Governor, I know Hillary Clinton.

Cross Posted to Clintonistas for Obama

Cross Posted to Daily Kos

Well, today has brought an interesting selection of a Vice Presidential nominee. John McBush went out on a limb and selected Governor Sarah "Panderbear" Palin as his Vice Presidential candidate, citing her as the running mate who can "best help him shake up Washington".

Or she could be the running mate that "best helps him pander in an intellectually dishonest way" to disillusioned Hillary voters. Sarah went right to work on that today, of course, comparing herself to Hillary and Geraldine Ferraro as a "groundbreaker" and telling us how she's going to finish Hillary's job and break the glass celing that has 18 million cracks in it.

Well, Governor, I can assure you, Hillary Rodham Clinton did not mean to put 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling so that a pro-life, pro-gun, home-schooling nobody from the frozen tundra of Alaska could break it.

But hey, Gov. Palin wants some comparisons to other great female leaders, so why don't we do a bit of a timeline?

In 1984, Sarah Palin won "Ms. Alaska", winning a scholarship so she could go to college.

In 1984, Hillary fought a successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association, to establish mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size.

In 1988, Sarah Palin was a sports reporter for the Anchorage local news!

From 1987-1991, Hillary chaired the American Bar Association's Commission on Women in the Profession, which addressed gender bias in the law profession and induced the association to adopt measures to combat it.

From 1992-1996, Sarah Palin served on the Wasilla (AK) city council. Wasilla, Alaska is less populated than the three block radius around my house.

In 1993, Bill Clinton appointed Hillary Clinton to head and be the chairwoman of the Task Force on National Health Care Reform, hoping to replicate the success she had in leading the effort for Arkansas education reform.

In the late 90's, Sarah had a HUGE victory in getting re-elected to the mayor's office in Wasilla. Her biggest accomplishment she named was cutting property taxes.

What was Hillary doing in the late 90's? How about being a driving force behind SCHIP, the largest expansion of health care coverage in the US since the 60's, helping to insure millions of uninsured children.

I'm sure you get the point by now.

But there's one more thing...

Last month, Hillary Clinton was campaigning for change on behalf of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.

But Sarah was campaigning too. She decided to campaign with indicted Alaska Senator Ted "Tubes" Stevens, the epitome of corruption and "old Washington politics", the same kind of "old Washington politics" that McCain says Palin is going to help stop.

But hey, they're very similar, right?

I'd like to paraphrase from a great Democrat, Lloyd Bensten, and close by saying:

Governor Palin, I know Senator Clinton. Senator Clinton is my friend. And Governor, you are NO Senator Clinton.



Display:


McDumbass... (2.00 / 16)

must be an idiot to think this thing's going to work out.


Hillary supporter for Barack Obama in 2008
by zcflint05 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:27:28 PM EST

McBush is a dumb ass... (2.00 / 9)

And I, for one, am OFFENDED that he thinks Sarah Palin is some "substitute" for Hillary.

Well, as Hillary herself said this week...


Want to defend marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how!
by atdleft on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:44:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

he thinks she's better than Hillary (2.00 / 1)


Jay leno asked McSame on Monday if he would consider Hillary since he's using Hillary's sound bites in his advertising.  and he broke out laughing.

I mean atleast Kerry asked McSame in 2004, something he could have done with Hillary.

there are plenty of women he could have selected, but the mayor of a town with a population of 8,471 ?!!


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:03:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

hey, no fair! (none / 0)

How dare you compare their records! That is almost as bad as using McLames own words to show what a flip-flopper he is!


by zerosumgame on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:47:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: hey, no fair! (2.00 / 1)

He spent five years not changing his mind -- as a POW!


New Mexico politics from the local perspective.
by fbihop on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 02:16:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 5)

I hear the dogs and they are coming. Keep going women. Keep going!


by Iceblinkjm on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:37:05 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 3)

Hey, but has  Hillary Clinton hit the bong and then cured the munchies with a mooseburger?

I think not!


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:38:24 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 2)

I hope Hillary eats a Palinburger


by KLRinLA on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:42:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 1)

I know what you meant, but that just looks to have come out wrong...;p


by zerosumgame on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:49:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

good point


by KLRinLA on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 07:06:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

She sure isn't hillary clinton .

But i am thrilled for her , she would have a chance to prove herself..


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:46:28 PM EST

BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (2.00 / 1)

you said any woman picked as VEEP other than Hillary would be a slap to Hillary's face.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:59:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (2.00 / 1)

Uh, for the Democrats.  It would be a little weird to say McCain should have picked Hillary over Palin, wouldn't it?


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:14:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (2.00 / 1)

Go figure...


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:16:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

oh brother (2.00 / 2)

so let me get this right: posting bile about fellow female democrats regarding the veepstakes and sending "well wishes" to a right-wing ideologue is congruent.

