DNCC: Post Show Open Thread

Reviews of Hillary's speech from 2 friends watching at home.

AMAZING speech by Hillary.  I had goosebumps.  and you know I don't like her.

And...

Excellent speech by Hillary. Far exceeded my expectations. UNITY!

Caps were theirs.

I'm about out of battery life. What did you think?

I don't think "hit it out of the park" begins to describe the speech.



Display:


Contribute to her (2.00 / 7)

She was amazing.  Let's help reduce her debt

https://contribute.hillarycampaign2008.c om/dnccontest.html?sc=1999&utm_sourc e=1999&utm_medium=e


by Jenai on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:17:04 PM EST

Re: Contribute to her (2.00 / 2)

Just sent her a $50.

I have a new imaginary girlfriend.


by Spiffarino on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:43:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary's speech (2.00 / 5)

Moving, rousing, tremendously effective--
and not at all surprising.

She is terrific.  


by Thaddeus on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:18:38 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 2)

Barack Obama, buddy, I'd give your speech an extra once over if I were you.

That was great. I dunno if it did what she wanted it to do, but I can't imagine anyone for whom it wouldn't.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:18:46 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 3)

As Maddow said, anyone who could be convinced rationally will be convinced by this speech. There will be post-rational holdouts, but that can't be helped. Excellent, home-run of a speech for Unity and against McCain, major credit to Clinton from a person who's not a fan of hers.


by Beomoose on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:19:20 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 4)

Good Point... Maddow also points out if Obama gets the same number of Dems Kerry and Gore did he'll be up by 4-5 points.   If this drives enough people that way.... Awesome.

Olbermann and Tweety are gushing AND ripping apart McCain's response.  EVEN BETTER!!!


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:31:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Me too. She done good tonight. No qualification for once.


by Christy1947 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:34:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 2)

Mrs Diefenbach was bitching about Hillary as late as yesterday, now she calls me at work telling me she loves her and her speech, which I guess I'll get the highlights of later.  What the heck is a goin on?


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:19:53 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 3)

Well for starters, it sounds like you might be getting laid tonight.  ;-)


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:22:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 3)

well, is that his wife or his mother?


by slynch on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:38:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Hillary, in the quiet words of The Who:

You are forgiven! You are forgiven!

You are forgiven, forgiven, forgiven!


by geha714 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:20:29 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Forgiven? For what?

Please.


Full Equality Now!
by cuppajoe on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:44:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 2)

Dude, there were just as many pissed off Obama supporters as there were Hillary Supporters.   This should not only help get some of the Hillary people on Obama's side, but also Obama's people on her side.


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:48:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Let's just hope all 9 million (2.00 / 2)

of those voters who plan to vote for McCain or don't know were watching.

Except for those dumbass PUMAs, I don't see how any former Clinton supporters can't let her down now by not voting or voting for McCain.


by BlueGAinDC on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:21:59 PM EST

Re: Let's just hope all 9 million (2.00 / 1)

I keep thinking there was a PUMA Viewing Party that turned into a major bummer about 60 seconds into the speech.

Somebody better call the authorities before they start ODing on Ben & Jerrys.


by Bush Bites on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Let's just hope all 9 million (none / 0)

Hell, I heard the PUMA party was turning into a reconciliation party...They started calling up every person they ever insulted and apologized....


A PROUD Hopium user!
by xodus1914 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:38:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Let's just hope all 9 million (none / 0)

Hillary was sensational.  This is the Hillary I've admired for so many years.  This is why she really deserves the passionate dedication that she gets from her supporters.

This speech was perfect; invigorating, exciting, passionate and deeply moving.  I can't scramble for the appropriate words.  But I can, and did send her a more thanks of a more tangible sort:   https://contribute.hillarycampaign2008.c om/contribute.html?sc=2507

As for the (ma)lingering pumas.  Well, we've all known for a while that this was no longer about Hillary or the Democratic ideals.  Judging from their mindset at the moment I think it's best just to consider them a small lost cause.  

Nope. Not gonna do it. NOBAMA for me. No deal. Not even for you, lady.

She is on FIRE tonight with this speech, even if a  quarter or so of it was bogus O-propaganda.

* sigh *


It's clear that both the Ensign and Sanford marriages were the victims of the increasing number of states approving gay marriage.
by January 20 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:04:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Let's just hope all 9 million (none / 0)

Its still a small minority.  I want the undecided and the soft mccain supporters.   The other ones were never Democrats.  


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:19:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Let's just hope all 9 million (none / 0)

Small minority?!?!?!

FTR, there are at least 50 PUMAs here.

Does that sound like a "small minority"?

"At least" could mean 50, 51 or 50,000.  In fact, all of Denver may be there.


by TCQuad on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:23:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

undecided and the soft (none / 0)

Agreed!


It's clear that both the Ensign and Sanford marriages were the victims of the increasing number of states approving gay marriage.
by January 20 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:45:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Have always loved her (2.00 / 4)

Always will.  Tremendous speech.  Both my wife and I were in tears.  The Harriet Tubman part of the speech was electric.

Well done Hillary.  Amazing job.


by zmus on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:22:04 PM EST

Excellent! (1.90 / 11)

Best speech thus far. I think only Obama will top it.


Restore America's Strength.
by RJEvans on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:22:25 PM EST

Re: Excellent! (2.00 / 1)

DTAYLOR2...

YOU NEED TO LEARN WHAT THE FUCK DESERVES A TROLL RATING.  THIS COMMENT IN NO WAY DESERVES IT.  


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:47:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent! (2.00 / 1)

Don't know why somebody would TR you for that...

As you said, Hill's speech was excellent. There aren't enough adjectives to describe how perfectly she hit every single note.

I hope Obama can top it because if he can, he can't be beaten. Then let's see if she can top him when he speaks at her nomination in 2016!


by Spiffarino on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:50:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent! (none / 0)

No way this deserves TR. Uprating.


by stegro on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:53:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent! (none / 0)

Guys, often these are accidental TRs.  Someone means to give mojo and selects the wrong rating.


