The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda

I posted this diary on Daily Kos on Nov 11, 2006, and I am reposting it here today for its relevance to the recent missile tests in Iran, because it seems pertinent to understanding how serious politicians from Israel seem bent on avoiding a nuclear capable Iran. At the time, only a year and a half ago, it was pure propaganda, perhaps a vehicle of intimidation. Iran, however, never bought into it. Still, it shows the seriousness with which Israel views the problem of not being the only nuclear power in the Middle East.

The BBC and Israeli Propaganda is the actual subtitle of the article, Israel's Plan for a Military Strike on Iran, by JONATHAN COOK, a British journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. It was published in CounterPunch on October 12, 2006 and is reproduced again by permission. At the time, there was an upsurge of interest in Iran's "threat," but the immediate circumstances are not now clear.

BEGIN

The last few days have seen quite a number of diaries posted on the topic of Israel's expected attack of Iran in order to stop its nuclear program, so far announced by the Iranians to be for peaceful purposes. Not widely publicized in the US, the Israeli government commissioned Israel's leading film maker, Noam Shalev, to execute a documentary about the Iranian threat, whose content lends further weight to the likelihood of an Israeli attack.

The Middle East, and possibly the world, stands on the brink of a terrible conflagration as Israel and the United States prepare to deal with Iran's alleged ambition to acquire nuclear weapons. Israel, it becomes clearer by the day, wants to use its air force to deliver a knockout blow against Tehran. It is not known whether it will use conventional weapons or a nuclear warhead in such a strike.

At this potentially cataclysmic moment in global politics, it is good to see that one of the world's leading broadcasters, the BBC, decided this week that it should air a documentary entitled "Will Israel bomb Iran?" It is the question on everyone's lips and doubtless, with the imprimatur of the BBC, the program will sell around the world.

Although Cook enumerates various slighted points not covered in the film, 1) that such an attack would be a gross violation of international law, 2) that Israel's own nuclear arsenal is unmonitored by the IAEA, 3) that Israel is perceived as a threat by its neighbors and may be fuelling a Middle East arms race, 4) that the consequences of an Israeli strike would cause instability and violence across the Middle East, including in Iraq, where British and American troops are stationed as an occupying force, or 5) that it is certain to provoke a steep rise in global jihad against the West, it is the words of various Israeli officials and politicians, who appear in the film that loom ominous.

....the program dedicates 40 minutes to footage of Top Gun heroics by the Israeli air force, and the recollections of pilots who carried out a similar, "daring" attack on Iraq's nuclear reactor in the early 1980s; menacing long shots of Iran's nuclear research facilities; and interviews with three former Israeli prime ministers, a former Israeli military chief of staff, various officials in Israeli military intelligence, and a professor who designs Israel's military arsenal.

All of them speak with one voice: Israel, they claim, is about to be "wiped out" by Iranian nuclear weapons and must defend itself "whatever the consequences".

They are given plenty of airtime to repeat unchallenged well-worn propaganda Israel has been peddling through its own media, and which has been credulously amplified by the international media: that Iran is led by a fanatical anti-Semite who, like Adolf Hitler, believes he can commit genocide against the Jewish people, this time through a nuclear holocaust.

Other Israeli misinformation, none of it believed by serious analysts, is also uncritically spread by the film-makers: that Hizbullah in Lebanon is a puppet of Iran, waiting to aid its master in Israel's destruction; that Iran is only months away from creating nuclear weapons, a "point of no return", as the program warns; and that a "fragile" Israel is under constant threat of annihilation from all its Arab neighbors.

But the program's unequivocal main theme -- echoing precisely Israel's own agenda -- is that Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is hell-bent on destroying Israel. The film makers treat seriously, bordering on reverentially, preposterous comments from Israel's leaders about this threat.

Shimon Peres, the Israeli government's veteran roving ambassador, claims, for example, that Iran has made "a call for genocide" against Israel, compares an Iranian nuclear bomb to a "flying concentration camp", and warns that "no one would like to see a comeback to the times of the Nazis".

Cabinet minister Avi Dichter, a former head of the Shin Bet domestic security service, believes Israel faces "an existential threat" from Iran. And Zvi Stauber, a former senior figure in military intelligence, compares Israel's situation to a man whose neighbor "has a gun and he declares every day he is going to kill you".