Gosh, and here I thought they wanted Hillary to be first.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:52:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: oh brother (none / 0)

Al, you'd have to show me what bile Lori posted, that sure sounds out of character for her.  I actually have no idea what you are talking about.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:55:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (none / 0)

And...???

The Obama campaign apparently understood that as well , while I think it was a mistake not going with Clinton , he went with the next best thing , which is Biden...knowing fully well it would have backfired if he picked another woman.

Doesn't really have much to do with me being excited for Palin . She seems like a decent person and I wish her luck..


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:15:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (2.00 / 5)

Sorry.  

I don't wish Palin luck.  

I wish Palin to lose.

With McCain showing signs of early stage dementia, the risk is too great that Palin could end up running this country.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:19:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

and you're a sexist (2.00 / 2)

you opposed other women as veep, based solely on their gender.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:56:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: and you're a sexist (none / 0)

Don't think so. that's the easy slap that gets you away from the issue raised. the cheap shot. But it doesn't get you away. It just gets you tagged for what you are.


by Christy1947 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:29:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Pee Wee Herman, in the house! (2.00 / 1)

"I know you are, but what am I"

Bravo.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 11:09:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (2.00 / 1)

What sort of luck do you wish her Lori?

Luck in running Alaska until she gets defeated by a Democrat in a couple of years I hope. Any more luck than that and I will begin to wonder how you feel about our party.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:21:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH (2.00 / 3)

You have no evidence at all to show that Obama didn't simply pick objectively between all the possible candidates. None whatsoever, except your merely personal belief that Clinton would have been the best.

Likewise you claim Obama believes it would have backfired if he'd have picked another woman and that this supposedly is the only reason he didn't pick one -- again no chance whatsoever that Obama possibly, possibly picked the best VP for the job?

So, basically, I call bullshit on all your assumptions.


by Aris Katsaris2 on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 12:49:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary's not on either ticket (2.00 / 1)

I'm not sure why people keep bringing Hillary up. She's not on the ticket. I thought people wanted her to take a backseat.


by Chelsea in 2020 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:52:51 PM EST

Sexist!! (2.00 / 2)

How dare you say Hillary is a backseat driver!!!

PUMA of the world unite!!


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:56:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary's not on either ticket (2.00 / 2)

Yeah people wanted her to take such a backseat that we cheered for her laughed with and cried with her Tuesday night. I think we are all a little tired of this idea that because we voted for someone else we don't like her. I think we are all a little tired of this idea that because Obama picked someone else as VP we don't want her around. I think most of all we are just a little tired of arguing about it...

So let me ask you this; how many other people do you see here today making sarcastic biting comments about what we think of Hillary?

If you guessed nobody you are right. So get past it already- she sure has.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:24:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary's not on either ticket (none / 0)

If you're tired of talking about her getting passed over for VP, then don't bring her up. I just find many of the comments very ironic.


by Chelsea in 2020 on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:30:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't bring her up? (none / 0)

Listen you moronic GOP imbecile... Hillary is an important part of this election, an important part of our party and an important part of our story. You and 5 other people are the only ones still bitching an moaning about these things.

Get on board or STFU.

K.Thnks.Bye.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:20:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary's not on either ticket (none / 0)

I certainly don't want her taking a backseat. I want her up front and center, helping to make change a reality and getting us universal healthcare.

There's no way she'll take a backseat anyway, so I'm not worried. She outgrew that quite a while ago.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:15:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is a slap to Hillary's face (2.00 / 1)

I remember people saying any selection other than Hillary would be a slap, whether it was Governor Napolitano of arizona or Senator McCaskill of Missouri.

I mean, people like Jerome and Mark Penn used to mock Alaska as a irrelevant state (ie "small states don't matter").

And now McSame selects the Mayor of a town who's population was 8,471 [no, really].

Ouch!  Poor Hillary.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:54:29 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 6)

oh that I could recommend this diary a hundred times.  


Jesus Christ was a community organizer and Pontius Pilate was a governor.
by GRO on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:54:59 PM EST

You know what? (none / 0)

Comparing Sarah Palin to Hillary Clinton based on gender is no different than comparing Jesse Jackson to Barrack Obama in South Carolina.  

I realize the point of your diary is to show the contrasts.   I don't however approve of minimizing a woman, just because she is a woman, and "so is Hillary."

Could it possibly be that Palin fits the image of the quintessential DC outsider that McCain is trying to foster?  Could she have any other worth to him other than being "female like Hillary?"

Speaking of Hillary,  lets all follow her example and just congratulate Palin for being the first GOP vp candidate.  Nuff said.  


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:12:06 PM EST

Re: You know what? (2.00 / 1)

No thanks.  It's time we grew up, and decided to win this election.

We get to attack them both.  nuff said.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:16:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Lets attack them both fine.... (none / 0)

but lets not degrade women in the process.  How about that?


