on the 5 month old baby. The chances of a teenager having a down syndrome baby are almost non-existent, but a woman over 40 chances increase dramtically (1 in 100) and by the age of 44, it's 1 in 41.

http://www.mydd.com/comments/2008/8/31/1 34127/530/36#36


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:00:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Fairly Clear from The Campaign (none / 0)

The kids are off limits.  End of story.

However, I consider Statements regarding government made by Sarah Palin to be fair game.

For Example, from a Candidate questionnaire from the Governor's Race:

11. Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

  ANSWER:

"Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."

Until I read this, I really didn't realize that the Religious Right were this disconnected from the historical record (aka Reality) of My Country.

Has the political discourse in this country truly stooped this low.  This is ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KNOWLEDGE and the candidate for Alaska Governor blew it.

I shudder to imagine the answer to something like 'what do you think of the Torries of the Revolution?'


by NvDem on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:51:30 PM EST

Re: Fairly Clear from The Campaign (none / 0)

Agree it will make someone like me hate what she stands for - put it out there to invigorate our base. The evangelicals will agree or not care & the swing voters won't get it (b/c they are generally ignorant & think "Under God" should be there b/c they DO think our founding fathers were christian @@)


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:44:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

TUBES !!!!!! (none / 0)

So-called "reformer" Sarah Palin directed Ted Stevens' 527!

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-tra il/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_em batt.html


by Bush Bites on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 04:59:12 PM EST

married at 17 (none / 0)

Why is this considered the mature responsible action?   Wouldn't the responsible action be to give the child up for adoption to a couple that has the means to care for it?  Wouldnt the responsible thing be to wait until you are older than 17 to try getting married?

I just can not understand this mentality.  And I do not understand why anyone else with a halfway decent intelligence would think marriage at 17 is smart.


by gavoter on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:06:45 PM EST

Is it really over? (none / 0)

So after 8 years of Bush and the Rove Express of Lies and endless smear attacks I'm pretty damn shameless myself these days.

I just want to point out that there are still a number of questions about what happened in April that really don't make any sense.  The flight from Texas after her water broke, the drive to the hospital in nowheresville, the elder daughter having mono and being out of school for five months, the rumors of seeing her pregnant and of course the lack of a belly on Palin in March.

And all I'm really saying is just because Bristol is 4 months pregnant now does not automatically mean that this is the first child she carried. I mean do the math.

Of course, none of this means all that much, tho' if she wants to be VP, she needs to level with the country.  And perhaps she already has.  Of course, if she is still lying and these lies ended up on the birth certificate, then she done for.


by j royale on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:21:40 PM EST

family vs. hot air (none / 0)

This is going to be most disasterous with the independants and swing votes.  Conservatives scream family values and really get down on parents who have under-age child pregnancies as being the fault of the parent. They hide their own mistakes and trumpet the problems of those "not like them".  Moderates HATE being held up to their standards especially when they cannot keep them themselves.

SO while the conservative base may forgive her, the moderate middle now has even more to be wary of about her.  And if McCain drops her, (even if she jumps ship it will look like he is dumping her), then the conservatives will be pissed.  Palin was brought on board in an astoundingly bad way.  She has so many little secrets that keep popping up she already feels like a drag for him...and shows HIS bad judgement.  When "ordinary" people find out these little things when I tell them, they go from interested in Palin to a sort of sour face.  Admittedly, I live in democrat country, but this is not good for McCain.

Tuesday will be interesting since Gustav is not providing cover for this mess.  Obama has a LOT of work to do, but it is his to loose.  He could win big if he keeps up his message discipline and community outreach or he could squeek through in a tight race based on many gaffes.

McCain reminds me of a saying from my miltary leadership training...order, re-order, dis-order.  The way he is doing things his campaign cannot hold together as is for much longer.  This is NOT optimism, this is the result of too much chaos.  He WILL get his crap together, but much later than he should have (his primary closed when?) and then Obama and the DNC just need to roll clips of how MANY times McCain has tried to change their message, how many times he has said one thing, then gone to another and then ask if ANYONE knows where McCain really stands?  NOT flip-flopping (that looks like Sour grapes) but just that he has BAD judgement and cannot easily get to good judgement without a lot of OTHER bad choices.


by Hammer1001 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:26:41 PM EST

Re: family vs. hot air (none / 0)

The moderate middle won't care.  The educated know how they are going to vote; it is only the ignorant that could POSSIBLY be a swing vote so they will go with the perception of group think & the headline snippets - these are 2 areas the GOP tends to dominate - it is imperative we don't allow that to happen.


by jrsygrl on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:46:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: family vs. hot air (none / 0)

I disagree.  I know several well educated moderate people who thought that Palin was a fabulous choice for McCain and said it made them much more comfortable to vote for him.  Of course, the news was only MSM radio and there were none of the new info out.