If yer after gettin the honey, then you don't go killing all the bees.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent! (2.00 / 2)

They need to then get their head out of their ass and check their work.   I do... most of us do.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:14:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent! (1.00 / 1)

If it's from DTaylor it's not accidental. You should check its hidden comments. McCain supporter troll.


by turtlescrubber on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:28:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent! (none / 0)

Agreed, but accidents happen.

Anyway, great night tonight. Good time to ignore the haters out there.


If yer after gettin the honey, then you don't go killing all the bees.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:39:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 4)

She didn't just hit it out of the park - that ball is sailing over New Zealand right now.


by auronrenouille on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23:24 PM EST

Leaving orbit (2.00 / 3)


"We live entangled in webs of endless deceit, often self-deceit, but with a little honest effort, it is possible to extricate ourselves from them". -- NC
by Trond Jacobsen on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Left a crater on Pluto (2.00 / 1)


by Spiffarino on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:52:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 7)

Finally someone did it, She ripped McCain into pieces.


Gandhi - "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
by HCLiberal on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23:30 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 2)

Loved the Twin cities line. That one bears repeating next week during the R convention.


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:31:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 2)

hahahaha the best part of this, it was a GREAT speech so ofcourse Fox News has to attack it, I hope PUMA is enjoying it, you know Fox News is their new favorite channel :-P


Dream for tomorrow but fight for it today.
by TruthMatters on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23:45 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 3)

Ha! Are they attacking it? That's proof it worked right there. We knew they'd head right back to Hillary hating after she became a threat again.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

That speech made me want to move back to New York just so that I can vote for her.  Blew me away.

No way.  No how.  No McCain.


"We live entangled in webs of endless deceit, often self-deceit, but with a little honest effort, it is possible to extricate ourselves from them". -- NC
by Trond Jacobsen on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:24:30 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

An fantastic speech from a fantastic woman.....Here's to Hillary Rodham Clinton!!!


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:25:34 PM EST

PUYBYA! Party Unity? You Bet Your Ass! (2.00 / 2)


by Hesiod Theogeny on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:25 PM EST

Re: PUYBYA! Party Unity? You Bet Your Ass! (none / 0)

heh, I like it!


Dream for tomorrow but fight for it today.
by TruthMatters on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:29:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Mark Penn really did her disservice (2.00 / 3)

Hillary was awesome tonight..if she would have been that person during her campaign...I may have never given another candidate a look. I am so happy to be able to send her an honest compliment and have restored respect for her.


by netgui68 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:29 PM EST

Re: Mark Penn really did her disservice (2.00 / 2)

I'll give you that... I still would have supported Obama but he IS my Senator.   But had she been like that, she would have probably won Iowa and thus take the whole thing.  If she runs in 2016, She will have learned quite a bit...

Clinton/Warner 2016!!!


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:34:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Mark Penn really did her disservice (2.00 / 2)

Obama/Biden 2008 and 2012
Clinton/Warner 2016 and 2020
Warner/Schweitzer 2024 and 2028
by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:35:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Mark Penn really did her disservice (none / 0)

Schweitzer/M. Obama 2032...With all the health care we're gonna have, we're all gonna live at least 25 years longer.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:43:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Mark Penn really did her disservice (2.00 / 1)

Hillary/M. Obama   You've had the men, now have the REAL rulers of the White House ;-)


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:56:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Mark Penn really did her disservice (none / 0)

But Hillary will already have served 8 years


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:59:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

For the first time since 2007 (2.00 / 3)

I'm remembering what it felt like when we were all giddy at our field, an embarrassment of riches.

Tonight was a good night.

Tonight reminded me why I'm a Democrat - and why at long last, I think we're going to reach that promised land in November.

Thank you Hillary.  

Well done and godspeed.


by zonk on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:26:39 PM EST

Re: For the first time since 2007 (2.00 / 2)

Ain't this the truth.  I am so proud of all of our candidates, and even though I have been a critic of Hillary, she won me over tonight.  That was a friggin' AWESOME speech.

With moments like this at the DNC there is NOTHING the RNC is going to be able to put out to compete with it.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:46:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 3)

Perfect.

Perfect.

Perfect.

Suck on that haters.

"Keep going!"


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:27:27 PM EST

ABC post speech reactions (2.00 / 4)

Were generally very positive. But Stephanopoulis couldn't resist pushing the Dems in Disarray meme a little, and was slapped down by ... wait for it ... Charlie freakin' Gibson!

Rough transcript:
STEPH: I got a call from a friend who's a big supporter of McCain who said "How dumb was it not to pick Hillary?"

GIBSON: Yeah, I guess the Republicans will try to keep fanning that flame.

You had to hear the tone of Gibson's voice for the full effect - so dismissive. I think he wanted to add "as if that's going to work any more after this speech." Steph came off looking like a real wanker.


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:29:38 PM EST

Re: ABC post speech reactions (none / 0)

Sounds like the Repubs know they just have to call Stephie up to get one of their talking points on the air.

Showing a rare flash of intelligence, Charlie knew Stephie was being had, but Stephie couldn't figure it out.


by Bush Bites on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:04:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Historical (2.00 / 4)

Her speech will be the speech we remember after the election is long over.

It's up there with Teddy Kennedy's '80 "The Dream Never Dies" speech, and Jesse Jackson's '88 "Keep Hope Alive" speech, and even Mario Cuomo's "Tale of Two Cities" speech in '84.


by wolff109 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:31:48 PM EST

Re: Historical (2.00 / 1)

Or Barack Obama's 2004 Speech "The Audacity of Hope" which I would say is easily as memorable as Kennedy's 80 speech and more than Jesse's 88 speech.


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:40:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Historical (none / 0)

Jesse Jackson's 88 speech is my first memory of politics.  I was 5 years old, and remember watching that speech, not knowing a damn thing about politics, but cheering "Go, Jesse, Go" out of sheer inspiration.