But pride of place goes to Binyamin Netanyahu, a former prime minister and the current leader of the opposition. He claims repeatedly that the only possible reason Iran and its president could want a nuclear arsenal is for Israel's "extermination". "If he can get away with it, he'll do it." "Ayatollahs with atomic bombs are a powerful threat to all of us." A nuclear Iran "is a threat unlike anything we have seen before. It's beyond politics"

As to the matter of a conventional versus a nuclear attack, Ehud Barak provides abundant hints:

"Ultimately we are standing alone," he says, in apparent justification for an illegal, unilateral strike. Iran's nuclear research facilities, Barak warns, are hidden deep underground, so deep that "no conventional weapon can penetrate", leaving us to infer that in such circumstances Israel will have no choice but use a tactical nuclear strike in its "self-defense". And, getting into his stride, Barak adds that some facilities are in crowded urban areas "where any attack could end up in civilian collateral damage".

"Apart from a brief appearance by an Iranian diplomat, no countervailing opinions are entertained in the BBC program; only Israel's military and political leadership is allowed to speak." Juxtaposing the above remarks are those from a poorly translated speech by Ahmadinejad. He is quoted as saying: "The regime occupying Jerusalem should be eliminated from the page of history". This is at least an improvement on the original translation, much repeated in the program by Netanyahu and others, that "Israel must be wiped off the map". According to Cook, "the program makers infer from their more accurate translation the same diabolical intent on Ahmadinejad's part as suggested by Netanyahu's fabricated version."

"But, as has now been pointed out on numerous occasions (though clearly not often enough for the BBC to have noticed), Khomeini and Ahmadinejad were referring to the need for regime change, the ending of the regime occupying the Palestinians in violation of international law. They were not talking, as Netanyahu and co claim, about the destruction of the state of Israel or the Jewish people. The implication of the speech is that the current Israeli regime will end because occupying powers are illegitimate and unsustainable, not because Iran plans to fire nuclear missiles at the Jewish state or commit genocide."

The film further informs that,

Iran's nuclear weapons...are already in existence and present.

Evidence for this claim, however, is not provided.

Another notable comment quoted by Cook was,

"With America unlikely to take military action, the pressure is growing on Israel's leaders to launch a raid."

Cook's article is too long to post in its entirety, but is highly recommended for its look at Israel's use of propaganda to lay the groundwork for what could be the next explosive political situation in the Middle East, one that could drag the US into yet another confrontation.

END

LINK HERE for the full article.

It is not clear if the documentary ever played in Britain; it has not played in the US. Perhaps it sounds too hysterical for any reasonable audience. Still, these were Israel's leaders talking and it is not clear what their thinking is today.



Display:


how much do you get paid to blog? (1.50 / 6)


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:18:20 PM EST

Re: how much do you get paid to blog? (none / 0)

what is that supposed to mean? I thought this was a very good blog.


by SocialDem on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:35:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

check the diarist's history. (1.66 / 3)

and it would appear that by the diarist's own admission he/she has been doing this for at least 2 years now....  and i got t/r for pointing out the obvious?  sheesh.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:38:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

oh.... (1.83 / 6)

and was banned from KOS for what was it.... promoting propaganda i think.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:39:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: oh.... (none / 0)

Don't be a bully CG. Let's judge each diary on it's merits.


by Politicalslave on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:43:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: oh.... (2.00 / 1)

a bully? ahaaaha.


"Rankles and Rush Limbaugh, ruining the chaos brand since 2008."
by alyssa chaos on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:14:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

...and also... (none / 0)

...he and his pals have called both dKos and Google part of the "right wing zionist conspiracy."

Google "Shergald" and "cabal" and get a look at his linkages. This
is no progressive.

Basically, shergald is a broadcaster, not a diarist interested in dialog.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 12:53:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 4)

I honestly don't know much about the diarist or even Israel's part in this, but I do believe that bush has been tryng to get the US involved in a conflict with Iran for at least two years. We have seen Israel go into Syria and Iraq to go after suspected nuclear research sites. Furthermore, Israel flew sorties over Iranian airspace last week. I am very concerned, because Iran is no Iraq or Syria. Iran will fight back, and I fear that we will either run into or be dragged into a situation we cannot handle.


"And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:58:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

i don't disagree. (none / 0)


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:04:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: i don't disagree. (2.00 / 1)

I did briefly scan his diaries. He has been a very busy fellow with a distinctive point of view. I have only read a couple of his diaries and have not found him to be anti-semetic. However, I am not very well read on Israel and/or the Palistinian conflict. Even though I have some huge problems with the Palistinian and Arab mindset, I will say I find some aspects of Israel to be frighteningly conservative. Some of this is understandable considering the history of the region. My heart tends to be with Israel but cannot condone them all of the time.