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:48:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets attack them both fine.... (2.00 / 3)

I don't care what their plumbing is, for crying out loud.

Other than the fact that Palin shares her plumbing with 51% of the planet, what is noteworthy about her?

She does not even occupy the same league as Hillary.  It's an insult to equate the two.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:54:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

MY point exactly.......... (none / 0)

so why do we have diaries comparing the two?  If Mitt Romney were picked,  would we be comparing Mitt Romney to Hillary Clinton right now?  


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:16:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (2.00 / 1)

Because it's very illustrative to compare these two "ceiling breakers" side by side.

It's helps kill the illusion that McCain is doing this out an altruistic desire to advance women's rights.

Can't you see the difference here?  He picked her for her gender...that's pretty much it.

Should women celebrate this accomplishment?


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:22:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No I dont see it that way............ (none / 0)

I am sorry you do.  I dont think the fact that she is a woman has anything to do with it.  I dont think there is any difference between the abilities of one gender or another.  

None of Hillary's supporters (myself included) would vote for Sarah Palin.  Yet I do honor her for breaking barriers.  


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:24:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No I dont see it that way............ (2.00 / 6)

I dont think the fact that she is a woman has anything to do with it.

If you don't think that McCain picked Palin because she was a woman, then you are lying to yourself.

I'm sorry.  I just try to see things as they are, not how I would wish them to be.  

Cheers!


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:28:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And another thing........... (2.00 / 1)

before you label me a PUMA,  I have to tell you this:   It disgusts me that there is a GOP WOMAN on TV saying "Hillary Clinton put 18 million cracks in the highest glass ceiling"  and "lets shatter that glass ceiling once and for all".

All of this could have been avoided if Obama had chosen Hillary for VP.  100 percent of this!   Why didnt he pick her again?  It couldnt have been for her aumf vote because Biden voted identically.  

Honestly I am disgusted with this whole thing.  I'll vote for the SOB but honestly I am not happy.  I feel that women have been betrayed by the Democratic Party.  Obama made no effort to reach out to us these last months.  What was he thinking?


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 10:29:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And another thing........... (2.00 / 2)

Sandy,

I didn't label you a PUMA.  Never even got close.

I'm not sure why you're going backwards in this discussion.  If you wanted to rehash the Dem VP pick, you should have said so in the beginning.

You can keep going with this discussion, if you want, but I'm done.

You're not listening, or even really thinking clearly at this moment.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:26:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No I dont see it that way............ (2.00 / 2)

You've got your head in the sand.  McCain picked Palin because she's a woman - n o other reason. Does she help him with the conservative base?  No.  If he wanted that, he would have chosen Romney, Huckabee or a dozen others. Does she have some great experience that would be helpful?  Is she a policy wonk?  Has she championed a certain issue for years?

The answer to all of those questions is no.  He picked her because of her gender.  


"It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for subtlety". Salvor Hardin
by Denny Crane on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:22:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No I dont see it that way............ (none / 0)

Actually she seems to be helping a lot with the conservative base:

1) Fanatically pro-life

  1. Godfearing Christian; wants creationism taught alongside evolution in science class.
  2. Gun nut.
  3. Very pro-business, not at all environmentalist. (Re: Drilling in Alaska)
  4. Seen as a reformer and sincere tax-cutter

Her being a woman is icing on the cake. I'm sure it was part of the decision, but there's no getting around the fact that in addition to her plumbing, it was Sarah Palin's stand on the issues important to the conservative base that got her picked.

So I don't think she's going to pick up that many Hillary voters (as much as I'd like to make a symbolic vote for her, the creationism thing is an absolute NO in my book), but I do think she helps his with his base, especially the evangelicals, and the folks who want to profit off the oil in the ANWR.

It's not a good time to get complacent. But then, it never has been.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:10:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No I dont see it that way............ (2.00 / 1)

I think you would be hard pressed to find someone here who did thing that gender somehow equals political ability. Which is exactly the point. If McCain had picked her based on her record or political ability she would be SOMEONE ELSE.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:31:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No I dont see it that way............ (none / 0)

She didn't break any barriers. What she did was stand on the shoulders of other women who actually did break the barriers (like Clinton, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Kathleen Sebelius, Olympia Snowe, etc).


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 08:40:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (2.00 / 2)

he picked a maverick. it was bold and gutsy. obama picked an insider who's been in washington longer than mccain. safe and status quo. could everyone be yapping so much about palin v. hillary because of that?

obama should have picked hillary. enough said. we would not be in this had he done it.

also i find it hypocritical that everyone is now asking about a candidate's qualification to be a VP...when i say everyone i mean the people who thought a flimsy resume and the idea of change was better than a lifetime of experience.

well, she's change with an actual record with a flimsy resume. why aren't obama's primary supporters rejoicing?


by darwinism on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:36:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (2.00 / 2)

Dude,

First learn to spell, then learn basic grammar, then learn to use your "shift" key.