Hillary gave some other kid that feeling tonight.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:49:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Historical (2.00 / 1)

Probably... just as Obama gave someone that feeling 4 years ago.  I'm not bad mouthing Jackson's speech... I'm saying Obama's is one of the best ever and felt it should be included in the above list.  I've heard Obama give 3 of the greatest speeches I have ever heard...  The Audacity of Hope, The Religion Speech (which pissed some progressives off who missed the point of the speech entirely, and the Race Speech after the Wright Affair.  

That was hands down the best speech I ever heard Hillary give and would probably make my list of greatest speeches.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:00:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Historical (none / 0)

Oh, I completely agree with you about Obama's speech in 04'.  And personally I think the speech on Race is one of the best, most insightful, and most important political speeches I'll see in my lifetime.

Can't wait till thursday...


by ArkansasLib on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 4)

dude even the bitter republican callers on cspan are saying she did a good job!!! damn. when you can get compliments from the cspan callers you know we have moved some motha fucken mountains!


by alyssa chaos on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:32:10 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Totally.


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:26:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Were You In It For Me? (2.00 / 3)

12 minutes or so in came this passage - absolutely arresting -

To me, she hit her stride here, and carried it through to the end.

In addition to everything else people will say about this speech's function, my take away is that in her writing, but most importantly, in her delivery, Hilary grew much larger in stature tonight.

I believe in what was suggested earlier (perhaps by Howard Fineman?) Ted Kennedy's torch in the Senate could now well pass now to her - what a noble calling!

~ Rob McC


by Rob McC again on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:32:28 PM EST

Re: Were You In It For Me? (none / 0)

Yes, there has been much said about the improvement of Obama's debate skills over the campaign, but if you look at her concession speech in June and tonight's effort, who could argue that Hillary has not shown tremendous growth in the area of public speaking?


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:41:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Simply amazing (2.00 / 2)

Thank you Senator Clinton.


by UrbanRedneck on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:33:34 PM EST

Cant help going back to VP decision (2.00 / 1)

How the frick did Obama people pass over her? If this is the speech she gave when she is not on the ticket, what would have happened when she was on the ticket.

Oh well, I guess you are allowed one mistake.


by ann0nymous on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:35:19 PM EST

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

I think if Hillary wasn't married to the former president of the United States, she probably would have been a shoe-in for veep.  Bill would have complicated things way too much for Obama.


by Will Graham on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:40:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (2.00 / 1)

If she wants to run again for President, she is better off not being VP.   She will be the favorite and there are only 2 people with a chance of taking her on in 2016...  Mark Warner and Al Gore.  If Obama had a bad presidency, she would be tied to it.... If he is successful, he will support her in the General and that will help her beat whatever reptile the GOP puts up.

Being VP won't boost her any and could hurt her.... She's better off staying in the Senate and growing her stature even more.  


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:44:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (2.00 / 1)

Unfortunately, Hillary is 61 this year.  She'll be 68 in 2016.  For all the reasons we're savaging McCain for being too old and out of touch, it's extremely unlikely that she could follow a younger president.  This was her chance.  It is gone.  That is why her supporters will always grieve that this wonderful woman will not be president.  

It's unrealistic to try to console people with the "she has 2016" line.  As the Democrats.com email just reminded me, at 73 McCain would be the oldest president ever elected.


by milton333 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:53:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

Well, I'm bad at math - she'll be 69 in 2016, is what I meant to say.


by milton333 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:54:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

69 is the same age as Ronald Reagan when he was elected in 1980.  I would hope you'd think Hillary's skills and political know how are better than Reagan's.

They're sure as hell alot more noble.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:57:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

She's starting with a hell of a lot more brains than Reagan, so it would take her much longer to lose her edge.


by Bush Bites on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:09:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

Agreed, but remember all the Rush "we don't want her to get old" talk.  Hillary would do fine among Dems, but Indies and Repubs would be a different matter.


by ProgressiveDL on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 07:37:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

Well, if this speech is the key to getting Obama over the top against McCain, maybe he could offer her the first Supreme Court opening that comes along.


by Will Graham on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:59:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

Boy am I the only one who'd love to see Roberts retire early, be impeached or simply drop dead from natural causes.... Chief Justice Hillary Clinton.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:03:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

This is what I've been thinking.  Honestly, though, I wonder about some sort of new cabinet post to deal with health care.  


by milton333 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:03:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

McCain comes off as a crazy bitter old man with some issues....   As long as Hillary is of sound mind, she will be find....   Especially with a Warner as VP.    As Arkansaslib pointed out, Reagan was that age when elected.  People are living longer these days.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:02:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

Yes, but perhaps you missed all the sexist media crap about how old she looked this campaign?  How she was getting jowly and had thick ankles?  Think that the media will be any kinder to her in 8 years?  

Reagan was a long time ago, and we now know that he had Alzheimer's while in office.  We as a country are moving away from electing elderly presidents.  I don't see us going back there.


by milton333 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:05:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

>>Yes, but perhaps you missed all the sexist media crap about how old she looked this campaign?

How many people vote based on thick ankles?  I know I don't.

>>We as a country are moving away from electing elderly presidents.  I don't see us going back there.

Yet at the same time we are becoming a more elderly country, and our life spans keep expanding.  I don't think electing someone in their 70's is a very revolutionary thing - rather "ho hum" if you asked me.  


by mikes101 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:13:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

> How many people vote based on thick ankles?

In 2000, we had an entire election about clothing, sighs, and random comments taken out of context and "improved" by the media. Just sayin'.


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:17:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

In all due respect, this is a shortsighted and ridiculous argument.
I want to make a couple points:

1) The media suffered a SERIOUS backlash for sexist attitudes in the netroots, Shuster was suspended and Matthews was made to apologize (which is something that blow hard rarely does).  If they got a backlash for picking on a middle aged women, you don't think they'd get a FAR greater backlash from picking on an older woman?

2)  Women have longer life expectancy than men.

3) Hillary doesn't have alzheimer's, isn't a fake cowboy or a fucking moron.

4) Hillary is a sharp lady and tough fighter now, 8 years will only add a few more years of grit and wisdom.

5) If there is one woman in America who could be just as tough and tenacious at 69 as she is at 60, TONIGHT proved it was Hillary Clinton.