You did help me look at this more critically, which I appreciate.


"And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:18:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 1)

but whats the end game? why start war with Iran- I just wanna know/understand why Bush wants to go to war with them-

whats in it for him?


"Rankles and Rush Limbaugh, ruining the chaos brand since 2008."
by alyssa chaos on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:17:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 2)

I think that after 9/11 Dick Cheney had his 20th heart attack and God spoke to him and told him to conquer the Middle East. And bush sits at his surrogate father's feet and does what Daddy says. Oh and they are both batshit crazy for thinking that they could control the oil reserves in the "Stans, Iraq, the Persian Gulf and yes, Iran.


"And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:34:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 1)

love your sig


"And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:34:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 2)

thats hilarious- and thanks;

look what i found; its a good read, and brings up some super great points.

Why the U.S. (Probably) Won't Attack Iran


"Rankles and Rush Limbaugh, ruining the chaos brand since 2008."
by alyssa chaos on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:41:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 1)

Thanks for the links. These are hard to read for me because I tend to go a bit batshit crazy myself, so it might take me a bit to get through.


"And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 11:49:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (2.00 / 2)

Ona a brighter note Kucinich will try to get Bush impeached again on Thursday...
by btchakir - July 9

"And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 12:06:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (none / 0)

Impeach Bush. That would make my Thursday.


by Politicalslave on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 09:56:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: check the diarist's history. (none / 0)

There is a public and private game going on between Israel and Iran. A war for either country would lead to obliteration by both. Earlier this week the Iranian foreign minister spoke about this and stated that neither the US or Israel would be crazy enough to start a war.

The mullahs want a nuke to prevent being pushed out of power by a third party nation, while the overwhelming amount of Iranians want the Mullahs gone. The president of Iran is just a figurehead. He is hated in the country and as much of national joke as Bush is...with the exception that he controls nothing.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 12:59:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how much do you get paid to blog? (2.00 / 1)

Seymour Hirsh has been talking about this for awhile maybe 2 years. Israel and the U.S. are ready to attack Iran. It's just a matter of time.


by Politicalslave on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:42:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I think bush is saving it for a (none / 0)

October surprise to be honest.


by SocialDem on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 08:58:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think bush is saving it for a (none / 0)

In a simple movie scenario that would be true. But  there are more circumstances to this. The Iraqi government is closely are closely aligned with Iran and the Iraqi army will push back hard on american troops. The death toll of US soldiers will skyrocket. No oil will be moving in the gulf as the Iranians harass shipping. The price of gas will skyrocket. None of this will help the repig party to stay in power.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 01:03:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not unless (none / 0)

Bush uses presidential directive no.51. Thus suspending elections and granting him 4 more years of power. Basically martial law. But I think there would be riots on the streets. Not likely, but still probable.


by SocialDem on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 01:58:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not unless (none / 0)

Cheney would enjoy 51. I think Bush just wants to back and play on his "ranch."


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 03:42:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not unless (none / 0)

That's just it. Cheney has been the one that is truly running this country anyways.


by SocialDem on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 05:01:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It could just be another distraction (none / 0)

US forces are losing in Iraq and Afghanistan. If people on the left are panicking about war with Iran, then they are not paying attention to the failures in those two countries. Neither the leaders of Iran or Israel have any intention of going to war. Looney guys like shergald love to ramp this stuff up, but that just part of his rhetoric of the international zionist conspiracy. It is to be noted that shergald never offers commentary on other international or domestic issues, and will not engage in meaningful discussions. Basically anyone who doesn't subscribe to his view he believes has been brainwashed by right wing zionists. Personally I think he is on the payroll of someone and most likely is not even in the US. Which is why he never comments on issues like health care, trade policy, tax fairness or environmental issues.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 06:24:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda (2.00 / 5)

Once again, you pollute what might have been a decent diary by going overboard with your extremism.

The US and Israel should certainly not attack Iran because, at least as far as our own intelligence services have discovered, they don't have a nuclear weapon and won't for some time, and there isn't even any real indication to say they'd use one if they had it.