Then learn to organize your thoughts.

Is that little ramble supposed to make ANY sense?


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:41:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (2.00 / 2)

Looks like "Survival of the fittest" doesn't apply to blogs.


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:58:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (none / 0)

Spacey!

I wonder if this dimwit thought that he was actually making any kind of a compelling argument.  Pretty funny, really.

How you doing? Chillin'?


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:03:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (2.00 / 1)

You can head back over to Red State now.  Thanks for your input.


"It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for subtlety". Salvor Hardin
by Denny Crane on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:24:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (2.00 / 3)

We have diaries taking on this comparison because Sarah Palin herself explicitly compared her run to Hillary's, and the McCain campaign has actively suggested that Hillary voters would vote for McCain/Palin just because Palin is a woman.


by elrod on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 10:12:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MY point exactly.......... (none / 0)

If Romney blatantly tried to co-opt Hillary's message and supporters, then perhaps we would.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 02:33:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets attack them both fine.... (1.00 / 0)

If you're truly a feminist, her gender is irrelevant to her stark lack of qualifications for the position in question.


by Dreorg on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:06:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets attack them both fine.... (none / 0)

SIGH

Let's try it this way:

"If you're truly post-racial, Obama's skin is irrelevant to his stark lack of qualifications for the position in question."

Doesn't sound too good, does it?


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:38:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets attack them both fine.... (none / 0)

How it sounds is irrelevant, in my opinion.  The overriding point of feminism is not to support women, no matter what, it is to judge individuals on their merits separate from their gender.

Creating a separate set of rules for judging Palin than for judging Pawlenty isn't feminist, regardless of which of the two are favored by said rules.


by Dreorg on Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 09:37:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (2.00 / 2)

Uhhh...

No?

Did you even watch her speak today?

Have you the 5 or 6 Hillary ads McCain has put out?

Are you paying attention here?

Some people just love being pandered too.

Hey! I know!

"You are a very witty and insightful commenter."

Can I gets some mojo now please?   ;o)


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:20:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes I was just aiming for mojo (none / 0)

you know how us "approval seeking" frilly little women are, after all.  


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:47:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes I was just aiming for mojo (2.00 / 3)

The sexist strawman.

Haven't seen that one in a while.


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:57:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes I was just aiming for mojo (2.00 / 1)

The only person displaying gender bias here is you.


by Dreorg on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:11:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (2.00 / 4)

Please don't ask me to believe that Sarah Palin was chosen in 2008 primarily for reasons other than her gender and her good looks. Those two came first, her other good qualities were simply made to be justification.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:31:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (none / 0)

I respectfully disagree.

While I'm sure her being a woman played a large role, I don't think her impeccable (to them) credentials as a conservative can be overlooked:

1) Fanatically pro-life: (This was crucial; reason why it wasn't Lieberman.)
   2. Godfearing Christian; wants creationism taught alongside evolution in science class. (This is why no Romney -- Mormonism is seen as weird.)
   3. Gun nut.
   4. Very pro-business, not at all environmentalist. (Re: Drilling in Alaska)
   5. Seen as a reformer and sincere tax-cutter

These are the areas we should be hitting her on, not her gender or her looks.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:18:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (none / 0)

Like I said, justification. "How can we make this appear that it wasn't just because she's a woman?"


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 11:20:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (2.00 / 9)

This was a reactionary pick on McCain's part.  It's clear that he picked her because she's a woman and because he felt that it would sow division within the Democratic party.  Now they have two outs.  You can't criticize McCain because he was a POW and you can't criticize Palin because she's a woman (they'll say: oh you know Democrats think women are unfit to lead.)

Since you didn't seem to realize, the diarist was trying to show that the pandering wouldn't work because there is no comparison between these two women--you can't just replace one with the other because they share the same gender and expect to get the same voters.  

She is so unqualified to take over in his stead that I'm actually offended by this choice.  He didn't make a bad choice for his ticket, he made a bad choice for his country.


by Tenafly Viper on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:38:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Sarah Palin has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton (2.00 / 1)

and Jesse Jackson has nothing to do with Barrack Obama.  


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:45:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sarah Palin has nothing to do with Hillary Cli (2.00 / 1)

Are you trying to make sense, or just babbling at this point?

Be direct.  

Make your point.  

What is the point of that comment?


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:51:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sarah Palin has nothing to do with (2.00 / 2)

Don't tell me, tell that to senator McCain...


by Tenafly Viper on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:52:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I have no idea why you are offended either (2.00 / 3)

McCain needed an anti-choice conservative to excite his base.  He found one in Sarah Palin.  Guess which GOP swine has now endorsed McCain?  James Dobson of the Family Research Council, who, until today,  refused to support him.  