6) We HAVE to turn the page on George Bush, we can't wait another 4 years, but we can rest assured that 8 years from now, we have one fighter who is absolutely ready to take center stage.

7) Think how FUCKING AWESOME it would be to see the Democrats elect the First African American and First Woman Presidents BACK TO BACK.

We can do it, whenever America faces challenges or needs barriers broken, history shows us that DEMOCRATS rise to the occasion.


by ArkansasLib on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:16:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes (2.00 / 1)

Women are not being melodramatic when we say that we will not see a female President for the foreseeable future. That is the reality. There is no one waiting in the wings (at least not in the Democratic Party) with a real chance to break the highest and hardest glass ceiling. Hillary was our one best chance. We got tantalizingly close but the moment is gone.

Hillary Clinton would have been a spectacular President. I will always believe that we are all missing out by not having the chance to have her as our President. I will always feel some regret for what might have been this year.

Obama has my support, he'll get my vote... but Hillary Clinton has my respect, my admiration, my gratitude, my awe, my heart.


"Life is too short, time is too precious, and the stakes are too high to dwell on what might have been." Hillary Rodham Clinton - June 7, 2008
by twinmom on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:03:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes (none / 0)

I dunno Twinmom. I do tend to agree that Hillary's chance may have slipped by for good. The prospect of her making a run in 2016 is not out of the question, but 8 years is an awfully long time in politics, and who knows who will be in the spotlight by then?

However, Hillary's candidacy has pushed our political discourse near (if not beyond) a tipping point, where from now on a female running for high office will not seem like a novelty. Maybe the next woman who runs can be examined more on her merits, with a lot less of the psycho-sexual undertone we saw in much of the media coverage this year.

In this respect, Jesse Jackson paved the trail for Obama by winning a bunch of primaries. even though he did not come close to getting the nomination, he gave people the chance to get used to the idea of a black man winning presidential primaries, and when Obama came along, he was instantly considered a credible candidate. Hillary has done the same for some woman - maybe herself, maybe someone we have not even heard of yet.


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:37:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

I think McCain is out of touch because he doesn't know how to use a computer, he's got 8 houses, and he thinks that Iraq was a good idea and wants to continue on in Iran....

As for him being 73, I don't see that being a decisive issue for the vast majority of Americans.  And frankly, I don't think attacking someone for their age is a very respectable thing to do - I would suggest Democrats lay off that line of attack.

If Obama has 2 good terms and Hillary still wants to run in 2016 and is in good health, her age is not going to prevent her from running.  But I sort of hope she either runs or makes peace with life and a difference in politics in other ways a la Al Gore.  Pushing a universal health care bill through Congress would be a major accomplishment.


by mikes101 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:09:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

don't forget, on average women also live longer than men.  that certainly helps.


Being Normal is for the Mediocre.
by Doug Tuttle on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:19:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

It's not her.

It's the people she's surrounded with.


by Bush Bites on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cant help going back to VP decision (none / 0)

Hillary Clinton as Obama's VP is not as effective as Hillary the Senator.


A PROUD Hopium user!
by xodus1914 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:19:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)


by UrbanRedneck on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:35:29 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

And that's just one reason I've been for Hillary all along.

Tremendous.


by InigoMontoya on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:35:50 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

I wonder if Hillary thought about that vile joke John McCain told about then 12-year old Chelsea being ugly to get herself psyched up for this.

I know she's fiercely protective of her daughter and that's the type of thing no one ever forgets.


by Will Graham on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:37:50 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Ummm... the comment was when Chelsea was 18, in 1998...

http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25news b.html

That said, it was indeed a putrid, vile joke.

Hill hit it from Coors Field across America into the Atlantic Ocean.

And I was a massive critic throughout the primaries.


by Obamaphile on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:09:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

You're right.  I guess I got the year mixed up with Rush Limbaugh's Chelsea joke right after Clinton won the presidency.


by Will Graham on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:19:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

I love what James Carville just said on CNN.  Quote, "if your a republican you had a bad night tonight."  


by nzubechukwu on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:38:10 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Wow Carville made an intelligent comment... I'm shocked.  Tweety was gushing as well... You know if two freaking morons are making intelligent comments about your speech, you did well.


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:45:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Even Andrea Mitchell Was Moved (none / 0)

OK, you'd expect a good reaction from Keith, and the fact that Tweety liked it isn't a real stretch, but Andrea? Her tag line was that she felt a real change on the convention floor after the speech.


by Bob Miller on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:38:48 PM EST

Re: Even Andrea Mitchell Was Moved (none / 0)

I feel sooo good that she squashed keith obermann tonight.. hate the jerk... glad he was left gawking.. fool!


by gladiatorsback on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:41:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Even Andrea Mitchell Was Moved (2.00 / 1)

I know he was hard on Hillary, but he and now Maddow are the only progressives on Cable news.


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:50:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Wow. Spectacular speech that made me proud of her and proud to be proud of her.  In retrospect, it's made me think back to that moment where the two of them stood together before the California debate and I thought there it is, that's why I am a Democrat.  And tonight once again, that is why, this is why, I am a Democrat.


by Piuma on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:39:15 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

OMG! She crushed it! I have no doubt now that we will win this election united and going away. She was all the things we needed her to be: powerful, inspiring and above all a team player who put the party and the bigger goals above her own campaign. She framed the battle in so many great ways, and took it to McCain in terms so tone perfect that I bet they are crapping themselves in McCain HQ. This Obama supporter has no doubts that Hillary Clinton will be a great asset not only to the election of Barack Obama but more importantly to the future of progressive politics in this country. Wow! What a night!


by wasder on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:39:22 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

OMG! She crushed it! I have no doubt now that we will win this election united and going away. She was all the things we needed her to be: powerful, inspiring and above all a team player who put the party and the bigger goals above her own campaign. She framed the battle in so many great ways, and took it to McCain in terms so tone perfect that I bet they are crapping themselves in McCain HQ. This Obama supporter has no doubts that Hillary Clinton will be a great asset not only to the election of Barack Obama but more importantly to the future of progressive politics in this country. Wow! What a night!


by wasder on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:39:57 PM EST

the proof will be in the teacking polls (none / 0)

If McCain is up five over the weekend, it's lights out...