Moderates are exactly what you said...generally out of touch.  But they know when someone is looking down on them (religous right) and they know when someone who thinks they are high-and-mighty screws up.  Call it a survival instinct.  

My comment on McCain's campaign is based on the comment of voters who vote based on their gut.  Right now he is giving them indigestion.


by Hammer1001 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 10:46:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: family vs. hot air (none / 0)

Well of course if anyone went on their initial reaction Bush/Cheney would never be in the WH - Rove et al has a way of curing that indigestion for the key demographics I mentioned.


by jrsygrl on Tue Sep 02, 2008 at 05:49:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Abstinence only ed bears fruit (pun intended) (none / 0)

Yay for abstinence only education! If it wasn't for mommy's 'values' Bristol probably would not be in the mess she's in right now. I blame the parents for being conservative Christian fundamentalist wingnuts.


by abraxas on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 05:47:50 PM EST

Re: Abstinence only ed bears fruit (pun intended) (1.00 / 0)

oh, don't be ridiculous.  she didn't buy any of that abstinence-only crap anyhow.  she probably had an allergy to nonoxonel-9 (i think that's how it's spelled).  otherwise, i'm sure she would've been using condoms.  just because her mom is (now) a Christian zealot, doesn't mean that the daughter doesn't have a brain or hormones.


by the mollusk on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:32:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why the McCainiacs need to be nervous about this.. (none / 0)

Personally, I doubt that Bristol Palin being pregnant will have much effect on progressive/independent voters -- they're more accepting that teens do make mistakes and wind up pregnant, and feel that families should deal with it as best they can, and shouldn't be judged on it by others.  (If there was any significance in the story for liberals, it lay not in the pregnancy, but in the extent to which the Palin family would lie to cover it up, whether -- as initially rumored -- by claiming that Mom was the real one having the baby, or by keeping daughter out of school for months due to a supposed case of "mononucleosis" rather than admit the situation.)

The group it will effect, OTOH, is the religious-right G.O.P. "base" that the Palin pick was meant to assuage.  For all the words about Christians being forgiven sinners, the fundie base is very Calvinist, both in the sense of having Puritanical morals regarding sex, and in expecting "righteous" believers to openly demonstrate that righteousness in their lives...and that of their families.  From their point of view, the fact that Sarah Palin obviously failed to impress the "Christian values" of virginity-until-marriage upon her oldest daughter testifies to her failure both as a Christian and as a mother -- and will make them less likely to trust her or believe that she is fit to hold high office from now on.

No wonder the McCainiac campaign is going for the only defense they can in this situation -- an attempt to smokescreen the actual pregnancy by turning it into a claim that those nasty Obama supporters are victimizing the Palin family.  For, if the faithful flock (i.e. the sheep) can be convinced that the real issue here is that those mean nasty secularist liberals led by that Madrassa-educated black non-citizen Muslim terraist drug dealer are beating up on a nice rural white conservative Christian family, they'll be more likely to rally around the ticket and less prone to the Palin family's inability to follow "traditional moral values."


by JDWalley on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:23:48 PM EST

Re: Why the McCainiacs need to be nervous about th (none / 0)

My guess is that the pregnancy won't have an effect on Progressive voters because they aren't voting for McCain


by yitbos96bb on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:12:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why McCain needs to be nervous about this... (none / 0)

Personally, I doubt that Bristol Palin being pregnant will have much effect on progressive/independent voters -- they're more accepting that teens do make mistakes and wind up pregnant, and feel that families should deal with it as best they can, and shouldn't be judged on it by others.  (If there was any significance in the story for liberals, it lay not in the pregnancy, but in the extent to which the Palin family would lie to cover it up, whether -- as initially rumored -- by claiming that Mom was the real one having the baby, or by keeping daughter out of school for months due to a supposed case of "mononucleosis" rather than admit the situation.)