But don't pretend that Ahmadinejad hasn't rattled the sabers against Israel.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5ix-v iVGAnfS1RHJGzZHSGjnzDIXg :

Those who think they can revive the stinking corpse of the usurping and fake Israeli regime by throwing a birthday party are seriously mistaken. Today the reason for the Zionist regime's existence is questioned, and this regime is on its way to annihilation.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/08060 2/world/international_iran_israel_usa_dc _1 :

You should know that the criminal and terrorist Zionist regime which has 60 years of plundering, aggression and crimes in its file has reached the end of its work and will soon disappear off the geographical scene.

http://www.meforum.org/article/659 :

"Israel must be uprooted and erased from history," inscribed on a Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile in a military parade

Ahmadinejad rattles his saber against Israel precisely for the same reason that Bush panders to Evangelical voters here: it riles up a voting bloc.  He's not mad enough to actually attempt to wipe Israel off the map, he just throws belligerent statements out there for effect.

But those statements are certainly out there.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:51:14 PM EST

Re: The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda (none / 0)

Juan Cole is the language expert to consult concerning the precise nature of Ahmadinejad's statements. Don't have the link handy.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 02:06:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda (2.00 / 2)

I actually support Shergald's diaries. He has been on MYDD for a while now. I also want to say that I think Ahmadinejad is an irresponsible moron.
I read one of his interviews and he pretty much made some cutesy vague statements about his doubts on the holocaust. He would answer a question with another question as if he was being so clever.

Having said that, this war with Iran thing would be a disaster. Iran has rarely been an expansionist nation. They do not send extremists all over the world to spread hateful propaganda like our Saudi "friends" did. It would just be incredibly stupid to encourage the Israeli looneys and the American neocons who wish they could have been at Entebbe(but would have lacked the guts in real life to do so).


by Pravin on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 09:43:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda (none / 0)

Ahmadinejad is in no way in charge of anything in Iran. The mullahs are. There desire for a nuke is an internal poilitcal ploy. Just like in North Korea, they see it as a way to hold onto power.

There is a huge gap between the babblings of Ahmadinejad, the Iranian people and the Mullahs. Iran is much more complex than the US media portrays it.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 01:07:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda (2.00 / 1)

PS: Ahmadinejad by all appearances is a loon. Then again, when one appreciates that his provocative statements, however interpreted, are likely condoned by the Ayatolahs, it may all be part of a strategy.

In 2002 (and again in 2006), the Arab League, through a Saudi Arabian spokesman, offered Israel full acceptance and peace in return for a settlement of the IP conflict based on 242. In 2003, under a moderate PM, Iran allegedly made the same offer to Israel through a Swiss government mediary. All of these offers were rejected by Israel, who opted to continue its colonization of the occupied Palestinian territories (OPT).

In the US, we are subjected to censorship and propaganda concerning events in the OPT and the treatment of Palestinians, while the entire Arab world receives daily reports about them in their media. I don't think we here in the US appreciate how much attitudes about Israel in the Middle East has been dependent upon the Palestinian cause for freedom through a real settlement of the conflict.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 02:50:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The BBC, Iran, and Israeli Propaganda (2.00 / 1)

Lebanon...


"harlequin speech of suicide, demanding instantaneous lobotomy"
by nogo postal on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 11:27:08 PM EST

Shergald IS A FRAUD (1.00 / 2)

JUST GOOGLE "shergald" and "cabal" and see what it leads you to.

Has called both dKos and Google part of the vast "right wing zionist conspiracy."

Challenge him to state his position on trade policy, universal health care, FISA...anything progressive. He is a one issue character that is not to be taken seriously.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 12:42:18 PM EST

Re: Shergald IS A FRAUD (none / 0)

Bye, for the third time.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 02:48:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Shergald IS A FRAUD (none / 0)

I'm not going anywhere.


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 03:44:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Shergald IS A FRAUD (none / 0)

Well, then, try responding to the content of the diary instead of trying to slay the messenger, or the publisher, in my case.

Is there something problematic with COOK's review of this propaganda film made for the BBC? Or are you unable to interpret just what the Israeli politicians are saying, like Peres or Netanyahu, or even Barak's details about getting bombs into Iran's deep nuclear facilities?

I am flattered that you have become my shadow, but please keep in mind that I am not McCain or Obama and I have no power to change this election.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 03:55:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Shergald IS A FRAUD (none / 0)

the medium is the message in your case


Cindy is John McCain's Personal GI Bill
by demwords on Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 04:37:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.