Just a snark, but you never know.


by esconded on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:41:23 PM EST

Re: the proof will be in the teacking polls (none / 0)

Is that the Biden bounce?  


by SueBee on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:49:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Her speech was great but I wish she would have given me a reason to vote for Obama, something other than he's not McCain.  She said nothing about Obama's qualities that will make him a good President.  Or did I miss that part?

I'm still not ready to vote for Obama.  Sorry.  Hillary just proved again that she should be on the ticket.  She didn't tell me why Obama should be.  


by SueBee on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:43:41 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

so did you not listen to the speech are you just a troll?

I want you to ask yourselves: Were you in this campaign just for me? Or were you in it for that young Marine and others like him? Were you in it for that mom struggling with cancer while raising her kids? Were you in it for that boy and his mom surviving on the minimum wage? Were you in it for all the people in this country who feel invisible?

Those are the reasons I ran for President. Those are the reasons I support Barack Obama. And those are the reasons you should too.

but if only she gave you a reason to vote for Barack.


Dream for tomorrow but fight for it today.
by TruthMatters on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:46:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

What's any of that got to do with Obama?  I wanted her to say something positive about HIM, give me a reason or two to support HIM, something other than "well, at least he's a democrat".   What's unique about Obama, what's he bringing to the table?  I didn't hear a thing about him, his skills, his visions, his leadership abilities.  


by SueBee on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:54:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

I think you should watch his speech if you were looking for that. From what I understand, that's what he will be doing.

As for Hillary, this was saying, if you care about the things I care for, this should not even be a choice.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:56:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

I think that SueBee is right here.  But she's also caught in a contradiction.  The fact that HRC did not give more of a rationale for why Obama, in particular, is poised to carry the legacy forward is why it was an excellent speech, but not a great one.  The evaluation of a speech has to take into account it's rhetorical context, i.e. regarding what it aims to persuade.  Of course, I am willing to take a utilitarian tack here.  If it works, than this criticism will be somewhat nullified.  Unfortunately, SueBee's own reaction seems to indicate that this flaw is a real one.  We need a larger sample size to determine that.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:09:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Go read some of the comments on allegre's corner.. (none / 0)

...and ask yourself what the average poster there would find to be a compelling reason to vote for Obama. Maddow's "post-rational" critique applies here. I heard HRC saying that Obama carries forward the values and goals we have in common. I think it will persuade rational people who share the values HRC enumerated. Post-rational people...well, like I said at first, what would ever convince those people?


Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -Voltaire
by kydoc2 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:55:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Go read some of the comments on allegre's (none / 0)

Sure.  Some will never be convinced.  But if the speech was light on something it was more specific rationale for Obama's candidacy.  It's not clear to me she could have accomplished this compellingly.  But this is exactly why some of us were so upset at the way she was giving the republicans fodder during the primaries.  McCain's camp is crowing that she still did not address his readiness.  That argument against Obama would have been raised anyway.  But look how Clinton (an Biden as well) made that accusation more credible.

I thought it was an excellent speech.  I hold nothing against Clinton with regards to it.  But if there is something we needed her to do, whether or not she was capable, then this was it.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 08:16:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah. (none / 0)

I hear you.

It would be pretty freaking cool if Bill talks convincingly about "specific rationale for Obama's candidacy " tonight. I honestly have no idea whether to expect that or not. Does anyone have predictions/guesses about the content and feel of Bill's speech tonight?


Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -Voltaire
by kydoc2 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 11:01:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Not her job, and she's not super-human.  Honestly, I cried during her speech.  I can't imagine what it took to stand up there, knowing that you lost, knowing that you are still passionately supported, knowing that your bid was historic and that so many women will be let down because it failed.  To try to put a smile on your face and say that it's okay, to not be sad or sentimental, to be a team player, despite what really was a deluge of sexism from the media.  It must have taken superhuman effort.  It's too much to ask that she make a passionate personal plea for Obama.  She did what she needed to do, she did what she could, she made the political case for him.  She fulfilled her role, and it must have been incredibly difficult to do it.  I don't think anyone should have expected her to make a sales pitch for Obama, there were plenty of other people at the convention to do that.


by milton333 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:01:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

I thought her plea for Obama was as passionate and personal as any I've seen her give this election cycle.  She did everything she could have.  This speech was FANTASTIC, and anyone who complains is looking for a reason to whine.


by ArkansasLib on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:03:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Honestly, I'll bet you anything Hillary thought about that awful joke McCain told about Chelsea being ugly to get pumped up for this.

There's just no way that she's forgotten about that.  It's the type of thing that sticks with you forever.


by Will Graham on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:05:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Yeah, she only said our children and our country depended on it.

Screw them, huh?


by Bush Bites on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:14:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Well, Hillary is smart, and a Democrat, and she endorses Obama. She basically said the fate of our nation hinges on us making the right decision and electing Barack Obama. In fact, she gave a barn burner of a speech saying that our future can only be bright if we elect Obama. I don't see any ambiguity here. Hillary says elect Obama or we will all suffer, and she couldn't be more right.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:26:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

So vote for the guy who wants to overturn Roe v Wade then. Or maybe you should vote for the guy that calls his wife a c*nt.


A PROUD Hopium user!
by xodus1914 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:43:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Pat Buchanan just said that Hillary didn't have supporters, she had a following. And that the following was non-transferrable and based entirely on personality, not on any issues. I fear he may be at least in part accurate.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:57:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Why don't you actually take some time and read both of their positions?   Are you an individual who is intelligent enough to read up on the Pro-Choice, Pro-Womens rights Obama and the Anti-Choice, Called his wife a C**T John McCain or are you a sheep that has to be told what to do.


by yitbos96bb on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:53:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

What do you disagree with Obama on? Or more specifically, what is McCain going to do for you that Obama will not?