Sarah Palin is wrong for this country.  She has bad ideas and will continue the failed policies of Bush and Cheney.

The fact that she is a woman has nothing to do with it.  And I am really getting sick of having to root out sexism in my own party.  This has been a very disillusioning year for me.  

I am not a PUMA.   I am not stupid.  I'll hold my nose and vote for the DEM ticket.  That doesnt mean I am not disgusted with the sexism.  


Another proud Hillary Clinton supporter for Obama
by Sandy1938 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:58:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have no idea why you are offended either (2.00 / 1)

The fact that she is a women, is the ONLY reason that she was picked by McCain, so why can we talk about this?

Why is this sexism to say that he picked her, only because she was a women?

Please explain to me her accomplishments. (You know, big reasons why she's fit to be CINC?)

Is it because of her gender?  Of course not.  So why can we discuss McCain's political motivation for making this selection?


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:11:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have no idea why you are offended either (none / 0)

He didn't pick her ONLY because she was a woman. She's a woman who is:

1. Fanatically pro-life
   2. Godfearing Christian; wants creationism taught alongside evolution in science class.
   3. Gun nut.
   4. Very pro-business, not at all environmentalist. (Re: Drilling in Alaska)
   5. Seen as a reformer and sincere tax-cutter

If just gender were the issue, McCain had a much larger field to draw from, but the other women had conservative problems -- KBH is pro-choice, for example.  

I'm convinced Palin's radical pro-life stance is just as important as her gender.  None of the men being considered had anywhere near her conservative "cred", if you will.

Her being a woman was icing on the cake, no doubt, but it's definitely not the sole reason she was chosen.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:21:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Divide and conquer (2.00 / 3)

Imagine that your the McCain campaign in the wake of a fabulous substantive speech by Obama and the only thing you can muster is a typical (obviously pre-written) Republican template response.  Do you give up on your candidate or do you call Karl Rove who has been interested in Sarah Palin for awhile?

There was a long list of accomplished Republican women who had similar idealogical beliefs as that of Palin.  So why were they passed over for this unknown (unknown even to McCain, they never even met) with no relevant experience who says that she has never much considered the Iraq war?  I think she was picked by Rove and I think that they wanted someone without any experience and without a discernible gift to the ticket.  Being generous, you could say that her being a woman offers them a padding from criticism in the same vein as the POW defense.  But I would say that it offers them the ability to rebuff attacks by twisting every attack that Democrats will want to make, into a rallying cry against sexism itself.  Because obviously we will make arguements against her candidacy that we wouldn't make against a qualified female candidate so the right will be able to label them as stereotypical attacks against women in power.
When we say:

She's inexperienced and unprepared to be commander in chief

They will say:
Democrats also didn't think Hillary was prepared to lead.  They are afraid of women in power but the Republican party isn't

She's not so much a serious VP pick as she is a tool to play out a cynical machiavellian farce against the Obama campaign and the American people as a whole.  


by Tenafly Viper on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:30:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Divide and conquer (2.00 / 1)

Bingo!  It is metaphorically, an immunization. Pretty historic, eh?

I think that it's just sad, and cynical.

KBH would have scared me. She's an experienced Tiger.  

Palin is about to become a joke.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:36:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have no idea why you are offended either (2.00 / 2)

Oh please.  If McCain really wanted to excite the nutjob conservative base, he had far better choices than Sarah Palin. He could have chosen someone that the conservative base had actually heard of before last week. You're right, there's plenty of sexism here, but you're looking in the wrong  place.  It's all coming from the McCain camp, who apparently believe that women are stupid enough to vote for him just because he put a woman on his ticket.  I don't know any women that dumb, and the ones I do know are insulted by the very idea.


"It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for subtlety". Salvor Hardin
by Denny Crane on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:30:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have no idea why you are offended either (none / 0)

"If McCain really wanted to excite the nutjob conservative base, he had far better choices than Sarah Palin."

Can I ask who you have in mind?


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:22:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (2.00 / 5)

Palin's the one who opened the door by trying to cast herself as Clinton's rightful heir.

I'm sure she's a pleasant enough person, but I can not wish someone well (politically) who believes creationism needs to be taught in science class, abortion must be illegal under every circumstance, and that it's peachy for women to be paid 80 cents on the dollar.

I hope she has a long and happy life living in a cabin in Alaska . . .  and a long way from any authority over our country.


by EvilAsh on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:25:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Could it be. . . ." to Sandy 1938 (2.00 / 1)

Could it be that Palin is coming in the day after the convention and trying to scoop up disaffected voters whose loyalty and support she did not earn the way Hillary did, working for it,  just because she too is a woman? Doesn't support any of Hillary's policies and doesn't have Hillary's dignity and perseverence,  and did not get them to vote for her the way Hillary did, just a quick flyby grab for the benefits created and earned by another, but which she thinks she can profit from.

