Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers

I can't decide if this is more sad or scary.

Governorial candidates were asked questions in 2006.  Some of Palin's answers are below the fold.

With respect to abortion, when given a question that specifically mentions rape as a rationale, she manages to ignore that, "I am pro-life. With the exception of a doctor's determination that the mother's life would end if the pregnancy continued. I believe that no matter what mistakes we make as a society, we cannot condone ending an innocent's life."

OK, we knew that she was dogmatic there, but what about sex education in schools?  "Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support," was her answer to, "Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs."

OK she's in favor of ignorance about sexual matters for children.  Surely that's the only thing she wants to be mistaught right?

11. Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.

Good enough for the founding fathers?  Good enough for the founding fathers?  "Under God" was added in 1951.  Maybe some of Alaska's founding fathers were there for that decision, but not the ones we normally think of.

Then again what do you expect from someone who lists, "Cracking down on the things that harm family life: gangs, drug use," as a lesser priority for families than stopping marriage equality?



Display:


Not a big deal but.. (none / 0)

I don't think this is a big deal. That being said this is one of the first things I've read here that is attacking policy related issues and not the person.

Thanks for that


by Wiseprince on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:02:04 PM EST

Re: Not a big deal but.. (none / 0)

The pledge issue is an amusing side but the abortion ones are pretty big with, y'know, a lot of the people she's supposed to be attracting.

It drives me crazy that her views are being hidden while the pro-lifers know that she's one of them.


But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.
by thezzyzx on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:04:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not a big deal but.. (none / 0)

Give her a break on the founding fathers/pledge thing.  Anyone before you were born is a founding father.  I mean, Harry Truman included that painting of the Founding Fathers signing the 10 Commandments.


by Khun David on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:49:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not a big deal but.. (none / 0)

Anyone before you were born is a founding father.

So my big sister is a founding father?


"In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." -Barack Obama
by blueAZ on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:56:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not a big deal but.. (none / 0)

Yep


by Khun David on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 09:37:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

I think this is a huge deal.  This info is more important than what I wrote on an earlier post.  Good to see more facts coming out about Palin.


Liberal in So Cal
by lqbruin on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:08:01 PM EST

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

I think that this is actually important--it shows ignorance. I'm buddhist, but I have no problem with the "under God" in the pledge of allegence. I know that some people do, surprisingly I think that most of the people who disagree with it are old people/seniors who resented this being put into the Pledge during the Pinko Commie Witchhunt days. But, what it shows is ignorance. Someone can say "I agree that it should be left in the Pledge, because I'm a fundamentalist, and I have no problem with it" without being completely ignorant that the founding fathers put change the allegance, and of course the "motto" on dollar bills to include "Under God." We don't need ignorant Presidents or Vice Presidents... ENOUGH. We've had enough of them.


by johnrarch on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:10:51 PM EST

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (none / 0)

"Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support,"

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Is she all for sex-ed so long as they use different words, like "hoo-hoo" and "mow-mow"?
"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:11:29 PM EST

Get used to this sort of dancing (none / 0)

she is a practised snake-oil salesman.  


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:19:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

My reading of this response is that she only believes in abstinence only sex education.  


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:35:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah, and nothing "explicit" (none / 0)

oh, like which activity actually leads to pregnancy.  Icky stuff like that...


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 09:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You forgot to add (2.00 / 2)

that the "pledge" was not written by the Founding Fathers and it also was not written during their time.


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:36:28 PM EST

Re: You forgot to add (2.00 / 1)

Good point, it was written in 1892.


by davisb on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 09:23:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

It sounds like Palin believes that the Founding Fathers made this a Christian nation.  I wonder where she got that idea...

From an November 25, 2007 sermon: "The purpose for the United States is... to glorify God. This nation is a Christian nation."

The problem is that we are not a Christian nation.  We are a secular nation made predominantly of Christians.

If Palin doesn't understand that, she doesn't belong anywhere near the Presidency.


by randomscientist on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:40:23 PM EST

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

If Thomas Jefferson picking and choosing what he wants to include in his Bible, I think that Sarah Palin can do the same.

/snark


by Khun David on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:50:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

Another thing I noticed, the Governor seems to have a need to give longer answers than needed. This is the type of habit that can get into to trouble at press conferences, debates and town halls.

This is what I call dazzle with BS than keeping it simple.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:43:49 PM EST

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (2.00 / 1)

I read on another diary that she calls public schools "government schools".

Palin was part of a movement that included her, Scott Ogan, Vic Kohring and the gang that told us government is bad, unless it is feeding our pet interests. The movement adopted its own lexicon which made things like public schools (renamed government schools) sound sinister and intruding.

h/t to RandyMI's diary.


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 08:44:26 PM EST

Re: Palin's Governor Questionaire Answers (none / 0)

These questionnaire responses are a good fine.  The other ones are more harmful to Palin than the Pledge of Allegiance one.  I expect she'll be backtracking or deemphasizing some of these positions on the campaign, so it's good to have a paper trail of her prior statements.


by markjay on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 11:36:17 PM EST

here's a doozy someone should ask her (none / 0)

OK, so you say you are totally pro-life, that "we cannot condone ending an innocent's life."  Does this mean that President Bush or the American military acted immorally in Iraq?  After all, tens of thousands (if not more) innocent Iraqi civilians lost their lives.  As President, would you approve an air strike on a terrorist suspect, even if you knew it would result in teh deaths of innocent children?


by Dont tread on me on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 12:05:08 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.