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:53:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

I just do not trust Obama to keep us safe.  If we aren't safe, abortion and gay rights don't really matter, do they?  jmo  


by SueBee on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:03:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

1) How does a guy with a twitchy trigger finger like McCain keep us safe?

2) Are we safer now than 8 years ago?  (The answer is No as Al Qaida is stronger than ever)

3)  Where do you live?  Do you live in an ACTUAL CITY THAT MAY BE A TARGET... DC, NY, CHICAGO, LA, SEATTLE, PHILLY, ETC. or do you live in rural Mississippi, Iowa, Ohio or some other place that terrorists don't give a flying fuck about, the people there are safer from terrorists than those in a big city but for some idiotic reason you run you life by needless fear because you watch way too much TV and movies?  Because if you don't live in a major city, you may want to worry about the economy and not something idiotic like the chance of a terrorist attacking.... in fact Buy a lotto ticket because you have a better chance winning Power Ball than getting killed ina  terrorist attack.  In fact there has only been 2 attacks on US soil by foreign terrorists... the failed Bombing of the World Trade Center and 9-11....

4) McCain has supported Bush's policies which have failed to make us safer by ignoring customs, border patrol etc.  

Answer those please.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:12:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

I guarantee you every city that might be an actual target of terrorism will vote for Obama.

The idiots in the sticks who think their local Pizza Hut is going to be attacked by Islamofascists are the ones who will vote for McCain on security issues.

(I'll never understand how the party that allowed 9/11 to happen became the security party anyway.)


by Bush Bites on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:18:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Agreed with you there... Its like the people who are scared all the info on their HD will be stolen if they drop it off to a recyling place... NOBODY CARES!  THEY DON'T TARGET THOSE PLACES... They go after businesses... the chances are ASTRONOMICAL.  I'm tired of stupid people who live in fear... my tolerance for them is nil.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:32:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Can you refrain from antagonizing potential Democratic voters?

SueBee raises a legitimate question and the answer is that Obama is going to put together a great national security team and have a great foreign policy, not that "you may be a dumb shit who lives in the exurbs so why do you care about terrorism".  Just a suggestion - that is - if you care about winning people over to your side...


by mikes101 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:24:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Sorry, SueBee's been declaring left right and center how there is no way she could ever vote for Obama.  We have to take her at her word and abandon hope of 'winning' her over.


If yer after gettin the honey, then you don't go killing all the bees.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:27:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Sue Bee has been trolling for a while.  So she can answer the questions and explain her self.  So kindly piss off as I don't really care about your opinion.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:30:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Please explain yourself as that comment is not really an answer.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:13:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Yeah,I gotta say, if you think we're safer now, I think you're nuts. Homeland security is shit, FEMA is a disaster and we still haven't caught the guy who killed thousands of innocent Americans.

McCain is advised by even more hardcore neoconservatives than Bush was. We WILL go to war with Iran. That much is a given. It's just a matter of who joins in. Russia has a great deal of disdain for John McCain, I think if he took us with Israel into war with Iran, Iran would get Russia to provide support.

Unfortunately, short of Obama either pledging to attack a country or killing a terrorist and bringing back their head, I don't think there's anything he can do to convince you on that front.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:22:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 2)

If we cared more as a country about being safe than about freedom and individual rights, we wouldn't have even had a revolution in the first place.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:24:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:34:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

If we aren't safe, abortion and gay rights don't really matter, do they?

You couldn't be more wrong. You would have us give up freedom in the pursuit of security? That is certainly not the basis upon which this nation was founded and has prospered. We need vision, intelligence and forward-looking leadership - not some guy who is "good" by default just because he has been making wrong decisions for a really, really long time.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:30:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Keeping people safe (none / 0)

Actually, bombing other countries and killing millions of people is exactly how NOT to keep a country safe.  Being a terrorist is a very hard, horrible life - the only reason people ever become terrorists is because they are so completely burned about perceived injustice to themselves, their loved ones and their country.  The way to create lots of more terrorists quickly is to kill thousands of innocent people - many of their children and close family will take to terrorism, especially if there is no other way to retaliate against the perpetrators (bombers).  When you "shock and awe" bomb a country thousands of miles away that wasn't even involved in an attack on your own country, with completely disregard for massive loss of civilian life, you maximize the likelihood of creating new terrorists.

Bush and McCain's response to 9/11 has been to work hard to create thousands of new terrorists.

The Democrat / Obama way is police action that eliminates existing terrorists combined with good faith negotiation and aid that improves living conditions, improves the image of the US and prevents the creation of new terrorists.

You judge who will keep you more safe, the one who wants to negotiate with Iran or the one who wants to bomb it.


by swaminathan on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:50:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

Scene: 911 Commission hearing


RICE: I remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the United States. He talked to people about this. But I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.

BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?

RICE: I believe the title was, "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."

Nobody told them they should do something about it? And recall that Rice was subsequently promoted to Secretary of State.

Are these the people you think are best equipped to keep us safe?


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:39:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

this is probably a troll but this is the republican talking point coming out of the speech and as good a speech as it was for hillary supporters, her own career, and for showing how much mccain sucks, she didn't really do her job in getting people to vote for obama.

she will have to do her own GOTV to get her supporters to the polls.  simply "not voting for mccain" is not enough.

makes me sick when people vote on things not related to the issues.  not voting is even worse  


by ab03 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:55:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

I agree that not voting on issues and not voting sucks.

She may have to do those other things but, really, I don't think any Dem should expect any more from her.  She did a great job tonight.  I've never been a HRC fan, but I believe any imagined 'debt' has been paid tonight.

The one line, "were you in it for me or for that Marine?"  was more than enuf in my opinion.

If she wants to do GOTV and barnstorm across the country for Barack, that's great.  


If yer after gettin the honey, then you don't go killing all the bees.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:34:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

yeah.  I guess she has done all she can.  What is sad is that even given this great speech, there are still people out there that will think "Hillary is right - I'm still not voting for Obama though"


by ab03 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 08:33:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

God, I wish someone from the Clinton camp would leak to the media that Hillary was still bitter about McCain's disgusting joke about Chelsea being ugly so many years ago.

