I can't decide if this is more sad or scary.
Governorial candidates were asked questions in 2006. Some of Palin's answers are below the fold.
With respect to abortion, when given a question that specifically mentions rape as a rationale, she manages to ignore that, "I am pro-life. With the exception of a doctor's determination that the mother's life would end if the pregnancy continued. I believe that no matter what mistakes we make as a society, we cannot condone ending an innocent's life."
OK, we knew that she was dogmatic there, but what about sex education in schools? "Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support," was her answer to, "Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs."
OK she's in favor of ignorance about sexual matters for children. Surely that's the only thing she wants to be mistaught right?
11. Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?
SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.
Good enough for the founding fathers? Good enough for the founding fathers? "Under God" was added in 1951. Maybe some of Alaska's founding fathers were there for that decision, but not the ones we normally think of.
Then again what do you expect from someone who lists, "Cracking down on the things that harm family life: gangs, drug use," as a lesser priority for families than stopping marriage equality?
|
|
|
Permalink :: 19 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.