The group it will effect, OTOH, is the religious-right G.O.P. "base" that the Palin pick was meant to assuage.  For all the words about Christians being forgiven sinners, the fundie base is very Calvinist, both in the sense of having Puritanical morals regarding sex, and in expecting "righteous" believers to openly demonstrate that righteousness in their lives...and that of their families.  From their point of view, the fact that Sarah Palin obviously failed to impress the "Christian values" of virginity-until-marriage upon her oldest daughter testifies to her failure both as a Christian and as a mother -- and will make them less likely to trust her or believe that she is fit to hold high office from now on.

No wonder the McCainiac campaign is going for the only defense they can in this situation -- an attempt to smokescreen the actual pregnancy by turning it into a claim that those nasty Obama supporters are victimizing the Palin family.  For, if the faithful flock (i.e. the sheep) can be convinced that the real issue here is that those mean nasty secularist liberals led by that Madrassa-educated black non-citizen Muslim terraist drug dealer are beating up on a nice rural white conservative Christian family, they'll be more likely to rally around the ticket and less prone to the Palin family's inability to follow "traditional moral values."


by JDWalley on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:25:22 PM EST

Re: Why McCain needs to be nervous about this... (none / 0)

(So, why did the board tell me that it couldn't accept my first post of this because "the subject was too long," then accept the first post anyway???)


by JDWalley on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:30:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

third possibility (none / 0)

Third possibility

The media is on the liberal blogs.

Surely the MSNBC folk visit kos


by dtaylor2 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:26:06 PM EST

Re: McCain (none / 0)

Kos is really a classly blog.  I guess markos was too busy calling everyone a racist to notice another smear on his blog.

what ever.  

david


by giusd on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 06:37:15 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama (none / 0)

I didn't need 30 minutes of research to realize it was garbage. Not even 30 seconds. I didn't research at all. Once I saw it on DU two days ago I realized it was the typical internet desperation, where cynicism has no burden other than imagination, the more idiotic the better.

BTW, now you've got threads asserting the daughter is not really pregnant, that it's a distractive ploy and a sudden miscarriage will be announced within a few weeks.

Whatever fits.

As always, I'll bet on normalcy. I wish the conspiracy clowns made the betting lines.


by Gary Kilbride on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 07:36:29 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

Well looks like Jerome was right when he said Palin is a game changer... fortunately he was completely wrong in WHAT WAY she was a game changer.     Can we initiate a slaughter rule on this election and give it to Obama?  Or should we just laugh as McCain and the GOP crumble and are slaughtered.  Remember... you can't spell slaughter without laughter!


by yitbos96bb on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:10:21 PM EST

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

Actually, you implied that I was only saying it was a net positive, there is just as likely to be negative downside as well, depending on how she handles the media. Gamechanger either way though.


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:33:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Campaign Tries To Tie Obama To Internet (none / 0)

Actually Sullivan was pretty restrained about it. I'd save my fire for the DKos diaries and I guess Markos (though of course he'd just say "I'm not responsible for diaries, Daily Kos is users not me.")


by MNPundit on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:37:35 PM EST

Shame on Daily Kos (none / 0)

Well, DKos certainly is influential and powerful, and if the idiots on that site keep up their antics, they could help us lose the election.

One thing I've noticed first hand, since I began posting there this primary season (yes, as a Clinton supporter), is the utter lunacy of what qualifies as "acceptable" point of views and reasonable discourse.

Out of touch?  Out of touch is an understatement.  Not only is the Palin-bashing--the locus of which DID originate on DailyKos-- clearly beginning to backfire (and does our prospects no net good whatsoever), but time and time again the site's most recommended diaries have also been the most wrong.

This is a site whose users almost universally sang the praises of Reverend Wright when the Wright story first broke, with its recommended diaries at the time proclaiming that Wright would be an Obama asset in the fall.  I take pride in knowing that I got it right while dKos got it very, very wrong.  


by MMR2 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:03 PM EST

If You Don't Laugh You Cry (none / 0)

For a humorous take on Palin's pregnancy pickle check out this video.


by VidCrayzee on Tue Sep 02, 2008 at 02:33:43 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.