She does have worth to him, a woman who is rock ribbed conservative, even more so than those who criticize him for not being so.

And a person with Ted Stevens campaigning with her is hardly an outsider. A person who says she wants the money her Congressional delegation in 2006 could get at that moment, i.e. pork barrel, is not an outsider, especially when she said she supported the bridge to nowhere then, and got the money for her state but didn't return it when the project was cancelled and now says she opposed it, with nary a mention of the money she kept to apply elsewhere in her state. Outsiders, country people, have been making fools of City birds for centuries.


by Christy1947 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:38:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You know what? (2.00 / 1)

If she had any worth to him other than that she would not have invoked Hillary OR the glass ceiling in the speech that was to introduce her to nation.

Pretending this is anything other than what it is would be a waste of time. The nation deserves better.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:26:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 6)

Highly recc'd

I'd pretty much vomit if Hillary did the yeoman's work of cracking this ceiling, and somebody like Palin gets to walk through it.

These two women don't even occupy the same universe.  


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:14:50 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

Well, after the Democrats blew their chances at doing this completely, I definitely feel the emotion behind the "Serves the Dems right that the Rethugs saw the moment and took advantage." I mean, I won't vote for her (Creationism? Puh-lease...) but really, the Dems had a chance to put Hillary up there somewhere on the ticket and chose not to.

Just put it down to the Rethugs perpetually being better as sensing and seizing the mood of the electorate than the Dems.  

Anyway, she's not the first case of a woman spitting on the people who gave her a chance to succeed -- Phyllis Schlafly, anyone? Making opportunities for women means making opportunites for all women, even the unpleasantly hypocritcal ones.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:26:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

Sarah Palin is nearly 20 years younger than Clinton; of course she was not accomplishing what Hillary was during the 1990's.

I'm sorry, but what is the point?  Is Sarah Palin actually comparing herself to the achievements of Senator Clinton, beyond their shared femininity?  

Please recognize that partisanship aside, Palin's nomination as VP of the Republican Party is a historic achievement in and of itself, that deserves to be celebrated...just as we celebrated the nomination of the first African American to be President.


by MMR2 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:25:16 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 3)

Okay,

There cheers for Palin:

Hip, Hip, Huzzah!

Hip, Hip, Huzzah!

Hip, Hip, Huzzah!

Celebration over.  

Now, let attack them both and win this campaign.  Palin would set back women's reproductive rights by 30 years.  Not much to celebrate in that pick.

Game on folks!


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:37:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 2)

And this is the type of comment that scares me.  

If you look at the situation rationally and unemotionally you realize that it's a truly absurd choice.  How could he possibly win with this ticket?  But then you hear comments like this one and you realize that we won't be able to attack her for lack of accomplishments, for her ignorance on foreign policy and domestic issues--because she will be liked.  She's charming, she's beautiful and she is in no way qualified to be president.  But if we say that, it will be turned into: You're just saying that because she's a woman.  This heightened fervor over identity politics will be the only thing that will lose us this election.  

And being originally from a very small, very poor town in central Pennsylvania, I'm not willing to see my friends and family suffer through 4 or 8 more years of shitty policies and inconsequential politics just because Governor Palin is an historic candidate.  It has real world consequences.


by Tenafly Viper on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:50:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 4)

A historic achievement? Really?

McCain choosing an extraordinarily unqualified person in a pandering political stunt is an achievement?

Put this another way. Is there anything aside from her gender that makes her better for VP, in any way, than any other national level republican?

This isn't a historic achievement. This is raw mockery of the REAL historic achievement bought by the grueling work of Hillary Clinton.


by EvilAsh on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:30:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

Uh, if you think a female VP on the GOP ticket isn't historic, then you need to read a history book.

I won't vote for McCain/Palin, but how is a sitting Governor, and former mayor "extraordinarily unqualified". Didn't we just pick Obama as our nominee.

Attack policy, not the person.


by Chelsea in 2020 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:51:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 3)

Okay,

When I tell my daughter that Sarah Palin wants to take away her right to choose what's best for her body...I'll also remind her how "historic" Palin is.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:55:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 1)

If she had been picked because she was more qualified than Romney or Pawlenty, you might have a point.
The fact that she was picked solely because she's a woman and then tries to take credit for breaking the glass ceiling, when she hasn't been elected yet? Uh, no.
She has exactly 19 months as governor of a state that has less than 700,000 residents. Rudy Guiliani had more executive experience as mayor of NYC and had a budget 30 times bigger than the state of Alaska.
The residents of a state pay no income taxes because the state makes money off of oil and natural gas and is also the biggest recipient of federal funds out of 50 states.
Here's how one commenter put it last night:

I don't think most Americans understand how Oil runs Alaska and its Republican party.  Like Wyoming and some other energy producing states, Alaska skim a little off the top when they export their oil and gas, and the wealth generated funds their government and its patronage system.