I would love to get the media discussing that incident ad nauseum.  McCain comes off looking like a heartless piece of shit.


by Will Graham on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:44:50 PM EST

not bitter (none / 0)

pissed! Angry! mad!


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:45:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (1.00 / 1)

Like Michelle tonight?  Why did she look so angry?  

McCain never said that Chelsea was ugly.  That was Rush.  Assuming you care about accuracy.  

BTW, I have worked for every democrat President since McGovern.  I intended to do the same thing this year, if we had a candidate with enough experience that I could trust her/him.  I didn't get that.  

After that speech, can anyone tell me why Hillary isn't on this ticket?  


by SueBee on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:05:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (none / 0)

McCain never said that Chelsea was ugly.  That was Rush.

Nope, sorry.  I hate to burst your bubble but it was McCain who told that joke.  It's all over the internets.

Here's one link, of many...

Sure you still want to vote for McCain?

BTW: Michelle looked elated.


by Will Graham on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:13:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (2.00 / 1)

You're wrong.

http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25news b.html

But you're obviously delusional.

The PUMAs are calling......


by Bush Bites on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:23:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (2.00 / 1)

We get it. You hate Obama. Nothing can be said to make you vote for him. Don't drag Michelle Obama into it.

If you are unable to vote on the issues and can only vote on personality, well, godspeed.

BUT, McCain told a joke about Chelsea Clinton being ugly. Please, learn how to use the Google.
If yer after gettin the honey, then you don't go killing all the bees.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:24:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (2.00 / 1)

I think Michelle is cursed with a natural frown on her face. I have one of those myself. Even when I'm happy, unless I'm absolutely delighted, I look like I'm totally bored. I got more of her personality from the way she kinda awkwardly held her arms in front of her like a shy little kid.

I can't believe you don't trust Obama to keep us safe, but you worked for McGovern. Jesus Christ.

McCain is a navy man and he has never changed. He clearly learned misogynist tendencies that have never escaped him. Even when courting his wife, he chased her around a table like a dog in heat.

I wish Hillary was on the ticket, I think it would have been really hard to govern with it. Hillary's role would be reduced to an advisor, and you know she doesn't want that.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:27:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (none / 0)

Let Biden do the funerals, behind-the-scenes counseling and all the other minutiae that comes with the VP slot.

We just found the heir-apparent to the title "Lion(ess) of the Senate".


by TCQuad on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:31:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

*sigh* (2.00 / 2)

It's shame that a woman has to plaster a smile on her face to be acceptable. I read it as completely engrossed, also tense (there was a lot riding on how the speech was received).

I remember the look on my wife's face after the birth of our first daughter. It was weird, focused and powerful. A little scary.

However, I am fairly certain she was not angry.


by Neef on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:34:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You are wrong (none / 0)

It was mccain. rush limpball and the rest of the rightwing pigs picked up on it and ran.

You are the first person to say Michele looked angry. I have not seen it yet, but I am guessing that you are seeing what you want to see.

Since the righties and faux news want to keep pushing the meme that Michele is an "angry" black woman, I am guessing that you just accidently gave into that train of thought. Right?


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:40:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I loved the looks on Michelle's face (none / 0)

There were a lot of different looks--she did smile at times, but she looked a lot of ways, all completely congruent with what Hillary was saying. I think Michelle loved the speech. And I know where the "she looked angry" meme came from, or at least a place it's taken root. I went to allegre's corner immediately after the speech, assuming that they would finally wake up or something, because I am naive sometimes. And that was all over the comment threads. I was surprised for a second...then I remembered that my doctoral research was all about how people project their own preconceptions when interpreting ambiguous facial expressions (and complex emotions generate ambiguous facial expressions).


Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -Voltaire
by kydoc2 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:08:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You are wrong (none / 0)

The Black woman isn't smiling 100% of the time, so she must want to kill Whitey.  

Do you even listen to your own contradictions?  You keep stating what a strong Democrat you have been and how you have supported every Democrat, but you can't support Obama.  

What wonderful Foreign and Military experience did Bill Clinton have in 1992 that Obama does not have now in 2008?  Please give me just 3 good examples on this, and I will not assume you are talking about the big honking obvious one that is staring us all in the face.


by gavoter on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:30:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You replied to me (none / 0)

Also, your first line... eh... I think you could have left that at home.


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:00:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: not bitter (none / 0)

Ambigous construction, Ms. Bee.  You've "worked for every democrat President since McGovern."

You served in Carter's administration, and both of Clinton's?  (McGovern of course was never president.)

Or, did you mean to say you campaigned for every Democratic presidential candidate since McGovern?  (If so, was there a reason you didn't support McGovern, as well?)

Blogging engenders imprecision - we get that.  But it also allows for drilling down.


by Rob McC again on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:58:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

From everyones (none / 0)

descriptions... since I have not seen it.

AWESOME BABY!


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:45:16 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

This was a reminder of the true depth of leaders in our Party. The GOP...not so much.
To me, the genius of the speech was how she started with anecdotes from her campaign..(I have to admit I was wondering where this was headed)then closed it with it was not about her (JRE ..R.I.P.)but about what her anecdotes represented...
"harlequin speech of suicide, demanding instantaneous lobotomy"
by nogo postal on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:50:30 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

I hope Ford is right and Bill will try to outdo Hillary.  Great job.  Here's hoping Clinton and Biden keep it going tomorrow.


But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.
by thezzyzx on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:51:52 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

My wife called me halfway through, so I paused the DVR...and then the channel changed to PBS and I lost the speech!

Anybody know where I can find it online?  Or if somebody will be replaying it?  I'm freaking out here.


by randomscientist on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:55:23 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

http://www.demconvention.com/ will have it soon.  MSNBC just promised to replay it as well.


by auronrenouille on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:56:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Thanks!  Their video player is amazing, I can actually watch full screen and have it not look like crap.  Hopefully she'll be up soon...


by randomscientist on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:11:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

They've done a lot of ad-hoc repairs - the site didn't work with my Mac until recently.  So they may be converting the video into a new format or something.


by auronrenouille on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:13:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 5)

Pat Buchanan (MSNBC) seriously needs to STFU.


by auronrenouille on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:55:26 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

God, I wish i could dive this comment a billion recommends.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:59:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

She stumped him.