Alaskans don't pay income tax to their government.  Their government pays out "royalties" to them to the tune of more than $1500 each every year.

That makes people like Palin think they're great fiscal geniuses who can balance budgets.  In fact, like most good Republicans, all they're doing is taking credit for the work of others.  We gasoline-buyers are the ones who balance the Alaska budgets.

Alaskans just sit back and let the money roll in, and their government leaders spend it however they want in their little planned economy.

Republicans hate socialism, except when they get to run it.

http://www.mydd.com/comments/2008/8/29/1 41257/329/17#17


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 08:59:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 2)

Imagine Hillary had actually won the democratic nomination against Obama, leaving some in the African American community dejected.  Now imagine that McCain had picked a black male running mate with Palin's credentials the day after the dem convention.

Would seem sort of like cynical political pandering, no?


by stegro on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 11:31:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

If he had picked, oh, Colin Powell?

He might have gotten my vote with that choice, pander or no pander.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:28:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

No, Colin Powell has a ton of experience. It would be more along the lines of picking Alan Keyes.


by EvilAsh on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 07:58:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 2)

She's not a national level republican. She's the eighteen month governor of a small and isolated state with a big stake in the oil business, whose prior experience in politics was an oil board, and terms as the mayor of a town of eight or so thousand.

I know some have argued that this is snippy to small towns and small states, but the oddity is that when the job you want is one where when called you would have to administer a nation of over three hundred million, and several million Federal employees, size does matter. And she's been running for vp, by website and postings and such, since her first year in Gubernatorial office.

She can't run as an ethics hero because she's the present subject of formal investigation in her state which might lead to removal from office, for abuse of Gubernatorial powers, and because there is no way the Repubs will allow her to do any ethics reform in Washington because they would be the goats.


by Christy1947 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:46:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 3)

Its not an achievement, I am sorry.

McCain did not do this because he is impressed with her record- she has none.
The GOP did not get together and decide that it is time they invited women to the party- it isn't their style.

They are using her to try and get what they want... lets not pretend its anything different than that.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:28:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

It's not her record that attracted McCain (and Rove) -- it's her stand on issues conservatives care about. She's just about perfect in that regard, AND she's a woman! If she had, like, 20 more years experience she'd have been absolutely perfect for pandering, NOT to Hillary's women, but to the conservative base.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:30:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 5)

highly recc'd


by colebiancardi on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 07:46:39 PM EST

small correction (2.00 / 5)

I think she came in second in the Miss Alaska gig.

Coming in second would be good thing for her to do again.


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 08:03:01 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 1)

What's most amazing is that McCain apparently didn't realize she's in the midst of an abuse of power probe back home.  Heck, it's Alaska, half the Republicans there are crooked.  This is not what McCain wants to come up over the next couple of months.

And yeah, it's hard to imagine McCain picking a freshly elected male governor from Alaska to be his running mate.  This is pretty blatant.  If it was Kay Bailey Hutchison that would be different, the Texas Senator has been in office for 15 years and is the highest ranking Republican woman in the Senate.  That would make sense.  But Palin?  right...


by Skaje on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:06:07 PM EST

Well, KBH is a mindless tool, (none / 0)

almost as bad as Big Bad John Cornyn.  I know, not that that ever stopped Republicans before.

But still, you can say for Palin that she is hugely popular in AK and that she has reformer cred.

Hutchinson would be vulnerable to politics-as-usual Washington-insider lines of attack, while Palin is not.  Also, she may have experienced McCain's temper first hand.  I'm wondering if it's a coincidence none of McCain's short-listers were his fellow Senators, other than his clueless soulless douchebag BFF Lieberman.


by corph on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 02:46:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I would have been insulted (2.00 / 1)

(though partly irrationally so since they should be picked on their merits, not their x chromosomes) if Obama picked another woman other than Hillary.

I am insulted McCain picked Palin. I mean, my god, Kay Bailey Hutchinson was a great choice, or Meg Whitman, and others but Palin? That's really insulting to me as a woman.

Also this:

 

No sooner did my best friend hear about the Sarah Palin pick did I receive an e-mail from her.  It said simply: "Sarah Palin is a Bad Mother!"

   I was at work but could not resist giving her a call to follow up.  She told me that she was watching CNN and heard that Ms. Palin had 5 children and that one was only 4 months old and born with Down Syndrome.  "How in the name of GOD, can she even think about leaving her child or taking her child on the campaign trail for 70 days?"  She was indignant.

   Let me tell you why My best friend Liz matters.  She is 37 years old and Catholic.

   She has three children under the age of 9 years old. She lives in Reston, VA (the suburbs of D.C.).  She is a registered Independent and has voted both Democratic and Republican.  She is a stay at home mother and was a RABID Hillary Clinton supporter.  She was considering staying home instead of voting this November.  I had been trying to convince her of the FOLLY of this stance.  Anyway...