Seriously. He keeps trying to form coherent arguments, but the logic keeps falling apart because her speech was so fantastic. It was a perfectly polished shield with no nicks, no weaknesses, no defects.


by TCQuad on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:34:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (2.00 / 1)

one real mojo and 99 virtual ones.


by Neef on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:36:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Damnnnnn (none / 0)

If I never before saw a tour-de-force, epic, game-changing speech, I saw one tonight.

Damn!


by Neef on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:55:40 PM EST

Re: Pat Buchanan (2.00 / 2)

its great when he has a live crowd, so that that everyone sees that no, he is wrong.

I love it he is saying Hillary supporters wont move over, and he has hillary supporters behind him yelling nooo!!

shut him up quite nicely and really makes his argument look dumb when the people he is talking about are behind him saying he is wrong.


Dream for tomorrow but fight for it today.
by TruthMatters on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 11:58:32 PM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

A perfect speech.  She was absolutely wonderful.


by RussTC3 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:01:30 AM EST

I'm glad everyone loved the speech (none / 0)

but i didn't think it was that great.  number one, she didn't really make a case for obama, just said that she supported him fully.  i wish she'd taken on some of the things she said in the past, said he was ready to lead, etc.

number two, i am tired as hell of the sacharine rhetoric we get in all these convention speeches about how we are in favor of jobs, education and health care for everyone, opportunity for all, and a happy wonderful america.  this stuff is just not inspiring and is boring as hell.  i also get pretty tired of the Little Timmy anecdotes i.e. "I will always remember Little Timmy from the campaign and how he inspired me and how we're all in this for him."  98% of the time the anecdote is empty of feeling.

Same with Warner.  How about some semi-substance at least about how McCain will trample the right to choose, flip flopped on drilling and tax cuts and a million other things, doesn't understand the economy and wants to dig the deficit hole even deeper, doesn't inspire anyone, is a dangerous hothead who loves war, etc.  How many empty speeches are we going to get about the laundry list of Things We All Like?

I liked the Harriet Tubman part though, that was actually inspiring.


by snaktime on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:02:11 AM EST

Re: I'm glad everyone loved the speech (none / 0)

To your point, if there is one thing that Republicans will try to take out of this is that she never explicitly stated that Obama was prepared and qualified to be President.  I am sure that there is an attack ad already prepared to that fact.

I think it was a very good speech overall, and I did love the lines asking if people were in it for her, or what she believed in.  I think she made some very good opening attacks on McCain and I hope that Biden is able to take those attacks to the next level tomorrow (oh, and please stop telling us he is your friend,  just go for the throat)


by gavoter on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:22:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm glad everyone loved the speech (none / 0)

agree completely.  let's go for the throat.  enough playing nice against the f*ckwad lying republicans.  

i did like when Hillary asked whether we were in it for her or for america.  only she diluted that great line by asking if we were in it for her or for Little Timmy, which is the formulation that grates the hell out of me (see above).


by snaktime on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:27:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pat Buchanan (none / 0)

When he gets this detached from reality you know he is scared.


by souvarine on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:02:27 AM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

"I'm about out of battery life. What did you think?"

I think we need universal power outlets.  What good is your health when you can't even blog?


"In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." -Barack Obama
by blueAZ on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:07:20 AM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Thank you.  That's what I have been trying to say.  She needed to say something about Obama and why he's deserving of our votes!  


by SueBee on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:07:42 AM EST

Can't Obama say why he (2.00 / 1)

deserves my vote?
by usedmeat on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:17:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Be honest. If she had, would you have listened?


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:29:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Makes us even. (1.00 / 2)

AMAZING speech by Hillary. I had goosebumps. and you know I don't like her.
I don't like Obama.
by usedmeat on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:16:07 AM EST

Re: Makes us even. (none / 0)

But are you voting for him?


by yitbos96bb on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:35:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Top Notch Speech (none / 0)

I loved it


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:22:14 AM EST

Re: DNCC: Post Show Open Thread (none / 0)

Hillary's speech was OUT-FUCKING-STANDING!

Pardon my French, but I'm fired up.


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:30:24 AM EST

This has got to be freaking out the Republicans. (2.00 / 1)

When they realize our SECOND place finisher is so much better than the best they have to offer.  I've said it from the beginning of the primary, we had a great slate of candidates to choose from and the Republicans had squat.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 12:33:00 AM EST

I couldn't agree more n/t (2.00 / 1)


Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -Voltaire
by kydoc2 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:13:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

That was... (2.00 / 1)

the speech of a lifetime.  I know Obama is supposed to be the better speaker, but man...I can't see him topping this!

Although the PBS talking heads' (all male, of course!) dissection of it pissed me off.  Earth to morons:

1. Backtracking on all her primary comments would have simply re-emphasized the wounds of the past, rather than emphasizing what we need to do NOW and in the coming months.
2. Backtracking on all her primary comments would have been a complete turn-off to her wavering supporters, who would have (rightly, I might add) interpreted it as "I'm being forced to do this."  That is exactly the wrong message.  The RIGHT message is the one she gave tonight--"I am freely and willingly endorsing Obama, because he stands for what you and I really believe in."

So the scorecard of the evening comes out to Talking Heads 0, Hillary Clinton 18,000,000.  Rock on, Senator Clinton!


Wouldn't it be nice if there were no rhetorical questions?
by Elsinora on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 01:45:32 AM EST

During the primaries (2.00 / 1)

it was an article of faith that Obama's was the better speaker. At the beginning, it really wasn't close. She found her voice near the end, and each speech improved until we get this, a masterpiece, easily the equal of his 2004 speech.

If the speeches are supposed to keep getting better (to build climax) then Biden must be sweating, Bill has his work cut out for him, and Obama's going to have to find some genuine inspiration. The acceptance speech will either be a generational model of political rhetoric, or it will be the "speech 2 days after Hillary's".


by Neef on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:09:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.