   I guess that McCain feels that Liz is just the demographic that he could poach with the selection of Palin.  Instead, Liz tells me that there is "no way that those two people (McCain/Palin) should be in charge of her kids' future."  Today she decided to vote for Barack.


by iamold on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:06:23 PM EST

Re: I would have been insulted (none / 0)

Bingo!

I think that this is a Dan Quayle pick.  It will end up being considered a disaster.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:11:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would have been insulted (2.00 / 1)

Yeah, let's just hope that this folly doesn't extend to actually letting her serve...ugh.


by Tenafly Viper on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 10:32:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would have been insulted (none / 0)

It worked the first time around actually.


by jrsygrl on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:00:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would have been insulted (none / 0)

Maybe we're smarter this time, eh?


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:51:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would have been insulted (none / 0)

....

Unlikely.


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:31:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would have been insulted (none / 0)

People tend not to learn from our mistakes; we also keep saying she is akin to Spirew Agnew another VP that was on a winning ticket despite being horrible.


by jrsygrl on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 08:36:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You don't get it. (2.00 / 2)

The point of Palin as VP choice isn't really to replace Clinton. Here's the real point --> McCain is no longer a spoiler when it comes to making history. McCain just played the "making history card."


by soyousay on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:24:27 PM EST

Re: You don't get it. (2.00 / 1)

Isn't that what Geraldine Ferraro did?  OK, so the GOP did it this time. But it's not the first a woman was on the ticket.


by elrod on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 10:37:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You don't get it. (none / 0)

"making history"

It's not the first woman on the ticket but Ferraro didn't make it to the finish line, Palin might.


by soyousay on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 07:46:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You don't get it. (2.00 / 1)

Sorry, that history was already made about 24 years ago by Ferraro.
Are we supposed to give out awards because it took republicans 24 years longer than Dems to get around to selecting a woman for a VP?
Oooh, rah rah, go republicans.
Yee gods.
"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 09:22:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You don't get it. (none / 0)

Yes but the  GOP is all about marketing & strategy - it is very popular right now to talk about how historical it is to have a black man nominated & a woman as a contender for President; well the GOP can now argue either way history will be made as no woman has been VP before.  The GOP is not one-dimensional in their reasoning.


by jrsygrl on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 08:38:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (2.00 / 2)

I am so baffled by this choice. As a woman, I am totally insulted by this obvious ploy on the part of the Republicans. If McCain had picked a woman with some real substantial experience, I might have been a little worried, but this just reeks of tokenism.

I wasn't sure it could happen,but the Republican party has just reached a new low in its desperate attempt to win at all costs.


by Dari on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:58:14 PM EST

Re: NOT EQUALS (none / 0)

Former Editor of the Harvard Law Review vs former TV Sports announcer.

Not all short term federal politicians are created equally.

This whole juxtapositioning of the longevity of Obama's term with that of Palin is a red herring and insulting to the intelligence of anybody who listens to them speak.


Change is coming soon.
by jv on Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:10:51 PM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

I put this on another site also, but no one has given me an answer.

I'm not trying to be stupid, but why is the Media stating that Palin being V.P. is "Historic?"

I mean, G. Ferrarro was the first woman candidate to be nominated by a major party--Democrats. And, Hillary Clinton was the first woman to have an actual shot at being the President from a major  party--Democrats. Obama is the first African-American or minority to be a Presidential Candidate--from the Democratic Party.

Is Palin's "Historic" run only because she's Republican?  I'm missing something here. I'm not trying to be a bastard, but it just seems that the Media is giving out the label "Historic" quite LIBERALLY when applying it to conservatives.

Any ideas? Has anyone asked the Media this?

The only Historic part of the Republican Party that I see is Failure.


by johnrarch on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:19:46 AM EST

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

Well, it is pretty historic that the Repubes could crawl out of their caves, and at least make a passing nod at the 21st century.

It doesn't mean that they won't be crawling right back into their caves soon, either way.


"Can We Build It? Yes We Can!" - Bob the Builder
by Stipes on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 01:50:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

As I said in my comment above, are we supposed to hand out awards because it took the repubs 24 years longer than the Dems to put a woman on the ticket?


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 09:24:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. (none / 0)

The point being made is that no matter which team wins, it will be a first for American politics: Either the first African-American President, or the first female Veep.  Barack's nomination itself was historic; not true of Palin. But either ticket is now in position to claim a "first" if elected:

Dems: "Vote for us and put a black person in the White House! Make history!"

Rethugs: "Vote for us and put a woman in the White House! Make history!"

What really burns my crumpets is that we could have had two-in-one on the Dem ticket, and for no sensible reason I can see, we don't.  


by SuGeAtARC on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:35:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.